Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Re-assessing prolonged cold ischemia time in kidney transplantation through machine learning consensus clustering.
Jadlowiec, Caroline C; Thongprayoon, Charat; Tangpanithandee, Supawit; Punukollu, Rachana; Leeaphorn, Napat; Cooper, Matthew; Cheungpasitporn, Wisit.
Afiliación
  • Jadlowiec CC; Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Thongprayoon C; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Tangpanithandee S; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Punukollu R; Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Leeaphorn N; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Cooper M; Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Cheungpasitporn W; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 38(1): e15201, 2024 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38041480
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We aimed to cluster deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) using an unsupervised machine learning approach.

METHODS:

We performed consensus cluster analysis on 11 615 deceased donor kidney transplant patients with CIT exceeding 24 h using OPTN/UNOS data from 2015 to 2019. Cluster characteristics of clinical significance were identified, and post-transplant outcomes were compared.

RESULTS:

Consensus cluster analysis identified two clinically distinct clusters. Cluster 1 was characterized by young, non-diabetic patients who received kidney transplants from young, non-hypertensive, non-ECD deceased donors with lower KDPI scores. In contrast, the patients in cluster 2 were older and more likely to have diabetes. Cluster 2 recipients were more likely to receive transplants from older donors with a higher KDPI. There was lower use of machine perfusion in Cluster 1 and incrementally longer CIT in Cluster 2. Cluster 2 had a higher incidence of delayed graft function (42% vs. 29%), and lower 1-year patient (95% vs. 98%) and death-censored (95% vs. 97%) graft survival compared to Cluster 1.

CONCLUSIONS:

Unsupervised machine learning characterized deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with prolonged CIT into two clusters with differing outcomes. Although Cluster 1 had more favorable recipient and donor characteristics and better survival, the outcomes observed in Cluster 2 were also satisfactory. Overall, both clusters demonstrated good survival suggesting opportunities for transplant centers to incrementally increase CIT.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Riñón Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trasplante de Riñón Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Asunto de la revista: TRANSPLANTE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos