Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multi-sensor spectral synergies for crop stress detection and monitoring in the optical domain: A review.
Berger, Katja; Machwitz, Miriam; Kycko, Marlena; Kefauver, Shawn C; Van Wittenberghe, Shari; Gerhards, Max; Verrelst, Jochem; Atzberger, Clement; van der Tol, Christiaan; Damm, Alexander; Rascher, Uwe; Herrmann, Ittai; Paz, Veronica Sobejano; Fahrner, Sven; Pieruschka, Roland; Prikaziuk, Egor; Buchaillot, Ma Luisa; Halabuk, Andrej; Celesti, Marco; Koren, Gerbrand; Gormus, Esra Tunc; Rossini, Micol; Foerster, Michael; Siegmann, Bastian; Abdelbaki, Asmaa; Tagliabue, Giulia; Hank, Tobias; Darvishzadeh, Roshanak; Aasen, Helge; Garcia, Monica; Pôças, Isabel; Bandopadhyay, Subhajit; Sulis, Mauro; Tomelleri, Enrico; Rozenstein, Offer; Filchev, Lachezar; Stancile, Gheorghe; Schlerf, Martin.
Afiliación
  • Berger K; Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain.
  • Machwitz M; Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Luisenstr. 37, 80333 Munich, Germany.
  • Kycko M; Remote Sensing and Natural Resources Modelling Group, Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 41, rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
  • Kefauver SC; Department of Geoinformatics Cartography and Remote Sensing, Chair of Geomatics and Information Systems, Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland.
  • Van Wittenberghe S; Integrative Crop Ecophysiology Group, Plant Physiology Section, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Gerhards M; AGROTECNIO (Center for Research in Agrotechnology), Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
  • Verrelst J; Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain.
  • Atzberger C; Earth Observation and Climate Processes, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany.
  • van der Tol C; Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltrán 2, Paterna 46980, Valencia, Spain.
  • Damm A; Institute of Geomatics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Peter Jordan Str. 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
  • Rascher U; Faculty Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
  • Herrmann I; Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Paz VS; Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
  • Fahrner S; Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
  • Pieruschka R; The Plant Sensing Laboratory, The Robert H. Smith Institute for Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.
  • Prikaziuk E; Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Buchaillot ML; Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
  • Halabuk A; Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
  • Celesti M; Faculty Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
  • Koren G; Integrative Crop Ecophysiology Group, Plant Physiology Section, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
  • Gormus ET; AGROTECNIO (Center for Research in Agrotechnology), Av. Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
  • Rossini M; Institute of Landscape Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 814 99 Bratislava, Slovakia.
  • Foerster M; HE Space for ESA - European Space Agency, European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESA-ESTEC), Keplerlaan 1, 2201, AZ Noordwijk, the Netherlands.
  • Siegmann B; Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Abdelbaki A; Department of Geomatics Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Turkey.
  • Tagliabue G; Remote Sensing of Environmental Dynamics Laboratory (LTDA), University of Milano - Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
  • Hank T; Geoinformation in Environmental Planning Lab, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
  • Darvishzadeh R; Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
  • Aasen H; Earth Observation and Climate Processes, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany.
  • Garcia M; Remote Sensing of Environmental Dynamics Laboratory (LTDA), University of Milano - Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
  • Pôças I; Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Luisenstr. 37, 80333 Munich, Germany.
  • Bandopadhyay S; Faculty Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, ITC, University of Twente, the Netherlands.
  • Sulis M; Earth Observation and Analysis of Agroecosystems Team, Division Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Tomelleri E; Institute of Agricultural Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Rozenstein O; Research Centre for the Management of Agricultural and Environmental Risks (CEIGRAM), ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Spain.
  • Filchev L; ForestWISE - Collaborative Laboratory for Integrated Forest & Fire Management, Quinta de Prados, Campus da UTAD, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
  • Stancile G; Department of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, UK.
  • Schlerf M; Remote Sensing and Natural Resources Modelling Group, Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 41, rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Remote Sens Environ ; 280: 113198, 2022 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36090616
ABSTRACT
Remote detection and monitoring of the vegetation responses to stress became relevant for sustainable agriculture. Ongoing developments in optical remote sensing technologies have provided tools to increase our understanding of stress-related physiological processes. Therefore, this study aimed to provide an overview of the main spectral technologies and retrieval approaches for detecting crop stress in agriculture. Firstly, we present integrated views on i) biotic and abiotic stress factors, the phases of stress, and respective plant responses, and ii) the affected traits, appropriate spectral domains and corresponding methods for measuring traits remotely. Secondly, representative results of a systematic literature analysis are highlighted, identifying the current status and possible future trends in stress detection and monitoring. Distinct plant responses occurring under shortterm, medium-term or severe chronic stress exposure can be captured with remote sensing due to specific light interaction processes, such as absorption and scattering manifested in the reflected radiance, i.e. visible (VIS), near infrared (NIR), shortwave infrared, and emitted radiance, i.e. solar-induced fluorescence and thermal infrared (TIR). From the analysis of 96 research papers, the following trends can be observed increasing usage of satellite and unmanned aerial vehicle data in parallel with a shift in methods from simpler parametric approaches towards more advanced physically-based and hybrid models. Most study designs were largely driven by sensor availability and practical economic reasons, leading to the common usage of VIS-NIR-TIR sensor combinations. The majority of reviewed studies compared stress proxies calculated from single-source sensor domains rather than using data in a synergistic way. We identified new ways forward as guidance for improved synergistic usage of spectral domains for stress detection (1) combined acquisition of data from multiple sensors for analysing multiple stress responses simultaneously (holistic view); (2) simultaneous retrieval of plant traits combining multi-domain radiative transfer models and machine learning methods; (3) assimilation of estimated plant traits from distinct spectral domains into integrated crop growth models. As a future outlook, we recommend combining multiple remote sensing data streams into crop model assimilation schemes to build up Digital Twins of agroecosystems, which may provide the most efficient way to detect the diversity of environmental and biotic stresses and thus enable respective management decisions.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Remote Sens Environ Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Remote Sens Environ Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España