A novel ELISA test for laboratory diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in human stool specimens.

Detection of Blastocystis is routinely performed by microscopy, culture, and formyl-ether (ethyl acetate) concentration technique (FECT). Yet, these methods require special skilled personnel, are time consuming, and often involve processing that may cause misdiagnosis. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the usefulness of a newly introduced ELISA test for the detection of Blastocystis antigens in stool samples (CoproELISA(TM) Blastocystis, Savyon Diagnostics) as a proper alternative to currently used methods, especially microscopy. A cohort of 179 fresh/frozen clinical stool samples was tested by the ELISA test, and results were compared to consensus methods comprised of microscopic examination of Lugol's iodine staining, culture, and immunofluorescence assay (IFA). The new ELISA test was able to detect fewer than 10(3) cells, recognized subtypes 1, 2, 3, and 5 (comprising >95 % of human Blastocystis infections), and exhibited similar reactivity when comparing formalin-preserved samples to fresh/frozen samples. The test demonstrated 92 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and 89 % accuracy when culture, and IFA or microscopy consensus results were taken as reference. When the consensus was comprised of culture and IFA, the test demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 82, 86, and 84 %, respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity of Lugol staining microscopy was only 18 %. This work presents a unique ELISA test that provides an alternative to the use of microscopy, currently most widely used method. The test enables high-throughput screening and diagnosis of Blastocystis, adaptation to automatic procedures.

[Investigation of the presence of Blastocystis spp. in stool samples with microscopic, culture and molecular methods]. / Diski örneklerinde Blastocystis spp. varliginin mikroskobik, kültür ve moleküler yöntemlerle arastirilmasi

Blastocystis species are enteric protozoa frequently detected in human and animals. Seventeen subtypes (STs) have now been identified, nine of them isolating from humans. The pleomorphic structure and genetic diversity of Blastocystis spp. and the absence of standardized diagnostic methods complicate the evaluation of current data. Microscopic methods such as native-lugol and trichrome staining are most frequently used methods in routine diagnosis, while culture and molecular methods are preferred for research purposes. The aims of this study were to investigate the presence of Blastocystis spp. in the stool samples of patients with gastrointestinal complaints by microscopic and culture methods, and to detect the subtypes of isolates by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A total of 350 stool samples collected from patients with diarrhea (n= 157) and without diarrhea (n= 193) were included in the study. Presence of Blastocystis spp. in the samples were investigated by native-lugol examination, trichrome staining and direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) methods. Ringer's solution containing 10% horse serum and 0.05% asparagine was used for cultivation. The cultures were evaluated after 3-4 days of incubation at 37°C by microscopic examination. The subtypes of Blastocystis spp. strains isolated from the cultures have been identified by PCR using sequence-tagged site primers. A total of 66 (19%) stool samples, of them 26 (16.6%) were from diarrheal and 40 (21%) from non-diarrheal cases, yielded Blastocystis sp. growth in culture. Among the evaluated samples, 12% (42/350) were found positive with native-lugol examination, 17% (58/350) with trichrome staining, and 19% (66/350) with DFA method. The agreement of culture and native-lugol method was estimated as strong (κ= 0.752), while it was very strong between culture with trichrome staining and DFA methods (κ= 0.922 and κ= 1.00, respectively). When the culture was accepted as reference method, the sensitivity and specificity rates of native-lugol method were 65% and 100%, trichrome staining method were 88% and 100%, and DFA method were 100% and 100%, respectively. Forty-three (65%) of Blastocystis spp. positive samples were subtyped by PCR, while 23 isolates could not be subtyped. The most frequent detected subtype was ST3 (12/43; 28%), followed by ST1 (6/43; 13.9%), ST4 (5/43; 11.6%) and ST7 (5/43; 11.6%), ST2 (3/43; 7%) and ST6 (1/43; 2.3%). ST5 was not detected in this study and 11 (25.6%) samples have been identified to have mixed subtypes. The differences of Blastocystis spp. positivity rates and the distribution of the subtypes between the patients with or without diarrhea were not found statistically significant (p> 0.05). In our study, ST3 was the most frequently identified Blastocystis spp. subtype, similar to the previous national studies, however ST6 and ST7 have been identified for the first time. In conclusion, as the sensitivity of native-lugol examination is low, culture is time-consuming and laborious and PCR methods are costly and non-standardized, rapid, practical and high sensitive DFA is considered as the favourable method in the diagnosis of Blastocystis spp. in routine laboratories.