Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of transesophageal echocardiogram-guided electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation greater than 48 hours treated in the emergency department versus the cardiology ward: A retrospective comparison study.
Zaro, Baha; Alpert, Evan Avraham; Kaufman, Nechama; Rosenmann, David.
Afiliación
  • Zaro B; Department of Emergency Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Alpert EA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Kaufman N; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
  • Rosenmann D; Department of Quality and Safety, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(9): e14480, 2021 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34107147
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The current emergency medicine literature on cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) describes its performance on those who are hemodynamically unstable, present within 48 hours of the onset of the arrhythmia, or are on long-term anticoagulants. For patients who are not anticoagulated and present with atrial fibrillation for more than 48 hours, one option is to perform a transesophageal echocardiogram and then synchronized cardioversion in the absence of atrial clot. The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with atrial fibrillation (AF) of more than 48 hours who underwent a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) and subsequent cardioversion in the ED versus the cardiology ward.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective comparison study of patients who presented to the ED with AF for more than 48 hours, underwent a transesophageal echocardiogram, and then were electrically cardioverted either in the emergency department or in the cardiology ward. Outcomes include time to cardioversion, length of hospital stay, rate of successful cardioversion, and rate of complications.

RESULTS:

Electrical cardioversion was performed in the ED on 94 patients (62%) and the cardiology ward on 57 (38%). Over 90% of cardioversions were successful in both groups. Time to cardioversion was significantly less in the ED group versus the cardiology group (1.04 ± 0.9 days versus 3.81 ± 1.9; P < .001). Similarly, the mean length of hospital stay was less for the ED group (1.6 ± 1.6 days versus 7.3 ± 3.5; P < .001).

CONCLUSION:

Patients who present in atrial fibrillation for more than 48 hours and then have a TEE undergo electrical cardioversion faster in the ED compared with the cardiology ward. This clinical pathway also results in a shorter length of hospital stay without having more side effects.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Cardiología Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Atrial / Cardiología Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel