Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An Australian survey of health professionals' perceptions of use and usefulness of electronic medical records in hospitalised children's pain care.
Pope, Nicole; Keyser, Janelle; Crellin, Dianne; Palmer, Greta; South, Mike; Harrison, Denise.
Afiliación
  • Pope N; Department of Nursing Research, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Keyser J; Department of Nursing, Melbourne School of Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Crellin D; The Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Palmer G; Child Health Evaluative Services, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • South M; Acute Pain Service, Queensland Children's Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Harrison D; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
J Child Health Care ; : 13674935241256254, 2024 May 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809661
ABSTRACT
Pain in hospitalised children is common, yet inadequately treated. Electronic medical records (EMRs) can improve care quality and outcomes during hospitalisation. Little is known about how clinicians use EMRs in caring for children with pain. This national cross-sectional survey examined the perceptions of clinician-EMR users about current and potential use of EMRs in children's pain care. One hundred and ninety-four clinicians responded (n = 81, 74% nurses; n = 21, 19% doctors; n = 7, 6% other); most used Epic (n = 53/109, 49%) or Cerner (n = 42/109, 38%). Most (n = 84/113, 74%) agreed EMRs supported their initiation of pharmacological pain interventions. Fewer agreed EMRs supported initiation of physical (n = 49/113, 43%) or psychological interventions (n = 41/111, 37%). Forty-four percent reported their EMR had prompt reminders for pain care. Prompts were perceived as useful (n = 40/51, 78%). Most agreed EMRs supported pain care provision (n = 94/110, 85%) and documentation (n = 99/111, 89%). Only 39% (n = 40/102) agreed EMRs improved pain treatment, and 31% (n = 32/103) agreed EMRs improved how they involve children and families in pain care. Findings provide recommendations for EMR designs that support clinicians' understanding of the multidimensionality of children's pain and drive comprehensive assessments and treatments. This contribution will inform future translational research on harnessing technology to support child and family partnerships in care.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Child Health Care Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / PEDIATRIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Child Health Care Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / PEDIATRIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia