The Development and Implementation of the Fast-Pace Assessment Framework and Tiered Analgesic Orders for Opioid Optimization.

BACKGROUND: Within the context of the opioid epidemic, changes needed to be made in the prescription and administration of analgesics. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and implementation of a project that utilized a holistic pain assessment framework and introduced new order sets to guide the integration of nonopioid, opioid, and co-analgesics in a quaternary care medical center. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team updated policies and procedures for pain assessment and opioid administration and created new analgesic order sets for both adult and pediatric patients. Following requisite approvals, these order sets were integrated into the electronic health record. Education of clinicians, patients, and caregivers was provided to facilitate implementation of these new clinical practices. RESULTS: Prescribers' levels of adherence with the use of the pain order sets ranged from 80% to 90% and no adverse effects were reported. Education of nursing staff was incorporated into hospital orientation. Ongoing evaluations are providing insights into how the new policies and procedures can be optimized to ensure reliable, safe, and effective pain management. CONCLUSIONS: Since the implementation of the opioid optimization project, adherence with the tiered, multimodal approach to analgesic prescribing is high. Next steps include both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the benefits and challenges associated with this practice change. For example, systems will be developed to monitor nurses' adherence with the implementation of the pain order sets and the use of both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic pain management interventions.

Challenges Recruiting and Retaining New Members of a Professional Nursing Organization.

BACKGROUND: The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) began as a nursing-focused pain organization in 1990 and has experienced fluctuations in membership over time. According to the literature, membership to many professional organizations, including ASPMN, are waning. New member recruitment and retention is crucial for maintaining viability and financial strength of an organization. AIM: This study explores ASPMN new member attitudes, perceptions, and experiences. The intention was to learn what inspired or influenced nurse participants to join ASPMN, what they expect gain from membership, and how the organization can help fulfill their professional pain management goals. METHOD: This IRB-exempted qualitative descriptive study offered participants opportunities to reflect upon and share their member experiences either individually or in small focus groups. Nurses were identified via ASPMN new member lists or referred from ASPMN Chapter leaders. Conversations were recorded and transcribed using virtual technology, validated, then analyzed for recurring themes. RESULTS: One key finding was that 0 of 11 participants were fully apprised of member benefits. Key themes were most had motivating factors which prompted their joining ASPMN, and many were seeking organization resources (networking, certification, and new knowledge). Challenging focus group recruitment was likely related to internal and external forces, including post-pandemic fatigue with virtual platforms, time constraints, and a general over-abundance of e-communications. CONCLUSIONS: Many professional organizations continue to struggle to recruit and retain members. While there were no material incentives, the focus group or individual interviews promoted collegiality, reinforced knowledge about ASPMN member benefits, and provided a platform to dialog about how the organization can grow while addressing member needs. Findings from this study may benefit ASPMN and other organizations by providing insight into what attracts and maintains new members, creating a platform to learn about members, and ideally, identifying new ways of engagement and initiatives.

Pain Assessment Disparities by Race, Ethnicity, and Language in Adult Hospitalized Patients.

AIM: Nurses assess patients' pain using several validated tools. It is not known what disparities exist in pain assessment for medicine inpatients. Our purpose was to measure differences in pain assessment across patient characteristics, including race, ethnicity, and language status. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult general medicine inpatients from 2013 to 2021. The primary exposures were race/ethnicity and limited English proficiency (LEP) status. The primary outcomes were 1) the type and odds of which pain assessment tool nursing used and 2) the relationship between pain assessments and daily opioid administration. RESULTS: Of 51,602 patient hospitalizations, 46.1% were white, 17.4% Black, 16.5% Asian, and 13.2% Latino. 13.2% of patients had LEP. The most common pain assessment tool was the Numeric Rating Scale (68.1%), followed by the Verbal Descriptor Scale (23.7%). Asian patients and patients with LEP were less likely to have their pain documented numerically. In multivariable logistic regression, patients with LEP (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.58-0.65) and Asian patients (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70-0.78) had the lowest odds of numeric ratings. Latino, Multi-Racial, and patients classified as Other also had lower odds than white patients of numeric ratings. Asian patients and patients with LEP received the fewest daily opioids across all pain assessment categories. CONCLUSIONS: Asian patients and patients with LEP were less likely than other patient groups to have a numeric pain assessment and received the fewest opioids. These inequities may serve as the basis for the development of equitable pain assessment protocols.

A Quality Initiative Incorporating Tablet Technology to Facilitate Nonpharmacologic Pain Intervention Use in the Hospital.

BACKGROUND: The opioid crisis has changed the culture and expectations of pain management, elevating the importance of nonpharmacologic pain interventions (NPIs) into multimodal pain management programs. Little is known about use of NPIs in hospitalized patients. AIMS: This quality improvement project aimed to increase awareness and use of NPIs by engaging patients and nurses on one medical unit using tablet technology. METHODS: Pre- and post intervention data were collected using surveys of nurse and nursing assistant perceptions of NPIs and by assessing pain management experiences of acute care patients using the American Pain Society-Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-Revised. Interventions included staff education, integration of an NPI menu and tools onto bedside tablets, and a Comfort Card communication tool. SETTINGS: This Quality Improvement project was conducted on an 18-bed adult medical unit at a Midwestern academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: Subjects included RN and Certified Nursing Assistants from one medical unit. Patient perspectives were obtained from a baseline cohort of 30 hospitalized medical patients and compared to an intervention group of 15 medical patients. Patient inclusion criteria included adults ages 18 and older, hospitalized ≤72 hours, who verbalized a willingness to participate. DESIGN: The 8-week project included nurse and nursing assistant pre-/post-intervention perception surveys and an educational module about NPIs. Pain management experiences and NPI use were assessed post-tablet intervention using the American Pain Society-Pain Outcomes Questionnaire-Revised (APS-POQ-R). Additionally, staff education, integration of an NPI menu and tools onto bedside tablets, and a Comfort Card communication tool were planned interventions. RESULTS: Nursing staff believe NPIs are beneficial, safe, and evidence-based; however, limited resources, time constraints, and lack of provider support are perceived as barriers. Staff and volunteers provided 80 comfort items to 38 patients during the project. Half of baseline patients (n = 30) and intervention (n = 15) groups reported not receiving information about pain treatment options. Many patients in both groups denied using "non medicine methods," but further assessment revealed that 90% of the baseline group and 87% of the intervention group had used an NPI. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that patients and nurses may benefit from education about using NPIs in acute care. Nurses have a critical role influencing positive pain-related outcomes, and tablet technology can enhance patient use of NPIs during hospitalization.

A Focused Screening and Clinical Intervention with Streamlined Outpatient Linkage for Hospitalized Patients with Opioid Use Disorder Experiencing Homelessness.

Background: Patients experiencing homelessness have higher rates of substance use and related mortality, often driven by opioid overdose. Conversely, opioid use disorder (OUD) is a leading risk factor for homelessness. Our goal was to test the efficacy of an electronic health record (EHR) screen in identifying this vulnerable population during hospitalization and to assess the feasibility of a bundled intervention in improving opioid safety. Methods: We assessed patients' housing status, substance use, previous MOUD treatment, barriers to MOUD treatment and readiness to take MOUD in and out of the hospital. For each post discharge follow up call, patients were asked about their MOUD status, barriers accessing treatment, current substance use, and housing status. We also assessed team members perceptions and experiences of the study. Results: We enrolled 32 patients with housing insecurity and OUD. The mean age was 44, the majority self-identified as male (78%), and mostly as White (56%) or Black (38%). At each follow up within the 6-months post-discharge, reach rates were low: 40% of enrollees answered at least 1 call and the highest reach rate (31% of patients) occurred at week 4. At the third and sixth-month follow ups, >50% of subjects still taking MOUD were also using opioids. Conclusion: Our clinician augmented EHR screen accurately identified inpatients experiencing OUD and PEH. This intervention showed high rates of attrition among enrolled patients, even after providing cellphones. The majority of patients who were reached remained adherent to MOUD though they reported significant barriers.