Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 18(11): 1229-1240, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30266330

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shigella and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) are bacterial pathogens that are frequently associated with diarrhoeal disease, and are a significant cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors study 2016 (GBD 2016) is a systematic, scientific effort to quantify the morbidity and mortality due to over 300 causes of death and disability. We aimed to analyse the global burden of shigella and ETEC diarrhoea according to age, sex, geography, and year from 1990 to 2016. METHODS: We modelled shigella and ETEC-related mortality using a Bayesian hierarchical modelling platform that evaluates a wide range of covariates and model types on the basis of vital registration and verbal autopsy data. We used a compartmental meta-regression tool to model the incidence of shigella and ETEC, which enforces an association between incidence, prevalence, and remission on the basis of scientific literature, population representative surveys, and health-care data. We calculated 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) for the point estimates. FINDINGS: Shigella was the second leading cause of diarrhoeal mortality in 2016 among all ages, accounting for 212 438 deaths (95% UI 136 979-326 913) and about 13·2% (9·2-17·4) of all diarrhoea deaths. Shigella was responsible for 63 713 deaths (41 191-93 611) among children younger than 5 years and was frequently associated with diarrhoea across all adult age groups, increasing in elderly people, with broad geographical distribution. ETEC was the eighth leading cause of diarrhoea mortality in 2016 among all age groups, accounting for 51 186 deaths (26 757-83 064) and about 3·2% (1·8-4·7) of diarrhoea deaths. ETEC was responsible for about 4·2% (2·2-6·8) of diarrhoea deaths in children younger than 5 years. INTERPRETATION: The health burden of bacterial diarrhoeal pathogens is difficult to estimate. Despite existing prevention and treatment options, they remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Additional emphasis by public health officials is needed on a reduction in disease due to shigella and ETEC to reduce disease burden. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.


Asunto(s)
Disentería Bacilar/epidemiología , Disentería Bacilar/mortalidad , Escherichia coli Enterotoxigénica/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/mortalidad , Salud Global , Shigella/aislamiento & purificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bioestadística , Niño , Preescolar , Costo de Enfermedad , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/microbiología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Shigella/clasificación , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
2.
Syst Rev ; 1: 39, 2012 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22929178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent developments related to a safe and effective nonabsorbable antibiotic, rifaximin, and identification of postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome as a frequent sequela call for a need to reconsider the value of primary prevention of traveler's diarrhea (TD) with antibiotics. METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies evaluating the effectiveness and safety of rifaximin or a fluoroquinolone chemoprophylaxis against TD were pooled using a random effects model and assessed for heterogeneity. RESULTS: The nine studies (four rifaximin and five fluoroquinolone) included resulted in pooled relative risk estimates of 0.33 (95% CI = 0.24-0.45, I2 = 3.1%) and 0.12 (95% CI = 0.07-0.20, I2 =0.0%), respectively. Similar rates of treatment emergent adverse events were found between antibiotic and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports the effectiveness of antibiotics in preventing TD. However, further studies that include prevention of secondary chronic health outcomes among travelers to different geographic regions, and a formal risk-benefit analysis for antibiotic chemoprophylaxis, are needed.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Diarrea/prevención & control , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Rifamicinas/uso terapéutico , Viaje , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Rifaximina
3.
Vaccine ; 30 Suppl 1: A7-14, 2012 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22520139

RESUMEN

Rotavirus is the leading cause of diarrheal disease in children under 5 years of age. It is responsible for more than 450,000 deaths each year, with more than 90% of these deaths occurring in low-resource countries eligible for support by the GAVI Alliance. Significant efforts made by the Alliance and its partners are providing countries with the opportunity to introduce rotavirus vaccines into their national immunization programs, to help prevent childhood illness and death. We projected the cost-effectiveness and health impact of rotavirus vaccines in GAVI-eligible countries, to assist decision makers in prioritizing resources to achieve the greatest health benefits for their populations. A decision-analytic model was used to project the health outcomes and direct costs of a birth cohort in the target population, with and without a rotavirus vaccine. Current data on disease burden, vaccine efficacy, immunization rates, and costs were used in the model. Vaccination in GAVI-eligible countries would prevent 2.46 million childhood deaths and 83 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from 2011 to 2030, with annual reductions of 180,000 childhood deaths at peak vaccine uptake. The cost per DALY averted is $42 for all GAVI countries combined, over the entire period. Rotavirus vaccination would be considered very cost-effective for the entire cohort of GAVI countries, and in each country individually, as cost-effectiveness ratios are less than the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. Vaccination is most cost-effective and has the greatest impact in regions with high rotavirus mortality. Rotavirus vaccination in GAVI-eligible countries is very cost-effective and is projected to substantially reduce childhood mortality in this population.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Inmunización/economía , Infecciones por Rotavirus/economía , Infecciones por Rotavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/economía , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/inmunología , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Países en Desarrollo , Diarrea/economía , Diarrea/epidemiología , Diarrea/mortalidad , Diarrea/prevención & control , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Estadísticos , Prevalencia , Infecciones por Rotavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Rotavirus/mortalidad , Vacunas contra Rotavirus/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA