Therapeutic Interventions and Outcomes in Civilian and Military Isolated Gunshot Wounds to the Head: A Department of Defense Trauma Registry and ACS TQIP-matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare therapeutic strategies and outcomes, following isolated gunshot wounds of the head, between military and civilian populations. BACKGROUND: Recent military conflicts introduced new concepts in trauma care, including aggressive surgical intervention in severe head trauma. METHODS: This was a cohort-matched study, using the civilian Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR), during the period 2013 to 2016. Included in the study were patients with isolated gunshots to the head. Exclusion criteria were dead on arrival, civilians transferred from other hospitals, and patients with major extracranial associated injuries (body area Abbreviated Injury Scale >3). Patients in the military database were propensity score-matched 1:3 with patients in the civilian database. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients in the DoDTR database were matched for age, sex, year of injury, and head Abbreviated Injury Scale with 408 patients from TQIP. Utilization of blood products was significantly higher in the military population ( P <0.001). In the military group, patients were significantly more likely to have intracranial pressure monitoring (17% vs 6%, P <0.001) and more likely to undergo craniotomy or craniectomy (34% vs 13%, P <0.001) than in the civilian group. Mortality in the military population was significantly lower (27% vs 38%, P =0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Military patients are more likely to receive blood products, have intracranial pressure monitoring and undergo craniectomy or craniotomy than their civilian counterparts after isolated head gunshot wounds. Mortality is significantly lower in the military population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

Preperitoneal Packing for Pelvic Fracture Bleeding Control: A Human Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Preperitoneal packing (PPP) has been widely accepted as a damage control technique for severe bleeding from pelvic fractures. It is supposed to work by direct compression and tamponade of the bleeding source in the pelvis and it has been suggested to be effective for both venous and arterial bleeding. However, there is little evidence to support its efficacy or the ability to place the laparotomy pads in proximity of the desired location. METHODS: Bilateral PPP was performed on 10 fresh human cadavers, followed by laparotomy and measurements of resultant pad placement in relation to critical anatomic structures. RESULTS: A total of 20 assessments of laparotomy pad placement were performed. Following completion of PPP, a midline laparotomy was performed to determine proximity and closest distance of the laparotomy pads to sites of potential bleeding in pelvic fractures. In almost all cases, the pad placement was not contiguous with the key anatomic structure with mean placement 3.9 + 1.1 cm from the sacroiliac joint, 3.5 + 1.6 cm from the common iliac artery, 1.1 + 1.2 cm from the external iliac artery, 2.8 + 0.8 cm from the internal iliac artery, and 2.3 + 1.2 cm from the iliac bifurcation. Surgeon experience resulted in improved placement relative to the sacroiliac joint, however the pads still did not directly contact the target point. CONCLUSION: This human cadaver study has shown that PPP, even in experienced hands, may not be placed in significant proximity of anatomical structures of interest. The role of PPP needs to be revisited with better clinical or human cadaver studies.

Injury Patterns and Treatment Strategies in Civilian and Military Isolated Abdominal Gunshot Wounds.

BACKGROUND: Combat-related gunshot wounds (GSW) may differ from those found in civilian trauma centers. Missile velocity, resources, logistics, and body armor may affect injury patterns and management strategies. This study compares injury patterns, management, and outcomes in isolated abdominal GSW between military (MIL) and civilian (CIV) populations. METHODS: The Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) and TQIP databases were queried for patients with isolated abdominal GSW from 2013 to 2016. MIL patients were propensity score matched 1:3 based on age, sex, and extraabdominal AIS. Injury patterns and in-hospital outcomes were compared. Initial operative management strategies, including selective nonoperative management (SNOM) for isolated solid organ injuries, were also compared. RESULTS: Of the 6435 patients with isolated abdominal GSW, 183 (3%) MIL were identified and matched with 549 CIV patients. The MIL group had more hollow viscus injuries (84% vs. 66%) while the CIV group had more vascular injuries (10% vs. 21%) (p < .05 for both). Operative strategy differed, with more MIL patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy (95% vs. 82%) and colectomy (72% vs. 52%) (p < .05 for both). However, no difference in ostomy creation was appreciated. More SNOM for isolated solid organ injuries was performed in the CIV group (34.1% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.05). In-hospital outcomes, including mortality, were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: MIL abdominal GSW lead to higher rates of hollow viscus injuries compared to CIV GSW. MIL GSW are more frequently treated with resection but with similar ostomy creation compared to civilian GSW. SNOM of solid organ injuries is infrequently performed following MIL GSW.

Does mortality after trauma team activation peak at shift change?

BACKGROUND: Prior institutional data have demonstrated trauma mortality to be highest between 06:00-07:59 at our center, which is also when providers change shifts (07:00-07:30). The objective was definition of patient, provider, and systems variables associated with trauma mortality at shift change among patients arriving as trauma team activations (TTA). METHODS: All TTA patients at our ACS-verified Level I trauma center were included (01/2008-07/2019), excluding those with undocumented arrival time. Study groups were defined by arrival time: shift change (SC) (06:00-07:59) vs. non-shift change (NSC) (all other times). Univariable/multivariable analyses compared key variables. Propensity score analysis compared outcomes after matching. RESULTS: After exclusions, 6020 patients remained: 229 (4%) SC and 5791 (96%) NSC. SC mortality was 25% vs. 16% during NSC (p < 0.001). More SC patients arrived with SBP <90 (19% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) or GCS <9 (35% vs. 24%, p < 0.001). ISS was higher during SC (43[32-50] vs. 34[27-50], p < 0.001). Time to CT scan (36[23-66] vs. 38[23-61] minutes, p = 0.638) and emergent surgery (94[35-141] vs. 63[34-107] minutes, p = 0.071) were comparable. Older age (p < 0.001), SBP <90 (p < 0.001), GCS <9 (p < 0.001), need for emergent operative intervention (p = 0.044), and higher ISS (p < 0.001) were independently associated with mortality. After propensity score matching, mortality was no different between SC and NSC (p = 0.764). CONCLUSIONS: Early morning is a low-volume, high-mortality time for TTAs. Increased mortality at shift change was independently associated with patient/injury factors but not provider/systems factors. Ensuring ample clinical resource allocation during this high acuity time may be prudent to streamline patient care at shift change.

Surgical Rib Fixation in Obese Patients with Isolated Flail Chest Improves Outcomes: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with adverse outcomes after major operations. The role of operative rib fixation (RF) in obese patients with flail chest is not clear. The presence of other associated injuries may complicate the interpretation of outcomes. This study compared outcomes after RF to nonoperative management (NOM) in obese patients with isolated flail chest injury. METHODS: Adult obese patients (BMI > 29.9) with flail chest were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database (2016-2018). Hospital transfers, death within 72 h, and extrathoracic injuries were excluded. RF patients were propensity score matched (1:2) to similar NOM patients. Multivariate regression identified independent factors predicting adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 367 patients with isolated flail chest who underwent RF were matched with 734 in the NOM group. After matching, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the RF group (1.4% vs. 3.7%; p < 0.05). RF had longer HLOS (15.7 days vs. 12.8 days; p < 0.05) and ICU LOS (10.1 days vs. 8.6 days; p < 0.05), shorter ventilator days (9.2 days vs. 11.5 days; p < 0.05), and a higher rate of venous thromboembolism (7.1% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, RF was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.27; p < 0.05). Early RF (≤ 72 h) was associated with shorter ICU stay and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: RF for isolated flail chest in obese patients is associated with decreased mortality and fewer ventilator days. When performed early, fixation decreases the need for prolonged ventilator use and ICU stay. A more aggressive VTE prophylaxis should be considered in patients undergoing RF.

When Is It Safe to Start Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Pelvic Fractures? A Prospective Study From a Level I Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: The ideal time for pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis initiation after pelvic fracture is controversial. This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of early VTE prophylaxis after blunt pelvic trauma. METHODS: Patients presenting to our American College of Surgeons-verified level I trauma center (between December 1, 2016 and November 30, 2017) with blunt pelvic fracture were prospectively screened. Exclusion criteria were emergency department death, immediate operative intervention, transfers, home anticoagulation, pregnancy, and patients receiving no pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis during hospitalization. Patients were dichotomized into study groups based on VTE prophylaxis initiation time ≤48 h (early prophylaxis [EP]) versus >48 h (late prophylaxis [LP]) after emergency department arrival. Demographics, injury data, clinical data, VTE prophylaxis agent and initiation time, and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: After exclusions, 146 patients were identified: 74 (51%) patients in EP group and 72 (49%) patients in LP group. Pelvic fracture severity was comparable between groups (Abbreviated Injury Scale extremity score 2 [2-3] versus 2 [2-3]; P = 0.610). On univariate analysis, deep vein thrombosis rates were higher after LP (n = 5, 7% versus 0, 0%; P = 0.027). Pulmonary embolism rates were similar (n = 2, 3% versus n = 3, 4%; P = 1.000). No patient required delayed intervention for bleeding, and postprophylaxis blood transfusion was comparable between groups (P > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, timing of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis initiation was not associated with VTE development (odds ratio, 0.647; P = 0.999). Pelvic angioembolization was independently associated with VTE (odds ratio, 1.296; P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis after blunt pelvic fracture is safe. Although EP initiation did not reduce the rate of VTE, these data identify angioembolization as an independent risk factor for VTE. Patients with blunt pelvic fracture who undergo angioembolization may therefore represent a high-risk population who may especially benefit from EP.

Hangings: Lessons Learned from the Coroner's Office.

BACKGROUND: Hangings are an infrequent wounding mechanism among patients arriving alive to hospital but are frequently encountered by the Coroner's Office. It is unclear if classically described hanging injuries, such as the Hangman's fracture, are common among contemporary hangings patients who typically do not suspend from height. This study was undertaken to define patient and injury characteristics after hangings causing death. METHODS: All patients presenting to the Los Angeles County Medical Examiner/Coroner's Office (January 2016 - May 2020) who died by hanging were included. Demographics, psychiatric history, hanging details, autopsy type, and sustained injuries were collected. Data variables were summarized with descriptive statistics and the diagnostic yield of a ligature mark in the diagnosis/exclusion of cervical injuries was calculated. RESULTS: Over the study, 1,401 patients died by hanging. Patients underwent external exam alone (n = 1,282, 92%), traditional neck autopsy (n = 114, 8%), or traditional neck autopsy plus postmortem computed tomography scan (n = 5, <1%). Home was the most frequent hanging setting (n = 1,028, 73%) followed by public spaces (n = 80, 6%) and jail (n = 28, 2%). The manner of death was almost exclusively suicide (n = 1,395, >99%) and psychiatric disease was common (n = 968, 69%). Of the patients undergoing traditional autopsy, most had a ligature mark (n = 109, 92%) and only 9 (8%) had a cervical injury (hyoid fractures, n = 6, 5%; thyroid cartilage fractures, n = 4, 3%). None had a vertebral fracture/dislocation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a ligature mark were 100%, 5%, 8%, and 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Hangings are a frequent cause of death in Los Angeles County. Patients typically have a psychiatric history and die almost exclusively from suicide. Hangings commonly occur at home, in public places, and in jail. Injuries were exceedingly rare and no patient sustained a Hangman's fracture, which may be related to the lack of significant suspension with modern hangings.

Timing and Type of Venous Thromboembolic Prophylaxis in Isolated Severe Liver Injury Managed Non-Operatively.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing and type of pharmacological venous thromboembolic prophylaxis (VTEp) after severe liver injury selected for nonoperative management (NOM) are controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of timing and type of VTEp in severe liver injuries selected for NOM. METHODS: ACS-TQIP database study (2013-17) including patients with blunt isolated severe liver injuries (AIS ≥ 3), selected for NOM, who received VTEp with either unfractionated heparin (UH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Patients who underwent laparotomy or angiointervention within 24 h or prior to the initiation of VTEp were excluded. The study population was stratified according to the timing of VTEp ≤ 48 h (EP) and > 48 h (LP) groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify differences between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 4074 patients was included in the study. 2004 (49.2%) received EP and 2070 (50.8%) LP. Patients with more severe injuries were more likely to receive LP than an EP [ISS 24 (19-29) vs 22 (17-27), p < 0.001]. On multivariate analysis (correcting for age, gender, comorbidities, blood pressure, GCS, ISS, type of VTEp), LP was identified as an independent risk factor for thromboembolic events (OR 1.52, p = 0.032) and mortality (OR 2.49, p = 0.031). LMWH was independently associated with lower mortality (OR 0.36, p = 0.007), compared to UH. EP did not increase the risk of laparotomy or angiointervention after starting VTEp, compared to LP (p = 0.992). CONCLUSION: Early VTEp (≤ 48 h) is safe and independently associated with fewer thromboembolic events and a lower mortality after isolated severe liver injuries managed nonoperatively. LMWH was independently associated with improved outcomes when compared with UH.

Practical assessment of different saw types for field amputation: A cadaver-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Field amputation can be life-saving for entrapped patients requiring surgical extrication. Under these austere conditions, the procedure must be performed as rapidly as possible with limited equipment, often in a confined space, while minimizing provider risk. The aim of this study was to determine the ideal saw, and optimal approach, through bone or joint, for a field amputation. METHODS: This was a prospective cadaver-based study. Four saws (Gigli, manual pruning, electric oscillating and electric reciprocating) were tested in human cadavers. Each saw was used to transect four separate long bones (humerus, ulna/radius, femur and tibia/fibula), previously exposed at a standardized location. The time required for each saw to cut through the bone, the number of attempts required to seat the saw when transecting the bone, slippage, quality of proximal bone cut and extent of body fluid splatter as well as the physical space required by each device during the amputation were recorded. Additionally, the most effective saw in the through bone assessment was compared to limb amputation using scalpel and scissors for a through joint amputation at the elbow, wrist, knee and ankle. Univariate analysis was used to compare the outcomes between the different saws. RESULTS: The fastest saw for the through bone amputation was the reciprocating followed by oscillating (2.1 [1.4-3.7] seconds vs 3.0 [1.6-4.9] seconds). The manual pruning (58.8 [25-121] seconds) was the slowest (p = 0.007). Overall, the oscillating saw was superior or equivalent to the other devices in number of attempts (1), slippage (0), quality of bone cut (100% good) and physical space requirements (4500 cm3), and was the second fastest. In comparison, a through joint amputation (125.0 [50-147] seconds for scalpel and scissor; 125.5 [86-217] seconds for the oscillating saw) was significantly slower than through bone with the Gigli (p = 0.029), the oscillating (p = 0.029) and the reciprocal saw (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The speed, precision, safety, space required, as well as the adjustable blade of the oscillating saw make it ideal for a field amputation. A Gigli saw is an excellent backup for when electrical tools cannot be used. Through bone amputation is faster than a through joint amputation.

Transthyretin at Admission and Over Time as a Marker for Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Trauma Patients: A Prospective Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Transthyretin (TTR) has been described as a predictor for outcomes in medical and surgical patients. However, the association of TTR on admission and over time on outcomes has not yet been prospectively assessed in trauma patients. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study including trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a large Level I trauma center 05/2014-05/2015. TTR levels at ICU admission and all subsequent values over time were recorded. Patients were observed for 28 days or until hospital discharge. The association of outcomes and TTR levels at admission and over time was assessed using multivariable regression and generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients with TTR obtained at admission were included, 69 of whom had repeated TTR measurements. Median age was 40.0 years and median ISS 16.0; 83.1% were male. Below-normal TTR levels at admission (41.8%) were independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (p = 0.042), more infectious complications (p = 0.032), longer total hospital length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.013), and ICU LOS (p = 0.041). Higher TTR levels over time were independently associated with lower in-hospital mortality (p = 0.015), fewer infections complications (p = 0.028), shorter total hospital and ICU LOS (both p < 0.001), and fewer ventilator days (0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill trauma patients, below-normal TTR levels at admission were independently associated with worse outcomes and higher TTR levels over time with better outcomes, including lower in-hospital mortality, less infectious complications, shorter total hospital and ICU LOS, and fewer ventilator days. Based on these results, TTR may be considered as a prognostic marker in this patient population.

