Angiotensin II as a Vasopressor for Perioperative Hypotension in Solid Organ Transplant.

During the perioperative period of transplantation, patients experience hypotension secondary to the side effects of anesthesia, surgical stress, inflammatory triggering, and intraoperative fluid shifts, among others causes. Vasopressor support, in this context, must reverse systemic hypotension, but ideally, the agents used should benefit allograft function and avoid the adverse events commonly seen after transplantation. Traditional therapies to reverse hypotension include catecholamine vasopressors (norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, and phenylephrine), but their utility is limited when considering allograft complications and adverse events such as arrhythmias with agents with beta-adrenergic properties. Synthetic angiotensin II (AT2S-[Giapreza]) is a novel vasopressor indicated for distributive shock with a unique mechanism of action as an angiotensin receptor agonist restoring balance to an often-disrupted renin angiotensin aldosterone system. Additionally, AT2S provides a balanced afferent and efferent arteriole vasoconstriction at the level of the kidney and could avoid the arrhythmic complications of a beta-adrenergic agonist. While the data, to date, are limited, AT2S has demonstrated safety in case reports, pilot studies, and small series in the kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplant populations. There are physiologic and hemodynamic reasons why AT2S could be a more utilized agent in these populations, but further investigation is warranted.

Surgical opioid-avoidance protocol: a postoperative pharmacological multimodal analgesic intervention in diverse patient populations.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the effect of a surgical opioid-avoidance protocol (SOAP) on postoperative pain scores. The primary goal was to demonstrate that the SOAP was as effective as the pre-existing non-SOAP (without opioid restriction) protocol by measuring postoperative pain in a diverse, opioid-naive patient population undergoing inpatient surgery across multiple surgical services. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was divided into SOAP and non-SOAP groups based on surgery date. The non-SOAP group had no opioid restrictions (n=382), while the SOAP group (n=449) used a rigorous, opioid-avoidance order set with patient and staff education regarding multimodal analgesia. A non-inferiority analysis assessed the SOAP impact on postoperative pain scores. RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores in the SOAP group compared with the non-SOAP group were non-inferior (95% CI: -0.58, 0.10; non-inferiority margin=-1). The SOAP group consumed fewer postoperative opioids (median=0.67 (IQR=15) vs 8.17 morphine milliequivalents (MMEs) (IQR=40.33); p<0.01) and had fewer discharge prescription opioids (median=0 (IQR=60) vs 86.4 MMEs (IQR=140.4); p<0.01). DISCUSSION: The SOAP was as effective as the non-SOAP group in postoperative pain scores across a diverse patient population and associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption and discharge prescription opioids.