Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Systematic conservation planning for Antarctic research stations.
Brooks, Shaun T; Jabour, Julia; Hughes, Kevin A; Morgan, Fraser; Convey, Peter; Polymeropoulos, Elias T; Bergstrom, Dana M.
Afiliación
  • Brooks ST; CSIRO Environment, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Electronic address: shaun.brooks@csiro.au.
  • Jabour J; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Hughes KA; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, United Kingdom.
  • Morgan F; Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand; Te Punaha Matatini, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Convey P; British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, United Kingdom; Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa; Cape Horn International Center (CHIC), Puerto Williams, Chile; Millennium Institute Biodiver
  • Polymeropoulos ET; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Bergstrom DM; Global Challenges Program, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia; University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa; Australian Antarctic Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Kingston, Australia.
J Environ Manage ; 351: 119711, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38070424
ABSTRACT
The small ice-free areas of Antarctica are essential locations for both biodiversity and scientific research but are subject to considerable and expanding human impacts, resulting primarily from station-based research and support activities, and local tourism. Awareness by operators of the need to conserve natural values in and around station and visitor site footprints exists, but the cumulative nature of impacts often results in reactive rather than proactive management. With human activity spread across many isolated pockets of ice-free ground, the pathway to the greatest reduction of human impacts within this natural reserve is through better management of these areas, which are impacted the most. Using a case study of Australia's Casey Station, we found significant natural values persist within the immediate proximity (<10 m) of long-term station infrastructure, but encroachment by physical disturbance results in ongoing pressures. Active planning to better conserve such values would provide a direct opportunity to enhance protection of Antarctica's environment. Here we introduce an approach to systematic conservation planning, tailored to Antarctic research stations, to help managers improve the conservation of values surrounding their activity locations. Use of this approach provides a potential mechanism to balance the need for scientific access to the continent with international obligations to protect its environment. It may also facilitate the development of subordinate conservation tools, including management plans and natural capital accounting. By proactively minimising and containing their station footprints, national programs can also independently demonstrate their commitment to protecting Antarctica's environment.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Biodiversidad Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conservación de los Recursos Naturales / Biodiversidad Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article