Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Switching Biological Therapies in Severe Asthma.
Scioscia, Giulia; Nolasco, Santi; Campisi, Raffaele; Quarato, Carla Maria Irene; Caruso, Cristiano; Pelaia, Corrado; Portacci, Andrea; Crimi, Claudia.
Afiliación
  • Scioscia G; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
  • Nolasco S; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy.
  • Campisi R; Respiratory Medicine Unit, Policlinico "G. Rodolico-San Marco", 95123 Catania, Italy.
  • Quarato CMI; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy.
  • Caruso C; Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Policlinico Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
  • Pelaia C; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
  • Portacci A; Department of Health Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Crimi C; Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Section of Respiratory Disease, University "Aldo Moro" of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(11)2023 May 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37298514
Currently, three classes of monoclonal antibodies targeting type 2 inflammation pathways are available in Italy for the treatment of severe asthma: anti-IgE (Omalizumab), anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα (Mepolizumab and Benralizumab), and anti-IL-4Rα (Dupilumab). Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-life studies have been conducted to define their efficacy and identify baseline patients' characteristics potentially predictive of favorable outcomes. Switching to another monoclonal antibody is recommended in case of a lack of benefits. The aim of this work is to review the current knowledge on the impact of switching biological therapies in severe asthma as well as on predictors of treatment response or failure. Almost all of the information about switching from a previous monoclonal antibody to another comes from a real-life setting. In the available studies, the most frequent initial biologic was Omalizumab and patients who were switched because of suboptimal control with a previous biologic therapy were more likely to have a higher baseline blood eosinophil count and exacerbation rate despite OCS dependence. The choice of the most suitable treatment may be guided by the patient's clinical history, biomarkers of endotype (mainly blood eosinophils and FeNO), and comorbidities (especially nasal polyposis). Due to overlapping eligibility, larger investigations characterizing the clinical profile of patients benefiting from switching to different monoclonal antibodies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Mol Sci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Mol Sci Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia