RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the success rates and complications of ultrasound and low-power Holmium laser-assisted ureteroscopy (URS) in managing middle-distal ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 90 patients with middle-distal ureteral stones who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy at our institution from May 2006 to April 2010. 45 patients were treated with ultrasound (mean size 6.7 mm), 45 patients with low-power Holmium laser (mean size 7.4 mm). The same ureteroscope (9.5/8ch rigid-Storz) was used to treat all the patients. Patients were monitored before the hospital discharge with abdominal radiograph and ultrasonography, and as outpatients after 3 months with abdominal radiograph, ultrasonography and urography in selected cases. RESULTS: We obtained a complete immediate fragmentation of stones in 27/45 (60%) patients with ultrasound, and in 36/45 (80%) patients after laser treatment. A proximal migration of stones was observed in 12/45 (26.8%) patients with ultrasound and 3/45 (6.6) with laser. We observed a ureteral perforation after laser treatment and no patient developed urosepsis. 6/45 (13.3%) patients who were treated with ultrasound underwent auxiliary therapy such as alkalizing therapy, 9/45 (20%) patients a second ureteroscopy, 9/45 (20%) a shockwave lithotripsy. No patient underwent an auxiliary shockwave treatment after laser, 6/45 (13.4%) patients underwent a second ureteroscopy. Operating time (20.33 vs 28.85 minutes) and hospitalization (3.6 vs 5.1 days) were shorter with laser if compared with ultrasound treatment. CONCLUSION: In our study the fragmentation rates of Holmium laser-assisted ureteroscopy were significantly better than with ultrasound in the middle-distal ureteral stones management. We did not have relevant complications using both procedures, and the need for auxiliary procedures was significantly less for Holmium laser-assisted ureteroscopy when compared with ultrasound.