Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Belgium.
Osteoporos Int
; 35(7): 1173-1183, 2024 Jul.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38565690
ABSTRACT
This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with romosozumab-to-alendronate compared to alendronate monotherapy and teriparatide-to-alendronate, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women from a Belgian healthcare perspective. Romosozumab-to-alendronate was found to be cost-effective compared to alendronate monotherapy and dominant compared to teriparatide-to-alendronate for osteoporotic women at high risk of fracture in Belgium. PURPOSE:
This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sequential treatment with romosozumab followed by alendronate compared to alendronate monotherapy and teriparatide followed by alendronate, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women at high risk of fracture, from a Belgian healthcare perspective. Romosozumab is reimbursed in Belgium since December 2021.METHODS:
A Markov microsimulation model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of romosozumab-to-alendronate compared to alendronate monotherapy and to teriparatide-to-alendronate over a lifetime horizon. Patients transition between five different health states every 6 months based on fracture risks or death. The model was populated with Belgium-specific epidemiological and cost data, where available. The fracture risk reduction of romosozumab treatment was collated from the ARCH study, and from a published network meta-analysis. Costs were included from a healthcare perspective (NIHDI). Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), reported in Euro () 2022. Deterministic (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed.RESULTS:
Romosozumab-to-alendronate was associated with 0.12 additional QALYs at an additional cost of 2314 compared to alendronate monotherapy, resulting in an ICER of 19,978. Compared to teriparatide-to-alendronate, romosozumab-to-alendronate was found to be dominant, with higher QALYs and lower costs. The base-case results were robust to uncertainty in the input parameters when conducting the sensitivity analysis.CONCLUSION:
Sequential treatment with romosozumab followed by alendronate was found to be cost-effective compared to alendronate monotherapy and dominant compared to teriparatide followed by alendronate for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Belgium.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica
/
Cadenas de Markov
/
Costos de los Medicamentos
/
Análisis Costo-Beneficio
/
Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
/
Alendronato
/
Teriparatido
/
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea
/
Fracturas Osteoporóticas
/
Anticuerpos Monoclonales
Límite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Middle aged
País/Región como asunto:
Europa
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Osteoporos Int
Asunto de la revista:
METABOLISMO
/
ORTOPEDIA
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Bélgica