Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
It's all in the timing: Delayed feedback in autism may weaken predictive mechanisms during contour integration.
Knight, Emily J; Altschuler, Ted S; Molholm, Sophie; Murphy, Jeremy W; Freedman, Edward G; Foxe, John J.
Afiliación
  • Knight EJ; The Frederick J. and Marion A. Schindler Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, The Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
  • Altschuler TS; Development and Behavioral Pediatrics, Golisano Children's Hospital, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
  • Molholm S; The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics and Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
  • Murphy JW; Program in Cognitive Neuroscience, Departments of Psychology & Biology, City College of the City University of New York, New York, USA.
  • Freedman EG; The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics and Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
  • Foxe JJ; Program in Cognitive Neuroscience, Departments of Psychology & Biology, City College of the City University of New York, New York, USA.
bioRxiv ; 2024 Jan 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38293016
ABSTRACT
Humans rely on predictive mechanisms during visual processing to efficiently resolve incomplete or ambiguous sensory signals. While initial low-level sensory data are conveyed by feedforward connections, feedback connections are believed to shape sensory processing through conveyance of statistical predictions based on prior exposure to stimulus configurations. Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show biases in stimulus processing toward parts rather than wholes, suggesting their sensory processing may be less shaped by statistical predictions acquired through prior exposure to global stimulus properties. Investigations of illusory contour (IC) processing in neurotypical (NT) adults have established a well-tested marker of contour integration characterized by a robust modulation of the visually evoked potential (VEP) - the IC-effect - that occurs over lateral occipital scalp during the timeframe of the N1 component. Converging evidence strongly supports the notion that this IC-effect indexes a signal with significant feedback contributions. Using high-density VEPs, we compared the IC-effect in 6-17-year-old children with ASD (n=32) or NT development (n=53). Both groups of children generated an IC-effect that was equivalent in amplitude. However, the IC-effect notably onset 21ms later in ASD, even though timing of initial VEP afference was identical across groups. This suggests that feedforward information predominated during perceptual processing for 15% longer in ASD compared to NT children. This delay in the feedback dependent IC-effect, in the context of known developmental differences between feedforward and feedback fibers, suggests a potential pathophysiological mechanism of visual processing in ASD, whereby ongoing stimulus processing is less shaped by statistical prediction mechanisms.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BioRxiv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BioRxiv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos