A Step-Up Approach Using Alternative Endoscopic Modalities Is an Effective Strategy for Postoperative and Traumatic Pancreatic Duct Disruption.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Standard endotherapy for pancreatic duct (PD) disruption is pancreatic stenting and sphincterotomy. In patients refractory to standard treatment, treatment algorithm is currently not standardized. This study aims to report the 10-year experience with the endoscopic treatment of postoperative or traumatic PD disruption and to share our algorithmic approach. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 30 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for postoperative (n = 26) or traumatic (n = 4) PD disruption between 2011 and 2021. Standard treatment was initially applied to all patients. Endoscopic modalities used with a step-up approach in patients unresponsive to standard treatment were stent upsizing and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrilate (NBCA) injection for partial disruption, and the bridging of the disruption with a stent and cystogastrostomy for complete disruption. RESULTS: PD disruption was partial in 26 and complete in 4 patients. Cannulation and stenting of PD was successful in all patients and sphincterotomy was performed in 22 patients. Standard treatment was successful in 20 patients (66.6%). The resolution of PD disruption in 9 of 10 patients refractory to standard treatment was achieved with stent upsizing in 4, NBCA injection in 2, the bridging of the complete disruption in one, and cystogastrostomy after spontaneously and intentionally developed pseudocyst in one patient each. Overall, therapeutic success rate was 96.6% (100% for partial, 75% for complete disruption). Procedural complications occurred in 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Standart treatment for PD disruption is usually effective. In patients refractory to standard treatment, the outcome may be improved by step-up approach using alternative endoscopic modalities.

Ectopic Opening of Common Bile Duct to Duodenal Bulb: A Single Tertiary Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The ectopic opening of the common bile duct(CBD) into the duodenal bulb is a rare biliary anomaly. The study aimed to reveal the experience with clinical and endoscopic outcomes in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for ectopic opening of the CBD into the duodenal bulb at our institution between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS: The median age was 59 years (49 males). A total of 146 ERCP procedures were performed (once in 26 patients and 2 or more times in 31 patients). Ten patients had a history of unsuccessful ERCP in an external center. The median follow-up time was 14.6 months. All patients had a slit-like opening of the CBD into the duodenal bulb, apical stenosis, and hook-shaped distal CBD. ERCP findings were CBD stone or dilatation in 55 patients and post-cholecystectomy biliary leakage in 2 patients. Balloon dilatation was performed for apical stenosis in 7 patients and distal CBD stenosis in 26 patients. During the first ERCP session, biliary stent/nasobiliary drainage was placed in 37 patients, and CBD stones were extracted in 19 patients without stenting. Biliodigestive anastomosis was applied to 13 patients, 5 of whom had recurrent cholangitis, 7 required recurrent ERCP, and one was due to the technical difficulty of ERCP. CONCLUSIONS: Ectopic biliary opening should be remembered if the papilla cannot be seen in its usual place in a patient with apical stenosis. ERCP should be performed in experienced hands, and surgery should be considered in the need for recurrent ERCP.

Tissue quantitative RT-PCR test for diagnostic significance of cytomegalovirus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and treatment response: Cytomegalovirus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic pathogen that exacerbates inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There are no clear diagnostic criteria for CMV infection in IBD patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of the diagnosis of CMV infection with CMV-DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the colonic mucosa and the response to antiviral treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 30 patients with IBD (24 men, 6 women; median age: 42 years) who were hospitalized because of IBD exacerbation and whose samples were assessed by tissue CMV-DNA PCR positivity. Most of the IBD patients had ulcerative colitis (90%). The CMV-DNA PCR median value was 8848 copies/mL of tissue (range 90-242,936 copies/mL). Blood CMV-DNA PCR was found to be positive in a small group (33.3%, 10/30) of tissue CMV-DNA PCR-positive cases. immunohistochemistry tests were positive in only 5 of the 23 patients positive for CMV-DNA PCR in the colonic mucosa, and high remission (25/30, 83.3%) was detected with antiviral therapy. Recurrence of CMV colitis infection was observed in 9 of 25 patients who had remission with antiviral therapy. The tissue CMV-DNA PCR test was found to be more useful than blood CMV-DNA PCR and immunohistochemistry tests for diagnosing CMV colitis, and the tissue CMV-DNA PCR test enabled rapid and appropriate treatment.