Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-reported Outcomes Among Vulnerable Populations in the Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.
McClellan, Sean R; Trombley, Matthew J; Maughan, Brandon C; Kahvecioglu, Daver C; Marshall, Jaclyn; Marrufo, Grecia M; Kummet, Colleen; Hassol, Andrea.
Afiliación
  • McClellan SR; Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA.
  • Trombley MJ; Abt Associates, Durham, NC.
  • Maughan BC; Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
  • Kahvecioglu DC; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
  • Marshall J; Bind Benefits, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Marrufo GM; Lewin Group, Falls Church, VA.
  • Kummet C; General Dynamics Information Technology, West Des Moines, IA.
  • Hassol A; Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA.
Med Care ; 59(11): 980-988, 2021 11 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34644284
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative tested whether episode-based payment models could reduce Medicare payments without harming quality. Among patients with vulnerabilities, BPCI appeared to effectively reduce payments while maintaining the quality of care. However, these findings could overlook potential adverse patient-reported outcomes in this population. RESEARCH

DESIGN:

We surveyed beneficiaries with 4 characteristics (Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility; dementia; recent institutional care; or racial/ethnic minority) treated at BPCI-participating or comparison hospitals for congestive heart failure, sepsis, pneumonia, or major joint replacement of the lower extremity. We estimated risk-adjusted differences in patient-reported outcomes between BPCI and comparison respondents, stratified by clinical episode and vulnerable characteristic.

MEASURES:

Patient care experiences during episodes of care and patient-reported functional outcomes assessed roughly 90 days after hospitalization.

RESULTS:

We observed no differences in self-reported functional improvement between BPCI and comparison respondents with vulnerable characteristics. Patient-reported care experience was similar between BPCI and comparison respondents in 11 of 15 subgroups of clinical episode and vulnerability. BPCI respondents with congestive heart failure, sepsis, and pneumonia were less likely to indicate positive care experiences than comparison respondents for at least 1 subgroup with vulnerabilities.

CONCLUSIONS:

As implemented by hospitals, BPCI Model 2 was not associated with adverse effects on patient-reported functional status among beneficiaries who may be vulnerable to reductions in care. Hospitals participating in heart failure, sepsis or pneumonia bundled payment episodes should focus on patient care experience while implementing changes in care delivery.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mecanismo de Reembolso / Medicare / Atención a la Salud / Poblaciones Vulnerables / Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Care Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Marruecos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mecanismo de Reembolso / Medicare / Atención a la Salud / Poblaciones Vulnerables / Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Care Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Marruecos