Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients With Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer With Extraprostatic Extension Treated With Radical Prostatectomy.
Rezaee, Michael E; Pallauf, Maximilian; Fletcher, Sean A; Han, Misop; Pavlovich, Christian P; Cornelia Ding, Chien-Kuang; Epstein, Jonathan I; Allaf, Mohamad E; Trock, Bruce J; Singla, Nirmish.
Afiliación
  • Rezaee ME; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Pallauf M; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Fletcher SA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Han M; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Pavlovich CP; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Cornelia Ding CK; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Epstein JI; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Allaf ME; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Trock BJ; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Singla N; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Urol ; 211(3): 407-414, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38109699
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We sought to examine the association of extraprostatic extension (EPE) with biochemical recurrence (BCR) separately in men with Grade Group (GG) 1 and GG2 prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We reviewed our institutional database of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for PCa between 2005 and 2022 and identified patients with GG1 and GG2 disease on final pathology. Fine-Gray competing risk models with an interaction between EPE (yes vs no) and GG (GG1 vs GG2) were used to examine the relationship between disease group and BCR-free survival.

RESULTS:

The cohort consisted of 6309 men, of whom 169/2740 (6.2%) with GG1 disease had EPE while 1013/3569 (28.4%) with GG2 disease had EPE. Median follow-up was 4 years. BCR occurred in 400/6309 (6.3%) patients. For men with GG1, there was no statistically significant difference in BCR-free survival for men with vs without EPE (subdistribution HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.37-2.09). However, for GG2 patients BCR-free survival was significantly worse for those with vs without EPE (subdistribution HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.54-2.52).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although there is a subset of GG1 PCas capable of invading through the prostatic capsule, patients with GG1 PCa and EPE at prostatectomy experience similar biochemical recurrence and survival outcomes compared to GG1 patients without EPE. However, among men with GG2, EPE connotes a worse prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article