Next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a discussion on its implementation in the Brazilian clinical practice.

The objective of this review is to address the barriers limiting access to next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in Brazil and to propose its implementation in practice. A selected panel of lung cancer experts was provided with relevant prompts to address at a conference; a paper was then compiled on the topic. The authors propose specific and realistic recommendations for implementing access to ctDNA NGS. Further, the authors address all barriers and impediments mentioned within this review. There is a great need to increase ctDNA NGS for cancer care in Brazil. Adapting the current cancer testing framework is essential to expanding the use of this tool.

Patient-centered outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world perspective.

Aims: To assess non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient-centered outcomes in the real world. Methods: This is a prospective study of NSCLC patients treated at a private cancer care institution in Brazil between 2014 and 2019. Results: The report comprises 337 patients. Advanced stage was associated with higher symptom burden - fatigue (p = 0.03), pain (p < 0.001) and arm pain (p = 0.022) - and worse global, social and physical functioning (all p < 0.001). In the first 2 years, most factors evolved to either improvement or stability: cough (p = 0.02), pain (p = 0.002), global functioning (p < 0.001) and emotional functioning (p < 0.001). Staging (p < 0.001), fatigue (p = 0.001) and gender (p = 0.004) were independently associated with overall survival. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the feasibility of conducting real-world prospective analysis of patient-centered outcomes.

Lay abstract This study looked at patient-centered outcomes in lung cancer in a real-world setting. Standardized quality-of-life questionnaires were used to actively measure patients' perception of their functional well-being and health in a clinical setting. Three hundred thirty-seven patients were enrolled in a private cancer center in Brazil between 2014 and 2019. We demonstrated that patients diagnosed at advanced stages presented with more symptoms and lower capacity to perform daily activities. However, symptoms and functioning tended to improve during treatment. Our results show that it is possible to put patients at the heart of cancer care and use their experience to guide clinical approach.

Defining a standard set of patient-centred outcomes for lung cancer.

In lung cancer, outcome measurement has been mostly limited to survival. Proper assessment of the value of lung cancer treatments, and the performance of institutions delivering care, requires more comprehensive measurement of standardised outcomes.The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement convened an international, multidisciplinary working group of patient representatives, medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, palliative care specialists, registry experts and specialist nurses to review existing data and practices. Using a modified Delphi method, the group developed a consensus recommendation ("the set") on the outcomes most essential to track for patients with lung cancer, along with baseline demographic, clinical and tumour characteristics (case-mix variables) for risk adjustment.The set applies to patients diagnosed with nonsmall cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. Our working group recommends the collection of the following outcomes: survival, complications during or within 6 months of treatment and patient-reported domains of health-related quality of life including pain, fatigue, cough and dyspnoea. Case-mix variables were defined to improve interpretation of comparisons.We defined an international consensus recommendation of the most important outcomes for lung cancer patients, along with relevant case-mix variables, and are working to support adoption and reporting of these measures globally.

Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiation Followed or Not by Consolidation Chemotherapy: A Survival Analysis From a Brazilian Multicentric Cohort.

PURPOSE: Of newly diagnosed patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stage III accounts for 30%. Most patients are treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy, but the addition of consolidation chemotherapy (CC) is debatable. We examined the effect of CC in Brazilian patients with stage III NSCLC treated in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data for patients from five different Brazilian cancer institutions who had stage III NSCLC and who were treated with chemoradiation therapy followed or not by CC. Eligible patients were age 18 years or older and must have been treated with cisplatin-carboplatin plus etoposide, paclitaxel, or vinorelbine, concurrently with thoracic radiation therapy (RT). Patients treated with surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Associations between CC and clinical variables and demographics were evaluated by using Pearson's χ2 test. Survival curves were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable analysis used a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We collected data from 165 patients. Median age was 60 years. Most patients were male (69.1%), white (77.9%), current or former smokers (93.3%), and had stage IIIB disease (52.7%). Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology (47.9%). Weight loss of more than 5% was observed in 39.1% and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 was observed in 14.6%. The only variable associated with CC was T stage ( P = .022). We observed no statistically significant difference in OS between patients treated or not with CC ( P = .128). A total delivered RT dose ≥ 61 Gy was the only variable independently associated with improved survival ( P = .012). CONCLUSION: Brazilian patients with locally advanced NSCLC who were treated with standard treatment achieved OS similar to that reported in randomized trials. CC did not improve OS in patients with stage III NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiation therapy. An RT dose of less than 61 Gy had a negative effect on OS.

Padrões de tratamento, uso de recursos e custo do câncer de pulmão de não pequenas células avançado em instituições brasileiras privadas / Treatment patterns, resource use and cost-of-illness of advanced non-small lung cancer in Brazilian private institutions

Objetivo: No Brasil, dados clínicos e custos econômicos do câncer de pulmão de não pequenas células (CPNPC) são escassos. Portanto, conduzimos este estudo para coletar dados de mundo real sobre padrões de tratamento e uso de recursos para CPNPC avançado (CPNPCa) em pacientes em instituições privadas brasileiras. Métodos: Coletamos dados de prontuários de seis instituições privadas no Brasil. Os pacientes elegíveis tinham diagnóstico de CPNPC avançado ou recorrente (estágios IIIB e IV) entre janeiro de 2011 e julho de 2014, e haviam recebido pelo menos duas linhas de quimioterapia. Dados foram resumidos usando estatísticas descritivas e os custos foram estimados pela abordagem bottom-up. Resultados: Dos 430 pacientes selecionados, 152 foram elegíveis para coleta de dados. A idade mediana dos pacientes foi de 62 anos e 55,9% eram do sexo masculino. Entre os pacientes, 57,2% e 31,6% receberam três e quatro linhas de tratamento, respectivamente. Dezesseis e vinte regimes foram utilizados como tratamentos de primeira e segunda linha. Bevacizumabe carboplatina + paclitaxel (n = 32; 21,1%) foi o mais frequente na primeira linha, enquanto docetaxel isolado (n = 36; 23,7%) foi o regime mais comum de segunda linha. Hospitalizações e visitas ao pronto-socorro foram registradas em 52% e 25% dos pacientes, respectivamente. O custo total da coorte foi de R$ 47.692.195,1 (US$ 14.803.425,4). Conclusões: Os padrões de tratamento para pacientes com CPNPCa em instituições privadas brasileiras são heterogêneos. O alto uso e custos de recursos observados entre os pacientes da CPNPCa têm um impacto econômico significativo para o sistema de saúde privado brasileiro.

Objective: In Brazil, data on clinical and economic burden of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are scarce. Therefore, we conducted this study to gather real-world data on treatment patterns and resource use for advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) patients in Brazilian private institutions. Methods: We collected data from medical charts from six private institutions in Brazil. Eligible patients were diagnosed with advanced or recurrent NSCLC (stages IIIB and IV) between January 2011 and July 2014, and had received at least two lines of chemotherapy. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and costs estimated by bottom-up approach. Results: Out of 430 charts screened, 152 were eligible for data collection. Patients' median age was 62 years, 55.9% were male. Among patients, 57.2% and 31.6% had received three and four treatment lines, respectively. Sixteen and twenty regimens were used as first and second-line treatments, respectively. Bevacizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel (n = 32; 21.1%) was the most frequent first-line regimens, while docetaxel (n = 36; 23.7%) the most common second-line regimen. Hospitalizations and ER visits were recorded from 52% and 25% of the patients, respectively. Total cohort costs were R$ 47,692,195.1 (US$ 14,803,425.4). Conclusions: Treatment patterns for patients with aNSCLC in Brazilian private institutions are heterogeneous. The observed high resource use and costs among aNSCLC patients have a significant economic impact to the Brazilian private healthcare system.