Associations between race and ethnicity and treatment setting among gynecologic cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Racial and ethnic disparities in gynecologic cancer care have been documented. Treatment at academic facilities is associated with improved survival, yet no study has examined independent associations between race and ethnicity with facility type among gynecologic cancer patients. MATERIALS & METHODS: We used the National Cancer Database and identified 484,455 gynecologic cancer (cervix, ovarian, uterine) patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2020. Facility type was dichotomized as academic vs. non-academic, and we used logistic regression to estimate multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between race and ethnicity and facility type. Secondarily, we examined joint effects of race and ethnicity and facility type on overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: We observed higher odds of treatment at academic (vs. non-academic) facilities among American Indian/Alaska Native (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.28-1.57), Asian (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.59-1.70), Black (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.65-1.72), Hispanic (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.66-1.75), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.57-1.93), and other race (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.20-1.40) patients compared with White patients. In the joint effects survival analysis with White, academic facility-treated patients as the reference group, Asian, Hispanic, and other race patients treated at academic or non-academic facilities had improved overall survival. Conversely, Black patients treated at academic facilities [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.07-1.12] or non-academic facilities (HR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.16-1.21) had worse survival. DISCUSSION: Minoritized gynecologic cancer patients were more likely than White patients to receive treatment at academic facilities. Importantly, survival outcomes among patients receiving care at academic institutions differed by race, requiring research to investigate intra-facility survival disparities.

RETRACTED: Cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy and dostarlimab for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the Authors. The authors have independently identified an error in the formula that was utilized to calculate the Quality Adjusted Life Years which invalidates the data and the conclusion of the paper. The authors have contacted the journal requesting to retract the article. Apologies are offered to the readers of the journal for any confusion or inconvenience that may have resulted from the publication of this article.

Does the choice of platinum doublet matter? A study to evaluate the impact of platinum doublet choice for treatment of platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer recurrence on the development of future PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance.

OBJECTIVES: The use of a platinum doublet for the treatment of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) recurrence is well established. The impact of the non­platinum chemotherapy used as part of a platinum doublet on PARP inhibitor (PARPi) and platinum sensitivity it not known. We aimed to describe oncologic outcomes in cases of recurrent EOC receiving PARPi as maintenance therapy based on preceding platinum doublet. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer treated with platinum doublet followed by maintenance PARPi from 1/1/2015 and 1/1/2022. Comparisons were made between patients receiving carboplatin + pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (CD) versus other platinum doublets (OPDs). Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier and univariate survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: 100 patients received PARPi maintenance following a platinum doublet chemotherapy regimen for platinum-sensitive recurrence. 25/100 (25%) received CD and 75/100 (75%) received OPDs. Comparing CD and OPDs, median progression-free survival was 8 versus 7 months (p = 0.26), median time to platinum resistance was 15 versus 13 months (p = 0.54), median OS was 64 versus 90 months (p = 0.28), and median OS from starting PARPi was 25 versus 26 months (p = 0.90), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as part of a platinum doublet preceding maintenance PARPi for platinum-sensitive recurrence does not seem to hasten PARPi resistance or platinum resistance compared to OPDs. Although there was a non-significant trend towards increased OS among patients who received a platinum doublet other than CD prior to PARPi, the OS from PARPi start was similar between groups. Given the retrospective nature of this study and small study population, further research is needed to evaluate if the choice of platinum doublet preceding PARPi maintenance impacts PARPi resistance, platinum resistance and survival.

Maintenance with mirvetuximab soravtansine plus bevacizumab vs bevacizumab in FRα-high platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

At first recurrence, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC) is frequently treated with platinum-based chemotherapy doublets plus bevacizumab, then single-agent bevacizumab. Most patients' disease progresses within a year after chemotherapy, emphasizing the need for novel strategies. Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV), an antibody-drug conjugate, comprises a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody and tubulin-targeting payload (maytansinoid DM4). In FRα-high PSOC, MIRV plus bevacizumab previously showed promising efficacy (objective response rate, 69% [95% CI: 41-89]; median progression-free survival, 13.3 months [95% CI: 8.3-18.3]; median duration of response, 12.9 months [95% CI: 6.5-15.7]) and safety. The Phase III randomized GLORIOSA trial will evaluate MIRV plus bevacizumab vs. bevacizumab alone as maintenance therapy in patients with FRα-high PSOC who did not have disease progression following second-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05445778; GOG.org ID: GOG-3078; ENGOT.ESGO.org ID: ENGOT-ov76.

Most patients with ovarian cancer are initially treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. If the cancer reappears/recurs after more than 6 months following this therapy, it is called platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC). Patients with PSOC usually receive additional platinum-based chemotherapy along with bevacizumab, a drug that reduces tumor growth by decreasing its blood supply. If patients improve or are stable on this therapy, they are usually kept on bevacizumab alone for 'maintenance therapy'. Unfortunately, this maintenance therapy does not work long-term in all patients, so better long-term treatments are needed. The GLORIOSA (NCT05445778) clinical trial will compare maintenance therapy with bevacizumab alone to maintenance therapy with bevacizumab plus a drug called mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV) to determine which therapy leads to better results in patients with PSOC. MIRV is made up of an antibody that binds to a specific protein (folate receptor alpha [FRα]) on cancer cells to directly deliver a cancer-killing drug. MIRV received US FDA approval to be used as a therapy for patients with ovarian cancer who are resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy and express high levels of FRα. The GLORIOSA trial will study maintenance therapy with MIRV plus bevacizumab in patients with PSOC who have not had cancer progression after second-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, and whose cancer expresses high amounts of FRα. The main purpose of this trial is to determine if MIRV plus bevacizumab leads to better patient survival and decreases cancer growth and spread when compared with bevacizumab alone.

The right time for change: A report on the heterogeneity of IVB endometrial cancer and improved risk-stratification provided by new 2023 FIGO staging criteria.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to provide a contemporary report on stage IVB endometrial carcinoma (2009 FIGO criteria) and applied the 2023 FIGO staging criteria to this population. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients who underwent cytoreduction for stage IVB endometrial carcinoma (2009 FIGO criteria) from 2014 to 2020 was performed. Demographics, clinicopathologic factors, and outcomes were recorded. Disease burden and distribution were determined by imaging, operative notes, and pathology reports. Patients were re-staged according to 2023 FIGO staging criteria. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 or Fisher's exact test, and Kaplan-Meier curves compared survival outcomes using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Eighty-eight cases were included. Most patients (63.6%) were not suspected to have stage IVB (2009 FIGO criteria) disease prior to surgery. Seventy-two percent of patients underwent primary cytoreduction, and 12 (19%) were suboptimal. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months (95% CI 10-16 months), and median overall survival (OS) was 38 months (95% CI 19-61 months). Degree of cytoreduction (p = 0.0101) and pelvic-confined metastatic disease (p = 0.0149) were significant prognostic factors, while distant metastases were not associated with worse outcomes. For those patients who underwent primary cytoreduction, number (p = 0.0453) and diameter (p = 0.0192) of tumor deposits were associated with PFS. When 2023 FIGO staging criteria were applied, 58% of patients underwent change in stage, and 8% did not meet criteria for complete staging. PFS was significantly different based on 2023 FIGO staging (p = 0.0307); a trend in OS was also noted (p = 0.0550). CONCLUSION: Stage IVB endometrial carcinoma (2009 FIGO criteria) encompasses a diverse cohort of patients, where certain clinicopathologic features, tumor burden, and degree of cytoreduction are associated with outcomes. The 2023 FIGO staging criteria significantly improves our ability to risk-stratify patients.

Glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix: Findings from a combined National Cancer Database analysis and single institution review of treatment patterns and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To describe stage, treatment patterns, and survival for glassy cell carcinoma of the cervix (GCCC), a poorly understood rare tumor. METHODS: Clinical data and survival were compared between GCCC and more common histologic types using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2017. A retrospective review of GCCC cases at our institution from 2012 to 2020 was simultaneously performed with staging updated according to 2018 FIGO staging. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed, and outcomes compared to historical references. RESULTS: 143/89,001 (0.16%) NCDB cervical cancer cases were GCCC. Compared to other histologies, GCCC cases were younger, with 74.8% diagnosed before age 50. Stage distribution was similar. Stage I cases were less commonly treated with surgery alone (19/69, 27%). 79.4% of locally advanced (stage II-IVA) cases were treated with definitive chemoradiation. GCCC demonstrated worse OS for early-stage and locally-advanced disease. No survival differences were observed for patients with stage IVB disease. Our institutional review identified 14 GCCC cases. Median age at diagnosis was 34 years. All nine early-stage cases underwent radical hysterectomy. Adjuvant radiation was given for cases meeting Sedlis criteria (4/9, 44%). All five advanced stage cases were stage IIIC and received definitive chemoradiation. Recurrence rate was 0% (0/9) for early-stage and 60% (3/5) for advanced-stage cases. 3-year PFS was 100% for early-stage and 40% for advanced-stage. 3-year OS was 100% for early-stage and 60% for advanced-stage GCCC. CONCLUSIONS: GCCC presents at earlier ages than other cervical cancer histologic types. Although NCDB showed worse OS, our more contemporary institutional review, which incorporates updated staging and newer treatment modalities found outcomes more similar to historical references of more common histologic subtypes.

The impact of antibiotic and proton pump inhibitor use at the time of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy on survival in patients with endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the impact of antibiotic (ABX) and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (PC) for endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution cohort study of EC patients treated with ≥four cycles of adjuvant PC following surgical staging from 2014 to 2020. Demographics and clinicopathologic features, including ABX and PPI use, were compared using χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed, and survival outcomes were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Of 325 patients, 95 (29%) received ABX, and 80 (24.6%) received PPI. ABX were associated with decreased 3-year PFS (49.9% vs. 66%; p = 0.0237) but not 3-year OS (68.9% vs. 79.9%; p = 0.0649). ABX targeting gram-positive bacteria were associated with decreased 3-year PFS (21.2% vs. 66.0% vs. 55.4%; p = 0.0038) and 3-year OS (36.5% vs. 79.9% vs. 75.6%; p = 0.0014) compared to no ABX and other ABX, respectively. PPI use was associated with decreased 3-year PFS (46.9% vs. 66.0%; p = 0.0001) and 3-year OS (60.7% vs. 81.9%; p = 0.0041) compared to no PPI. On multivariable regression analysis controlling for confounders including stage, histology, grade, radiation, and co-morbidities, PPI use was independently associated with worse PFS (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.25-3.08; p = 0.0041) and OS (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.01-4.18, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study, we demonstrate that PPI use is independently associated with worse PFS and OS in patients with EC treated with PC. ABX use was associated with worse PFS on univariate analysis only. There is an unmet need to understand how PPI, ABX, and, potentially, the microbiome impact the effectiveness of chemotherapy in EC patients.

Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following minimally invasive hysterectomy in the morbidly obese patient population.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether morbid obesity should serve as an independent factor in the decision for same day discharge following minimally invasive hysterectomy. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of patients with BMI ≥ 40 who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy within a single comprehensive cancer center between January 2018 - August 2020. Demographics, perioperative factors, post-operative monitoring, complications, and readmissions were compared between patients who underwent same day discharge and overnight observation using Fisher's exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: 374 patients with BMI ≥ 40 were included. Eighty-three (22.2%) patients underwent same day discharge, and 291 (77.8%) patients underwent overnight observation. Factors associated with increased likelihood of same day discharge included younger age (median age 53 vs 58; p = 0.001), lower BMI (median BMI 45 vs 47; p = 0.005), and fewer medical co-morbidities (Charlson Co-Morbidity Index 2 vs 3; p < 0.001). On multivariate regression analysis, frailty (OR 2.16 [1.14-4.11], p = 0.019) and surgical completion time after 12 PM (OR 3.67 [2.16-6.24], p < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of overnight observation. Few patients admitted for routine overnight observation required medical intervention (n = 14, 4.8%); most of these patients were frail (64.3%). The overall hospital readmission rate within 30 days of discharge was 3.2% (n = 12), with no patients discharged on the day of surgery being readmitted. CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity alone should not serve as a contraindication to same day discharge following minimally invasive hysterectomy. Admission for observation was associated with low rates of clinically meaningful intervention, and patients who underwent same day discharge were not at increased risk of adverse outcome.

Postoperative venous thromboembolism risk stratification in patients with uterine cancer.

BACKGROUND: Uterine cancers are associated with a high risk for venous thromboembolisms. The American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guidelines recommend that all patients undergoing pelvic surgery for cancer should receive extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis with the duration being dependent on risk. However, risk stratification for patients with uterine cancer is not clearly defined. The Caprini score is the most widely used risk assessment model but it has been found to have limited use in the gynecologic oncology population. A modified Caprini score has been explored in other populations. The Khorana score is an additional risk assessment model that has not been studied in this context. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the ability of a modified Caprini model and the Khorana score to risk stratify patients with uterine cancer for postoperative venous thromboembolisms within 90 days of surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective cohort study was performed, and all patients with uterine cancer who underwent a hysterectomy over a 4-year period were included. The Caprini and Khorana scores were calculated for each patient. The Caprini score cutoff for highest risk was evaluated at ≥7, ≥8, and ≥9 (modified Caprini) and the Khorana score cutoff was evaluated at ≥2 and ≥3. To determine the prognostic use of each score and other clinico-pathologic criteria related to the development of a venous thromboembolism, univariate analyses were performed using independent t tests, chi-square tests, or Fisher's exact tests; a multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 954 patients were included. The rate of venous thromboembolism development was 1.7% (16/954). A minimally invasive surgical approach was used in 90.5% (863/954) of patients. The mean Caprini score for patients with a venous thromboembolism was 10.3 compared with 8.1 for patients without a venous thromboembolism (95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.33; P<.0001). The mean Khorana score for the venous thromboembolism group was 2.4 vs 1.9 for those without (95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.82; P=.03). Both the Caprini and Khorana scores were found to be associated with venous thromboembolisms, but only a Caprini score with a cutoff of ≥8 or ≥9 was statistically significant (risk ratio, 31.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-519.49; risk ratio, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-14.13, respectively), with high accuracy based on the area under the curve (0.75 and 0.68, respectively). Of the minimally invasive subgroup, 11.7% (101/863) of patients had same-day discharge with no postoperative thromboprophylaxis; none of these patients developed venous thromboembolisms. Despite extended prophylaxis among the laparotomy patients (30 days), the rate of venous thromboembolisms was more than 3 times that of the minimally invasive group (5.49% vs 1.7%). Advanced tumor stage and leukocytosis were noted to be independent risk factors for venous thromboembolisms. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that using a modified Caprini score could help to identify the highest-risk patients who would benefit from prolonged thromboprophylaxis, could reduce the incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolisms, and could minimize the cost and harm of overtreatment. These findings need to be validated in a prospective manner, and further research is needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy.

Less is more: clinical utility of postoperative laboratory testing following minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing rates of same-day discharge following minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer, the need for and value of routine postoperative testing is unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether routine postoperative laboratory testing following minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer leads to clinically significant changes in postoperative care. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer by a gynecologic oncologist between June 2014 and June 2017. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, operative and postoperative data, and pathologic findings were manually extracted from the patients' medical records. The financial burden of laboratory testing was computed using hospital-level cost data. RESULTS: Of the 649 women included in the analysis, most (91.4%) were White, with a mean age of 61 years, and mean body mass index of 38.0 kg/m2. The most common comorbidities were diabetes mellitus (31.9%, n=207), chronic pulmonary disease (7.9%, n=51), and congestive heart failure (3.2%, n=21). Median operative time was 151 minutes (range, 61-278), and median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range, 10-1500). Most patients (68.6%, n=445) underwent lymphadenectomy. All patients had postoperative laboratory tests ordered: 100% complete blood count, 99.7% chemistry, 62.9% magnesium, 46.8% phosphate, 37.4% calcium, and 1.2% liver function tests. Twenty-six patients (4.0%) had a change in management owing to postoperative laboratory test results. Of these 26 women, 88% experienced a change in clinical status that would have otherwise prompted testing. Only 3 (0.5% of entire cohort) were asymptomatic: 1 received a blood transfusion for asymptomatic anemia, and the other 2, who did not carry a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, had interventions for hyperglycemia. On univariable analysis, peripheral and cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus with end-organ damage, and a Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥3 were associated with increased odds of change in management; these were not significant on multivariable analysis. Routine postoperative laboratory evaluation in this cohort increased hospital costs by $292,000. CONCLUSION: Routine postoperative laboratory tests are unlikely to lead to significant changes in management for women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer, and may increase cost without providing a discernible clinical benefit. In the setting of strict postoperative guidelines, laboratory tests should be ordered when clinically indicated rather than as part of routine postoperative management for women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Who will be readmitted? Evaluation of the laparoscopic hysterectomy readmission score in a gynecologic oncology population undergoing robotic-assisted hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The laparoscopic hysterectomy readmission score (LHRS) was created to identify patients for whom same day discharge (SDD) after minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) may not be advisable and includes diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, disseminated cancer, chronic steroid use, bleeding disorder, length of surgery, and any postoperative complication prior to discharge. We evaluated the performance of the score at predicting readmission in a gynecologic oncology population, and additionally sought to determine if any factors known prior to surgery could replace those that are not known until the time of surgery (operative time and postoperative complication). METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of women undergoing robotic hysterectomy by a gynecologic oncologist in 2018. Associations between pre-operative, operative and post-operative factors and 30-day readmission, SDD and postoperative complications were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate among the 423 women in the cohort was 4.5% and 1.9% in those undergoing SDD. Readmission rates by LHRS were: score 1 (4.9%), score 2 (7.8%), score 3 (13.6%), score 4 (16.7%). Patients with a LHRS of ≥3 had higher odds of readmission compared to those with a lower score (OR 4.20, p = 0.02). Infectious morbidity accounted for the majority of postoperative complications, emergency room visits and readmissions. We did not identify preoperative factors to replace the intra- and post-operative factors used in the score. CONCLUSIONS: The readmission rate following MIH is low, and a LHRS of ≥3 is associated with increased risk of readmission. Our findings support the applicability of the LHRS to a gynecologic oncology population; addressing risk factors for postoperative infection or closer follow up for patients with a LHRS ≥3 could reduce postoperative readmissions.

The contemporary presentation and diagnosis of endometrial cancer recurrence: When, where, and how?

