Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementation of social needs screening in primary care: a qualitative study using the health equity implementation framework.
Drake, Connor; Batchelder, Heather; Lian, Tyler; Cannady, Meagan; Weinberger, Morris; Eisenson, Howard; Esmaili, Emily; Lewinski, Allison; Zullig, Leah L; Haley, Amber; Edelman, David; Shea, Christopher M.
Afiliación
  • Drake C; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. connor.drake@duke.edu.
  • Batchelder H; Center for Personalized Health Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. connor.drake@duke.edu.
  • Lian T; Center for Personalized Health Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Cannady M; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Weinberger M; Center for Personalized Health Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Eisenson H; Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Esmaili E; Lincoln Community Health Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Lewinski A; Lincoln Community Health Center, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Zullig LL; Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Haley A; Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Edelman D; Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, USA.
  • Shea CM; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 21(1): 975, 2021 Sep 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34530826
BACKGROUND: Screening in primary care for unmet individual social needs (e.g., housing instability, food insecurity, unemployment, social isolation) is critical to addressing their deleterious effects on patients' health outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to apply an implementation science framework to identify implementation factors and best practices for social needs screening and response. METHODS: Guided by the Health Equity Implementation Framework (HEIF), we collected qualitative data from clinicians and patients to evaluate barriers and facilitators to implementing the Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks, and Experiences (PRAPARE), a standardized social needs screening and response protocol, in a federally qualified health center. Eligible patients who received the PRAPARE as a standard of care were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. We also obtained front-line clinician perspectives in a semi-structured focus group. HEIF domains informed a directed content analysis. RESULTS: Patients and clinicians (i.e., case managers) reported implementation barriers and facilitators across multiple domains (e.g., clinical encounters, patient and provider factors, inner context, outer context, and societal influence). Implementation barriers included structural and policy level determinants related to resource availability, discrimination, and administrative burden. Facilitators included evidence-based clinical techniques for shared decision making (e.g., motivational interviewing), team-based staffing models, and beliefs related to alignment of the PRAPARE with patient-centered care. We found high levels of patient acceptability and opportunities for adaptation to increase equitable adoption and reach. CONCLUSION: Our results provide practical insight into the implementation of the PRAPARE or similar social needs screening and response protocols in primary care at the individual encounter, organizational, community, and societal levels. Future research should focus on developing discrete implementation strategies to promote social needs screening and response, and associated multisector care coordination to improve health outcomes and equity for vulnerable and marginalized patient populations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Equidad en Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Equidad en Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos