Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emphasizing Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Capture for Improved Cardiovascular Care of the LGBTQ+ Population.
Deb, Brototo; Porter, Kadijah; van Cleeff, Ashlan; Reardon, Leigh C; Cook, Stephen.
Afiliación
  • Deb B; Department of Medicine, Georgetown University-WHC, Washington, DC.
  • Porter K; Department of Medicine, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida.
  • van Cleeff A; Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina.
  • Reardon LC; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Ahmanson/UCLA Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center and UCLA Children's Heart Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
  • Cook S; Indiana Heart Physicians, Franciscan Physician Network, Indianapolis, Indiana.
JAMA Cardiol ; 9(3): 295-302, 2024 Mar 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265768
ABSTRACT
Importance The rising self-identifying lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) population makes understanding the unique health care needs of sexual and gender minoritized patients an urgent one. The interaction between minority stress and cardiovascular disease has been well described among underrepresented minoritized populations. The underrepresentation of minoritized populations in clinical research is partly responsible for worse cardiovascular outcomes in these populations. The absence of sexual orientation and gender identity and expression (SOGIE) data makes it difficult to understand the cardiovascular health of LGBTQ+ adults, thereby widening health care disparities in this population. Advancing cardiovascular health equity for LGBTQ+ patients must begin with careful and accurate SOGIE data collection. Observations Current SOGIE data capture remains inadequate despite federal mandates. Challenges in data collection include political and regulatory discrimination, patient/practitioner hesitancy, lack of supportive guidance on SOGIE data collection, improper terminology, regulatory inertia, and inadequate and often incorrect integration of SOGIE data into electronic health records (EHRs). Additional challenges include grouping participants as "others" for statistical significance. The inclusion of SOGIE data has demonstrated an impact in other fields like cancer survivorship and surgery. The same needs to be done for cardiology. Conclusions and Relevance Potential solutions for improving much-needed SOGIE data collection include (1) implementing LGBTQ+ inclusive policies, (2) integrating SOGIE data into the EHR, (3) educating health care professionals on the relevance of SOGIE to patient-centered care, and (4) creating a diverse cardiovascular workforce. These steps can substantially enhance the ability to collect SOGIE data to address LGBTQ+ cardiovascular health care disparities.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cardiología / Minorías Sexuales y de Género Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Cardiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cardiología / Minorías Sexuales y de Género Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: JAMA Cardiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article