OBJECTIVE: To examine patients with confirmed endometrial cancer recurrence; evaluate patterns, presentation, and mode of diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of women with endometrial cancer diagnosis between 2014 and 2020. Disease recurrences were evaluated. Medical records were reviewed focusing on presentation at time of recurrence. Relationships were assessed using χ2, Fisher's exact test, t-test, and Wilcoxon test. The Kaplan-Meier product limit was used to estimate survival. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of covariates. RESULTS: Endometrial cancer recurrence was identified in 201 (11.7%) patients. Sixty percent (120/201) of patients presented with symptoms. Pain was the most common presenting symptom (23.4%, 47/201) and bleeding was reported in <14% (28/201). Patients with symptomatic presentation were less likely to be able to receive treatment for their recurrent disease (76.7% vs 91.3%, p = 0.005). Asymptomatic pelvic exam diagnosed recurrence in 13.4% (27/201) and was more common in patients initially diagnosed with early-stage disease (66.7% vs 34.5% p = 0.001) of endometrioid histology (66.7% vs 36.8%, p = 0.003) without prior adjuvant therapy (48.2% vs 17.9%, p = 0.001). More than1/3 of diagnoses were made by providers outside of the oncologic care team. CONCLUSION: The majority of women with recurrent endometrial cancer were symptomatic and pain is a common complaint associated with disease recurrence. Patients with symptomatic presentation of disease recurrence were less likely to receive treatment for recurrent disease but this did not result in an overall survival (OS) difference. Given the rising mortality rate of endometrial cancer further work is needed to develop multidisciplinary surveillance strategies that will enable meaningful treatment of disease recurrence.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Ovarian Cancer, Version 3.2022.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States, with less than half of patients living >5 years following diagnosis. The NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines, including revised guidance on alternative chemotherapy regimens for patients with advanced age and/or comorbidities, a new algorithm for recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma based on developing research and novel therapeutic agents, and updated language regarding tumor molecular analysis applications in ovarian cancer.

Endometrial Cancer: Who Lives, Who Dies, Can We Improve Their Story?

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer in the U.S. The objective of this cohort study was to characterize the clinical and pathologic features that are associated with endometrial cancer-specific death for women cared for at a single National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort from 2014 to 2017 including all women who had a hysterectomy for EC. Charts were reviewed for clinical and pathologic data, focusing on survival outcomes. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-one patients with EC underwent hysterectomy with 760 informative for outcomes. Seventy-six (10%) deaths were related to their EC; 62 women died from recurrent EC. Nonendometrioid histology and advanced stage were predictors of recurrence and EC death. Among patients with endometrioid ECs, mismatch repair status was significantly associated with EC-specific survival (relative risk = 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-10.3; p < .0001). Most patients with EC who recurred died of their disease 62/83 (74.7%). Nearly half of the patients that recurred (27/62) had no additional therapy at the time of recurrence. Overall survival was significantly longer for those women who had additional treatment at the time of recurrence; however, the improvement in overall survival with therapy at recurrence was largely attributable to effects in those women who were adjuvant therapy naïve. CONCLUSION: Although there is benefit of treatment at the time of recurrence for treatment-naïve women; only approximately half of patients were able to receive therapy. There is an urgent need for continued efforts for more effective EC therapy in both the front-line and recurrent setting as well as early identification of cancer diagnosis and recurrence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Approximately 10% of patients died of their endometrial cancer. Most deaths were from recurrent disease; however, almost 20% of endometrial cancer deaths were within 120 days of surgery. Although treatment at the time of recurrence improves overall survival, only approximately half of patients will receive therapy at the time of recurrence. Traditional prognostic features like histology and stage remain important to predict risk of recurrence, and newer biomarkers, such as mismatch repair status, may improve risk stratification and targeted therapy. There remains an urgent need for improved therapy and early detection of diagnosis and recurrence.

Endometrial cancer: A society of gynecologic oncology evidence-based review and recommendations, part II.

In 2014, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Committee published a clinical update reviewing the treatment of women with endometrial cancer. At that time, there had been significant advances in the diagnosis, work-up, surgical management, and available treatment options allowing for more optimal care of affected women. This manuscript, Part II in a two-part series, includes specific recommendations on treatment of recurrent disease, post treatment surveillance and survivorship, considerations for younger women, and special situations. Part I covered histopathology and molecular pathology, risk factors, presentation and diagnostic approach, surgical approach and adjuvant therapy.

