Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The influence of tibial length on radiographic posterior tibial slope measurement: How much tibia do we need?
Garra, Sharif; Li, Zachary I; Triana, Jairo; Savage-Elliott, Ian; Moore, Michael R; Kanakamedala, Ajay; Campbell, Kirk; Alaia, Michael; Strauss, Eric J; Jazrawi, Laith M.
Afiliación
  • Garra S; NYU Langone Health, USA.
  • Li ZI; NYU Langone Health, USA.
  • Triana J; NYU Langone Health, USA.
  • Savage-Elliott I; NYU Langone Health, USA.
  • Moore MR; NYU Langone Health, USA. Electronic address: Michael.Moore@nyulangone.org.
  • Kanakamedala A; NYU Langone Health, USA.
  • Campbell K; NYU Langone Health, USA.
  • Alaia M; NYU Langone Health, USA.
  • Strauss EJ; NYU Langone Health, USA.
  • Jazrawi LM; NYU Langone Health, USA.
Knee ; 49: 167-175, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981280
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to determine whether significant differences exist when comparing posterior tibial slope (PTS) measured using increasing lengths of the tibia to determine the anatomical axis.

METHODS:

Patients with full-length weight-bearing tibial radiographs were retrospectively identified from 2014 to 2022 at a single institution. Patients were excluded if there was any previous history of lower extremity fracture or osteotomy. The anatomical axis of the tibia was determined using the full length of tibial radiographs, and the "reference PTS" was measured using this axis. Using the same radiograph, the PTS was measured using four different anatomical axes at standardized tibial lengths. While the center of the proximal circle remained constant at 5-cm below the tibial plateau, the center of the distal circle was drawn at four points a) overlapping circles; b) 10-cm distal to the tibial plateau; c) 15-cm distal to the tibial plateau; d) half the length of the tibia, measured from the tibial plateau to the tibial plafond. Bivariate correlation and frequency distribution analysis (measurements >2-degrees from reference PTS) were performed between the reference PTS and PTS measured at each of the four other lengths.

RESULTS:

A total of 154 patients (39.8 ± 17.4 years old, 44.2% male) were included in the final analysis. Measurements at each of the four tibial lengths were all significantly different from the reference PTS (p < 0.001). The correlation strength improved with increasing tibial length (overlapping R = 0.681, 10-cm R = 0.821, 15-cm R = 0.937, and half-tibia R = 0.963). The number of PTS measurements >2-degree absolute difference from the reference PTS decreased with increasing tibial length (overlapping 40.3%, 10-cm 24.0%, 15-cm 26.0%, and half-tibia 18.8%).

CONCLUSION:

Assessment of PTS is dependent on the length of the tibia utilized to obtain the anatomical axis. Accuracy and precision of PTS measurements improved with increasing length of tibia used to determine the anatomical axis. STUDY

DESIGN:

Case series.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tibia / Radiografía Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Knee Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tibia / Radiografía Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Knee Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos