Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Asthma ; 56(6): 603-610, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29738270

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Limited English proficiency can be a barrier to asthma care and is associated with poor outcomes. This study examines whether pediatric patients in Ohio with limited English proficiency experience lower asthma care quality or higher morbidity. METHODS: We used electronic health records for asthma patients aged 2-17 years from a regional, urban, children's hospital in Ohio during 2011-2015. Community-level demographics were included from U.S. Census data. By using chi-square and t-tests, patients with limited English proficiency and bilingual English-speaking patients were compared with English-only patients. Five asthma outcomes-two quality and three morbidity measures-were modeled using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: The study included 15 352 (84%) English-only patients, 1744 (10%) patients with limited English proficiency, and 1147 (6%) bilingual patients. Pulmonary function testing (quality measure) and multiple exacerbation visits (morbidity measure) did not differ by language group. Compared with English-only patients, bilingual patients had higher odds of ever having an exacerbation visit (morbidity measure) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-1.6) but lower odds of admission to intensive care (morbidity measure) (aOR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7), while patients with limited English proficiency did not differ on either factor. Recommended follow-up after exacerbation (quality measure) was higher for limited English proficiency (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3) and bilingual (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1), compared with English-only patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this urban, pediatric population with reliable interpreter services, limited English proficiency was not associated with worse asthma care quality or morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Asma/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Multilingüismo , Ohio/epidemiología
2.
J Asthma ; 56(10): 1070-1078, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30365346

RESUMEN

Background: Gaps in health insurance coverage may complicate asthma management and increase emergency department (ED) use. Using two nationally-representative surveys, we characterize the prevalence of coverage gaps among children with asthma, and describe their association with ED visits in this population. Methods: De-identified data were obtained from the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Among children with asthma, we classified coverage over the past year as: (1) continuous private, (2) continuous public, (3) gap in coverage, and (4) continuously uninsured. The primary outcome was all-cause ED visits in the past year (both surveys). Secondary outcomes included unmet health care needs (NSCH), asthma-related ED visits or hospitalizations (NHIS) and asthma exacerbations (NHIS). Results: The analysis included 3739 (NSCH) and 854 (NHIS) children with asthma, representing a population of 5.5 million children in the US. Estimated prevalence of coverage gaps was 5% in the NSCH and 3% in the NHIS. On multivariable ordinal logistic regression using NSCH data, coverage gaps were associated with increased all-cause ED use (OR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 4.7, p = 0.005), compared to continuous private coverage. Further analysis confirmed higher odds of unmet health care needs, asthma exacerbations, and asthma-related ED visits among children with coverage gaps. Conclusions: Children with asthma who experience insurance coverage gaps have increased ED use, possibly related to poorer access to appropriate health care. Protecting insurance coverage continuity may reduce ED use and improve clinical outcomes in this population.


Asunto(s)
Asma/economía , Asma/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Multivariante , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
3.
J Asthma ; 55(10): 1122-1130, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29190172

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Describe implementation and clinical impact of a "real world" School-Based Asthma Therapy (SBAT) Program serving an urban, largely Medicaid population in a large midwestern city in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive evaluation of SBAT was conducted. Students were referred by school nurses or providers, enrolled throughout the year, and could reenroll in subsequent years. A total of 286 students participated in the 2015-2016 school year. Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric testing compared Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) scores from enrollment (anytime between 2013 and 2015) to 2015-2016 for 198 students; and pre- and postenrollment asthma-related emergency department (ED), inpatient, and critical care (pediatric intensive care unit or PICU) utilization rates (events/student/year) for 98 students enrolled for a full year. RESULTS: SBAT participation grew from 17 to 131 schools and from 38 to 268 students between 2013-2014 and 2015-2016. Mean ACT scores increased from 16.2 (SD = 4.89) to 21.37 (SD = 3.41) (K-W χ2 = 35.45, p = 0.008). Healthcare utilization rates from 1-year preenrollment to 1-year postenrollment decreased for ED (0.91-0.44; K-W χ2 = 18.61, p = 0.0002) and Inpatient (0.38-0.10; K-W χ2 = 7.68, p = 0.02). Reduction in PICU (0.27-0.02) was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: SBAT, modeled after programs shown in controlled trials to improve asthma health markers ( 1-3 ), was successfully implemented in economically challenged, urban schools. Rapid growth and patient reenrollment reflect program acceptance by schools, providers, and caregivers. Improved ACT scores and healthcare utilization supported program efficacy. SBAT could be one solution to improved asthma control in underserved school-aged pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Servicios de Salud Escolar/organización & administración , Población Urbana , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos
4.
J Asthma ; 55(7): 785-794, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28853957

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Asthma is a leading cause of pediatric emergency department (ED) use. Optimizing asthma outcomes is a goal of Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH) and its affiliated Accountable Care Organization. NCH's Primary Care Network, comprised of 12 offices serving a predominantly Medicaid population, sought to determine whether an Asthma Specialty Clinic (ASC) operated within a single primary care office could reduce ED asthma rates and improve quality measures, relative to all other network offices. METHODS: An ASC was piloted with four components: patient monitoring, provider continuity, standardized assessment, and multi-disciplinary education. A registry was established to contact patients at recommended intervals. At extended-length visits, a general pediatrician evaluated patients and a multi-disciplinary team provided education. Novel educational tools were utilized, guideline-based templates recorded and spirometry obtained. ED asthma rate, spirometry utilization, and controller fills by intervention office patients were compared to all other network offices before and after ASC initiation. RESULTS: At baseline, asthma ED visits by intervention and usual care populations were similar (p = 0.43). After, rates were significantly lower for intervention office patients versus usual care office patients (p < 0.001), declining in the intervention population by 26.2%, 25.2%, and 31.8% in 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively, from 2012 baseline, versus increases of 3.8%, 16.2%, and 9.5% in the usual care population. Spirometry completion, controller fills, and patients with favorable Asthma Medication Ratios significantly increased for intervention office patient relative to the usual care population. CONCLUSIONS: A primary care-based asthma clinic was associated with a significant and sustainable reduction in ED utilization versus usual care. What's new: This study describes a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary, and innovative model for an asthma management program within the medical home that demonstrated a significant reduction in ED visits, an increase in spirometry utilization, and an increase in controller fills in a high-risk asthma population versus comparison group.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Asma/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Ohio , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
5.
Pediatrics ; 152(6)2023 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37960935

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Asthma exacerbation is a common and often preventable cause of Emergency Department (ED) utilization. Children eligible for Medicaid are at increased risk of poor asthma control and subsequent ED visits. In 2010, we implemented a multicomponent longitudinal quality improvement project to improve pediatric asthma care for our primary care population, which was 90% Medicaid-eligible. Our goal was to reduce asthma-related ED visits by patients ages 2 to 18 years by 3% annually. METHODS: The setting was a multisite large urban high-risk primary care network affiliated with a children's hospital. We implemented 5 sequential interventions within our network of pediatric primary care centers to increase: use of asthma action plans by clinicians, primary care-based Asthma Specialty Clinic visits (extended asthma visits in the main primary care site), use of a standard asthma note at all visits, documentation of the Asthma Control Test, and step-up therapy for children with poorly controlled asthma. RESULTS: At baseline in 2010, there were 21.7 asthma-related ED visits per 1000 patients per year. By 2019, asthma-related ED visits decreased to 14.5 per 1000 patients per year, a 33% decrease, with 2 center line shifts over time. We achieved and sustained our goal metrics for 4 of 5 key interventions. CONCLUSIONS: We reduced ED utilization for asthma in a large, high-risk pediatric population. The interventions implemented and used over time in this project demonstrate that sustainable outcomes can be achieved in a large network of primary care clinics.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados Unidos , Niño , Humanos , Asma/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Atención Primaria de Salud , Medicaid
6.
Acad Pediatr ; 19(2): 216-226, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30597287

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of a coordinated effort by an urban pediatric hospital and its associated accountable care organization to reduce asthma-related emergency department (ED) and inpatient utilization by a large, countywide Medicaid patient population. METHODS: Multiple evidence-based interventions targeting general pediatric asthma care and high health care utilizers were implemented using standardized quality improvement methodologies. Annual asthma ED and inpatient utilization rates by 2- to 18-year-old members of an accountable care organization living in the surrounding county (>140,000 eligible members in 2016), adjusted per 1000 children from 2008 through 2016, were analyzed using Poisson regression. We compared these ED utilization rates to national rates from 2006 to 2014. RESULTS: Asthma ED utilization fell from 18.1 to 12.9 visits/1000 children from 2008 to 2016, representing a 28.7% reduction, with an average annual decrease of 3.9% (P < .001), during a time when national utilization was increasing. Asthma inpatient utilization did not change significantly during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma-related ED utilization was significantly reduced in a large population of primarily urban, minority, Medicaid-insured children by implementing a multimodal asthma quality improvement program. With adequate support, a similar approach could be successful in other communities.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Organizaciones Responsables por la Atención , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Atención Ambulatoria , Niño , Preescolar , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Hospitales Pediátricos , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
7.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 2(5): e038, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30229174

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Achieving control in asthma is a primary goal of pediatric care, and assessing the degree of control is a principal step in management. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) in a large primary care network as a means to reliably and consistently assess asthma control at all visit types. METHODS: A prospective design was used to measure provider documentation of the ACT or C-ACT. Patients (or caregivers) 4 years of age or older with a known diagnosis of asthma were administered the ACT (ages 12 and older) or the C-ACT (ages, 4-11). The quality improvement project, which involved multiple interventions, took place at 11 centers of the Primary Care Network of Nationwide Children's Hospital from November 2013 to December 2014. A goal was set for a 70% completion rate of the ACT/C-ACT at any visit type for patients 4 years of age or older with asthma. RESULTS: Six months after the introduction of the questionnaires, the 70% completion rate was reached. Rates of ACT/C-ACT completion have consistently exceeded 70% through December 2016. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the ACT/C-ACT can be integrated into a busy primary care network. It is imperative to work toward better asthma care; consistent assessment of asthma control can be the critical first step.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA