Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Belgian rheumatologists' preferences regarding measures of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a mixed-methods study.
De Cock, D; Buckinx, E; Pazmino, S; Bertrand, D; Stouten, V; Westhovens, R; Verschueren, P.
Afiliación
  • De Cock D; Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, ON IV Herestraat 49, P. O. Box 813, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. diederik.decock@kuleuven.be.
  • Buckinx E; Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, ON IV Herestraat 49, P. O. Box 813, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Pazmino S; Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, ON IV Herestraat 49, P. O. Box 813, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Bertrand D; Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, ON IV Herestraat 49, P. O. Box 813, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Stouten V; Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, ON IV Herestraat 49, P. O. Box 813, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Westhovens R; Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, ON IV Herestraat 49, P. O. Box 813, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Verschueren P; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals of Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Rheumatol Int ; 42(5): 815-823, 2022 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34687348
The reliability and clinical usefulness of the different composite disease activity scores and their individual components in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) are still debated. This study investigated which measures of disease activity were preferred by rheumatologists. A mixed-method study was performed. First, ten Belgian rheumatologists were invited for individual interviews on their current practice and preferences for measurement of RA disease activity. Results of this qualitative study and evidence from literature served as input for developing a survey. This survey asked rheumatologists to rate preferred standard disease activity score(s), their individual components, ultrasound and related patient-reported outcomes (PROs), by maximum difference scaling. The relative importance score (RIS) for each indicator was calculated using hierarchical Bayes modeling. The qualitative study included 6/10 invited rheumatologists. Composite scores and components were perceived as useful, while PROs were found subjective. Interestingly, ultrasound was used to mediate discrepancies between physician and patient. The survey based on this was sent to 244 Belgian rheumatologists, 83/244 (34%) responded, including 66/83 (80%) complete and 17/83 (20%) incomplete surveys (two missing essential information). Most rheumatologists (75/81, 93%) used a disease activity score and 68/81 (84%) preferred the DAS28-CRP. Swollen joint count obtained the highest mean ± SD RIS (22.54 ± 2.64), followed by DAS28 ESR/CRP (20.61 ± 4.06), ultrasound (16.47 ± 7.97), CRP (13.34 ± 6.11) and physician's global assessment (12.59 ± 7.83). PROs including fatigue, pain, and patient's global assessment, and Health Assessment Questionnaire, obtained the lowest mean RIS (0.34-2.54). Rheumatologists place more faith in self-assessed disease activity components or in laboratory tests. Trust in PROs to evaluate disease activity is low in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Reumatoide / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatol Int Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Reumatoide / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Rheumatol Int Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica