Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 147
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 29(10): 1425-1435, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30016005

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) has increased significantly, since its initial approval for use in selected patients with heart failure. Limited data exist as for current trends in implant-related in-hospital complications and cost utilization. The aim of our study was to examine in-hospital complication rates associated with CRT-D and their trends over the last decade. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we estimated 378 248 CRT-D procedures from 2003 to 2012. We investigated common complications, including mechanical, cardiovascular, pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in-hospital deaths described with CRT-D, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. Mechanical complications (5.9%) were the commonest, followed by cardiovascular (3.6%), respiratory failure (2.4%), and pneumothorax (1.5%). Age (≥65 years), female gender (OR, 95% CI; P value) (1.08, 1.03-1.13; 0.001), and the Charlson score ≥3 (1.52, 1.45-1.60; <0.001) were significantly associated with increased mortality/complications. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate in patients undergoing CRT-D has been increasing in the last decade. Age (≥65), female sex, and the Charlson score ≥3 were associated with higher complications. In patients who underwent CRT-D implantation, postoperative complications were associated with significant increases in cost.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/economía , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/economía , Desfibriladores Implantables/economía , Cardioversión Eléctrica/economía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/economía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Costos de Hospital , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/mortalidad , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/tendencias , Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/tendencias , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Desfibriladores Implantables/tendencias , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Cardioversión Eléctrica/tendencias , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
2.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 29(5): 715-724, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478273

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is widely accepted intervention for atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs, but limited data are available regarding contemporary trends in major complications and in-hospital mortality due to the procedure. This study was aimed at exploring the temporal trends of in-hospital mortality, major complications, and impact of hospital volume on frequency of AF ablation-related outcomes. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was utilized to identify the AF patients treated with catheter ablation. In-hospital death and common complications including vascular access complications, cardiac perforation and/or tamponade, pneumothorax, stroke, and transient ischemic attack, were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD-9-CM) codes. RESULT: In-hospital mortality rate of 0.15% and overall complication rate of 5.46% were noted among AF ablation recipients (n = 50,969). Significant increase in complications during study period (relative increase 56.37%, P-trend < 0.001) was observed. Cardiac (2.65%), vascular (1.33%), and neurological (1.05%) complications were most common. On multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]; P value), significant predictors of complications were female sex (OR = 1.40; CI = 1.17-1.68; P value < 0.001), high burden of comorbidity as indicated by Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR = 2.84; CI = 2.29-3.52; P value < 0.001), and low hospital volume (< 50 procedures). CONCLUSION: Our study noted a decline in AF ablation-related hospitalizations and complications associated with the procedure. These findings largely reflect shifting trends of outpatient performance of the procedure and increasing safety profile due to improved institutional expertise and catheter techniques.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Pacientes Internos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/tendencias , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/tendencias , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 91(6): 1171-1181, 2018 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29152829

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are sparse clinical data on the procedural trends, outcomes and readmission rates following FDA approval and expansion of Transcatheter mitral valve repair/MitraClip® . Whether a complex new technology can be disseminated safely and quickly is controversial. METHODS: The study cohort was derived from the National Readmission Data (NRD) 2013-14. MitraClip® was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality + procedural complications. Secondary outcome included 30-day readmissions. Hierarchical two level logistic models were used to evaluate study outcomes. RESULTS: Our analysis included 2003 MitraClip® procedures. Overall in-hospital mortality was 3.9%. As expected, there was a significant increase in procedural volume post-FDA approval. Importantly, a corresponding downward trend in mortality and procedural complications was observed. Significant predictors of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications included the use of vasopressors (P <0.001) and hemodynamic support (P < 0.001). Higher hospital volume (≥10 MitraClips/year) was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and complications (P = 0.02). There were 304 (15.1%) 30-day readmissions, with heart failure being the most common cause of readmission. Elective procedures had lower in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001) and lower readmission rates (P = 0.011) compared with nonelective procedures. CONCLUSION: A significant increase in MitraClip® procedural volumes occurred post-FDA approval. Overall morbidity and mortality were low and trended downwards. Hospital procedure volume ≥10 cases were associated with lower mortality and overall complication rates. These data suggest a successful roll out of a very complex novel structural heart procedure.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendencias , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/tendencias , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/tendencias , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Aprobación de Recursos , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/tendencias , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug Administration , Adulto Joven
4.
Vascular ; 26(6): 615-625, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29973108

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although the published literature has reported an inverse association between hospital volume and outcomes of coronary interventions, sparse data are available for percutaneous peripheral atherectomy (PPA). The aim of our study was to examine the effect of hospital volume on outcomes of PPA. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database of the year 2012, PPA with ICD-9 code of 17.56 was identified. The primary outcomes were mortality and amputation rates; secondary outcomes were peri-procedural complications, cost, and length of hospitalization and discharge disposition of the patient. Multivariate models were generated for predictors of the outcomes. RESULTS: We identified a total of 21,015 patients with mean age of 69.53 years, with 56% males. Higher hospital volume centers were associated with a significantly lower mortality (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.57, p < 0.0001), amputation rates (5.34% vs. 9.32%, p < 0.0001), combined endpoint of mortality and complications (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.49-0.58, p < 0.0001), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) (4.86 vs. 6.79 days, p < 0.0001) and lower hospitalization cost ($23,062 vs. $30,794, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis for acute and chronic limb ischemia showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Hospital procedure volume is an independent predictor of mortality, amputation rates, complications, LOS, and costs in patients undergoing PPA with an inverse relationship.


Asunto(s)
Aterectomía/métodos , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Aterectomía/efectos adversos , Aterectomía/economía , Aterectomía/mortalidad , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/economía , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/economía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/economía , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Circulation ; 132(25): 2363-71, 2015 Dec 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26534954

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead removal (TLR) has made significant progress with respect to innovation, efficacy, and safety. However, limited data exist regarding trends in use and adverse outcomes outside the centers of considerable experience for TLR. The aim of our study was to examine use patterns, frequency of adverse events, and influence of hospital volume on complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified 91 890 TLR procedures. We investigated common complications including pericardial complications (hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade, or pericardiocentesis), pneumothorax, stroke, vascular complications (consisting of hemorrhage/hematoma, incidents requiring surgical repair, and accidental arterial puncture), and in-hospital deaths described with TLR, defining them by the validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code. We specifically assessed in-hospital death (2.2%), hemorrhage requiring transfusion (2.6%), vascular complications (2.0%), pericardial complications (1.4%), open heart surgery (0.2%), and postoperative respiratory failure (2.4%). Independent predictors of complications were female sex and device infections. Hospital volume was not independently associated with higher complications. There was a significant rise in overall complication rates over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate in patients undergoing TLR was higher than previously reported. Female sex and device infections are associated with higher complications. Hospital volume was not associated with higher complication rates. The number of adverse events in the literature likely underestimates the actual number of complications associated with TLR.


Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Desfibriladores Implantables/tendencias , Remoción de Dispositivos/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
J Card Fail ; 22(3): 232-7, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26547012

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There are few data in the literature regarding impact of annual hospital volume on outcomes such as mortality and length of stay (LOS) post-LVAD implantation. METHODS: We queried the nationwide inpatient sample from 2008 to 2011 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision procedure code 37.66. We included patients ≥18 years without primary diagnosis of orthotopic heart transplant. Annual volume of LVAD implantation was computed for each hospital. Multivariable hierarchical mixed effect logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality and LOS. RESULTS: There were 1749 LVAD implants from 2008 to 2011; patients had a mean age of 55.4 years, and 23% were female. In-hospital mortality decreased from 20.9% in the first tertile (1-22 LVADs/y) to 13.7% in the third tertile (≥35 LVADs/y) of hospital volume. Median LOS decreased from 34 days in the first tertile to 28 days in third tertile of hospital volume. The adjusted odds ratios of the highest tertile of hospital volume in predicting in-hospital mortality and LOS were 0.41 (0.26-0.64, P < .001) and 0.41 (0.23-0.73, P = .003), respectively. Restricted cubic spline analysis showed that a volume threshold of >20 LVADs/year was associated with favorable mortality rates of <10%. CONCLUSIONS: High annual LVAD volume is associated with significantly decreased in-hospital mortality and LOS after LVAD implantation. Center experience is an important determinant of optimal patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(5): 955-62, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26699085

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the in-hospital outcomes in cirrhosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus those undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). BACKGROUND: Over the last 10 years, TAVR has emerged as a therapeutic option for treating severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients. Cirrhosis patients have a high risk of operative morbidity and mortality while undergoing cardiac surgery. This study's hypothesis was that TAVR is a safer alternative compared to SAVR in cirrhosis patients. METHODS: The study population was derived from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the years 2011-2012 using ICD-9-CM procedure codes 35.21 and 35.22 for SAVR, and 35.05 and 35.06 for TAVR. Patients <50 years of age and those who concomitantly underwent other valvular procedures were excluded. ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes were used to identify patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and esophageal varices. Using propensity score matching, two matched cohorts were derived in which the outcomes were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: There were 30 patients in the SAVR and TAVR group each. Compared to the TAVR group, the patients in SAVR group had significantly higher rate of transfusion of whole blood or blood products (p = 0.037), longer mean postprocedural length of stay (p = 0.006), and nonsignificantly higher mean cost of hospitalization (p = 0.2), any complications rate (p = 0.09), and liver complications rate (p = 0.4). In-hospital mortality rate was same in the both the groups. No patients in the TAVR group required open-heart surgery or cardiopulmonary bypass. CONCLUSION: TAVR could be a viable option for aortic valve replacement in cirrhosis patients.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Transfusión Sanguínea , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/economía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
8.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 88(4): 605-616, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26914274

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to study the impact of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) on in-hospital outcomes. BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data regarding the impact of GPI on the outcomes following peripheral endovascular interventions. METHODS: The study cohort was derived from Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between the years 2006 and 2011. Peripheral endovascular interventions and GPI utilization were identified using appropriate ICD-9 Diagnostic and procedural codes. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The study outcomes were: primary (in-hospital mortality and amputation studied separately) and secondary (composite of in-hospital mortality and postprocedural complications). Hospitalization costs were also assessed. RESULTS: GPI utilization (OR, 95% CI, P-value) was independently predictive of lower amputation rates (0.36, 0.27-0.49, <0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of in-hospital mortality (0.59, 0.31-1.14, P 0.117), although GPI use predicted worse secondary outcomes (1.23, 1.03-1.47, 0.023). Following propensity matching, the amputation rate was lower (3.2% vs. 8%, P < 0.001), while hospitalization costs were higher in the cohort that received GPI ($21,091 ± 404 vs. 19,407 ± 133, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Multivariate analysis revealed GPI use in peripheral endovascular interventions to be suggestive of an increase in composite end-point of in-hospital mortality and postprocedural complications, no impact on in-hospital mortality alone, significantly lower rate of amputation, and increase in hospitalization costs. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Complejo GPIIb-IIIa de Glicoproteína Plaquetaria/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Costos de los Medicamentos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/economía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/economía , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
9.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 87(1): 23-33, 2016 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26032938

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We studied the trends and predictors of drug eluting stent (DES) utilization from 2006 to 2011 to further expound the inter-hospital variability in their utilization. BACKGROUND: We queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2006 and 2011 using ICD-9-CM procedure code, 36.06 (bare metal stent) or 36.07 (drug eluting stents) for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Annual hospital volume was calculated using unique identification numbers and divided into quartiles for analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We built a hierarchical two level model adjusted for multiple confounding factors, with hospital ID incorporated as random effects in the model. About 665,804 procedures (weighted n = 3,277,884) were analyzed. Safety concerns arising in 2006 reduced utilization DES from 90% of all PCIs performed in 2006 to a nadir of 69% in 2008 followed by increase (76% of all stents in 2009) and plateau (75% in 2011). Significant between-hospital variation was noted in DES utilization irrespective of patient or hospital characteristics. Independent patient level predictors of DES were (OR, 95% CI, P-value) age (0.99, 0.98-0.99, <0.001), female(1.12, 1.09-1.15, <0.001), acute myocardial infarction(0.75, 0.71-0.79, <0.001), shock (0.53, 0.49-0.58, <0.001), Charlson Co-morbidity index (0.81,0.77-0.86, <0.001), private insurance/HMO (1.27, 1.20-1.34, <0.001), and elective admission (1.16, 1.05-1.29, <0.001). Highest quartile hospital (1.64, 1.25-2.16, <0.001) volume was associated with higher DES placement. CONCLUSION: There is significant between-hospital variation in DES utilization and a higher annual hospital volume is associated with higher utilization rate of DES. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/economía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
10.
J Interv Cardiol ; 29(5): 505-512, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27545515

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Septal ablation (SA) is a key modality for left ventricular outflow tract gradient reduction in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients with refractory symptoms. The primary objective of our study was to evaluate post-procedural mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), and cost of hospitalization following SA. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2005 and 2011 using the ICD9 procedure code of 37.34 for ablation of heart tissue. Only adult patients with HOCM (ICD-9-CM: 425.1) were included. Patients with any arrhythmia diagnosis or open surgical ablation procedure code were excluded. Hierarchical mixed effects models were generated in order to identify the independent multivariate predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 358 SAs were available for analysis. There was no reported mortality during the study period; permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 8.7%. Highest hospital volume tertile (OR, 95%CI, P- value) predicted significantly lower post-procedural complications (0.51, 0.26-0.98, P = 0.04). Univariate analysis of highest versus lowest tertile of hospital volume showed significant decrease in LOS (2.6 days vs. 3.8 days, P<0.01) and non-significant decrease hospitalization costs (16,800$ vs. 19,500$, P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: SA is a safe procedure and associated with low peri- procedural mortality rate. A higher burden of baseline comorbidities is associated with worse outcomes while higher annual hospital volume is associated with lower rate of post-procedural complications, length of stay, and cost of care following SA.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica , Ablación por Catéter , Tabiques Cardíacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Obstrucción del Flujo Ventricular Externo , Adulto , Anciano , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/diagnóstico , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/mortalidad , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/fisiopatología , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Femenino , Tabiques Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tabiques Cardíacos/cirugía , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Obstrucción del Flujo Ventricular Externo/etiología , Obstrucción del Flujo Ventricular Externo/cirugía
11.
J Endovasc Ther ; 23(1): 65-75, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26637836

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) utilization during lower limb endovascular interventions as regards postprocedural complications and amputation. METHODS: The study cohort was derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database between the years 2006 and 2011. Peripheral endovascular interventions were identified using appropriate ICD-9 procedure codes. Two-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The co-primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and amputation; the secondary outcome was postprocedural complications. Model results are given as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Hospitalization costs were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, among the 92,714 patients extracted from the database during the observation period, IVUS was used in 1299 (1.4%) patients. IVUS utilization during lower extremity peripheral vascular procedures was independently predictive of a lower rate of postprocedural complications (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.99, p=0.037) as well as lower amputation rates (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.77, p<0.001) without any significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis also revealed IVUS utilization to be predictive of a nonsignificant increase in hospitalization costs ($1333, 95% CI -$167 to +$2833, p=0.082). CONCLUSION: IVUS use during lower limb endovascular interventions is predictive of lower postprocedural complication and amputation rates with a nonsignificant increase in hospitalization costs.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/economía , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
12.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 18(4): 39, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26960424

RESUMEN

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an integral treatment modality for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) as well as chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD) not responsive to optimal medical therapy. This coupled with studies on the feasibility and safety of performing PCI in centers without on-site surgical backup led to widespread growth of PCI centers. However, this has been accompanied by a recent steep decline in the volume of PCIs at both the operator and hospital level, which raises concerns regarding minimal procedural volumes required to maintain necessary skills and favorable clinical outcomes. The 2011 ACC/AHA/SCAI competency statement required PCI be performed by operators with a minimal procedural volume of >75 PCIs annually at high-volume centers with >400 PCIs per year, a number which was relaxed in the 2013 ACC/AHA/SCAI update to >50 PCIs/operator/year in hospitals with >200 PCIs annually to coincide with reduction in national PCI volume. Recent data suggests that many hospitals do not meet these thresholds. We review data on the importance of volume as a vital quality metric at both an operator and hospital level in determining procedural outcomes following PCI.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
J Card Surg ; 31(10): 608-616, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27572827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since elective transcatheter aortic valve replacements (TAVRs) can be performed on the day of admission, i.e., Day 0, or on the next day of admission, i.e., Day 1, we sought to investigate if there is an advantage to either approach. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study, using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample database of 2012 and identified subjects undergoing endovascular (Transfemoral/Transaortic) TAVRs using the ICD-9-CM procedure code of 35.05. The cohort was divided based on the day of the TAVR performed, i.e., Day 0 or 1. The cost of the hospitalization and length of stay were the primary outcomes, with in-hospital mortality and procedural complications as the secondary outcomes. We identified a total of 843 TAVRs. Propensity matched models were created. The mean age of the study cohort was 82 years. RESULTS: In a propensity-matched dataset, TAVRs performed on Day 0 were associated with a lower cost ($51,126 ± 1184 vs $57,703 ± 1508, p < 0.0001) and length of stay (mean days, standard error: 5.87 ± 0.25 vs 7.20 ± 0.29, p < 0.001) compared to Day 1. In-hospital mortality plus complication rates were relatively similar with no difference between Days 0 and 1 (31.5% vs 34.1%, p = 0.47, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular TAVRs performed on the same day of admission are associated with lower hospitalization costs and length of stay, and similar mortality and complication rates compared to those performed on the next day of admission.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Admisión del Paciente , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/economía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Circulation ; 129(23): 2371-9, 2014 Jun 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24842943

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. The associated morbidity and mortality make AF a major public health burden. Hospitalizations account for the majority of the economic cost burden associated with AF. The main objective of this study is to examine the trends of AF-related hospitalizations in the United States and to compare patient characteristics, outcomes, and comorbid diagnoses. METHODS AND RESULTS: With the use of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2000 through 2010, we identified AF-related hospitalizations using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification code 427.31 as the principal discharge diagnosis. Overall AF hospitalizations increased by 23% from 2000 to 2010, particularly in patients ≥65 years of age. The most frequent coexisting conditions were hypertension (60.0%), diabetes mellitus (21.5%), and chronic pulmonary disease (20.0%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 1%. The mortality rate was highest in the group of patients ≥80 years of age (1.9%) and in the group of patients with concomitant heart failure (8.2%). In-hospital mortality rate decreased significantly from 1.2% in 2000 to 0.9% in 2010 (29.2% decrease; P<0.001). Although there was no significant change in mean length of stay, mean cost of AF hospitalization increased significantly from $6410 in 2001 to $8439 in 2010 (24.0% increase; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization rates for AF have increased exponentially among US adults from 2000 to 2010. The proportion of comorbid chronic diseases has also increased significantly. The last decade has witnessed an overall decline in hospital mortality; however, the hospitalization cost has significantly increased.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitalización/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Planificación en Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
15.
Circulation ; 130(16): 1392-406, 2014 Oct 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25189214

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The relationship between operator or institutional volume and outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cross-sectional study based on the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2005 to 2009. Subjects were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision, Clinical Modification procedure code, 36.06 and 36.07. Annual operator and institutional volumes were calculated using unique identification numbers and then divided into quartiles. Three-level hierarchical multivariate mixed models were created. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. A total of 457,498 PCIs were identified representing a total of 2,243,209 PCIs performed in the United States during the study period. In-hospital, all-cause mortality was 1.08%, and the overall complication rate was 7.10%. The primary and secondary outcomes of procedures performed by operators in 4(th) [annual procedural volume; primary and secondary outcomes] [>100; 0.59% and 5.51%], 3(rd) [45-100; 0.87% and 6.40%], and 2(nd) quartile [16-44; 1.15% and 7.75%] were significantly less (P<0.001) when compared with those by operators in the 1(st) quartile [≤15; 1.68% and 10.91%]. Spline analysis also showed significant operator and institutional volume outcome relationship. Similarly operators in the higher quartiles witnessed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and cost of hospitalization (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall in-hospital mortality after PCI was low. An increase in operator and institutional volume of PCI was found to be associated with a decrease in adverse outcomes, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 86(7): 1219-27, 2015 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26308961

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the utilization of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and its comparative effectiveness against systemic thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). BACKGROUND: Contemporary real world data regarding utilization and outcomes comparing systemic thrombolysis with CDT for PE is sparse. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2012 using the ICD-9-CM diagnosis code 415.11, 415.13, and 415.19 for acute PE. We used propensity score analysis to compare outcomes between systemic thrombolysis and CDT. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome was combined in-hospital mortality and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). RESULTS: Out of 110,731 patients hospitalized with PE, we identified 1,521 patients treated with thrombolysis, of which 1,169 patients received systemic thrombolysis and 352 patients received CDT. After propensity-matched comparison, primary and secondary outcomes were significantly lower in the CDT group compared to systemic thrombolysis (21.81% vs. 13.36%, OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36-0.85, P value = 0.007) and (22.89% vs. 13.36%, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.80, P value = 0.003), respectively. The median length of stay [7 days, interquartile range (IQR) (5-9 days) vs. 7 days, IQR (5-10 days), P = 0.17] was not significant between the two groups. The CDT group had higher cost of hospitalization [$17,218, IQR ($12,272-$23,906) vs. $23,799, IQR ($17,892-$35,338), P < 0.001]. Multivariate analysis identified increasing age, saddle PE, cardiopulmonary arrest, and Medicaid insurance as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: CDT was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and combined in-hospital mortality and ICH.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/efectos adversos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/mortalidad , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/tendencias , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracraneales/inducido químicamente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Puntaje de Propensión , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidad , Terapia Trombolítica/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Trombolítica/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
17.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 85(6): 1073-81, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25534392

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contemporary data regarding percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect/patent foramen ovale (ASD/PFO) are lacking. We evaluated the current trends in utilization of ASD/PFO closure in adults and investigated the effect of annual hospital volume on in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between the years 2001 and 2010 using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) procedure code for percutaneous closure of ASD/PFO with device. Hierarchical mixed effects models were generated to identify the independent multivariate predictors of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 7,107 percutaneous ASD/PFO closure procedures (weighted n = 34,992) were available for analysis. A 4.7-fold increase in the utilization of this procedure from 3/million in 2001 to 14/million adults in 2010 in US (P < 0.001) was noted. Overall, percutaneous ASD/PFO closure was associated with 0.5% mortality and 12% in-hospital complications. The utilization of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) increased 15 fold (P < 0.001) during the study period. The procedures performed at the high volume hospitals [2nd (14-37 procedures/year) and 3rd (>38 procedures/year) tertile] were associated with significant reduction in complications, length of stay and cost of hospitalization when compared to those performed at lowest volume centers (<13 procedures/year). Majority (70.5%) of the studied hospitals were found to be performing <10 procedures/year hence deviating from the ACC/AHA/SCAI clinical competency guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Low hospital volume is associated with an increased composite (mortality and procedural complications) adverse outcome following ASD/PFO closure. In the interest of patient safety, implementation of the current guidelines for minimum required annual hospital volume to improve clinical outcomes is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Foramen Oval Permeable/terapia , Defectos del Tabique Interatrial/terapia , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Foramen Oval Permeable/diagnóstico por imagen , Foramen Oval Permeable/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Defectos del Tabique Interatrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Defectos del Tabique Interatrial/economía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Seguridad del Paciente , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Estados Unidos
18.
J Interv Cardiol ; 28(6): 563-73, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26643003

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the utilization and outcomes in patients who had percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) performed with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) versus percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVADs) such as Impella and TandemHeart and identify a sub-group of patient population who may derive the most benefit from the use of PVADs over IABP. BACKGROUND: Despite the lack of clear benefit, the use of PVADs has increased substantially in the last decade when compared to IABP. METHODS: We performed a cross sectional study including using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Procedures performed with hemodynamic support were identified through appropriate ICD-9-CM codes. RESULTS: We identified 18,094 PCIs performed with hemodynamic support. IABP was the most commonly utilized hemodynamic support device (93%, n = 16, 803) whereas 6% (n = 1069) were performed with PVADs and 1% (n = 222) utilized both IABP and PVAD. Patients in the PVAD group were older in age and had greater burden of co-morbidities whereas IABP group had higher percentage of patients with cardiac arrest. On multivariable analysis, the use of PVAD was a significant predictor of reduced mortality (OR 0.55, 0.36-0.83, P = 0.004). This was particularly evident in sub-group of patients without acute MI or cardiogenic shock. The propensity score matched analysis also showed a significantly lower mortality (9.9% vs 15.1%; OR 0.62, 0.55-0.71, P < 0.001) rate associated with PVADs when compared to IABP. CONCLUSION: This largest and the most contemporary study on the use of hemodynamic support demonstrates significantly reduced mortality with PVADs when compared to IABP in patients undergoing PCI. The results are largely driven by the improved outcomes in non-AMI and non-cardiogenic shock patients.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar/estadística & datos numéricos , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
19.
J Interv Cardiol ; 28(5): 464-71, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26489974

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) is a complex procedure for patients with mitral regurgitation who cannot get surgery. However, there is a lack of data on how hospital volumes affect these outcomes. METHODS: We performed a cross sectional study based on Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample database of 2012 and identified subjects using the ICD-9-CM procedure code of 35.97, which was introduced in October 2010 for percutaneous mitral valve repair if present in the primary or secondary procedure field. Hospital volumes were divided into tertiles. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications. Length of stay and hospitalization cost were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 95 (weighted n = 475) TMVR procedures were identified. The mean age of the overall cohort was 70 years; 43.2% were female and 63.2% had a significant baseline burden of co-morbidities. The composite of in-hospital mortality and peri-procedural complications decreased with increasing TMVR hospital volume: 48.7% in the first tertile, 17.4% in the second tertile, and 9.1% in the third tertile. Additionally, we saw a decrease in the length of stay and a trend in decrease in the hospitalization cost. CONCLUSION: In hospitals performing TMVR, higher hospital volumes are associated with a reduction in a composite of in-hospital mortality and post-procedural complications, in addition to the shorter length of stay.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital , Hospitales , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales/clasificación , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/efectos adversos , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/economía , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/métodos , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/mortalidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados Unidos
20.
J Interv Cardiol ; 28(6): 503-13, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26642999

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Trial of Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy with PCI versus PCI alone in patients with STEMI (TOTAL trial) refuted the salutary effect of routine aspiration thrombectomy (AT) in PPCI for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVES: We performed an updated meta-analysis to assess clinical outcomes with AT prior to PPCI compared with conventional PPCI alone including the additional trial data. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical trials (n = 20) that randomized patients (n = 21,281) with STEMI between Routine AT (n = 10,619) and PPCI (n = 10,662) were pooled. There was no difference in all-cause mortality between the 2 groups (RR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.78-1.01, P = 0.08). Stratifying by follow up at 1-month (RR: 0.87, 95%CI: 0.69-1.10, P = 0.25), up to 6 months (RR: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.74-1.13, P = 0.39 and beyond 6 months (RR: 0.88, 95%CI: 0.74-1.05, P = 0.16) yielded similar results. There was a statistically significant increase risk of stoke rate in the AT arm (RR: 1.51, 95%CI: 1.01-2.25, P = 0.04). The 2 groups were similar with regards to target vessel revascularization (0.94, 95%CI: 0.83-1.06, P = 0.28) recurrent MI (RR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.80-1.16, P = 0.68, MACE events (RR: 0.91 95%CI: 0.81-1.02, P = 0.11), early (0.59, 95%CI: 0.23-1.50, P = 0.27) and late (RR: 0.91, 95%CI: 0.69-1.18, P = 0.47) stent thrombosis and net clinical benefit (RR 0.99, 95%CI: 0.91-1.07, P = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Routine AT prior to PPCI in STEMI is associated with higher risk of stroke. There is no statistical difference in clinical outcome parameters of mortality, major adverse cardiac events, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, and net clinical benefit between AT and PCI alone.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Trombectomía , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA