Reappraisal of bone and soft tissue cytopathology classification using the modified Milan system.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A standardized reporting system for bone and soft tissue tumor cytopathology has not yet been established. The objective of this study was to explore the potential utility of a classification modified from the Milan System for Salivary Gland Cytopathology and compared it with the upcoming World Health Organization (WHO) system for fine-needle aspiration of soft tissue lesions. METHODS: The authors reviewed 285 cytology cases of bone/joint (n = 173) and soft tissue (n = 112) lesions, scoring each within diagnostic categories. The results were compared with histologic diagnoses and the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category, and diagnostic reliability was analyzed. RESULTS: All 285 cases were successfully classified into one of the following categories nondiagnostic (6.3%), non-neoplastic (11.9%), atypia of uncertain significance (11.9%), benign neoplasm (5.6%), bone and soft tissue neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (25.3%), suspicious for malignancy (1.4%), and malignant (37.5%). The ROM was 44.4% (eight of /18 cases) in nondiagnostic, 0% (zero of 34 cases) in non-neoplastic, 32.4% (11 of 34 cases) in atypia of uncertain significance, 0% (zero of 16 cases) in benign neoplasm, 16.7% (12 of 72 cases) in bone and soft tissue neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, 75.0% (three of four cases) in suspicious for malignancy, and 100% (107 of 107 cases) in malignant categories. Using the WHO system, the proportion and ROM of the benign category (non-neoplastic and benign neoplasm) was 17.5% and 0%, respectively. Among benign and malignant lesions, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for detecting malignancy were 99.4%, 100%, and 98.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Milan system as well as the WHO system may be a useful cytopathologic classification tool for both bone and soft tissue lesions.