Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol ; 42(3): 352-361, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35045730

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treating known risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) has substantially reduced CAD morbidity and mortality. However, a significant burden of CAD remains unexplained. Immunoglobulin E sensitization to mammalian oligosaccharide galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) was recently associated with CAD in a small observational study. We sought to confirm that α-Gal sensitization is associated with CAD burden, in particular noncalcified plaque. Additionally, we sort to assess whether that α-Gal sensitization is associated with ST-segment-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in the BioHEART cohort study. We measured α-Gal specific-immunoglobulin E antibodies in serum of 1056 patients referred for CT coronary angiography for suspected CAD and 100 selected patients presenting with STEMI, enriched for patients without standard modifiable risk factors. CT coronary angiograms were assessed using coronary artery calcium scores and segmental plaque scores. RESULTS: α-Gal sensitization was associated with presence of noncalcified plaque (odds ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.04-2.53], P=0.03) and obstructive CAD (odds ratio, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.29-3.25], P=0.002), independent of age, sex, and traditional risk factors. The α-Gal sensitization rate was 12.8-fold higher in patients with STEMI compared with matched healthy controls and 2.2-fold higher in the patients with STEMI compared with matched stable CAD patients (17% versus 1.3%, P=0.01 and 20% versus 9%, P=0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: α-Gal sensitization is independently associated with noncalcified plaque burden and obstructive CAD and occurs at higher frequency in patients with STEMI than those with stable or no CAD. These findings may have implications for individuals exposed to ticks, as well as public health policy. Registration: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12618001322224.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/complicaciones , Placa Aterosclerótica/etiología , Placa Aterosclerótica/inmunología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/inmunología , Anciano , Animales , Estudios de Cohortes , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Disacáridos/inmunología , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placa Aterosclerótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen
4.
Aust Fam Physician ; 41(6): 404-6, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22675681

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccinations have been linked to lymphoedema but there is no quality scientific evidence to support or refute a causative relationship. OBJECTIVE: We report on a case of a breast cancer patient who developed lymphoedema following vaccination in her 'at risk' arm. She had previously undergone mastectomy and axillary clearance but did not have lymphoedema before the vaccinations. DISCUSSION: The risk of lymphoedema is still present for many years following breast surgery. Patients who are at risk of lymphoedema should be warned to report persistent swelling after vaccination so that they can be referred early for physiotherapy intervention if required.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina/efectos adversos , Linfedema/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Australia , Femenino , Humanos , Vacunación/efectos adversos
7.
Pathology ; 41(3): 280-3, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19291541

RESUMEN

AIM: Investigations into 14 suspected pathology sample identification errors and mix-ups were performed, as a service for several public hospital and private laboratories, from 2005 to 2007. METHODS: Analyses were performed with the forensic ABI Identifiler kit of 16 microsatellites (15 autosomal and amelogenin) on DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues or blood specimens and compared to independently verified (single or multiple) patient samples. RESULTS: Of 23 unique patient specimens referred for sample integrity confirmation because of pathologist, clinician or patient concern, six (26.1%) were demonstrated to be discordant, indicating that specimen identification errors or mix-ups had occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Due to their great sensitivity and high discrimination power, forensic identity multiplex systems using either microsatellites or single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can resolve concerns about pathology specimen identity and integrity.


Asunto(s)
Dermatoglifia del ADN/métodos , Errores Médicos , Patología Quirúrgica/métodos , Sistemas de Identificación de Pacientes/métodos , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Australasia , Biopsia , Medicina Legal/métodos , Humanos , Repeticiones de Microsatélite , Patología Quirúrgica/normas , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Manejo de Especímenes/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA