Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endovascular treatment for delayed post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage of unusual origin (splenic artery branch).
Wang, Xiangdong; He, Chengjian; Li, Hai; Huang, Jian; Ge, Naijian; Yang, Yefa.
Afiliación
  • Wang X; Department of Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • He C; Department of Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Li H; Department of Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Huang J; Department of Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Ge N; Department of Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Yang Y; Department of Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 8(4): 865-871, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36568956
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the method, efficacy, and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) of delayed splenic artery branch (SAB) hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods: From March 2019 to January 2022, all patients underwent EVT of SAB for delayed post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage were included. Demographic, laboratory, angiographic, and clinical follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of eight patients were enrolled. In two patients, celiac axis angiography alone failed, but selective splenic artery (SA) angiography demonstrated the SAB bleeding; SAB erosions in four patients with recurrent bleeding were successfully detected by a second angiography; four patients underwent balloon catheter placement at the SA for temporary hemostasis and to further confirm the SAB bleeding before the subsequent EVT. Superselective embolization was performed in only one patient (12.5%; 1/8); covered stent implantation at the SA was performed in two patients (25%; 2/8); Embolization of the SA was performed in the remaining five patients (62.5%; 5/8). The technical success rate, clinical success rate, and in-hospital mortality were 100.0%, 87.5%, and 25%, respectively. No severe complications related to EVT occurred. Conclusions: EVT of SAB for delayed post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage is effective and safe. An awareness of the SAB as a potential bleeding source, together with appropriate endovascular procedures including selective SA angiography, repeat angiography, balloon catheter placement at the SA, and applicable hemostasis protocol, could achieve a high success rate of managing SAB hemorrhage.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China