Safety and efficacy of Lucilia cuprina maggots on treating an induced infected wound in Wistar rats.

Infection is one of the main complications that hinder wound healing. Currently, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, such as Methicilin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), are a concern worldwide for both humans and animals. Maggot therapy is re-emerging as an alternative to intractable wounds and may be an option to the traditional antibiotic treatment. Although the species of choice is Lucilia sericata, reports of clinical use have led us to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using Lucilia cuprina larvae on induced infected wounds in Wistar rats. In short, 32 male Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups: Group I - saline solution treated; Group II - antibiotic-treated; Group III - treated with larval debridement, and Group IV - without wound and treatment. Skin wounds were induced in groups I, II and III. All treatments were performed once and held for 48 h. Clinical, microbiological, histopathological, hematological, and biochemical analyses were done. Significant wound area contraction was found (>95%) in group III on day 9 compared to day 15 in group II. Complete elimination (0.0 ± 0.0 CFU/mL) of bioburden was achieved after the second treatment (day 6) in both the II and III groups, compared to an increase in Group I (6.51 ± 0.37 CFU/mL). A cleaner wound was also observed in the histopathological evaluation of group III, with adequate collagen formation and re-epithelialization on day 15. Furthermore, larvae increased blood platelet levels after the first treatment. L. cuprina larvae have proven safe and effective in accelerating wound treatment and eliminating MRSA.

Macroscopic Distribution, Histopathology and Viral Antigen Expression in Dogs with Canine Distemper Virus-induced Hyperkeratosis in Nasodigital and Other Regions.

Cutaneous hyperkeratosis is one of the many clinicopathological manifestations of canine distemper and is characterized by thickening and hardening of the skin, predominantly in nasodigital areas. Although this lesion may rarely affect other regions, this has been poorly characterized. Twelve dogs with canine distemper and cutaneous hyperkeratosis, necropsied at an anatomical pathology service, were investigated. Twenty-two cutaneous hyperkeratotic foci were observed on footpads (11/22), nasal planum (3/22), haired skin on the snout (2/22), periocular region (2/22), ventral abdomen (2/22), scrotum (1/22) and vulva (1/22). The dogs had one (5/12), two (4/12) or three (3/12) regions concomitantly affected. Orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis was a predominant histopathological feature in 17 dogs, occasionally accompanied by other lesions, including inclusion bodies (14/17), epidermal hyperplasia (9/17) and keratinocyte hydropic degeneration (6/17). Canine distemper virus antigen was expressed in at least one skin lesion in 10 dogs. Fourteen (14/17) hyperkeratotic foci were immunopositive while three (3/17) were immunonegative. Viral antigen expression was most common in the sweat glands (13/17), epidermis (11/17) and vascular endothelial cells or pericytes (8/17). Histological findings and antigen detection were similar among nasodigital and other regions. We emphasize the importance of clinicopathological recognition of these lesions for the initial suspicion of canine distemper, thereby facilitating early treatment.