Deutetrabenazine Provides Long-Term Benefit for Tardive Dyskinesia Regardless of Underlying Condition and Dopamine Receptor Antagonist Use: A Post Hoc Analysis of the 3-Year, Open-Label Extension Study.

BACKGROUND: Deutetrabenazine is approved for adults with tardive dyskinesia (TD). Data based on underlying psychiatric condition and baseline dopamine receptor antagonist (DRA) use are limited. METHODS: Patients with TD who completed parent studies ARM-TD or AIM-TD were eligible for the 3-year, open-label extension study (RIM-TD; NCT02198794). In RIM-TD, deutetrabenazine was titrated based on dyskinesia control and tolerability. In this post hoc analysis of RIM-TD, total motor Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by underlying condition and DRA use at parent study baseline. RESULTS: Of 343 patients enrolled in RIM-TD, 336 were included in the analysis by underlying condition, and 337 were included in the analysis by DRA use. One hundred eighty-nine of 205 (92%) patients with psychotic disorders (schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder) and 65 of 131 (50%) with mood and other disorders (depression/bipolar disorder/other) were receiving a DRA. Mean (SE) deutetrabenazine doses at week 145 were 40.4 (1.13), 38.5 (1.21), 39.9 (1.00), and 38.5 (1.48) mg/d for patients with psychotic disorders, those with mood and other disorders, and those receiving DRAs or not, respectively. Mean (SD) changes in total motor AIMS score from this study baseline to week 145 were -6.3 (4.53), -7.1 (4.92), -6.1 (4.42), and -7.5 (5.19). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (number of AEs/patient-years) of AEs were similar across groups: any (1.02, 1.71, 1.08, 1.97), serious (0.10, 0.12, 0.10, 0.12), and leading to discontinuation (0.07, 0.05, 0.06, 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term deutetrabenazine provided clinically meaningful improvements in TD-related movements, with a favorable benefit-risk profile, regardless of underlying condition or DRA use.

Numbers needed to treat or harm and likelihood of being helped versus harmed for fremanezumab in patients who had prior inadequate response to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications: A post hoc analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH) in a post hoc analysis of the phase 3b FOCUS trial. BACKGROUND: Fremanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), has demonstrated efficacy, tolerability, and safety in adults with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM), with documented previous inadequate response to two to four classes of migraine preventive medications. METHODS: In the 12-week double-blind period of the FOCUS study, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to quarterly fremanezumab, monthly fremanezumab, or matched monthly placebo. NNT was based on responder analysis, defined as ≥50% reduction in monthly average number of migraine days at 12 weeks. NNH was based on discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Among patients with CM (n = 509), response rates and discontinuation rates were 27% (45/169) and 0 for quarterly fremanezumab, 29% (50/173) and 2% (3/173) for monthly fremanezumab, and 8% (13/167) and <1% (1/167) for placebo, respectively. These results translated to NNTs of 5.3 and 4.7, NNHs of 1000 and 88, and LHHs of 188 and 19 for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab, respectively. Among patients with EM (n = 328), response rates were 47% (50/107) for quarterly fremanezumab, 43% (47/110) for monthly fremanezumab, and 10% (11/111) for placebo. Discontinuation rates were <1% (n = 1) in all three groups. These results translated to NNTs of 2.7 and 3.0, NNHs of 1000 and 1000, and LHHs of 368 and 328 for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The NNT, NNH, and LHH for quarterly and monthly fremanezumab compare favorably with those for traditional oral preventive medications, including topiramate, valproate, and propranolol.

Safety and tolerability of fremanezumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine: a pooled analysis of phase 3 studies.

BACKGROUND: Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide, has demonstrated efficacy for preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine. Since calcitonin gene-related peptide is expressed within the cardio- and cerebrovascular system and may have cardioprotective effects, it is critical to understand the cardio- and cerebrovascular safety of fremanezumab. METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3, 12-week trials in which patients with episodic migraine or chronic migraine received quarterly fremanezumab, monthly fremanezumab, or placebo. Incidences of overall and serious adverse events were analyzed. Cardio- and cerebrovascular adverse events (CVAEs) were analyzed in subgroups stratified by cardio- and cerebrovascular medical history, cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs), and use of cardio- and cerebrovascular medications or triptans. RESULTS: Two thousand, eight hundred and forty-two patients were included in the study. Overall (58-65%) and serious adverse events (<1-2%) occurred in similar proportions across fremanezumab and placebo groups. CVAEs were infrequent, regardless of cardio- and cerebrovascular medical history (2-6%). CVAEs occurred in low, similar proportions of patients with CVRFs and those using cardio- and cerebrovascular medications or triptans. No cardio- and cerebrovascular signals were identified. CONCLUSION: Fremanezumab demonstrated a favorable overall and cardio- and cerebrovascular safety profile in more than 2800 patients with episodic migraine or chronic migraine, regardless of cardio- and cerebrovascular medical history, CVRFs, or medication use.Trial Registrations: NCT02629861 (HALO EM, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02629861), NCT02621931 (HALO CM, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02621931), NCT03308968 (FOCUS, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/ show/NCT03308968).

Efficacy and quality-of-life improvements with fremanezumab treatment in patients with difficult-to-treat migraine with associated neurological dysfunction.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) that selectively targets calcitonin-gene-related peptide, has demonstrated efficacy as a preventive treatment for adults with episodic migraine or chronic migraine and inadequate response to two to four prior preventive treatment classes in the phase 3b FOCUS study. In this post hoc analysis, efficacy and effects on quality-of-life outcomes for fremanezumab were evaluated in subgroups of patients with and without aura or similar neurological symptoms, here referred to as migraine with or without associated neurological dysfunction. METHODS: In the FOCUS study, 838 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to quarterly fremanezumab, monthly fremanezumab or matched placebo for 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. For this post hoc analysis, subgroups of patients with migraine with and without associated neurological dysfunction at baseline were identified based on patient response to questions about symptoms. RESULTS: In patients with migraine with associated neurological dysfunction at baseline, fremanezumab significantly reduced monthly average days with neurological symptoms (quarterly, -1.7 days; monthly, -1.8 days) compared to placebo (-0.5 days; both p ≤ 0.01). In comparison with placebo, both dosing regimens of fremanezumab yielded greater reductions in monthly migraine days over 12 weeks (p < 0.0001) and improvements in Headache Impact Test 6 and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life scores over the last 4 weeks (p < 0.05), regardless of neurological dysfunction at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Fremanezumab reduced days with neurological symptoms, effectively prevented migraine, and improved quality of life in patients with migraine with associated neurological dysfunction, including those with previous inadequate response to two to four migraine preventive medication classes.

Impact of fremanezumab on disability outcomes in patients with episodic and chronic migraine: a pooled analysis of phase 3 studies.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is the second leading cause of disability worldwide. Although many preventive treatments reduce migraine frequency and severity, it is unclear whether these treatments reduce migraine-related disability in a clinically meaningful way. This pooled analysis evaluated the ability of fremanezumab to reduce migraine-related disability, based on responses and shifts in severity in patient-reported disability outcomes. METHODS: This pooled analysis included 3 double-blind phase 3 trials (HALO EM, HALO CM, FOCUS) in which patients with episodic or chronic migraine were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to quarterly or monthly fremanezumab or matched placebo for 12 weeks. Migraine-related disability was assessed using the 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaires. A clinically meaningful improvement in disability was defined per American Headache Society guidelines: for HIT-6, a ≥ 5-point reduction; for MIDAS, a ≥ 5-point reduction when baseline score was 11 to 20 or ≥ 30% reduction when baseline score was > 20. Proportions of patients who demonstrated shifts in severity for each outcome were also evaluated. RESULTS: For patients with baseline MIDAS scores of 11 to 20 (n = 234), significantly higher proportions achieved 5-point reductions from baseline in MIDAS scores with fremanezumab (quarterly, 71%; monthly, 70%) compared with placebo (49%; both P ≤ 0.01). For patients with baseline MIDAS scores of > 20 (n = 1266), proportions achieving ≥30% reduction from baseline in MIDAS scores were also significantly higher with fremanezumab (quarterly, 69%; monthly, 79%) compared with placebo (58%; both P < 0.001). For HIT-6 scores, proportions of patients achieving 5-point reductions from baseline were significantly higher with fremanezumab (quarterly, 53%; monthly, 55%) compared with placebo (39%; both P < 0.0001). Proportions of patients with shifts of 1 to 3 grades down in MIDAS or HIT-6 disability severity were significantly greater with quarterly and monthly fremanezumab compared with placebo (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Fremanezumab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in disability severity in this pooled analysis. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: HALO CM, NCT02621931 ; HALO EM, NCT02629861 ; FOCUS, NCT03308968 .

Improvements in quality of life and work productivity with up to 6 months of fremanezumab treatment in patients with episodic and chronic migraine and documented inadequate response to 2 to 4 classes of migraine-preventive medications in the phase 3b FOCUS study.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is associated with depression as well as negative impact on quality of life and work productivity. Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa), selectively targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide and has proven efficacy for the preventive treatment of migraine. OBJECTIVE: In this open-label extension (OLE) of the phase 3b FOCUS study, we assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) over time. METHODS: Patients with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) completing the 12-week, double-blind (DB) period of the FOCUS trial entered the 12-week OLE and received three monthly doses of fremanezumab (225 mg). PROs included the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQoL) questionnaire (role function-restrictive [RFR], role function-preventive [RFP], and emotional function [EF] domains), EuroQol-5-Dimension-5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) assessment, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire, and 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). RESULTS: A total of 838 patients were randomized in the DB period, 807 entered the OLE at 3 months, and 772 were still enrolled at 6 months. At 6 months, patients in the quarterly fremanezumab, monthly fremanezumab, and placebo DB randomization groups, respectively, reported improvements in RFR (mean [standard deviation] change from baseline: 24.6 [21.9]; 22.9 [21.3]; 20.8 [26.5]), RFP (19.6 [20.0]; 18.3 [19.7]; 16.0 [19.9]), and EF (22.5 [24.2]; 19.1 [23.6]; 17.2 [24.7]) domains of the MSQoL questionnaire, the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (8.0 [19.6]; 7.3 [21.1]; 6.6 [21.0]), all four domains of the WPAI questionnaire, and the PHQ-9 (-2.4 [5.3]; -1.6 [5.5]; -2.0 [4.9]); 77.1% (209/271), 75.4% (205/272), and 68.8% (181/263) of patients were identified as PGIC responders. CONCLUSION: Among patients with EM or CM and prior inadequate response to multiple migraine-preventive medication classes, progressive improvements in MSQoL, depression, and work productivity were achieved during 6 months of fremanezumab treatment.

Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine with documented inadequate response to 2 to 4 classes of migraine preventive medications over 6 months of treatment in the phase 3b FOCUS study.

BACKGROUND: Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) selectively targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide and has proven efficacy for the preventive treatment of migraine. In this study, we evaluated the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of monthly and quarterly fremanezumab. METHODS: Episodic migraine and chronic migraine patients completing the 12-week double-blind period of the FOCUS trial entered the 12-week open-label extension and received 3 monthly doses of fremanezumab (225 mg). Changes from baseline in monthly migraine days, monthly headache days of at least moderate severity, days of acute headache medication use, days with photophobia/phonophobia, days with nausea or vomiting, disability scores, and proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% or ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 807 patients who completed the 12-week double-blind treatment period and entered the open-label extension, 772 patients completed the study. In the placebo, quarterly fremanezumab, and monthly fremanezumab dosing regimens, respectively, patients had fewer average monthly migraine days (mean [standard deviation] change from baseline: - 4.7 [5.4]; - 5.1 [4.7]; - 5.5 [5.0]), monthly headache days of at least moderate severity (- 4.5 [5.0]; - 4.8 [4.5]; - 5.2 [4.9]), days per month of acute headache medication use (- 4.3 [5.2]; - 4.9 [4.6]; - 4.8 [4.9]), days with photophobia/phonophobia (- 3.1 [5.3]; - 3.4 [5.3]; - 4.0 [5.2]), and days with nausea or vomiting (- 2.3 [4.6]; - 3.1 [4.5]; - 3.0 [4.4]). During the 12-week open-label extension, 38%, 45%, and 46% of patients, respectively, achieved a ≥50% reduction and 16%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, achieved a ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days. Disability scores were substantially improved in all 3 treatment groups. There were low rates of adverse events leading to discontinuation (<1%). CONCLUSION: Fremanezumab demonstrated sustained efficacy up to 6 months and was well tolerated in patients with episodic migraine or chronic migraine and documented inadequate response to multiple migraine preventive medication classes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03308968 (FOCUS).

Impact of age and sex on the efficacy of fremanezumab in patients with difficult-to-treat migraine: results of the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3b FOCUS study.

BACKGROUND: Migraine prevalence is age and sex dependent, predominating in women in early and middle adulthood; however, migraine also represents a substantial burden for men and adults of all ages. Thus, understanding this burden and the efficacy of migraine preventive medications in both sexes and across age groups is critical. The randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3b FOCUS study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2∆a) that selectively targets calcitonin gene-related peptide as a migraine preventive treatment for individuals with migraine and prior inadequate response to 2 to 4 migraine preventive medication classes. Here, we assessed the efficacy of fremanezumab in participants from FOCUS subgrouped by age (18-45 years and > 45 years) and sex. METHODS: In the FOCUS study, eligible participants were randomized (1:1:1) to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with quarterly fremanezumab, monthly fremanezumab, or matched monthly placebo. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated changes from baseline in monthly migraine days (primary endpoint of FOCUS) and other secondary and exploratory efficacy outcomes in prespecified age (18-45 and > 45 years) and sex subgroups. RESULTS: The modified intention-to-treat population (received ≥ 1 dose of study drug and had ≥ 10 days of postbaseline efficacy assessments for the primary endpoint) totaled 837 participants (18-45 years, n = 373; > 45 years, n = 464; male, n = 138; female, n = 699). Consistent reductions in monthly average number of migraine days during 12 weeks were observed, regardless of age (18-45 years: quarterly fremanezumab, - 4.1 days; monthly fremanezumab, - 4.7 days; placebo, - 0.9 days; P < 0.001; > 45 years: quarterly fremanezumab, - 3.6 days; monthly fremanezumab, - 3.7 days; placebo, - 0.3 days; P < 0.001) and sex (male: quarterly fremanezumab, - 4.1 days; monthly fremanezumab, - 4.6 days; placebo, - 0.3 days; P < 0.001; female: quarterly fremanezumab, - 3.6 days; monthly fremanezumab, - 3.9 days; placebo, - 0.6 days; P < 0.001). Fremanezumab also reduced monthly headache days of at least moderate severity, monthly days of acute medication use, and improved Migraine Disability Assessment scores across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the efficacy of fremanezumab in patients with difficult-to-treat migraine for reducing migraine and headache days, acute medication use, and disability, regardless of age or sex. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03308968 (FOCUS), registered October 13, 2017.

Pridopidine activates neuroprotective pathways impaired in Huntington Disease.

Pridopidine has demonstrated improvement in Huntington Disease (HD) motor symptoms as measured by secondary endpoints in clinical trials. Originally described as a dopamine stabilizer, this mechanism is insufficient to explain the clinical and preclinical effects of pridopidine. This study therefore explored pridopidine's potential mechanisms of action. The effect of pridopidine versus sham treatment on genome-wide expression profiling in the rat striatum was analysed and compared to the pathological expression profile in Q175 knock-in (Q175 KI) vs Q25 WT mouse models. A broad, unbiased pathway analysis was conducted, followed by testing the enrichment of relevant pathways. Pridopidine upregulated the BDNF pathway (P = 1.73E-10), and its effect on BDNF secretion was sigma 1 receptor (S1R) dependent. Many of the same genes were independently found to be downregulated in Q175 KI mice compared to WT (5.2e-7 < P < 0.04). In addition, pridopidine treatment upregulated the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) response, D1R-associated genes and the AKT/PI3K pathway (P = 1E-10, P = 0.001, P = 0.004, respectively). Pridopidine upregulates expression of BDNF, D1R, GR and AKT/PI3K pathways, known to promote neuronal plasticity and survival, as well as reported to demonstrate therapeutic benefit in HD animal models. Activation of S1R, necessary for its effect on the BDNF pathway, represents a core component of the mode of action of pridopidine. Since the newly identified pathways are downregulated in neurodegenerative diseases, including HD, these findings suggest that pridopidine may exert neuroprotective effects beyond its role in alleviating some symptoms of HD.

