Efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy is not impaired by previous bispecific antibody treatment in large B-cell lymphoma.

ABSTRACT: In this retrospective study, chimeric antigen receptor T cells remained effective in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after prior exposure to bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting different antigens. These results are relevant to clinical practice, particularly given the increasing use of BsAbs in earlier treatment lines.

Rituximab maintenance after bendamustine-based treatment for follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma may exert a negative influence on SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes.

Not available.

New Insights into First-Line Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Are We Improving Outcomes?

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most prevalent subtype of lymphoma, comprising heterogeneous patient subgroups with distinctive biological and clinical characteristics. The R-CHOP combination (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) has been the standard initial treatment, yielding prolonged remissions in over 60% of patients with advanced-stage disease. Several attempts to enhance the outcomes of this regimen over the last two decades have shown limited success. Various novel therapeutic approaches have recently emerged in lymphoma, demonstrating promising results. These include small molecules, novel monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. This review explores recent advancements in therapeutic strategies for DLBCL and their potential impact on the initial management of DLBCL patients.

Safety and efficacy of parsaclisib in combination with rituximab, bendamustine + rituximab, or ibrutinib in patients with previously treated B-cell lymphoma: analysis of a phase 1 dose-finding study (CITADEL­112).

Parsaclisib, a potent and highly selective phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ inhibitor, has shown clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell lymphoma. The phase 1 CITADEL-112 (NCT03424122) study assessed safety and efficacy of parsaclisib in combination with investigator choice standard of care (SOC; rituximab [Treatment A], rituximab plus bendamustine [Treatment B], or ibrutinib [Treatment C]) in 50 patients with R/R B-cell lymphoma. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included neutropenia (62.5%, 50.0%, and 50.0% of patients in Treatments A, B, and C, respectively); diarrhea (37.5%) and anemia (31.3%) in Treatment A; abdominal pain, asthenia, diarrhea, and nausea (each 33.3%) in Treatment B; and increased alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (each 37.5%) in Treatment C. Objective responses were observed in 13 patients (81.3%) in Treatment A, 10 (55.6%) in Treatment B, and 8 (50.0%) in Treatment C. Parsaclisib combined with SOC therapies had an expected safety profile and promising efficacy in patients with R/R B-cell lymphomas.

Polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a cohort of a multicentre, single-arm, phase 1b/2 study.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma comprises nearly 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases and patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for stem-cell transplantation have few treatment options and poor prognoses. We aimed to determine whether the novel combination of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide (Pola+R+Len) would provide a tolerable treatment option with enhanced antitumour response in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. METHODS: This completed phase 1b/2, open-label, multicentre, single-arm study (GO29834) evaluated the safety and efficacy of Pola+R+Len in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at 19 sites in three countries (USA, Spain, and UK). Patients (≥18 years old) were eligible for inclusion if they had histologically documented CD20-positive relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, had received at least one previous line of chemoimmunotherapy, including an anti-CD20 agent, and were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. The dose-escalation phase (1b) used escalating doses of lenalidomide to find the recommended phase 2 dose. Patients received six 28-day cycles of induction treatment with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 and intravenous polatuzumab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg (all cohorts) plus oral lenalidomide at the following doses: 10 mg (cohort A); 15 mg (cohort B); and 20 mg (cohort C). Rituximab and polatuzumab vedotin were administered on day 1 and lenalidomide on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. During the dose-expansion phase (2), patients received six 28-day cycles of Pola+R+Len at the recommended phase 2 dose established during dose escalation. In both phases, patients with a complete response or partial response at the end of induction were eligible for post-induction therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 and lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary safety objective of the dose-escalation phase was identification of the maximum tolerated dose through incidence of dose-limiting toxic effects. The primary efficacy outcome of the dose-expansion phase was Independent Review Committee-assessed complete response rate at end of induction, based on PET-CT. Analyses were conducted in the safety population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug, and the efficacy population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug at the recommended phase 2 dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02600897. FINDINGS: Between July 11, 2017 and Feb 3, 2020, 57 patients were enrolled (median age 71 years [IQR 60-75]; 38 [67%] were male and 19 (33%) were female; 47 [82%] were not Hispanic or Latino; and the median previous lines of therapy was 2 [IQR 1-3]). 18 participants were included in phase 1b and 39 were included in phase 2. Phase 1b confirmed a 20 mg recommended phase 2 dose for lenalidomide. After a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 4·7-25·8), the complete response rate, as assessed by the Independent Review Committee, was 31% (90% CI 20-43). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (35 [61%] of 57) and thrombocytopenia (eight [14%] of 57). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (40%) of 57 patients and one patient died due to a treatment-related adverse event (neutropenic sepsis). INTERPRETATION: Although the combination of Pola+R+Len did not meet the prespecified activity threshold, some patients derived clinical benefit and the regimen had a tolerable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. FUNDING: Genentech/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Ibrutinib followed by ofatumumab consolidation in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): GELLC-7 trial from the Spanish group of CLL (GELLC).

Background: BTK inhibitors have been concurrently administered with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the optimal regimen for combining these two drugs remains pending. Methods: This multi-center phase 2 study aimed to analyze whether consolidation with ofatumumab improved the response in patients with CLL receiving front-line treatment with ibrutinib. Patients received 12 cycles of ibrutinib monotherapy. Those who achieved CR after this induction were maintained on ibrutinib. Conversely, those who did not attain CR continued with ibrutinib in addition to a consolidation, which involved 7 doses of ofatumumab. The primary objective was the complete response (CR) rate at cycle 20. This study is registered within the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2016-004937-26). Findings: Between September 8, 2017, and May 21, 2018, 84 patients (median age, 69 years) were included. After completion of 12 cycles of ibrutinib (n = 80), 4 patients (5%) were in CR, 67 (84%) in partial response (PR), and 6 patients (7%) had a PR with lymphocytosis (PRL). After consolidation with ofatumumab, 20 patients improved the response from PR to CR and 6 patients with PRL obtained a PR. Seventy-one patients (85%) completed 20 cycles of treatment, with a CR rate of 24/71 (34%). According to the intention-to-treat analysis at cycle 20, the ORR was 69/84 (82.2%), with a CRR of 24/84 (28.6%). Progression-free survival and overall survival at 48-months were 89.9% (CI: 82.4-95.5) and 92.2% (CI: 85.3-97.1), respectively. Interpretation: These findings underscore the potential for a consolidation strategy in CLL, wherein the addition of a mAb in patients with low tumor burden might enhance the quality of the response. Funding: The study was funded by Janssen that also supplied ibrutinib, whereas ofatumumab was supplied by Novartis.

Ibrutinib and R-GemOx in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of non-GCB type: Phase II clinical trial of the Spanish GELTAMO group.

PURPOSE: This phase II clinical trial evaluated the combination of Ibrutinib with rituximab, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) in patients with non-germinal centre B-cell-like (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The IBDCL trial (NCT02692248) included patients with histological diagnosis of non-GCB DLBCL with relapsed or refractory disease and non-candidates for stem cell transplantation. Patients received an induction treatment consisting of 6 or 8 cycles of R-GemOx at standard doses every 2 weeks, in combination with ibrutinib (560 mg daily), followed by a maintenance treatment with ibrutinib for a maximum of 2 years. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) after 4 cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included, 72% of them refractory to the last regimen. The ORR and CR rate after the 4th cycle were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-65) and 34% (95% CI, 24-46), respectively. Twenty-four (37%) patients started maintenance and 7 (11%) completed the planned 2 years. After a median follow-up of 29.7 months (range: 0.4-48.6), the estimated 2-year PFS and OS were 18% (95% CI, 8 - 28) and 26% (95% CI, 14 - 37), respectively. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were thrombocytopenia (44%), neutropenia (30%) and anemia (14%). Grade ≥3 infectious and cardiovascular TRAEs were reported in 6 (9%) and 1 (2%) patient, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib in combination with R-GemOx, followed by ibrutinib maintenance, demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity with durable responses and a manageable toxicity in patients with non-GCB DLBCL.

Treatment outcomes in patients with large B-cell lymphoma after progression to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients who receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells will experience disease progression. There is no standard next line of therapy and information in this setting is scarce and heterogeneous. We analyzed 387 R/R LBCL patients who progressed after CAR T cells from July 2018 until March 2022 in Spain and the United Kingdom. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months, with significant differences according to the interval between infusion and progression (<2 months [1.9 months], 2-6 months [5.2 months], and >6 months [not reached]). After progression, 237 (61%) patients received treatment. Focusing on the first subsequent therapy, overall (complete) response rates were 67% (38%) for polatuzumab-bendamustine-rituximab (POLA), 51% (36%) for bispecific antibodies (BsAb), 45% (35%) for radiotherapy (RT), 33% (26%) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 25% (0%) for lenalidomide (LENA), and 25% (14%) for chemotherapy (CT). In terms of survival, 12-month progression-free survival and OS was 36.2% and 51.0% for POLA, 32.0% and 50.1% for BsAb, 30.8% and 37.5% for RT, 29.9% and 27.8% for ICI, 7.3% and 20.8% for LENA, and 6.1% and 18.3% for CT. Thirty-two (14%) patients received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant with median OS not reached after a median follow-up of 15.1 months. In conclusion, patients with R/R LBCL who progress within the first 2 months after CAR T-cell therapy have dismal outcomes. Novel targeted agents, such as polatuzumab and BsAbs, can achieve prolonged survival after CAR T-cell therapy failure.

Importancia del despistaje del virus de la hepatitis B en los pacientes hematológicos / Importance of hepatitis B virus screening in hematological patients

No disponible

Actualización de las guías nacionales de consenso del Grupo Español de Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica para el tratamiento y seguimiento de la leucemia linfocítica crónica / Update of the Grupo Español de Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica clinical guidelines of the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Antecedentes y objetivo: El amplio arsenal terapéutico junto con la heterogeneidad biológica de los pacientes hace que sea difícil estandarizar el tratamiento de la leucemia linfocítica crónica (LLC) en la práctica clínica. Estas consideraciones han motivado la preparación del presente documento de consenso, que se trata de una actualización de la versión publicada en 2013, prestando especial atención a las estrategias de tratamiento que han aparecido en los últimos 5 años, como los inhibidores del receptor de células B (ibrutinib e idelalisib), los nuevos anticuerpos monoclonales anti-CD20 (ofatumumab y obinutuzumab) y los inhibidores de Bcl-2 (venetoclax). Material y métodos: Un grupo de expertos del Grupo Español de Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica ha revisado la bibliografía publicada entre 2010 y 2016 para poder establecer una serie de recomendaciones basadas en la evidencia clínica. En aquellas áreas donde no se encontró una evidencia científica, el grupo de expertos estableció recomendaciones por consenso con base en sus experiencias clínicas. Resultados: Como resultado del proyecto se ha establecido un conjunto de recomendaciones de carácter práctico que facilitarán el diagnóstico, el tratamiento y el seguimiento de los pacientes con LLC. Conclusiones: Existen muchos aspectos del tratamiento de la LLC que resultan ser temas controvertidos sobre los que no hay estudios apropiados para generar recomendaciones de forma consensuada (AU)

Background and objective: The broad therapeutic arsenal and the biological heterogeneity of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) makes it difficult to standardize treatment for CLL patients with specific clinical settings in routine clinical practice. These considerations prompted us to elaborate the present consensus document, which constitutes an update of the previous version published in 2013, mainly focusing on novel treatment strategies that have been developed over last 5 years, namely B-cell receptor inhibitors (ibrutinib and idelalisib), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (ofatumumab and obinutuzumab), and Bcl-2 inhibitors (venetoclax). Material and methods: A group of experts from the Spanish Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Group reviewed all published literature from January 2010 to January 2016, in order to provide recommendations based on clinical evidence. For those areas without strong scientific evidence, the panel of experts established consensus criteria based on their clinical experience. Results: The project has resulted in several practical recommendations that will facilitate the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with CLL. Conclusions: There are many controversial issues in the management of CLL with no appropriate studies for making consensus recommendations (AU)