Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adrenal fast-track and enhanced recovery in retroperitoneoscopic surgery for primary aldosteronism improving patient outcome and efficiency.
van de Wiel, Elle C J; Mulder, Janneke; Hendriks, Anke; Booij Liewes-Thelosen, Ingeborg; Zhu, Xiaoye; Groenewoud, Hans; Mulders, Peter F A; Deinum, Jaap; Langenhuijsen, Johan F.
Afiliación
  • van de Wiel ECJ; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. elle.vandewiel@radboudumc.nl.
  • Mulder J; Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Hendriks A; Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Booij Liewes-Thelosen I; Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Zhu X; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Groenewoud H; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Mulders PFA; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Deinum J; Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Langenhuijsen JF; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 187, 2024 Mar 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38517537
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

No data exist on perioperative strategies for enhancing recovery after posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA). Our objective was to determine whether a multimodality adrenal fast-track and enhanced recovery (AFTER) protocol for PRA can reduce recovery time, improve patient satisfaction and maintain safety.

METHODS:

Thirty primary aldosteronism patients were included. Fifteen patients were treated with 'standard-of-care' PRA and compared with 15 in the AFTER protocol. The AFTER protocol contains a preoperative information video, postoperative oral analgesics, early postoperative mobilisation and enteral feeding, and blood pressure monitoring at home. The primary outcome was recovery time. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, postoperative pain and analgesics requirements, patient satisfaction, perioperative complications and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS:

Recovery time was much shorter in both groups than anticipated and was not significantly different (median 28 days). Postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in AFTER patients (mean 32 vs 42 h, CI 95%, p = 0.004). No significant differences were seen in pain, but less analgesics were used in the AFTER group. Satisfaction improved amongst AFTER patients for time of admission and postoperative visit to the outpatient clinic. There were no significant differences in complication rates or QoL.

CONCLUSION:

Despite no difference in recovery time between the two groups, probably due to small sample size, the AFTER protocol led to shorter hospital stays and less analgesic use after surgery, whilst maintaining and even enhancing patient satisfaction for several aspects of perioperative care. Complication rates and QoL are comparable to standard-of-care.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Hiperaldosteronismo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Hiperaldosteronismo Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos