RESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate the performance of mammography and breast ultrasonography to diagnose tumor recurrence in patients after breast conserving therapy. Material and Methods: Imaging findings of 130 breast cancer patients treated by breast conserving therapy (BCT) who have followed up with mammography and ultrasonography at our center between 1 st January 2010 and 1st January 2016 were interpreted by two radiologists. The information of recurrent tumor and baseline data were blinded. Imaging interpretation followed the ACR Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 5th edition guideline. Findings of mammography, breast ultrasonography, demographic data and histological data were recorded and analyzed. Results: The presence of mass in mammography (P-value=0.025) and internal vascularity in mass in ultrasonography (P-value<0.001) were associated with recurrent tumor at the surgical bed. All the recurrent tumors were interpreted as BI-RADS 4 (71 patients) with sensitivity= 100%, specificity= 89.5%. BIRADS4 is significant in the diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer in BCT patients (AUC of the ROC curve = 0.742 and 95% CI=(0.7-0.79)). Conclusion: The presence of mass in mammography and internal vascularity in the mass in ultrasonography are the imaging findings which were significantly related to recurrent tumor at surgical bed in patient with breast conserving treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma is the most common form of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and is associated with a worse prognosis. This study aimed to assess the role of diffusion-weighted imaging and other imaging features as prognostic markers to predict the survival of patients with intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included patients with pathologically proven IMCC from January 2011 to January 2018. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed various imaging findings and manually estimated the area of diffusion restriction. Patients were grouped according to their restriction area into (group 1) restriction ≥ 1/3 of the tumor and (group 2) restriction < 1/3 of the tumor. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the relationship between various imaging features and patients' survival. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included in the study. IMCC patients with tumor size ≥ 5 cm had increased intrahepatic- and peritoneal metastases (p = 039 and p = 0.001 for reader 1 and p = 0.048 and p = 0.057 for reader 2). There was no significant relationship between the diffusion restriction area and tumor size, enhancement pattern, vascular involvement, lymph node metastasis, peritoneal- and distant metastasis. The number of deaths was significantly higher in patients with group 2 restriction (63.6% for group 1 vs. 96.6% for group 2; p = 0.001 for reader 1)(68.2% for group 1 vs. 89.7%% for group 2; p = 0.030 for reader 2). Patients with group 2 restriction had shorter 1- and 3-year survival rates and lower median survival time. Multivariable survival analysis showed two independent prognostic factors relating to poor survival outcomes: peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.04 for reader 1 and p = 0.041 for reader 2) and diffusion restriction < 1/3 (p = 0.011 for reader 1 and p = 0.042 for reader 2). Lymph node metastasis and intrahepatic metastasis were associated with shorter survival in the univariate analysis. However, these factors were non-significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Restriction diffusion of less than 1/3 and peritoneal metastasis were associated with shorter overall survival of IMCC patients. Other features that might correlate with the outcome are suspicious lymph nodes and multifocal lesions.