Impact of socioeconomic status on end-of-life costs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic inequalities in access to, and utilization of medical care have been shown in many jurisdictions. However, the extent to which they exist at end-of-life (EOL) remains unclear. METHODS: Studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest, Web of Science, Web of Knowledge, and OpenGrey databases were searched through December 2019 with hand-searching of in-text citations. No publication date or language limitations were set. Studies assessing SES (e.g. income) in adults, correlated to EOL costs in last year(s) or month(s) of life were selected. Two independent reviewers performed data abstraction and quality assessment, with inconsistencies resolved by consensus. RESULTS: A total of twenty articles met eligibility criteria. Two meta-analyses were performed on studies that examined total costs in last year of life - the first examined costs without adjustments for confounders (n = 4), the second examined costs that adjusted for confounders, including comorbidities (n = 2). Among studies which did not adjust for comorbidities, SES was positively correlated with EOL costs (standardized mean difference, 0.13 [95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.24]). However, among studies adjusting for comorbidities, SES was inversely correlated with EOL expenditures (regression coefficient, -$150.94 [95% confidence interval, -$177.69 to -$124.19], 2015 United States Dollars (USD)). Higher ambulatory care and drug expenditure were consistently found among higher SES patients irrespective of whether or not comorbidity adjustment was employed. CONCLUSION: Overall, an inequality leading to higher end-of-life expenditure for higher SES patients existed to varying extents, even within countries providing universal health care, with greatest differences seen for outpatient and prescription drug costs. The magnitude and directionality of the relationship in part depended on whether comorbidity risk-adjustment methodology was employed.

Does whole body vibration therapy assist in reducing fat mass or treating obesity in healthy overweight and obese adults? A systematic review and meta-analyses.

PURPOSE: This review describes the effects of Whole Body Vibration therapy (WBV) for reducing fat mass (%/kg) among healthy (no comorbid disease) overweight and obese adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and PubMed databases up to 27th March 2019. Studies evaluating the effects of WBV therapy on fat mass as a primary or secondary outcome among healthy (no comorbid disease), overweight or obese adults (Body Mass Index ≥25) were included. RESULTS: Following the search, 2,420 studies were reviewed and 1,603 studies were selected for title and abstract screening. Of 153 studies considered for full-text review, 13 controlled trials were included in the systematic review. Two meta-analyses were performed for five studies. The first random effects (I2 = 70%, p-value = 0.02) meta-analysis, revealed a statistically significant mean change for percent fat mass (-2.56, 95% CI: -3.81, -1.31). The second fixed effects meta-analysis, revealed a significant mean change (-1.91, 95% CI: -2.64, -1.18) for fat mass/kg. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analyses indicate a positive effect of Whole Body Vibration therapy on reducing fat mass (%/kg), especially when combined with conventional weight loss interventions specifically, diet and exercise.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONWhole Body Vibration therapy may assist obese and bariatric clients with weight loss.Whole Body Vibration therapy with conventional weight loss strategies may augment reductions in fat mass among obese clients in rehabilitation setting.

Systematic reviews in spinal cord injury: A step-by-step guide for rehabilitation science learners and clinicians.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created opportunity for multiple rehabilitation science learners and clinicians to critically evaluate and synthesize published research in the field of spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To provide a step-by-step guide for rehabilitation science learners and clinicians outlining how to conduct rigorous systematic reviews in the field of SCI. RESULTS: Steps for conducting a systematic review (SR) include: (1) formation of the SR team consisting of interprofessional experts; (2) formulation of the research question(s) with patient/population/problem, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) specification; (3) determination of inclusion and exclusion criteria; (4) development of SR protocol and registration; (5) development of the search strategies (database specific); (6) screening of titles and abstracts (level 1 screening), and full-texts (level 2 screening); (7) quality assessment of the included studies; (8) data extraction; (9) summary of findings and discussion; and, (10) dissemination of results. CONCLUSIONS: The enclosed ten steps for conducting SRs in SCI rehabilitation research have the potential to significantly improve the quality of evidence synthesis and the associated inferences. The importance of assembling team with diverse expertise is emphasized to assure a quality product with the potential to influence practice and inform the content of clinical practice recommendations.

Development of community participation indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

Community participation following spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) can be challenging due to associated primary impairments and secondary health conditions as well as difficulties navigating both the built and social-emotional environment. To improve the quality of SCI/D rehabilitation care to optimize community participation, the SCI-High Project developed a set of structure, process and outcome indicators for adults with SCI/D in the first 18 months after rehabilitation admission.A pan-Canadian Working Group of diverse stakeholders: (1) defined the community participation construct; (2) conducted a systematic review of available outcomes and their psychometric properties; (3) constructed a Driver diagram summarizing available evidence associated with community participation; and (4) prepared a process map. Facilitated meetings allowed selection and review of a set of structure, process and outcome indicators.The structure indicator is the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation programs with availability of transition living setting/independent living unit. The process indicators are the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation inpatients who experienced: (a) a therapeutic community outing prior to rehabilitation discharge; and, (b) those who received a pass to go home for the weekend. The intermediary and final outcome measures are the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale and the Reintegration to Normal Living Index.The proposed indicators have the potential to inform whether inpatient rehabilitation for persons with SCI/D can improve self-efficacy and lead to high levels of community participation post-rehabilitation discharge.

Development of Reaching, Grasping & Manipulation indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development of structure, process, and outcome indicators aimed to advance the quality of Reaching, Grasping & Manipulation (RG&M) rehabilitation for Canadians living with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D). METHOD: Upper extremity rehabilitation experts developed a framework of indicators for evaluation of RG&M rehabilitation quality. A systematic search of the literature identified potential upper extremity indicators that influence RG&M outcomes. A Driver diagram summarized factors influencing upper extremity outcomes to inform the selection of structure and process indicators. Psychometric properties, clinical utility, and feasibility of potential upper extremity measures were considered when selecting outcome indicators. RESULTS: The selected structure indicator is the number of occupational and physical therapists with specialized certification, education, training and/or work experience in upper extremity therapy related to RG&M at a given SCI/D rehabilitation center. The process indicator is the total hours of upper extremity therapies related to RG&M and the proportion of this time allocated to neurorestorative therapy for each individual with tetraplegia receiving therapy. The outcome indicators are the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP) strength and Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) Self-Care subscores implemented at rehabilitation admission and discharge, and SCIM III Self-Care subscore only at 18 months post-admission. CONCLUSION: The selected indicators align with current practice, will direct the timing of routine assessments, and enhance the volume and quality of RG&M therapy delivered, with the aim to ultimately increase the proportion of individuals with tetraplegia achieving improved upper extremity function by 18 months post-rehabilitation.

Conception and development of Self-Management indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

CONTEXT: Although self-management is linked to reduced secondary health complications (SHCs) and enhanced overall quality of life post-spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D), it is poorly integrated into the current rehabilitation process. Promoting self-management and assuring equity in care delivery is critical. Herein, we describe the selection of Self-Management structure, process and outcome indicators for adults with SCI/D in the first 18 months after rehabilitation admission. METHODS: Experts in self-management across Canada completed the following tasks: (1) defined the Self-Management construct; (2) conducted a systematic search of available outcomes and their psychometric properties; and (3) created a Driver diagram summarizing available evidence related to Self-Management. Facilitated meetings allowed development and selection following rapid-cycle evaluations of proposed structure, process and outcome indicators. RESULTS: The structure indicator is the proportion of staff with appropriate education and training in self-management principles. The process indicator is the proportion of SCI/D inpatients who have received a self-management assessment related to specific patient self-management goal(s) within 30 days of admission. The outcome indicator is the Skill and Technique Acquisition, and Self-Monitoring and Insight subscores of the modified Health Education Impact Questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The structure indicator will heighten awareness among administrators and policy makers regarding the need to provide staff with ongoing training related to promoting self-management skill acquisition. Successful implementation of the Self-Management process and outcome indicators will promote self-management education and skill acquisition as a rehabilitation priority, allow for personalization of skills related to the individual's self-management goal(s), and empower individuals with SCI/D to manage their health and daily activities while successfully integrating into the community.

Prioritization of rehabilitation Domains for establishing spinal cord injury high performance indicators using a modification of the Hanlon method: SCI-High Project.

Objectives: To prioritize Domains of SCI Rehabilitation Care (SCI-Care) based on clinical importance and feasibility to inform the development of indicators of quality SCI-Care for adults with SCI/D in Canada. Methods: A 17-member external advisory committee, comprised of key stakeholders, ranked 15/37 Domains of rehabilitation previously flagged by the E-scan project team for gaps between knowledge generation and clinical implementation. Priority scores (D) were calculated using the Hanlon formula: D=[A+(2×B)]×C , where A is prevalence, B is seriousness, and C is the effectiveness of available interventions. A modified "EAARS" (Economic, Acceptability, Accessibility, Resources, and Simplicity) criterion was used to rank feasibility on a scale of 0-4 (4 is high). The product of these two scores determined the initial Domain ranking. Following the consensus process, further changes were made to the Domain rankings. Results: Despite a low feasibility score, Sexual Health was ranked as high priority; and, the Community Participation and Employment Domains were merged. The 11 final prioritized Domains in alphabetic order were: Cardiometabolic Health; Community Participation and Employment; Emotional Well-Being; Reaching, Grasping, and Manipulation; Self-Management; Sexual Health; Tissue Integrity; Urinary Tract Infection; Urohealth; Walking, and Wheeled Mobility. Conclusions: The modified Hanlon method was used to facilitate prioritization of 11 of 37 Domains to advance the quality of SCI-care by 2020. In future, the Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Care High Performance Indicators (SCI-High) Project Team will develop structure, process and outcome indicators for each prioritized Domain.

Conception and development of Urinary Tract Infection indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

Context: Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most frequent secondary health condition following spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) that adversely impact overall health and quality of life, and often result in rehabilitation service interruptions, emergency department visits, and urinary sepsis. Methods: Experts in Urohealth and/or UTI recognition and management and the SCI-High Project Team used a combination of evidence synthesis and consensus methods for developing the UTI indicators. A systematic search and a Driver diagram analysis were applied to identify key factors influencing UTI. This Driver diagram guided the UTI Working Group when defining the construct, specifying the aim for the UTI SCI/D quality indicators, and developing the UTI diagnostic checklist and fever definition. Results: The structure indicator was the proportion of patients with a health care professional (i.e. family physician or urologist) able to follow-up with the patient regarding urine culture and sensitivity results within 48-72 h of collection. The Working Group knowingly adopted a single checklist for UTI diagnosis, recognizing the stark contrast in the complexity of diagnosis in acute versus community settings. The process indicator is the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation inpatients with UTI as defined by the UTI diagnostic checklist. The outcome indicator is the proportion of SCI/D rehabilitation inpatients with inappropriate antibiotic prescription. Conclusion: UTI can be diagnosed using the developed symptoms and signs checklist. These structure, process, and outcome quality indicators will ultimately reduce inappropriate antibiotic therapy for UTI and the rising incidence of antibiotic resistance among community-dwelling individuals with chronic SCI/D.

Development of Walking indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

Objective: To describe the development of structure, process and outcome indicators that will advance the quality of walking rehabilitation for Canadians with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) by 2020. Method: A framework for the evaluation of the quality of walking rehabilitation was developed by experts in walking after SCI/D. A systematic literature review identified factors influencing walking outcomes and potential walking indicators. A Driver diagram analysis summarized the factors affecting walking outcomes and subsequently informed the selection of structure and process indicators. Psychometric properties and clinical utility of potential walking indicators were considered during the selection of outcome indicators. Results: The structure indicator is the number of physical therapists using evidence-based walking interventions per number of ambulatory individuals with SCI/D. The process indicator is the number of received hours of walking interventions during inpatient rehabilitation per number of ambulatory individuals with SCI/D. The intermediary outcome indicator, which is collected at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, is either the modified Timed Up and Go or the 10-Meter Walk Test, the choice of measure is dictated by the stage of walking recovery, as defined by the Standing and Walking Assessment Tool. The final outcome indicator, collected at 18 months post-discharge, is the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III-Mobility subscale. Conclusion: The selected indicators align with current clinical practice in Canada. The indicators will direct the timing and enhance the volume of walking therapy delivered, to ultimately increase the proportion of patients who achieve their walking potential by 18 months post-rehabilitation.

Methods for development of structure, process and outcome indicators for prioritized spinal cord injury rehabilitation Domains: SCI-High Project.

Background: High-quality rehabilitation care following spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) is critical for optimizing neurorecovery and long-term health outcomes. This manuscript describes the methods used for developing, refining, and implementing a framework of structure, process, and outcome indicators that reflect high-quality rehabilitation among adults with SCI/D in Canada. Methods: This quality improvement initiative was comprised of the following processes: (1) prioritization of care Domains by key stakeholders (scientists, clinicians, therapists, patients and stakeholder organizations); (2) assembly of 11 Domain-specific Working Groups including 69 content experts; (3) conduct of literature searches, guideline and best practice reviews, and outcome synthesis by the Project Team; (4) refinement of Domain aim and construct definitions; (5) conduct of cause and effect analysis using Driver diagrams; (6) selection and development of structure, process and outcome indicators; (7) piloting and feasibility analysis of indicators and associated evaluation tools; and, (8) dissemination of the proposed indicators. Result: The Project Team established aims, constructs and related structure, process, and outcome indicators to facilitate uniform measurement and benchmarking across 11 Domains of rehabilitation, at admission and for 18 months thereafter, among adult Canadians by 2020. Conclusion: These processes led to the selection of a feasible set of indicators that once implemented should ensure that adults with SCI/D receive timely, safe, and effective rehabilitation services. These indicators can be used to assess health system performance, monitor the quality of care within and across rehabilitation settings, and evaluate the rehabilitation outcomes of the population to ultimately enhance healthcare quality and equity.

Development of Cardiometabolic Health indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

Context: Spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) leads to unchanged low-density lipoprotein and cholesterol, very low high-density lipoprotein a form of dyslipidemia and physical inactivity which combine to increase risk of morbidity and mortality from cardiometabolic disease. Herein, we describe the selection of structure, process and outcome indicators for adults in the first 18 months post-SCI/D rehabilitation admission. Methods: A Pan-Canadian Cardiometabolic Health Working Group was formed to develop a construct definition. Cardiometabolic risk factors were summarized in a Driver diagram. Release of the Paralyzed Veterans of America "Identification and Management of Cardiometabolic Risk after Spinal Cord Injury" and the International Scientific Exercise Guidelines: "Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury", informed the group's focus on prevention strategies to advance this Domain of rehabilitation admission. Results: The structure indicator identifies during rehabilitation the presence of appropriate time and resources for physical exercise prescription. Process indicators are lipid profile assessment at rehabilitation admission and documented exercise prescriptions prior to discharge. The outcome indicators track patient's knowledge retention regarding exercise prescription at discharge, current exercise adherence and lipid status 18 months after rehabilitation discharge. Conclusion: Routine national implementation of these indicators at the specified time points will enhance efforts to detect dyslipidemia and assure routine participation in endurance exercise. These indicators align with international initiatives to improve cardiometabolic health through interventions targeting modifiable risk factors specifically endurance exercising and optimal lipid profiles, crucial to augmenting cardiometabolic health after SCI/D.

Development of Wheeled Mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

Background: Wheeled mobility is critical for individuals with Spinal Cord Injury or Disease (SCI/D) related paralysis. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed guidelines highlighting eight steps in wheelchair service delivery: (1) referral and appointment; (2) assessment; (3) prescription; (4) funding and ordering; (5) product preparation; (6) fitting; (7) user training; and, (8) follow-up maintenance/repairs. This article describes the processes used to develop structure, process and outcome indicators that reflect the WHO guidelines within the Domain of Wheeled Mobility rehabilitation for Canadians. Methods: Wheeled mobility experts within the SCI-High Project Team used the WHO guideline to inform the Construct refinement and development of a Driver diagram. Following seven meetings, the Driver diagram and review of outcome measures and literature synthesis regarding wheelchair service delivery informed indicator selection and group consensus. Results: The structure indicator examines the proportion of SCI/D service providers within a rehabilitation program who have specialized wheelchair training to ensure prescription, preparation, fitting, and maintenance quality. The process indicator evaluates the average number of hours of wheelchair service delivery provided per patient during rehabilitation. The intermediary outcome indicator (rehabilitation discharge), is a target capacity score on the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q). The final outcome indicators (at 18 months post rehabilitation admission) are the Life Space Assessment (LSA) and the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale (WheelCon) short form mean scores. Conclusion: Routine implementation of the selected Wheeled Mobility structure, process and outcome indicators should measurably advance care within the Wheeled Mobility Domain for Canadians living with SCI/D by 2020.

Development of Tissue Integrity indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

Objective: To establish structure, process and outcome indicators to evaluate tissue integrity in Canadians with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) in the first 18 months following inpatient rehabilitation admission. Method: A Working Group comprised of Canadian subject matter experts in the Domain of Tissue Integrity was formed to define the construct of tissue integrity. A literature review was conducted and a Driver diagram produced to identify factors that influence tissue integrity in individuals with SCI/D. Facilitated meetings were conducted to identify and achieve consensus on structure, process and outcome indicators. Rapid cycle testing was used to pilot test proposed indicators for face validity and feasibility within a quality improvement context. Results: The structure indicators are the proportion of patients with SCI/D who have access to a mirror for skin checks and the proportion of patients who have access to patient education on tissue integrity; the process indicator is the proportion of patients who completed daily head-to-toe skin checks; the intermediary outcome indicator is pressure injury (PI) incidence during inpatient rehabilitation; and the final outcome indicator is the proportion of individuals with intact skin at 18 months following rehabilitation admission. Conclusion: The set of indicators established for the Domain of Tissue Integrity are specifically focused on aspects of care that can impact the maintenance of tissue integrity and the prevention of PI and align with current practice guidelines. The implementation and evaluation of these indicators nationally have the potential to improve care for Canadians with SCI/D.

