Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of an adjacent zirconium implant, tube current, and metal artifact reduction algorithm on horizontal root fracture diagnosis in cone beam computed tomography.
Ruiz, Débora Costa; Reis, Larissa de Oliveira; Fontenele, Rocharles Cavalcante; Miranda-Viana, Murilo; Farias-Gomes, Amanda; Freitas, Deborah Queiroz.
Afiliación
  • Ruiz DC; Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: ruiz03338@gmail.com.
  • Reis LO; Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora Campus Governador Valadares, Governador Valadares, MG, Brazil.
  • Fontenele RC; OMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Miranda-Viana M; Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
  • Farias-Gomes A; School of Dentistry, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.
  • Freitas DQ; Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940483
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the influence of an adjacent zirconium implant, tube current (mA), and a metal artifact reduction algorithm (MARA) on horizontal root fracture (HRF) diagnosis in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). STUDY DESIGN: Nineteen teeth (9 with HRF, 10 without) were individually placed in a human maxilla. Scan volumes were acquired without and with a zirconium implant adjacent to the tooth at settings of 4, 8, and 10 mA, with MARA disabled and enabled, using a 5×5 cm field of view, 0.085-mm voxel size, and 90 kV. Four maxillofacial radiologists individually assessed the scans. Diagnostic metrics were compared by multiway analysis of variance (α=5%). Inter- and intraexaminer agreements for HRF diagnosis were evaluated with the weighted kappa test. RESULTS: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were significantly lower in the presence of the implant (P≤.005). AUC values were higher in scans obtained with 8 and 10 mA compared with 4 mA (P=0.010), but 10 mA without MARA was better with the implant present. MARA did not significantly influence outcomes (P≥0.240). Inter- and intraexaminer agreements ranged from moderate to almost perfect. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the zirconium implant impairs HRF detection. Settings of 8 or 10 mA improve HRF detection regardless MARA condition without the implant. With an adjacent implant, 10 mA without MARA is recommended to improve diagnostic performance.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas de los Dientes / Raíz del Diente Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas de los Dientes / Raíz del Diente Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article