Endometrial cancer: A society of gynecologic oncology evidence-based review and recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Committee published a clinical update reviewing the treatment of women with endometrial cancer. At that time, there had been significant advances in the diagnosis, work-up, surgical management, and available treatment options allowing for more optimal care of affected women. Despite these advances, the incidence of endometrial cancer as well as the deaths attributable to the disease have continued to rise; from 1987 to 2014 there has been a 75% increase in cases and almost 300% increase in endometrial cancer deaths. Fortunately, since then, there has been progress in the treatment of patients with endometrial cancer with increased utilization of molecular pathology, greater understanding of genetic predisposition, enhanced methods for lymph node assessment, a broader understanding of the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy, and a more efficient approach to survivorship and surveillance. The purpose of this document is to present a comprehensive review of this progress. MANUSCRIPT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: The authors reviewed the available evidence, contributed to the development of this manuscript, provided critical review of the guidelines, and finalized the manuscript recommendations. The review was also presented to and approved by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice Committee, SGO Publications Committee, and the SGO board members prior to submission for publication. The recommendations for this manuscript were developed by a panel of gynecologic oncologists who were members of the SGO Clinical Practice and Education Committees. Panelists reviewed and considered evidence from current uterine cancer literature. The terminology used in these guidelines was adopted from the ASCCP management guidelines [1] using a two-part rating system to grade the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence (Table 1). The rating for each recommendation is given in parentheses.

Phase I evaluation of lenvatinib and weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent endometrial, ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and describe toxicities associated with lenvatinib and weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent endometrial and platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Using a 3 + 3 design patients were given weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV day 1, 8, 15 and oral levantinib daily on a 28-day cycle. Lenvatinib dose levels were 8 mg, 12 mg, 16 mg, 20 mg. Toxicities were recorded using CTCAE v4.03 and response was determined with imaging after cycle 2, then every 3rd cycle, using RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: 26 patients were enrolled; 19 with ovarian cancer (14 high grade serous, 1 low grade serous, 2 clear cell, 1 endometrioid, and 1 carcinosarcoma), and 7 with endometrial cancer (3 serous, and 4 endometrioid). The MTD was established at lenvatinib 16 mg and weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2. Toxicities (all grades) occurring in ≥25% of patients included anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, mucositis, nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, hypertension, fatigue, proteinuria, epistaxis, hoarseness. Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response and PFS; 15 (65%) had a partial response, 7 (30%) stable, 1 (4%) progressive disease with an objective response rate of 65%; 71% in ovarian and 50% in endometrial cancer. Median progression free survival (PFS) is 12.4 months; 14.0 months in endometrial cancer, 7.2 months in ovarian cancer; 54% had a PFS > 6 months. The median duration of response for PR patients (n = 15) was 10.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen was tolerable with manageable side effects. Encouraging activity was observed in endometrial and ovarian cancer, and warrants further development.

Impact of Molecular Classification on Treatment Paradigms in Uterine Cancers.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article will discuss the recent data on the prognostic significance of molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma, as well as its impact on directing treatment decisions. RECENT FINDINGS: Molecular classification has emerged as a complement to the current paradigm of endometrial cancer (EC) risk stratification. POLE mutations appear to portend favorable prognoses, but data are insufficient to indicate withholding treatment based on this signature. Copy number high (CNH) EC carries a worse prognosis and may benefit from more aggressive therapy. MMRd tumors are likely to have other prognostic features that indicate adjuvant treatment and many recurrences respond favorably to pembrolizumab. Progression of molecular profiling may allow further discrimination of the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) group. Treatment for this group remains largely based on conventional risk factors. For both the NSMP and the CNH groups, treatment with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab is an attractive contemporary option for recurrence management. Molecular classification is a useful adjunct to conventional risk stratification paradigms for both prognostic counseling and treatment selection. Clinical trials incorporating molecular signatures in assigning treatment strategies may further elucidate the value of this classification system.