Transfusion-Related Hypocalcemia After Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Hypocalcemia is cited as a complication of massive transfusion. However, this is not well studied as a primary outcome in trauma patients. Our primary outcome was to determine if transfusion of packed red blood cells (pRBC) was an independent predictor of severe hypocalcemia (ionized calcium ≤ 3.6 mg/dL). METHODS: Retrospective, single-center study (01/2004-12/2014) including all trauma patients ≥ 18 yo presenting to the ED with an ionized calcium (iCa) level drawn. Variables extracted included demographics, interventions, outcomes, and iCa. Regression models identified independent risk factors for severe hypocalcemia (SH). RESULTS: Seven thousand four hundred and thirty-one included subjects, 716 (9.8%) developed SH within 48 h of admission. Median age: 39 (Range: 18-102), systolic blood pressure: 131 (IQR: 114-150), median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): 15 (IQR: 10-15), Injury Severity Score (ISS): 14 (IQR: 9-24). SH patients were more likely to have depressed GCS (13 vs 15, p < 0.0001), hypotension (23.2% vs 5.1%, p < 0.0001) and tachycardia (57.0% vs 41.9%, p < 0.0001) compared to non-SH patients. They also had higher emergency operative rate (71.8% vs 29%, p < 0.0001) and higher blood administration prior to minimum iCa [pRBC: (8 vs 0, p < 0.0001), FFP: (4 vs 0, p < 0.0001), platelet: (1 vs 0, p < 0.0001)]. Multivariable analysis revealed penetrating mechanism (AOR: 1.706), increased ISS (AOR: 1.029), and higher pRBC (AOR: 1.343) or FFP administered (AOR: 1.097) were independent predictors of SH. SH was an independent predictor of mortality (AOR: 2.658). Regression analysis identified a significantly higher risk of SH at pRBC + FFP administration of 4 units (AOR: 18.706, AUC:. 897 (0.884-0.909). CONCLUSION: Transfusion of pRBC is an independent predictor of SH and is associated with increased mortality. The predicted probability of SH increases as pRBC + FFP administration increases.

Falls in the Bathroom: A Mechanism of Injury for All Ages.

BACKGROUND: When ground-level falls occur in the bathroom, there is particular potential for morbidity and mortality given the high density of hard surfaces. Risk factors are not clearly defined by the existing literature. The objective of this study was to define the epidemiology, injury patterns, and outcomes after falls in the bathroom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients presenting to LAC+USC Medical Center (01/2008-05/2015) after a fall in the bathroom (ICD-9 code E884.6) were included. Demographics, injury data, investigations, procedures, and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included, with mean age 45 y (range 0-92). All ages were affected, with ages 41-60 y at highest risk. Common comorbidities included cardiovascular disease (n = 23, 40%), neuromuscular disorders (n = 13, 23%), and diabetes (n = 9, 16%). Ten patients (18%) were intoxicated. Home medications included antihypertensives (n = 18, 32%), antipsychotics (n = 9, 16%), and anticoagulants (n = 8, 14%). Common investigations included X-rays (n = 41, 72%) and CT scans of the head (n = 20, 35%). The most frequent injuries were contusion/laceration (n = 45, 79%), fracture (n = 12, 21%), and traumatic brain injury (n = 7, 12%). Most patients did not require hospital admission (n = 46, 81%), although 4 (7%) needed intensive care unit care and operative intervention (ORIF [n = 2, 4%] or craniectomy [n = 2, 4%]). Mortality was low (n = 1, 2%). Most patients were discharged home (n = 40, 70%). CONCLUSIONS: All ages, especially 41-60 y, are susceptible to falls in the bathroom. Despite the potential for serious injury, most do not require hospital admission. Risk factors include drugs/alcohol, cardiovascular disease, neuromuscular disorders, and diabetes. Efforts to minimize fall risk should be directed toward these individuals.

When is It Safe to Start VTE Prophylaxis After Blunt Solid Organ Injury? A Prospective Study from a Level I Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of VTE prophylaxis initiation after blunt solid organ injury is controversial. Retrospective studies suggest initiation ≤48 h is safe. This prospective study examined the safety and efficacy of early VTE prophylaxis initiation after nonoperative blunt solid organ injury. METHODS: All patients >15 years of age presenting after blunt trauma (12/01/16-11/30/17) were prospectively screened. Patients were included if solid organ injury (liver, spleen, kidney) was diagnosed on admission CT scan and nonoperative management was planned. ED deaths, transfers, patients with pre-existing bleeding disorders or home antiplatelet/anticoagulant medications, and those who did not receive VTE prophylaxis were excluded. Demographics, injury/clinical data, type/timing of VTE prophylaxis initiation, and outcomes were collected. Patients were dichotomized into study groups based on VTE prophylaxis initiation time: Early (≤48 h) vs Late (>48 h after admission). Prophylaxis initiation was at the discretion of the attending trauma surgeon. The primary study outcome was VTE event rate. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, need for and volume of post-prophylaxis blood transfusion, need for delayed (post-prophylaxis) interventional radiology (IR) or operative intervention, failure of nonoperative management, and mortality. Outcomes were compared with univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression determined independent predictors of late VTE prophylaxis initiation. RESULTS: After exclusions, 118 patients were identified. Median ISS was 22 [IQR 14-26]. Median AAST grade of injury was 2 [IQR 2-3] for liver, 2 [IQR 1-3] for spleen, and 3 [IQR 2-3] for kidney. Compared to late prophylaxis patients (n = 57, 48%), early prophylaxis patients (n = 61, 52%) had significantly fewer DVTs (n = 0, 0% vs n = 5, 9%, p = 0.024) but similar rates of PE (n = 2, 3% vs n = 3, 5%, p = 0.672). TBI was the only significant risk factor for late prophylaxis (OR 0.22, p = 0.015). No patient in either group required delayed intervention (operative or IR) for bleeding. There was no difference in volume of post-prophylaxis blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study of patients with nonoperative blunt solid organ injuries, early (≤48 h) initiation of VTE prophylaxis resulted in a lower incidence of DVTs without an associated increase in bleeding or need for intervention. Early initiation of VTE prophylaxis is likely to be safe and beneficial for patients with blunt solid organ injury.

Old Age With a Traumatic Mechanism of Injury Should Be a Trauma Team Activation Criterion.

BACKGROUND: Age is not a standard trauma team activation (TTA) criteria recommended by the Committee on Trauma. However, there is concern that vital signs in elderly patients are often unreliable. In addition, elderly patients are at risk after moderate trauma. At our institution, age ≥ 70 years with traumatic mechanisms of injury has been a TTA criterion for more than 15 years. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether age ≥70 years as a TTA criterion appropriately identifies patients in need of additional resources without significantly impacting overtriage rates. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective trauma registry study of TTAs for age ≥ 70 years from January 2012-December 2016. Demographics, injury data, Injury Severity Score (ISS), procedures, emergency department (ED) disposition, and hospital data were collected. Primary outcome was mortality, secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay. Patients were stratified into meeting standard criteria (TTA-S) or activated based on age alone (TTA-A). TTA patients with ISS > 15, ED intubation, ICU admission, immediate operating room or catheter-based intervention, and mortalities were appropriately triaged. RESULTS: During the study, there were 5436 total TTAs. Seven hundred and thirty-nine TTAs in patients aged ≥ 70 years, of which 198 (26.8%) were TTA-S and 541 (73.2%) were TTA-A. In the TTA-A group, 49 (9%) patients died, 149 (27.5%) had ISS > 15, 65 (12%) underwent immediate intervention, 72 (13%) had ED intubations, and 306 (56.6%) required admission to the ICU. The overtriage rate in the TTA-A group was 39.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with severe trauma patients often do not meet the standard TTA criteria, resulting in potentially dangerous undertriage. Addition of age (≥70 years) criterion for TTA reduces undertriage and does not result in excessive overtriage.

Factors affecting the caloric and protein intake over time in critically ill trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Major trauma leads to increased nutritional requirements. However, little is known about the actual amount of calories and protein administered and the factors affecting the intake over time in critically ill trauma patients. METHODS: Prospective study including 100 trauma patients admitted to the Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center intensive care unit between March 2014 and October 2014. Inclusion criteria were age > 16 y, surgery at admission, and no oral nutrition. The caloric and protein intake was recorded, and requirements were calculated daily for 28 d. The nutritional intake and the impact of clinical factors on the intake over time were assessed using mixed model analysis. RESULTS: The caloric and protein intake significantly increased over time, but the median intake did not meet the median calculated requirements at any time. Multivariable analysis revealed a smaller increase of the nutritional intake over time in patients with an injury severity score > 45, whereas penetrating injury and laparotomy were associated with a higher increase of the intake. Body mass index scores ≥ 30 kg/m2, traumatic brain injury, and gastrointestinal tract injuries were associated with a smaller increase of the caloric intake over time. CONCLUSIONS: The median nutritional intake did not meet the median calculated requirements over time. A smaller increase of the nutritional intake over time was found in patients with a higher injury burden, whereas penetrating injury and laparotomy were associated with a higher increase of the intake. Higher body mass index scores, traumatic brain injury, and gastrointestinal tract injuries were associated with a smaller increase of the caloric intake over time. These clinical factors can help to adjust the nutritional support in critically ill trauma patients.

Flail Chest: Less Deadly than Originally Thought.

INTRODUCTION: Flail chest is considered a highly morbid condition with reported mortality ranging from 10 to 20%. It is often associated with other severe injuries, which may complicate management and interpretation of outcomes. The physiologic impact and prognosis of isolated flail chest injury is poorly defined. METHODS: This is a National Trauma Databank study. All patients from 1/2007 to 12/2014 admitted with flail chest were extracted. Patients with head or abdominal AIS ≥3, dead on arrival, or transferred, were excluded. Primary outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes were need for mechanical ventilation and pneumonia. RESULTS: Of the 1,047,519 patients with blunt chest injury, 14,718 (1.4%) patients presented with flail chest, and 8098 (0.77%) met inclusion criteria. The most commonly associated intrathoracic injuries were hemothorax (57.9%) and lung contusions (63.0%), while sternal fracture (8.8%) and cardiac contusion (2.5%) were less common. In total, 29.8% of patients required mechanical ventilation, and 11.2% developed pneumonia. Overall mortality was 5.6%. On multivariable analysis, age >65 and need for mechanical ventilation were independent risk factors for mortality (OR 6.02, 3.75, respectively, p < 0.001). Independent predictors for mechanical ventilation included cardiac or pulmonary contusion and sternal fractures (OR 3.78, 2.38, 2.29, respectively, p < 0.001). Need for mechanical ventilation was an independent predictor of pneumonia (OR 13.18, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in isolated flail chest is much lower than previously reported. Fewer than 30% of patients require mechanical ventilation. Need for mechanical ventilation, however, is independently associated with mortality and pneumonia. Age >65 is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes, and these patients may benefit by more aggressive monitoring and treatment.

Early Seizure Prophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injuries Revisited: A Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological prophylaxis for early seizures following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a recommendation in the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines. However, several studies have challenged the efficacy and safety of this practice, resulting in varied practice across centers around the world. The purpose of the present study was to compare the incidence of early clinical seizures following TBI, between two large centers, a US Center that practises routine seizure prophylaxis and a Chinese Center that does not use seizure prophylaxis following TBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study including an urban level I trauma center in the USA and a large hospital in Shenzhen, China. At the US Center, all patients received seizure prophylaxis with levetiracetam. At the Chinese Center, no seizure prophylaxis was given. All patients with blunt TBI and positive computed tomography findings for epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage or diffuse axonal injury were included. Patients who died within 24 h of admission were excluded. The study population was monitored daily for clinical seizures for the first 7 post-injury days. Data collected included demographics, mechanism of injury, vital signs upon arrival, injury severity and emergency interventions. Primary outcome was the incidence of early seizures, defined as those occurring within 7 days of injury. RESULTS: A total of 522 patients were included in the analysis: 272 patients at the US Center who received seizure prophylaxis and 250 patients at the Chinese Center who did not receive prophylaxis. Overall, 3.7% of patients who received seizure prophylaxis developed early seizures, compared to 2.8% of patients who did not receive any prophylaxis (p = 0.573). Decompressive craniectomy was associated with the highest incidence of early seizure (9.2%). In this subgroup, the seizure rate was 10.4% in the prophylaxis group and 7.1% in the no-prophylaxis group (p = 0.738). Patients with admission GCS < 9 had an overall early seizure incidence of 7.0%: 4.3% in the prophylaxis group and 14.3% in the no-prophylaxis group (p = 0.062). Analysis of the subgroup with isolated blunt TBI showed an incidence of early seizures of 3.4% in the prophylaxis group versus 2.4% in the no-prophylaxis group (p = 0.593). Further analyses of outcomes according to head AIS 3, 4 and 5 showed no significant difference in the seizure rate between the two groups: head AIS 3: 6.1% in the prophylaxis group versus 2.6% in the no-prophylaxis group, p = 0.329; head AIS 4: 0 versus 2.7%, p = 0.302; head AIS 5: 8.7 versus 4.0%, p = 0.601. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to show any benefit of routine early seizure prophylaxis following blunt TBI. This practice should be reexamined in a large randomized clinical study.

Air Versus Ground Transportation in Isolated Severe Head Trauma: A National Trauma Data Bank Study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of prehospital helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) on mortality has been analyzed previously in polytrauma patients with discordant results. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare outcomes in patients with isolated severe blunt traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) transported by HEMS or ground emergency medical services (GEMS). METHODS: We conducted a National Trauma Data Bank study (2007-2014). All adult patients (≥16 years old) who sustained an isolated severe blunt TBI and were transported by HEMS or GEMS were included in the study. RESULTS: There were 145,559 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 116,391 (80%) patients were transported via GEMS and 29,168 (20%) via HEMS. Median transportation time was longer for HEMS patients (41 vs. 25 min; p < 0.001). HEMS patients were more likely to have hypotension (2.7% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.001), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 9 (38.2% vs. 10.9%; p < 0.001), and head Abbreviation Injury Scale (AIS) score of 5 (20.1% vs. 9.7%; p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified age ≥ 65 years old, male sex, hypotension, GCS score < 9, prehospital intubation, and head AIS scores 4 and 5 as independent predictors of mortality. Helicopter transportation was independently associated with improved survival (odds ratio [OR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.67; p < 0.001). Admission to a Level I trauma center was an independent predictor of survival (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.53-0.82; p = 0.001). Regardless of head AIS, helicopter transport was an independent predictor of survival (AIS 3: OR 0.35; p < 0.001; AIS 4: OR 0.44; p < 0.001; AIS 5: OR 0.76; p < 0.001). A prolonged transport time was not an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Helicopter transport, in adult patients with isolated severe TBI, is associated with improved survival.

The Age of Undertriage: Current Trauma Triage Criteria Underestimate The Role of Age and Comorbidities in Early Mortality.

BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend that prehospital and emergency department (ED) criteria identify patients who might benefit from trauma center triage and highest-level trauma team activation. However, some patients who are seemingly "stable" in the field and do not meet the standard criteria for trauma activation still die. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify these at-risk patients to potentially improve triage algorithms. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2012) were included. All adult blunt trauma patients that were stable in the field and upon arrival to the ED (defined as a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15, a heart rate ≤120 beats/min, systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, and diastolic blood pressure ≤200 mm Hg) and did not meet the standard criteria for the highest-level trauma team activation as defined by the American College of Surgeons were included. Demographic, clinical, and injury data including comorbidities, ED vitals, and outcome were collected. Regression models were used to identify independent risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,003,350 patients were stable in both the field and ED. Of these 11,010 (1.1%) died, including 1785 (0.2%) who died within 24 hours of hospital admission. The mortality in patients ≥60 years of age was 2.6%, and in patients ≥60 years of age with either a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or congestive heart failure (CHF) was 5.4%. Age ≥60 years was a significant independent predictor of early mortality (odds ratio [OR] 4.53, p < 0.001). CHF (OR 1.88, p < 0.001) and a history of stroke (OR 1.52, p < 0.001) were also significant independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Despite apparent evidence of both prehospital stability and stability upon arrival to the ED, patients ≥60 years of age and with a history of CHF or CVA have a significantly increased risk of early mortality after blunt trauma. These patients are at risk for subsequent clinical deterioration and should be considered for early transfer to a trauma center with highest-level activation.