Development of Emotional Well-Being indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.

Context: Emotional Well-Being (EWB) post-spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) is a critical aspect of adjustment to disability. Advancing care and assuring equity in care delivery within this rehabilitation care domain is essential. Herein, we describe the selection of EWB structure, process and outcome indicators for adults with SCI/D in the first 18 months after rehabilitation admission. Methods: A pan-Canadian Working Group completed the following tasks: (1) defined the EWB construct; (2) conducted a systematic review of available outcomes and their psychometric properties; (3) constructed a Driver diagram summarizing available evidence associated with EWB; and, (4) prepared a process map. Facilitated meetings allowed selection and review of feedback following rapid-cycle evaluations of proposed structure, process and outcome indicators. Results: The structure indicator is the proportion of staff with appropriate education and training in EWB and access to experts and resources. The process indicator is the proportion of SCI/D patients who were screened for depression and anxiety symptoms at rehabilitation admission and rehabilitation discharge. The intermediary outcome is the proportion of SCI/D patients at risk for depression or anxiety at rehabilitation discharge based on screening symptom scores. The final outcomes are: (a) proportion of individuals at risk for depression or anxiety based on screening symptom scores; and (b) proportion of individuals who received referral for EWB services or intervention. Conclusion: The proposed indicators have a low administrative burden and will ensure feasibility of screening for depression and anxiety at important transition points for individuals with SCI/D. We anticipate that the current structures have inadequate resources for at-risk individuals identified during the screening process.

Association between abnormal arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk factors in people with chronic spinal cord injury.

Aims To describe the association between cardiovascular risk factors and abnormal arterial stiffness, defined by a carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity ≥ 10 m/s, in patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods Ninety consenting adults with chronic SCI (C1-T10 ASIA Impairment Scale A-D) participated in this cross-sectional study. The cardiovascular risk factors considered included age, sex, duration of injury, neurological level of injury (C1-T1, tetraplegia; T2-T12, paraplegia), age at injury, impairment scale category, supine resting systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, leisure time physical activity, treated hypertension, treated hyperlipidemia, diabetes, lipid profiles, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and C reactive protein. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between abnormal arterial stiffness and dichotomized cardiovascular risk factors. Results Dichotomized variables significantly associated with increased arterial stiffness were: age ≥ 52 years (OR 22.1, CI 4.28-113.99); systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg (OR 11.76, CI 2.89-47.88); heart rate ≥ 62 bpm (OR 6.62, CI 1.33-33.03); and paraplegia (OR 4.26, CI 1.00-18.33). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for probability of arterial stiffness was 0.920 (95% CI 0.861-0.978, p < 0.001). Conclusions Age, resting systolic blood pressure, resting heart rate, and neurological level of injury can identify patients at high risk of elevated arterial stiffness in the population with chronic SCI.

Evaluating the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation therapy assisted walking after chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on bone biomarkers and bone strength.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation therapy assisted walking (FES-T) compared to a conventional aerobic and resistance training (CONV) with respect to bone biomarkers and lower extremity bone strength outcomes among adults with chronic motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Parallel group randomized controlled trial ( www.clinicaltrials.gov - NCT0020196819). Site: Tertiary academic rehabilitation centre in Canada. METHODS: Adults with chronic (≥18 months) motor incomplete SCI (C2-T12 AIS C-D) were consented and randomized to FES-T or CONV training for 45 minutes thrice-weekly for 4 months. Osteocalcin (OC), ß-cross laps (CTX) and sclerostin were assessed at baseline, and 4 months. Similarly, total hip, distal femur and proximal tibia region bone mineral density (BMD) via DXA (4500A, Hologic Inc. Waltham, MA, USA) and tibia bone quality via pQCT (Stratec XCT-2000, Mezintecknik, Pforzheim, Germany) were assessed at baseline, 4, and 12 months. Between group differences were analyzed using repeated measures general linear models. RESULTS: Thirty-four participants (17 FES-T, 17 CONV) consented and were randomized, 27 participants completed the 4-month intervention and 12-month outcome assessments. Participants in the FES-T arm had a decrease in CTX and a significant increase in OC at intervention completion (P<0.05). Significant biomarker changes were not observed in the CONV group. No within or between group differences from baseline were observed in sclerostin or bone strength. CONCLUSIONS: Four months of FES-T improved bone turnover (increase in OC and decrease in CTX) but not bone strength among individuals with chronic SCI. Future, long term FES-T may augment lower extremity bone strength.