Preoperative predictors of endometrial cancer at time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or complex atypical hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, also known as complex atypical hyperplasia, is a precancerous lesion of the endometrium associated with a 40% risk of concurrent endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy. Although a majority of endometrial cancers diagnosed at the time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia are low risk and low stage, approximately 10% of patients ultimately diagnosed with endometrial cancers will have high-risk disease that would warrant lymph node assessment to guide adjuvant therapy decisions. Given these risks, some physicians choose to refer patients to a gynecologic oncologist for definitive management. Currently, few data exist regarding preoperative factors that can predict the presence of concurrent endometrial cancer in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Identification of these factors may assist in the preoperative triaging of patients to general gynecology or gynecologic oncology. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether preoperative factors can predict the presence of concurrent endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia; and to describe the ability of preoperative characteristics to predict which patients may be at a higher risk for lymph node involvement requiring lymph node assessment at the time of hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing hysterectomy for pathologically confirmed endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia from January 2004 to December 2015. Patient demographics, imaging, pathology, and outcomes were recorded. The "Mayo criteria" were used to determine patients requiring lymphadenectomy. Unadjusted associations between covariates and progression to endometrial cancer were estimated by 2-sample t-tests for continuous covariates and by logistic regression for categorical covariates. A multivariable model for endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy was developed using logistic regression with 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Of the 1055 charts reviewed, 169 patients were eligible and included. Of these patients, 87 (51.5%) had a final diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia/other benign disease, whereas 82 (48.5%) were ultimately diagnosed with endometrial cancer. No medical comorbidities were found to be strongly associated with concurrent endometrial cancer. Patients with endometrial cancer had a thicker average endometrial stripe compared to the patients with no endometrial cancer at the time of hysterectomy (15.7 mm; standard deviation, 9.5) versus 12.5 mm; standard deviation, 6.4; P = .01). An endometrial stripe of ≥2 cm was associated with 4.0 times the odds of concurrent endometrial cancer (95% confidence interval, 1.5-10.0), controlling for age. In all, 87% of endometrial cancer cases were stage T1a (Nx or N0). Approximately 44% of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and an endometrial stripe of ≥2 cm met the "Mayo criteria" for indicated lymphadenectomy compared to 22% of endometrial cancer patients with an endometrial stripe of <2 cm. CONCLUSION: Endometrial stripe thickness and age were the strongest predictors of concurrent endometrial cancer at time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Referral to a gynecologic oncologist may be especially warranted in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia patients with an endometrial stripe of ≥2 cm given the increased rate of concurrent cancer and potential need for lymph node assessment.

Mismatch repair deficiency identifies patients with high-intermediate-risk (HIR) endometrioid endometrial cancer at the highest risk of recurrence: A prognostic biomarker.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the correlation between mismatch repair (MMR) status, disease recurrence patterns, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with high-intermediate-risk (HIR) endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). METHODS: A single-institution chart review for consecutive patients who were diagnosed with ECC between 2007 and 2016 was undertaken. Tumor MMR status was determined for all patients based on reported findings for mutL homolog 1 (MLH1), postmeiotic segregation (PMS2), mutS homolog 2 (MSH2), and MSH6 immunohistochemistry; and defective MMR (dMMR) status was defined as the lack of expression of at least 1 of these proteins. Patients were classified with HIR EEC according to criteria used for Gynecologic Oncology Group study 249. The factors associated with recurrence were assessed by logistic regression. RFS and associated factors were assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: In total, 197 patients who had HIR EEC (64 with dMMR and 133 with intact MMR [iMMR]) were identified, of whom 32 (16.2%) developed recurrent disease. The median follow-up was 54 months. The recurrence rate for women who had dMMR was 28% compared with 10.5% for those who had iMMR (P = .002), independent of the type of adjuvant therapy they received. The increase in distant recurrences among patients who had dMMR was even more pronounced (14.1% vs 3%; P = .003). The estimated 5-year RFS was 66% for women who had dMMR compared with 89% for those who had iMMR (P = .001). Excluding isolated vaginal recurrences, the difference in 5-year RFS was 73.5% versus 95%, respectively (P = .0004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had HIR EEC with dMMR had increased rates of recurrence and decreased RFS compared with those who had HIR EEC with iMMR, despite the receipt of similar adjuvant treatment. The current findings highlight the need for alternative treatment options and the importance of MMR status as a biomarker for patients with HIR EEC.