A Phase III Study of Balugrastim Versus Pegfilgrastim in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy With Doxorubicin and Docetaxel.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-per-cycle balugrastim versus pegfilgrastim for neutrophil support in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: Breast cancer patients (n = 256) were randomized to 40 or 50 mg of subcutaneous balugrastim or 6 mg of pegfilgrastim ≈24 hours after chemotherapy (60 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel, every 21 days for up to 4 cycles). The primary efficacy parameter was the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in cycle 1. Secondary parameters included DSN (cycles 2-4), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir, febrile neutropenia rates, and time to ANC recovery (cycles 1-4). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS: Mean cycle 1 DSN was 1.0 day with 40 mg of balugrastim, 1.3 with 50 mg of balugrastim, and 1.2 with pegfilgrastim (upper limit of 95% confidence intervals for between-group DSN differences was <1.0 day for both balugrastim doses versus pegfilgrastim). Between-group efficacy parameters were comparable except for time to ANC recovery in cycle 1 (40 mg of balugrastim, 2.0 days; 50 mg of balugrastim, 2.1; pegfilgrastim, 2.6). Median terminal elimination half-life was ≈37 hours for 40 mg of balugrastim, ≈36 for 50 mg of balugrastim, and ≈45 for pegfilgrastim. Antibody response to balugrastim was low and transient, with no neutralizing effect. CONCLUSION: Once-per-cycle balugrastim is not inferior to pegfilgrastim in reducing cycle 1 DSN in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy; both drugs have comparable safety profiles. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This paper provides efficacy and safety data for a new, once-per-cycle granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, balugrastim, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In this phase III trial, balugrastim was shown to be not inferior to pegfilgrastim in the duration of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 of doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy, and the safety profiles of the two agents were similar. Once-per-cycle balugrastim is a safe and effective alternative to pegfilgrastim for hematopoietic support in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy associated with a greater than 20% risk of developing febrile neutropenia.

Safety of Deutetrabenazine for the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia and Chorea Associated with Huntington Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Deutetrabenazine is a vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitor used to treat tardive dyskinesia (TD) and chorea associated with Huntington disease (HD). To enhance detection of safety signals across individual trials, integrated safety analyses of deutetrabenazine in TD and HD chorea were conducted. METHODS: For TD, safety data were integrated from two 12-week pivotal studies (ARM-TD and AIM-TD) and through week 15 of the open-label extension (OLE) study (RIM-TD). Data were analyzed by deutetrabenazine treatment group and placebo. For HD, safety data were integrated from the 12-week pivotal study (First-HD) and through week 15 of the OLE study (ARC-HD) for patients previously receiving placebo. Integrated deutetrabenazine data were compared with placebo from the pivotal study. RESULTS: For TD, deutetrabenazine (n = 384) was generally well tolerated compared with placebo (n = 130). Adverse event (AE) incidence was numerically higher in the response-driven deutetrabenazine vs the fixed-dose deutetrabenazine and placebo groups, respectively (any AE, 59.5% vs 44.4-50.0% and 53.8%; treatment-related AE, 38.1% vs 18.1-25.0% and 30.8%). Serious AEs were reported for 2.8-8.3% of patients in the deutetrabenazine groups and 6.9% in the placebo group. Common AEs (≥ 4%) included headache, somnolence, nausea, anxiety, fatigue, dry mouth, and diarrhea. AE incidence was higher during the titration vs maintenance periods. For HD, AE incidence was numerically higher with deutetrabenazine (n = 84) vs placebo (n = 45; any AE, 64.3% vs 60.0%; treatment-related AE, 38.1% vs 26.7%); serious AEs were reported for similar proportions for the deutetrabenazine and placebo groups, 2.4% and 2.2%, respectively. Common AEs (≥ 4%) included irritability, fall, depression, dry mouth, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Data from an integrated analysis of studies in TD and an integrated analysis of studies of chorea in HD showed that deutetrabenazine has a favorable safety profile and is well tolerated across indications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT02291861, NCT02195700, NCT01795859, NCT02198794, NCT01897896.

Unintended movements are often the first sign of Huntington disease. This type of unintended movement is called chorea in Huntington disease. Tardive dyskinesia causes unintended body movements. Deutetrabenazine is a medicine used to treat both types of movements. This report summarizes deutetrabenazine safety across five clinical studies. Safety was assessed via adverse events (side effects). Adverse events were compared between deutetrabenazine and inactive treatment (placebo). Serious adverse events were also compared. Serious adverse events cause substantial impairment or disruption. In tardive dyskinesia and chorea in Huntington disease studies, most patients kept taking deutetrabenazine. Adverse events were not a common reason to stop treatment. For tardive dyskinesia, adverse event rates were similar between deutetrabenazine (≤ 60%) and placebo (54%). Serious adverse event rates were also similar for deutetrabenazine (≤ 8%) and placebo (7%). Adverse events tended to be reported earlier in treatment. Common adverse events were headache, sleepiness, nausea, anxiety, fatigue, dry mouth, and diarrhea. For chorea in Huntington disease, adverse event rates were similar for deutetrabenazine (64%) and placebo (60%). Serious adverse event rates were also similar for deutetrabenazine (2%) and placebo (2%). Irritability, fall, depression, dry mouth, and fatigue were common adverse events. Adverse events were similar between deutetrabenazine and placebo in both conditions. Deutetrabenazine was well tolerated for patients with either tardive dyskinesia or chorea in Huntington disease.

Fremanezumab for Episodic Migraine Prevention in Japanese Patients: Subgroup Analysis from Two International Trials.

Purpose: The monoclonal antibody fremanezumab has been shown effective and well tolerated in numerous Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials. This subgroup analysis of the international HALO episodic migraine (EM; [NCT02629861]) trial and a similarly designed phase 2b/3 trial in Japanese and Korean patients (NCT03303092) sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in Japanese patients with EM. Patients and Methods: In both trials, eligible patients were randomly assigned at baseline to receive subcutaneous monthly fremanezumab, quarterly fremanezumab, or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the monthly (28-day) average number of migraine days during the 12-week period after the first dose of fremanezumab or placebo. Secondary endpoints assessed other aspects of efficacy, including disability and medication use. Results: A total of 301 patients in the Japanese and Korean phase 2b/3 trial and 75 patients in the HALO EM trial were Japanese with baseline and treatment characteristics similar between treatment groups. According to ANCOVA analysis of the primary endpoint, both fremanezumab quarterly and monthly led to greater reductions in the monthly (28-day) average number of migraine days than placebo. This was supported by MMRM analysis of the primary endpoint over the initial 4 weeks, highlighting the rapid onset of action of fremanezumab. Results of secondary endpoint analysis supported the primary endpoint analyses. Fremanezumab was well tolerated with no new safety signals seen in this population of Japanese patients. Conclusion: Fremanezumab appears to be an effective and well-tolerated preventive medication for Japanese patients with EM.

Fremanezumab for Chronic Migraine Prevention in Japanese Patients: Subgroup Analysis from Two International Trials.

Purpose: Fremanezumab monoclonal antibody therapy has demonstrated efficacy for chronic migraine (CM) with rapid onset and good tolerability. This subgroup analysis of two clinical trials (Japanese and Korean CM Phase 2b/3 [NCT03303079] and HALO CM Phase 3 [NCT02621931]) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in Japanese patients. Patients and Methods: Both trials randomly assigned eligible patients at baseline (1:1:1 ratio) to subcutaneous monthly fremanezumab, quarterly fremanezumab, or placebo at 4-week intervals. The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the monthly (28-day) average number of headache days of at least moderate severity during the 12-week period after the first dose of study medication (analyzed by ANCOVA over 12 weeks and MMRM over initial 4 weeks). Secondary endpoints examined other aspects of efficacy, including medication use and disability. Results: A total of 479 and 109 patients were Japanese in the Japanese and Korean CM Phase 2b/3 and HALO CM trials, respectively. Baseline and treatment characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups for both trials. Results of subgroup analyses for the primary endpoint according to ANCOVA demonstrated the superiority of fremanezumab over placebo in Japanese patients (quarterly fremanezumab, p=0.0005; monthly fremanezumab, p=0.0002 in both trials). Results using the MMRM analysis confirmed the rapid onset of action in this population. Results of the secondary endpoints further supported the efficacy of fremanezumab in Japanese patients. Fremanezumab was well tolerated with nasopharyngitis and injection-site reactions representing the most common adverse events in all treatment groups. Conclusion: Despite the limitations of subgroup analyses, these consistent results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of fremanezumab in Japanese patients with CM.

Comment on: Gao B, Lu Q, Wan R, Wang Z, Yang Y, Chen Z, Wang Z. "Monthly versus quarterly fremanezumab for the prevention of migraine: a systemic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials". Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;394(4):819-828. Epublished November 2020.

Recently, Gao et al. published an article titled "Monthly versus quarterly fremanezumab for the prevention of migraine: a systemic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials" which concluded that monthly administration of fremanezumab led to significant reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) when compared to quarterly fremanezumab. We have noted a critical flaw in Gao et al. meta-analysis wherein the authors have mistakenly utilized standard error values in place of standard deviation values in performing their pooled analyses. This error directly impacts the study results and conclusions. In this brief communication, we present revised analysis using correct methods. Using the correct SD values, our pooled analysis showed no significant difference in mean change from baseline in MMD between the two fremanezumab dosing regimens (P = 0.17). Furthermore, in the corrected subgroup analyses by type of migraine, there were no significant differences in mean change from baseline in MMD between monthly fremanezumab and quarterly fremanezumab (chronic migraine, P = 0.50; episodic migraine, P = 0.69). Overall, results from our corrected meta-analyses show that there is no significant difference in migraine prevention efficacy between monthly and quarterly fremanezumab dosing.

Evaluation of a Biologic Formulation Using Customized Design of Experiment and Novel Multidimensional Robustness Diagrams.

Formulation development includes selection of appropriate excipients to stabilize the active pharmaceutical ingredient throughout its recommended shelf life, against potential excursions in its life cycle and sometimes to aid in the delivery of therapeutics into the patient. Identity and quantity of every ingredient in a therapeutic formulation are critical to achieve their intended purpose. Deviations from a target composition can result in manufacturing, safety, and efficacy challenges. It is mandatory to establish robustness of a formulation for the expected changes in its composition arising from the qualified "process variability" of the impacting process steps during manufacture. The approach for carrying out a robustness study evolved through improved understanding of a therapeutic stability and exploration of new tools, including the quality by design elements strongly recommended by regulatory agencies. An approach is presented here to study formulation robustness in multidimensional space using a customized experimental design and novel multidimensional diagrams, which present a unique way of identifying robustness limits. The concept is universally applicable to any multivariate analysis and such diagrams would be useful to comprehend the outcome on all variables at a glance. Interpretation of these diagrams is discussed, some of which are applicable in general to any statistical design of experiment.

Immunogenicity assessment of tbo-filgrastim in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

AIM: This integrated analysis examined the immunogenicity of tbo-filgrastim and its potential clinical impact in three Phase III randomized studies in patients with breast cancer, lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving chemotherapy. RESULTS: Treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies (ADA) occurred in 3/213 (1.4%) breast cancer patients, 2/160 (1.3%) lung cancer patients and 1/63 (1.6%) patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. None of the treatment-emergent ADA showed cross-reactivity toward native granulocyte-colony stimulating factors or exhibited neutralizing activity against tbo-filgrastim. Among patients with treatment-emergent ADA, there was no treatment-related hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis and no evidence of loss of clinical efficacy. CONCLUSION: Tbo-filgrastim has demonstrated low immunogenicity in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and ADA response does not impact safety and efficacy in the patients.

An integrated functional genomics screening program reveals a role for BMP-9 in glucose homeostasis.

A coordinated functional genomics program was implemented to identify secreted polypeptides with therapeutic applications in the treatment of diabetes. Secreted factors were predicted from a diverse expressed-sequence tags (EST) database, representing >1,000 cDNA libraries, using a combination of bioinformatic algorithms. Subsequently, approximately 8,000 human proteins were screened in high-throughput cell-based assays designed to monitor key physiological transitions known to be centrally involved in the physiology of type 2 diabetes. Bone morphogenetic protein-9 (BMP-9) gave a positive response in two independent assays: reducing phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) expression in hepatocytes and activating Akt kinase in differentiated myotubes. Purified recombinant BMP-9 potently inhibited hepatic glucose production and activated expression of key enzymes of lipid metabolism. In freely fed diabetic mice, a single subcutaneous injection of BMP-9 reduced glycemia to near-normal levels, with maximal reduction observed 30 hours after treatment. BMP-9 represents the first hepatic factor shown to regulate blood glucose concentration. Using a combination of bioinformatic and high-throughput functional analyses, we have identified a factor that may be exploited for the treatment of diabetes.

First-in-human, phase I/IIa dose-escalation and safety study of balugrastim in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety of balugrastim, a recombinant human serum albumin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), administered over a range of therapeutic doses in women with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin plus docetaxel chemotherapy. METHODS: The phase I, sequential dose-escalation first segment compared subcutaneous balugrastim 50, 150, 300, and 450 µg/kg during chemotherapy cycles 0-2. The randomized (2:2:1), open-label, phase IIa second segment compared balugrastim 300 or 450 µg/kg with pegfilgrastim 6 mg during chemotherapy cycles 1 and 2. RESULTS: In the phase I segment, balugrastim was escalated to 450 µg/kg in 13 patients without dose-limiting toxicity. Three (9.7 %) of the 31 adverse events (AEs) reported in nine patients were grade 3 (agranulocytosis, vomiting, hypertension); none was grade 4. In the open-label phase IIa segment (N = 51), the majority of the 64 AEs reported in 31 (75.6 %) balugrastim-treated patients were grade 1 (59.4 %), with 39.1 % grade 2, 1.6 % grade 3 (one AE of vomiting), and none grade 4. Of the 16 AEs reported in seven (70.0 %) pegfilgrastim-treated patients, 87.5 % were grade 1, 6.3 % were grade 2, 6.3 % were grade 3 (one AE of thrombocytopenia), and none were grade 4. Overall, there were six bone pain AEs reported, one in the balugrastim 300 µg/kg group and five in the balugrastim 450 µg/kg group. No AEs in either study necessitated treatment interruption/discontinuation. The incidence and duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia were similar between balugrastim- and pegfilgrastim-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Balugrastim was well tolerated in this small population of breast cancer patients.

Efficacy and safety of balugrastim compared with pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) reduce the incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and febrile neutropenia when given as adjunct therapy to patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Balugrastim is a long-acting G-CSF composed of a genetic fusion between recombinant human serum albumin and G-CSF. We compared the efficacy and safety of balugrastim and pegfilgrastim, a long-acting pegylated recombinant G-CSF, in patients with breast cancer who were scheduled to receive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized phase III trial, patients with ≥ 1.5 × 10(9) neutrophils/L were randomly assigned to subcutaneous injections of balugrastim 40 mg (n = 153) or pegfilgrastim 6 mg (n = 151). The primary efficacy end point was the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) (days with an absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 0.5 × 10(9) cells/L) during cycle 1. Efficacy analyses were performed in the per-protocol (PP) population. In a separate open-label single-arm study, newly recruited patients (n = 77) received balugrastim 40 mg and were included in the safety analysis. RESULTS: The mean DSN in cycle 1 was 1.1 days in the balugrastim group and 1.0 days in the pegfilgrastim group (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.13-0.37). Two and 4 patients, respectively, had febrile neutropenia during cycle 1. Twenty percent of patients in the balugrastim group and 19% in the pegfilgrastim group had adverse events (AEs) considered to be related to study medication; 3.9% and 4.7% of patients, respectively, experienced serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the comparable safety and efficacy profile of balugrastim and pegfilgrastim and the noninferiority of balugrastim for reduction in DSN. There were no unexpected safety events.