Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Retrospective validation of a model to predict the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location]. / Évaluation rétrospective d'un algorithme d'aide à la décision concernant les grossesses de localisation indéterminée.
Dap, M; Chaillot, M; Rouche, J; Mezan de Malartic, C; Morel, O.
Afiliación
  • Dap M; Pôle de gynécologie obstétrique, maternité universitaire, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France; Laboratoire de pathologies fœtale et placentaire, maternité universitaire, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France. Electronic address: matthieudap@gmail.com.
  • Chaillot M; Pôle de gynécologie obstétrique, maternité universitaire, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Rouche J; Pôle de gynécologie obstétrique, maternité universitaire, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Mezan de Malartic C; Pôle de gynécologie obstétrique, maternité universitaire, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
  • Morel O; Pôle de gynécologie obstétrique, maternité universitaire, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France; Unité Inserm U1254, CHRU de Nancy, rue du Morvan, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 50(5): 390-394, 2022 05.
Article en Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34800739
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The prediction model M6 classifies pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) into a low-risk or a high-risk group in developing ectopic pregnancy (EP). The aim of this study was to validate the two-step M6 model's ability to classify PUL in French women. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

All women with a diagnosis of PUL over a year were included in this single center retrospective study. Patients with a diagnosis of EP at the first consultation of with incomplete data were excluded. For each patient, the M6 model calculator was used to classified them into "high risk of EP" and "low risk of EP" group. The reference standard was the final diagnostic failed PUL (FPUL), intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) of EP. The statistical measures of the test's performance were calculated.

RESULTS:

Over the period, 255 women's consulted for a PUL, 197 has been included in the study. Final diagnosis were 94 FPUL (94/197; 47.7%), 74 IUP (74/197; 37.6%) et 29 EP (29/197; 14.7%). The first step of the M6 model classified 16 women in the FPUL group of which 15 (15/16; 93.7%) correctly. The second step of the M6 model classified 181 women 90 (90/181; 49.7%) in the "high risk of EP" group of which 63 (63/90; 70%) were FPUL/IUP and 27 (27/90; 30%) were EP. 91 (91/181; 50.3%) was classified in the "low risk of EP" group of which 90 (90/91; 98.9%) were FPUL/IUP and 1 (1/91; 1.1%) were EP. EP were correctly classified with sensitivity of 96.4%, negative predictive value of 98.9%, specificity of 58.8% and positive predictive value of 30.0%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The prediction model of PUL M6 classified EP in "high risk of EP group" with a sensitivity of 96.4%. It classified 50.3% of PUL in a "low risk of EP" group with a negative predictive value of 98.9%.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Embarazo Ectópico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: Fr Revista: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Embarazo Ectópico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: Fr Revista: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article