Radiation exposure during sacral neuromodulation lead placement: Multi-institutional descriptive study.

OBJECTIVES: Fluoroscopy has significantly improved lead placement and decreased surgical time for implantable sacral neuromodulation (SNM). There is a paucity of data regarding radiation and safety of fluoroscopy during SNM procedures. Our study aims to characterize fluoroscopy time and dose used during SNM surgery across multiple institutions and assess for predictors of increased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose. METHODS: Electronic medical records were queried for SNM procedures (Stage 1 and full implant) from 2016 to 2021 at four academic institutions. Demographic, clinical, and intraoperative data were collected, including fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in milligray (mGy). The data were entered into a centralized REDCap database. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess for predictive factors using STATA/BE 17.0. RESULTS: A total of 664 procedures were performed across four institutions. Of these, 363 (54.6%) procedures had complete fluoroscopy details recorded. Mean surgical time was 58.8 min. Of all procedures, 79.6% were performed by Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery specialists. There was significant variability in fluoroscopy time and dose based on surgical specialty and institution. Most surgeons (76.4%) were considered "low volume" implanters. In a multivariate analysis, bilateral finder needle testing, surgical indication, surgeon volume, and institution significantly predicted increased fluoroscopy time and radiation dose (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in fluoroscopy time and radiation dose utilized during SNM procedures, with differences across institutions, surgeons, and subspecialties. Increased radiation exposure can have harmful impacts on the surgical team and patient. These findings demonstrate the need for standardized fluoroscopy use during SNM procedures.

State of the Art for Treatment of Vesicovaginal Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Vesico-vaginal fistulae (VVF) remain the most prevalent genitourinary fistula detrimentally impacting quality of life. PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to examine relevant literature on management of VVF. RECENT FINDINGS: Obstructed labor is the leading cause of VVF in the developing world with most repairs performed via the transvaginal approach. Conversely, the predominate etiology in industrialized nations is iatrogenic injury with an increasing trend towards abdominal repair via a minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) approach. No studies have compared transvaginal repair to minimally invasive transabdominal approaches. Further, an increasing number of authors have developed algorithms to determine optimum surgical approaches and risk factors for persistent incontinence. As surgeons become more facile with laparoscopic and robotic skills, there is a growing trend for minimally invasive surgical management of VVF in developed countries, perhaps widening the disparity gap between developing nations where transvaginal approaches predominate with good success. Further studies are needed to compare transvaginal to minimally invasive transabdominal approaches.

The fate of synthetic mid-urethral slings in 2013: A turning point.

INTRODUCTION: Since the introduction of the first retropubic tension-free synthetic sling to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI), newer approaches, different techniques and new devices have been created. Transobturator and single-incision sling (SIS) techniquespara-were developed with the goal of diminishing the rate of complications andspeeding the recovery phase. METHODS: For this review we searched Medline for relevant papers, with an emphasis on meta-analysis and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Specially selected reports were identified to address both 'index patients' (defined as those with genuine SUI and no previous anti-incontinence procedure or other genitourinary sign or symptom that might affect her SUI) and, briefly, non-index patients. Two authors independently reviewed papers for eligibility. RESULTS: Level 1 evidence from a Cochrane review and two meta-analyses indicated that subjective outcomes with the mid-urethral sling (MUS) were similar to those from colposuspension. However, the MUS was better than colposuspension when assessing objective outcomes (Level 1). MUS are equally effective as autologous pubovaginal slings (Level1). Two meta-analyses suggest that retropubic MUS (RMUS) might be better than transobturator MUS when assessing objective outcomes. Five more recent RCTs with longer term outcomes showed high success rates and only one reported a significant advantage for the RMUS in women with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency. One meta-analysis addressing the SIS showed inferior outcomes to the MUS (Level 1). New and improved SIS techniques have been used, but long-term outcomes are limited and results are still controversial when compared to the MUS. CONCLUSION: MUS are still the standard to treat the index patient as previously stated by the American and European Associations of Urology. Currently data are lacking to define which sling and what approach works best. Complications are significantly different between sling types and are dependent on technique.