Evaluating artificial intelligence for comparative radiography.

INTRODUCTION: Comparative radiography is a forensic identification and shortlisting technique based on the comparison of skeletal structures in ante-mortem and post-mortem images. The images (e.g., 2D radiographs or 3D computed tomographies) are manually superimposed and visually compared by a forensic practitioner. It requires a significant amount of time per comparison, limiting its utility in large comparison scenarios. METHODS: We propose and validate a novel framework for automating the shortlisting of candidates using artificial intelligence. It is composed of (1) a segmentation method to delimit skeletal structures' silhouettes in radiographs, (2) a superposition method to generate the best simulated "radiographs" from 3D images according to the segmented radiographs, and (3) a decision-making method for shortlisting all candidates ranked according to a similarity metric. MATERIAL: The dataset is composed of 180 computed tomographies and 180 radiographs where the frontal sinuses are visible. Frontal sinuses are the skeletal structure analyzed due to their high individualization capability. RESULTS: Firstly, we validate two deep learning-based techniques for segmenting the frontal sinuses in radiographs, obtaining high-quality results. Secondly, we study the framework's shortlisting capability using both automatic segmentations and superimpositions. The obtained superimpositions, based only on the superimposition metric, allowed us to filter out 40% of the possible candidates in a completely automatic manner. Thirdly, we perform a reliability study by comparing 180 radiographs against 180 computed tomographies using manual segmentations. The results allowed us to filter out 73% of the possible candidates. Furthermore, the results are robust to inter- and intra-expert-related errors.

Automatic landmark annotation in 3D surface scans of skulls: Methodological proposal and reliability study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Craniometric landmarks are essential in many biomedical applications, such as morphometric analysis or forensic identification. The process of locating landmarks is usually a manual and slow task, highly influenced by fatigue, skills and the experience of the practitioner. Localization errors are propagated and magnified in subsequent steps, which can result in incorrect measurements or assumptions. Thereby, standardization, reliability and reproducibility lay the foundations for the necessary accuracy in subsequent measurements or anatomical analysis. In this paper, we present an automatic method to annotate 3D surface skull models taking into account anatomical and geometrical features. METHODS: The proposed method follows a hybrid structure where a deformable template is used to initialize the landmark positions. Then, a refinement stage is applied using prior anatomical knowledge to ensure a correct placement. Our proposal is validated over thirty 3D skull scans of male Caucasians, acquired by hand-held surface scanning, and a set of 58 craniometric landmarks. A statistical analysis was carried out to analyze the inter- and intra-observer variability of manual annotations and the automatic results, along with a visual assessment of the final results. RESULTS: Inter-observer errors show significant differences, which are reflected in the expert consensus used as reference. The average localization error was 2.19±1.5 mm when comparing the automatic landmarks to the reference location. The subsequent visual analysis confirmed the reliability of the refinement method for most landmarks. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated manual annotations show a high variability depending on both skills and expertise of the observer, and landmarks' location and characteristics. In contrast, the automatic method provides an accurate, robust and reproducible alternative to the tedious and error-prone task of manual landmarking.