RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limited research has studied the influence of social determinants of health (SDoH) on the receipt, disease risk, and subsequent effectiveness of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (nMAbs) for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of SDoH variables on receiving nMAb treatments and the risk of a poor COVID-19 outcome, as well as nMAb treatment effectiveness across SDoH subgroups. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study utilizing electronic health record data from four health systems. SDoH variables analyzed included race, ethnicity, insurance, marital status, Area Deprivation Index, and population density. PARTICIPANTS: COVID-19 patients who met at least one emergency use authorization criterion for nMAb treatment. MAIN MEASURE: We used binary logistic regression to examine the influence of SDoH variables on receiving nMAb treatments and risk of a poor outcome from COVID-19 and marginal structural models to study treatment effectiveness. RESULTS: The study population included 25,241 (15.1%) nMAb-treated and 141,942 (84.9%) non-treated patients. Black or African American patients were less likely to receive treatment than white non-Hispanic patients (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.82-0.91). Patients who were on Medicaid, divorced or widowed, living in rural areas, or living in areas with the highest Area Deprivation Index (most vulnerable) had lower odds of receiving nMAb treatment, but a higher risk of a poor outcome. For example, compared to patients on private insurance, Medicaid patients had 0.89 (95% CI = 0.84-0.93) times the odds of receiving nMAb treatment, but 1.18 (95% CI = 1.13-1.24) times the odds of a poor COVID-19 outcome. Age, comorbidities, and COVID-19 vaccination status had a stronger influence on risk of a poor outcome than SDoH variables. nMAb treatment benefited all SDoH subgroups with lower rates of 14-day hospitalization and 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Disparities existed in receiving nMAbs within SDoH subgroups despite the benefit of treatment across subgroups.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Anticuerpos MonoclonalesRESUMEN
Germline variants might predict cancer progression. Bevacizumab improves overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancers. No biomarkers are available to identify patients that benefit from bevacizumab. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) was conducted in 1,520 patients from Phase III trials (CALGB 80303, 40503, 80405 and ICON7), where bevacizumab was randomized to treatment without bevacizumab. We aimed to identify genes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with survival independently of bevacizumab treatment or through interaction with bevacizumab. A cause-specific Cox model was used to test the SNP-OS association in both arms combined (prognostic), and the effect of SNPs-bevacizumab interaction on OS (predictive) in each study. The SNP effects across studies were combined using inverse variance. Findings were tested for replication in advanced colorectal and ovarian cancer patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TGCA). In the GWAS meta-analysis, patients with rs680949 in PRUNE2 experienced shorter OS compared to patients without it (P = 1.02 × 10-7 , hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-1.86), as well as in TCGA (P = .0219, HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.07-2.35). In the GWAS meta-analysis, patients with rs16852804 in BARD1 experienced shorter OS compared to patients without it (P = 1.40 × 10-5 , HR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.25-1.82) as well as in TCGA (P = 1.39 × 10-4 , HR = 3.09, 95% CI 1.73-5.51). Patients with rs3795897 in AGAP1 experienced shorter OS in the bevacizumab arm compared to the nonbevacizumab arm (P = 1.43 × 10-5 ). The largest GWAS meta-analysis of bevacizumab treated patients identified PRUNE2 and BARD1 (tumor suppressor genes) as prognostic genes of colorectal and ovarian cancer, respectively, and AGAP1 as a potentially predictive gene that interacts with bevacizumab with respect to patient survival.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypertension and proteinuria are common bevacizumab-induced toxicities. No validated biomarkers are available for identifying patients at risk of these toxicities. METHODS: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis was performed in 1039 bevacizumab-treated patients of European ancestry in four clinical trials (CALGB 40502, 40503, 80303, 90401). Grade ≥2 hypertension and proteinuria were recorded (CTCAE v.3.0). Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-toxicity associations were determined using a cause-specific Cox model adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: The most significant SNP associated with hypertension with concordant effect in three out of the four studies (p-value <0.05 for each study) was rs6770663 (A > G) in KCNAB1, with the G allele increasing the risk of hypertension (p-value = 4.16 × 10-6). The effect of the G allele was replicated in ECOG-ACRIN E5103 in 582 patients (p-value = 0.005). The meta-analysis of all five studies for rs6770663 led to p-value = 7.73 × 10-8, close to genome-wide significance. The most significant SNP associated with proteinuria was rs339947 (C > A, between DNAH5 and TRIO), with the A allele increasing the risk of proteinuria (p-value = 1.58 × 10-7). CONCLUSIONS: The results from the largest study of bevacizumab toxicity provide new markers of drug safety for further evaluations. SNP in KCNAB1 validated in an independent dataset provides evidence toward its clinical applicability to predict bevacizumab-induced hypertension. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00785291 (CALGB 40502); NCT00601900 (CALGB 40503); NCT00088894 (CALGB 80303) and NCT00110214 (CALGB 90401).
Asunto(s)
Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo/métodos , Hipertensión/patología , Canal de Potasio Kv1.3/genética , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Proteinuria/patología , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/inducido químicamente , Hipertensión/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/patología , Proteinuria/inducido químicamente , Proteinuria/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is characterised by genomic perturbations of key cell cycle regulators. Oncogenic activation of CDK4/6 results in RB1 inactivation and cell cycle progression. Given that single-agent CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy failed to show clinical activity in advanced GIST, we evaluated strategies for maximising response to therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition. METHODS: Targeted next-generation sequencing and multiplexed protein imaging were used to detect cell cycle regulator aberrations in GIST clinical samples. The impact of inhibitors of CDK2, CDK4 and CDK2/4/6 was determined through cell proliferation and protein detection assays. CDK-inhibitor resistance mechanisms were characterised in GIST cell lines after long-term exposure. RESULTS: We identify recurrent genomic aberrations in cell cycle regulators causing co-activation of the CDK2 and CDK4/6 pathways in clinical GIST samples. Therapeutic co-targeting of CDK2 and CDK4/6 is synergistic in GIST cell lines with intact RB1, through inhibition of RB1 hyperphosphorylation and cell proliferation. Moreover, RB1 inactivation and a novel oncogenic cyclin D1 resulting from an intragenic rearrangement (CCND1::chr11.g:70025223) are mechanisms of acquired CDK-inhibitor resistance in GIST. CONCLUSIONS: These studies establish the biological rationale for CDK2 and CDK4/6 co-inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced GIST, including metastatic GIST progressing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Quinasa 2 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/genética , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events is an item library designed for eliciting patient-reported adverse events in oncology. For each adverse event, up to three individual items are scored for frequency, severity, and interference with daily activities. To align the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events with other standardized tools for adverse event assessment including the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, an algorithm for mapping individual items for any given adverse event to a single composite numerical grade was developed and tested. METHODS: A five-step process was used: (1) All 179 possible Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events score combinations were presented to 20 clinical investigators to subjectively map combinations to single numerical grades ranging from 0 to 3. (2) Combinations with <75% agreement were presented to investigator committees at a National Clinical Trials Network cooperative group meeting to gain majority consensus via anonymous voting. (3) The resulting algorithm was refined via graphical and tabular approaches to assure directional consistency. (4) Validity, reliability, and sensitivity were assessed in a national study dataset. (5) Accuracy for delineating adverse events between study arms was measured in two Phase III clinical trials (NCT02066181 and NCT01522443). RESULTS: In Step 1, 12/179 score combinations had <75% initial agreement. In Step 2, majority consensus was reached for all combinations. In Step 3, five grades were adjusted to assure directional consistency. In Steps 4 and 5, composite grades performed well and comparably to individual item scores on validity, reliability, sensitivity, and between-arm delineation. CONCLUSION: A composite grading algorithm has been developed and yields single numerical grades for adverse events assessed via the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and can be useful in analyses and reporting.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Antineoplásicos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Neoplasias , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Algoritmos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Importance: Aspirin and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) inhibitors have been associated with a reduced risk of colorectal polyps and cancer in observational and randomized studies. The effect of celecoxib, a COX-2 inhibitor, as treatment for nonmetastatic colon cancer is unknown. Objective: To determine if the addition of celecoxib to adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) improves disease-free survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/Southwest Oncology Group 80702 was a 2 × 2 factorial design, phase 3 trial conducted at 654 community and academic centers throughout the United States and Canada. A total of 2526 patients with stage III colon cancer were enrolled between June 2010 and November 2015 and were followed up through August 10, 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive adjuvant FOLFOX (every 2 weeks) for 3 vs 6 months with or without 3 years of celecoxib (400 mg orally daily; n = 1263) vs placebo (n = 1261). This report focuses on the results of the celecoxib randomization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was disease-free survival, measured from the time of randomization until documented recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary end points included overall survival, adverse events, and cardiovascular-specific events. Results: Of the 2526 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 61.0 years [11 years]; 1134 women [44.9%]), 2524 were included in the primary analysis. Adherence with protocol treatment, defined as receiving celecoxib or placebo for more than 2.75 years or continuing treatment until recurrence, death, or unacceptable adverse events, was 70.8% for patients treated with celecoxib and 69.9% for patients treated with placebo. A total of 337 patients randomized to celecoxib and 363 to placebo experienced disease recurrence or died, and with 6 years' median follow-up, the 3-year disease-free survival was 76.3% for celecoxib-treated patients vs 73.4% for placebo-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR] for disease recurrence or death, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.03; P = .12). The effect of celecoxib treatment on disease-free survival did not vary significantly according to assigned duration of adjuvant chemotherapy (P for interaction = .61). Five-year overall survival was 84.3% for celecoxib vs 81.6% for placebo (HR for death, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.04; P = .13). Hypertension (any grade) occurred while treated with FOLFOX in 14.6% of patients in the celecoxib group vs 10.9% of patients in the placebo group, and a grade 2 or higher increase in creatinine levels occurred after completion of FOLFOX in 1.7% vs 0.5% of patients, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with stage III colon cancer, the addition of celecoxib for 3 years, compared with placebo, to standard adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve disease-free survival. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01150045.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Celecoxib/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa 2/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Celecoxib/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Inhibidores de la Ciclooxigenasa 2/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Cooperación del Paciente , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Prevención Secundaria , Tasa de Supervivencia , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The US cancer cooperative groups (cooperative groups) were founded in the 1950s to establish a standing infrastructure to conduct multi-institutional cancer clinical trials. Initially funded almost entirely by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI), over the years, the research conducted by the Cooperative Groups has evolved to meet the demands of cancer clinical research, with a scope now encompassing trials to advance cancer treatment, cancer control, biomarker development and validation, and health services research, with a corresponding broadening of their funding sources. The cooperative groups are also a critical mechanism for educating the next generation of cancer clinical trialists from many different disciplines. This review outlines the overall mission, structure, and funding of the cooperative groups, beginning in 1955 when they were first established by the NCI, and describes the considerable progress against cancer achieved over the past decade.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/terapia , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/organización & administración , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Conducta Cooperativa , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Clinical trials provide evidence essential for progress in health care, and as the complexity of medical care has increased, the demand for such data has dramatically expanded. Conducting clinical trials has also become more complicated, evolving to meet increasing challenges in delivering clinical care and meeting regulatory requirements. Despite this, the general approach to data collection remains the same, requiring that researchers submit clinical data in response to study treatment protocols, using precisely defined data structures made available in study-specific case report forms. Currently, research data management is not integrated within the patient's clinical care record, creating added burden for clinical staff and opportunities for error. During the past decade, the electronic health record has become standard across the US healthcare system and is increasingly used to collect and analyze data reporting quality metrics for clinical care delivery. Recently, electronic health record data have also been used to address clinical research questions; however, this approach has significant drawbacks due to the unstructured and incomplete nature of current electronic health record data. This report describes steps necessary to use the electronic health record as a tool for conducting high-quality clinical research.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Investigación Biomédica , Recolección de Datos , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Proyectos de InvestigaciónAsunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Músculo EsqueléticoRESUMEN
Desmoid tumors (DTs) are unusual neoplasms of mesenchymal origin that exhibit locally invasive behavior. Surgical resection is the initial treatment of choice for DTs. For patients with recurrent or unresectable disease, however, medical options are limited. Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with known antitumor activity in various cancers via suppression of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Here, we examined the effects of sorafenib on patient-derived DT cell lines, with the aim of characterizing the efficacy and molecular mechanism of action. Early passage DT-derived cells were treated with increasing doses of sorafenib (0-10 µM) and demonstrated up to 90% decrease in proliferation and invasion relative to controls. Signaling arrays identified multiple potential targets of sorafenib in the Ras/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling cascades. Immunoblot analysis revealed that sorafenib inhibited Akt, MEK and ERK phosphorylation, and this effect correlated with inhibition of total Akt and total MEK, while total ERK levels remained unchanged. Sorafenib also inhibited 4E-BP1 phosphorylation, and this effect correlated with decrease of p-eIF4E and total eIF4E. Finally, in combination with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus, sorafenib decreased phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein and mTOR effector S6K in an additive manner. Taken together, our results suggest that sorafenib suppresses DT proliferation and invasion via inhibition of Ras/MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways with additional effects on translation. Sorafenib may be a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of DTs. Additional studies in DT patients are warranted to examine the efficacy of combination therapy using sorafenib.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Invasividad Neoplásica/prevención & control , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Sistema de Señalización de MAP Quinasas/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/metabolismo , Proteínas ras/metabolismoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To refine treatment recommendations for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and surgery. BACKGROUND: Early reports suggested that patients with metastatic GIST responding to TKIs treated with surgery may have favorable outcomes. However, identification of prognostic factors was limited by small cohorts. METHODS: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from time of surgery and from start of initial TKI was determined. Multivariate analysis was conducted on all patients undergoing GIST metastasectomy between 2001 and 2014 at 2 institutions. RESULTS: We performed 400 operations on 323 patients with metastatic GIST on TKIs. Radiographic response at time of surgery was classified as responsive disease (RD, n = 64, 16%), stable disease (SD, n = 100, 25%), unifocal progressive disease (UPD, n = 132, 33%), and multifocal progressive disease (MPD, n = 104, 26%). For patients on imatinib before surgery, radiographic response was predictive of PFS from time of surgery (RD 36 months, SD 30 months, UPD 11 months, MPD 6 months; P < 0.001) and from imatinib initiation (RD 71 months, SD 51 months, UPD 47 months, MPD 33 months; P < 0.001). Radiographic response was predictive of OS from time of surgery (RD not reached, SD 110 months, UPD 59 months, MPD 24 months; P < 0.001), and from imatinib initiation (RD not reached, SD 144 months, UPD 105 months, MPD 66 months; P = 0.005). Radiographic response was not predictive of PFS/OS for patients on sunitinib. Metastatic mitotic index ≥5/50 HPF, MPD, and R2 resection were prognostic of worse PFS/OS; primary mutation was not. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery in metastatic GIST patients in the absence of MPD on imatinib is associated with outcomes at least comparable with second-line sunitinib and may be considered in select patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Metastasectomía , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Humanos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recently, some have argued for routine resection of adjacent but uninvolved organs in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) without stipulating the rationale for such organ resection (beyond the need to achieve a macroscopically complete resection) or examining histopathologic organ invasion (HOI). This study reviewed the authors' experience with primary RPS to investigate the rate and rationale for individual organ resection and the rate of HOI. METHODS: Operative and pathology reports for patients with primary RPS who underwent resection at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Histopathologic organ invasion was confirmed by a dedicated sarcoma pathologist. RESULTS: From 2002 through 2011, 118 patients underwent resection of a primary RPS, and 99 of these patients (84%) had at least one organ resected. Kidney (n = 57), colon (n = 51), and adrenal (n = 41) were the most commonly resected organs. For the 302 organs removed, the perioperative clinical rationale for the resection was suspected invasion or tumor origin (n = 52, 17%), involved end-organ vasculature (n = 39, 13%), organ encasement (n = 42, 14%), tumor adherence (n = 127, 42%), resection required for R0/R1 resection (n = 25, 8%), or other (n = 17, 6%). The presence of HOI was found in 77 (25%) of the 302 organs resected. In the reviewed studies, HOI was identified in 34 (65%) of 52 organs suspected of invasion or tumor origin, in 19% of organs resected due to tumor encasement, and in 26% of organs with adherent tumor, even when not suspected intraoperatively, but was never identified in organs resected purely as part of a liberal en bloc resection of adjacent organs. When invasion was suspected intraoperatively, HOI was confirmed in 50, 78, and 100% of resected organs respectively for well-dedifferentiated liposarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), and leiomyosarcoma (LMS). CONCLUSIONS: Histologic organ invasion was observed more commonly in organs resected with suspicion of invasion than in organs resected simply to achieve a negative margin, although this reflects a degree of subjectivity and selection bias. In more than one-fourth of adherent organs, HOI was present even when not suspected intraoperatively. Histologic subtype may predict HOI because DDLPS and LMS are associated with high rates of HOI when invasion is suspected intraoperatively. Development of a data-driven, histology-specific rationale for adjacent organ resection is critical.
Asunto(s)
Glándulas Suprarrenales/patología , Colon/patología , Riñón/patología , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/patología , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Sarcoma/patología , Sarcoma/cirugía , Adolescente , Adrenalectomía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Nefrectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Amputation for localized extremity sarcoma (ES), once the primary therapy, is now rarely performed. We reviewed our experience to determine why patients with sarcoma still undergo immediate or delayed amputation, identify differences based on amputation timing, and evaluate outcomes. METHODS: Records of patients with primary, nonmetastatic ES who underwent amputation at our institution from 2001 to 2011 were reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed, and survival outcomes were calculated. RESULTS: We categorized 54 patients into three cohorts: primary amputation (A1, n = 18, 33%), secondary amputation after prior limb-sparing surgery (A2, n = 22, 41%), and hand and foot sarcomas (HF, n = 14, 26%). Median age at amputation was 54 years (range 18-88 years). Common indications for amputation (> 40%) were loss of function, bone involvement, multiple compartment involvement, and large tumor size (A1); proximal location, joint involvement, neurovascular compromise, multiple compartment involvement, multifocal or fungating tumor, loss of function, and large tumor size (A2); and joint involvement and prior unplanned surgery (HF). There was no difference in disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.19) or metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p = 0.31) between early (A1) and delayed (A2) amputation. Compared with cohorts A1/A2, HF patients had longer overall survival (OS) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Indications for amputation for extremity sarcoma vary between those who undergo primary amputation, delayed amputation, and amputation for hand or foot sarcoma. Amputations chosen judiciously are associated with excellent disease control and survival. For patients who ultimately need amputation, timing (early vs. delayed) does not affect survival.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Toma de Decisiones , Extremidades/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Sarcoma/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Extremidades/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Cutaneous radiation therapy (RT)-associated breast angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare consequence of breast RT associated with poor outcomes. Previous small case series have documented high recurrence rates and poor survival. We reviewed our experience and focused on the impact of conservative versus radical resections. METHODS: Data for patients with RT-associated breast AS evaluated at our institution from 1993 to 2015 who underwent surgery were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-six women were diagnosed with RT-associated breast AS at a median 85 months from surgery for invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. Thirty-eight underwent mastectomy/wide excision with partial skin resection ("conservative") and 38 underwent resection of all or nearly all previously irradiated skin plus mastectomy ("radical"). The radical group (vs the conservative group) more often had multifocal disease (80% vs 56%, P = 0.04), chemotherapy for AS (58% vs 22%, P < 0.01), margin-negative resection (100% vs 73%, P < 0.01), reconstructive surgery (100% vs 13%, P < 0.01), and re-operation (16% vs 3%, P = 0.04). Five-year crude cumulative incidences of local recurrence and distant metastasis for radical versus conservative groups were 23% versus 76% (P < 0.01) and 18% versus 47% (P = 0.02), respectively. Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) for radical versus conservative groups was 86% versus 46% (P < 0.01), respectively. On multivariable analysis, age, radicality of surgery, and margin were predictive of DSS. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with RT-associated breast AS, radical resection was associated with reduced recurrence rates and improved DSS. Although margin was predictive of DSS, multifocality calls into question the reliability of negative margin assessment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/radioterapia , Hemangiosarcoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Hemangiosarcoma/etiología , Hemangiosarcoma/mortalidad , Hemangiosarcoma/patología , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/mortalidad , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/cirugía , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Tumor levels of thymidylate synthase (TS), a target of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, have been studied as a predictive or prognostic biomarker with mixed results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor TS levels were prospectively evaluated in two adjuvant therapy trials for patients with resected stage II or III colon cancer. TS expression was determined by standard immunohistochemistry and by automated quantitative analysis. Tumor mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D) and BRAF c.1799T > A (p.V600E) mutation status were also examined. Relationships between tumor TS, MMR-D, and BRAF mutation status, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were investigated in the subset of stage III patients. RESULTS: Patients whose tumors demonstrated high TS expression experienced better treatment outcomes, with DFS hazard ratio (HR) = 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.53, 0.84; and OS HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.53, 0.88, for high versus low TS expression, respectively. No significant interaction between TS expression and stage was observed (DFS: interaction HR = 0.94; OS: interaction HR = 0.94). Tumors with high TS expression were more likely to demonstrate MMR-D (22.2% vs. 12.8%; p = .0003). Patients whose tumors demonstrated both high TS and MMR-D had a 7-year DFS of 77%, compared with 58% for those whose tumors had low TS and were non-MMR-D (log-rank p = .0006). Tumor TS expression did not predict benefit of a particular therapeutic regimen. CONCLUSION: This large prospective analysis showed that high tumor TS levels were associated with improved DFS and OS following adjuvant therapy for colon cancer, although tumor TS expression did not predict benefit of 5-FU-based chemotherapy. The Oncologist 2017;22:107-114Implications for Practice: This study finds that measurement of tumor levels of thymidylate synthase is not helpful in assigning specific adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer. It also highlights the importance of using prospective analyses within treatment clinical trials as the optimal method of determining biomarker utility.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/genética , Timidilato Sintasa/genética , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/biosíntesis , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Timidilato Sintasa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Importance: Combining biologic monoclonal antibodies with chemotherapeutic cytotoxic drugs provides clinical benefit to patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, but the optimal choice of the initial biologic therapy in previously untreated patients is unknown. Objective: To determine if the addition of cetuximab vs bevacizumab to the combination of leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) regimen or the combination of leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen is superior as first-line therapy in advanced or metastatic KRAS wild-type (wt) colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients (≥18 years) enrolled at community and academic centers throughout the National Clinical Trials Network in the United States and Canada (November 2005-March 2012) with previously untreated advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer whose tumors were KRAS wt chose to take either the mFOLFOX6 regimen or the FOLFIRI regimen as chemotherapy and were randomized to receive either cetuximab (n = 578) or bevacizumab (n = 559). The last date of follow-up was December 15, 2015. Interventions: Cetuximab vs bevacizumab combined with either mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimen chosen by the treating physician and patient. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival and overall response rate, site-reported confirmed or unconfirmed complete or partial response. Results: Among 1137 patients (median age, 59 years; 440 [39%] women), 1074 (94%) of patients met eligibility criteria. As of December 15, 2015, median follow-up for 263 surviving patients was 47.4 months (range, 0-110.7 months), and 82% of patients (938 of 1137) experienced disease progression. The median overall survival was 30.0 months in the cetuximab-chemotherapy group and 29.0 months in the bevacizumab-chemotherapy group with a stratified hazard ratio (HR) of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77-1.01; P = .08). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months in the cetuximab-chemotherapy group and 10.6 months in the bevacizumab-chemotherapy group with a stratified HR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.84-1.08; P = .45). Response rates were not significantly different, 59.6% vs 55.2% for cetuximab and bevacizumab, respectively (difference, 4.4%, 95% CI, 1.0%-9.0%, P = .13). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with KRAS wt untreated advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, there was no significant difference in overall survival between the addition of cetuximab vs bevacizumab to chemotherapy as initial biologic treatment. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00265850.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Canadá , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/secundario , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Genes ras , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Desmoid tumors (DTs) are rare, mesenchymal tumors that exhibit features of an abundant wound healing process. Previously, we showed that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are constituents of DTs and may contribute to desmoid tumorigenesis via activities associated with wound healing. Hyaluronan (HA) is a long-charged chain of repeating glucuronate and N-acetylglucosamine disaccharides that is synthesized by HA synthases (HAS) and degraded by hyaluronidases (HYAL). HA is secreted into the extracellular matrix by injured stroma and is important for normal tissue repair and neoplastic progression. Here, we investigated the presence of HA in DTs and the antitumor effects of the HA inhibitor, 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU), on DT-derived mesenchymal cells. By immunohistochemistry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we found abundant expression of HA in 29/30 DTs as well as >5-fold increased HA levels in DT-derived cell lines relative to controls. Immunohistochemistry also demonstrated high expression of HAS2 in DTs, and quantitative PCR analysis showed increased HAS2 upregulation in frozen DTs and DT-derived cells. 4-MU treatment of DT-derived cells significantly decreased proliferation as well as HA and HAS2 levels. Fluorescent immunohistochemistry showed that MSCs in DTs coexpressed HA, HAS2, HYAL2, as well as the major HA receptor CD44 and HA coreceptor TLR4. Taken together, our results suggest that paracrine regulation of HA signaling in DTs may contribute to MSC recruitment and tumor proliferation. Future studies investigating the role of HA in tumor-stroma crosstalk and inhibition of HA-MSC interactions as a novel therapeutic target in DTs and other solid tumors are warranted.