RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to examine the association of psychiatric comorbidities and patient characteristics with treatment change and response as well as to assess the association between treatment change and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and psychiatric comorbidities. METHODS: De-identified electronic health records from the NeuroBlu Database (2002-2021) were used to select patients ≥ 18 years with ADHD who were prescribed ADHD-specific medication. The index date was set as the first prescription of ADHD medication. The outcomes were treatment change (discontinuation, switch, add-on, or drop) and HCRU (inpatient, outpatient, composite) within 12 months of follow-up. Cox proportional-hazard model was used to assess the association between clinical and demographic patient characteristics and treatment change, while generalized linear model with negative binomial distribution and log link function was used to assess the association between key risk factors linked to treatment change and HCRU rates. RESULTS: A total of 3,387 patients with ADHD were included (ADHD only: 1,261; ADHD + major depressive disorder (MDD): 755; ADHD + anxiety disorder: 467; ADHD + mood disorder: 164). Nearly half (44.8%) of the study cohort experienced a treatment change within the 12-month follow-up period. Treatment switch and add-on were more common in patients with ADHD and comorbid MDD and anxiety disorder (switch: 18.9%; add-on: 20.5%) compared to other cohorts (range for switch: 8.5-13.6%; range for add-on: 8.9-12.1%) Survival analysis demonstrated that the probability of treatment change within 12 months from treatment initiation in the study cohort was estimated to be 42.4%. Outpatient visit rates statistically significantly increased from baseline (mean [SD] 1.03 [1.84] visits/month) to 3 months post-index (mean [SD] 1.62 [1.91] visits/month; p < 0.001), followed by a gradual decline up to 12 months post-index. Being prescribed both a stimulant and a non-stimulant at index date was statistically significantly associated with increased risk of treatment change (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.13, 2.38; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study found that treatment change was common among patients with ADHD and psychiatric comorbidities. These findings support the need for future studies to examine the unmet medical and treatment needs of this complex patient population.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Comorbilidad , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin type A (IgA) nephropathy is the most common primary glomerulonephritis (GN) worldwide with higher rates in East and Pacific Asia compared to North America and Europe. Despite high reported prevalence of IgAN in these countries, the overall disease prevalence across Asia is not available. Treatment patterns of IgAN patients across Asian countries have also not been summarized. The aim of this study was to review and summarize evidence on IgA nephropathy prevalence, treatment patterns, and humanistic and economic burden in mainland China, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and Australia. METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted in PubMed and local databases in China (including Taiwan), South Korea, Japan, and Australia between January 2010-December 2021. Website literature searches were conducted using Google Scholar and Baidu. RESULTS: Sixty-nine publications and 3 clinical guidelines were included. Incidence ranged from 0 to 10.7 per 100 000 people per year in Australia, Japan, and Taiwan, and ranged from 6.3 to 24.70% among patients who underwent renal biopsy in mainland China. Prevalence and diagnosis rates ranged from 0 to 72.1% in mainland China, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and Australia. Mortality rates in mainland China, South Korea, and Japan varied widely. The top 3 commonly used therapies were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (0.9-99.6%), corticosteroids (3.5-100%), and immunosuppressants (1.6-85.5%) in Japan, mainland China, and South Korea. Patient quality of life was measured by different tools, and annual hospitalization costs ranged from $1 284.73 to $2 252.12 (2015-2018) in China. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of IgA nephropathy among the general population in select countries/regions is not commonly available, despite evidence from studies and clinical guidelines. In addition, it is observed across geographic regions that heterogeneity exists in prevalence rates, and large variations exist in treatment patterns. There is need to fill in these gaps to understand the contributing factors behind the differences through population-based, multi-center, and real-world studies.
Asunto(s)
Glomerulonefritis por IGA , Humanos , China/epidemiología , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/epidemiología , Glomerulonefritis por IGA/terapia , Japón/epidemiología , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the extent to which chronic comorbidities contribute to excess health care expenditures between older adults with dementia and propensity score (PS)-matched nondementia controls. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, PS-matched case (dementia): control (nondementia) study of older adults (65 y or above) using alternative years data from pooled 2005 to 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS). Chronic comorbidities were identified based on Clinical Classifications System or ICD-9-CM codes. Ordinary least squares regression was utilized to quantify the impact of chronic comorbidities on the excess expenditures with logarithmic transformation. Expenditures were expressed as 2019 US dollars. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design of MEPS. RESULTS: The mean yearly home health care expenditures were particularly higher among older adults with dementia and co-occurring anemia, eye disorders, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension compared with PS-matched controls. Ordinary least squares regression models revealed that home health care expenditures were 131% higher (ß=0.837, P <0.001) among older adults with dementia compared with matched nondementia controls before adjusting for chronic comorbidities. When additionally adjusting for chronic comorbidities, the percentage increase, while still significant ( P <0.001) decreased from 131% to 102%. CONCLUSIONS: The excess home health care expenditures were partially explained by chronic comorbidities among community-dwelling older adults with dementia.
Asunto(s)
Demencia , Estrés Financiero , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Demencia/epidemiología , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about relationships between opioid- and gabapentinoid-use patterns and healthcare expenditures that may be affected by pain management and risk of adverse outcomes. This study examined the association between patients' opioid and gabapentinoid prescription filling/refilling trajectories and direct medical expenditures in US Medicare. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included a 5% national sample (2011-2016) of fee-for-service beneficiaries with fibromyalgia, low back pain, neuropathy, or osteoarthritis newly initiating opioids or gabapentinoids. Using group-based multitrajectory modeling, this study identified patients' distinct opioid and gabapentinoid (OPI-GABA) dose and duration patterns, based on standardized daily doses, within a year of initiating opioids and/or gabapentinoids. Concurrent direct medical expenditures within the same year were estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighted multivariable generalized linear regression, adjusting for sociodemographic and health status factors. RESULTS: Among 67 827 eligible beneficiaries (mean age ± SD = 63.6 ± 14.8 years, female = 65.8%, white = 77.1%), 11 distinct trajectories were identified (3 opioid-only, 4 gabapentinoid-only, and 4 concurrent OPI-GABA trajectories). Compared with opioid-only early discontinuers ($13 830, 95% confidence interval = $13 643-14 019), gabapentinoid-only early discontinuers and consistent low-dose and moderate-dose gabapentinoid-only users were associated with 11% to 23% lower health expenditures (adjusted mean expenditure = $10 607-$11 713). Consistent low-dose opioid-only users, consistent high-dose opioid-only users, consistent low-dose OPI-GABA users, consistent low-dose opioid and high-dose gabapentinoid users, and consistent high-dose opioid and moderate-dose gabapentinoid users were associated with 14% to 106% higher healthcare expenditures (adjusted mean expenditure = $15 721-$28 464). CONCLUSIONS: Dose and duration patterns of concurrent OPI-GABA varied substantially among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries. Consistent opioid-only users and all concurrent OPI-GABA users were associated with higher healthcare expenditures compared to opioid-only discontinuers.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Gabapentina/uso terapéutico , Medicare/economía , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Estudios Transversales , Utilización de Medicamentos , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/economía , Femenino , Gabapentina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent interest in initiating pay-for-performance (P4P) programs indicates an underlying belief that economic incentives will have a direct impact on health care quality and efficiency. Evaluations of the impact of P4P programs on health care organizations and providers have been presented in the literature; however, none have focused on the impact of an incentive targeting community pharmacies. OBJECTIVE: To propose a theory-derived conceptual framework of how a financial incentive might work in a community pharmacy. METHODS: Studies from the fields of economics (agency theory), psychology (intrinsic and extrinsic motivators; expectancy theory), and organizational theory (ownership, institutional layers, organizational culture, and change management; quality improvement) were reviewed to inform the framework's components. This proposed conceptual framework also integrated and expanded on previous health care-related P4P models. RESULTS: P4P programs inherently use financial incentives to catalyze change; however, elements from psychology and organizational theories along with economic theory were identified as important considerations in how a financial incentive may operate when targeting a community pharmacy. Through the incorporation of these theories along with other P4P frameworks in health care, a conceptual framework was derived comprising 4 domains: incentive, pharmacy, other influencing factors, and P4P program measures. Hypothesized relationships among these domains were depicted. CONCLUSION: As focus on improving the quality of health care provision develops, opportunities for pharmacists to provide patient care services beyond dispensing will continue to advance, along with expanded reimbursement mechanisms extending beyond traditional product dispensing. The proposed theory-derived conceptual framework serves to depict how the integration of P4P and other factors may affect the pharmacy environment and subsequently affect a pharmacy's capability to perform well on medication-related quality measures. This framework may be used as a foundation on which to design studies to investigate the association between community pharmacy factors and performance in a P4P program.
Asunto(s)
Farmacias , Reembolso de Incentivo , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Back pain is a very prevalent complaint, affecting two-thirds of the US population, and it accounts for $100 billion annually in health care expenditures. The occurrence of depression has been reported in existing literature among patients with back pain, but there is limited information regarding health care expenditures among patients with back pain and concurrent depression. OBJECTIVE: To assess excess total and subtypes of health care expenditures among adults with spondylosis, intervertebral disc disorders, and other back problems who reported having depression compared with those without depression in the United States. METHODS: We utilized a cross-sectional design, pooling Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data from 2010-2012. The eligible study sample included adults (age ≥18 years) who reported positive health care expenditure. Total and subtypes of health care expenditures constituted the dependent variable. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions on logged expenditures were performed. Four models were developed to assess influence of demographics, functional ability, and concurrent diagnoses on health care expenditures. RESULTS: A total of 6,739 adults with spondylosis, intervertebral disc disorders, and other back problems were assessed, 20.2% (N = 1,316) of whom had concurrent depression. Adults with concurrent depression had significantly higher total health care expenditures ($13,153) compared with the nondepression group ($7,477, P < 0.001). Outpatient and prescription expenditures showed similar findings. After adjusting for demographics, functional disabilities, and comorbidities, excess cost remained higher in the group reporting concurrent depression (46%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the presence of depression in adults with spondylosis, intervertebral disc disorders, and other back problems is associated with greater economic burden. These findings remained consistent after adjusting for all independent sets of variables. The study's findings suggest that interventions resulting in better management of depression have the potential to significantly reduce the economic burden in this population.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/economía , Dolor de Espalda/psicología , Depresión/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Costo de Enfermedad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/economía , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espondilosis/complicaciones , Espondilosis/economía , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) between patients treated with opioid analgesia versus non-opioid analgesia for low back pain (LBP) in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) data (2014-2015). Adults (age ≥18â¯years) who presented to the ED with a reason for visit or primary diagnosis of LBP were included in the final study sample. Patient visits were categorized into two groups based on whether they received opioid analgesia (with or without non-opioid analgesia) or non-opioid analgesia only in the ED. The primary outcome measure was ED LOS, which was log-transformed (as ED LOS was not normally distributed) for analysis. A multivariable linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between opioid use and ED LOS. RESULTS: The study sample consisted of a national estimate of approximately 8.6 million ED visits for LBP (during 2014-2015), of which 60.1% received opioids and 39.9% received non-opioids only. The geometric mean ED LOS for patient visits who received opioids was longer than patient visits who received non-opioids (142 versus 92â¯min, respectively; pâ¯<â¯0.001). After adjusting for confounders in the multivariable analysis, patient visits that received opioids had a significantly longer ED LOS (coefficient 0.25; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.38; pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative sample of patient visits to ED due to LBP in the US, use of opioids in the ED was associated with an increased ED LOS.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent and identify predictors of potentially inappropriate antidepressant use among older adults with dementia and newly diagnosed major depressive disorders (MDD). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included older adults (aged ≥65 years) with dementia and newly diagnosed MDD using Medicare 5% sample claims data (2012-2013). Based on Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set guidelines, intake period for new antidepressant medication use was from May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. Index prescription start date was the first date of antidepressant prescription claim during the intake period. Dependent variable of this study was potentially inappropriate antidepressant use as defined by the Beers Criteria and the Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria. The authors conducted multiple logistic regression analysis to identify individual-level predictors of potentially inappropriate antidepressant use. RESULTS: The authors' final study sample consisted of 7,625 older adults with dementia and newly diagnosed MDD, among which 7.59% (Nâ¯=â¯579) initiated treatment with a potentially inappropriate antidepressant. Paroxetine (Nâ¯=â¯394) was the most commonly initiated potentially inappropriate antidepressant followed by amitriptyline (Nâ¯=â¯104), nortriptyline (Nâ¯=â¯35), and doxepin (Nâ¯=â¯32). Initiation of a potentially inappropriate antidepressant was associated with age and baseline use of anxiolytic medications. CONCLUSION: More than 7% of older adults in the study sample initiated a potentially inappropriate antidepressant, and the authors identified a few individual-level factors significantly associated with it. Appropriately tailored interventions to address modifiable and nonmodifiable factors significantly associated with potentially inappropriate antidepressant prescribing are required to minimize risks in this vulnerable population.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Demencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recently, several deaths secondary to cardiac arrhythmias have been reported in association with substitutive use of loperamide. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of all reported cases to overview the epidemiologic patterns and clinical outcomes to better elucidate loperamide-induced cardiac complications. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: Association between substitutive use of loperamide and cardiac arrhythmias. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 6 databases using variety of keywords to identify all reports of cardiac side effects associated with loperamide abuse. Only original case reports of cardiac toxicity or cardiac arrhythmias after loperamide abuse or overuse were included. Data were extracted by 2 authors independently using a structured template from the selected reports. Quality assessment of the reports was performed by using a high-quality evaluation tool. RESULTS: Thirteen reports describing 19 cases were included in our review. Except for coronary artery spasm in one case, cardiac arrhythmias were the major reported cardiac adverse event. The average age of patients was 31 years with majority being men (79%). The most common presentation was syncope (63%). All cases were reported in US except for 1 case. Three patients were concomitantly taking cimetidine, which is known to cause inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 leading to increased levels of loperamide. Thirteen of 19 patients were successfully treated and discharged in a stable condition. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that measures such as restricting over-the-counter availability of loperamide and increasing awareness regarding loperamide's toxicity are imperative to prevent deaths associated with loperamide abuse.
Asunto(s)
Antidiarreicos/efectos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas/inducido químicamente , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Cardiotoxicidad/epidemiología , Abuso de Medicamentos/psicología , Loperamida/efectos adversos , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Molecular imaging of carotid plaque vulnerability to atheroembolic events is likely to lead to improvements in selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aims of this study were to assess the relative value of endothelial inflammatory markers for this application and to develop molecular ultrasound contrast agents for their imaging. METHODS: Human CEA specimens were obtained prospectively from asymptomatic (30) and symptomatic (30) patients. Plaques were assessed by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry for vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1, P-selectin, and von Willebrand factor. Established small peptide ligands to each of these targets were then synthesized and covalently conjugated to the surface of lipid-shelled microbubble ultrasound contrast agents, which were then evaluated in a flow chamber for binding kinetics to activated human aortic endothelial cells under variable shear conditions. RESULTS: Expression of VCAM-1 on the endothelium of CEA specimens from symptomatic patients was 2.4-fold greater than that from asymptomatic patients (P < .01). Expression was not significantly different between groups for P-selectin (P = .43), von Willebrand factor (P = .59), or lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor 1 (P = .99). Although most plaques from asymptomatic patients displayed low VCAM-1 expression, approximately one in five expressed high VCAM-1 similar to plaques from symptomatic patients. In vitro flow chamber experiments demonstrated that VCAM-1-targeted microbubbles bind cells that express VCAM-1, even under high-shear conditions that approximate those found in human carotid arteries, whereas binding efficiency was lower for the other agents. CONCLUSIONS: VCAM-1 displays significantly higher expression on high-risk (symptomatic) vs low-risk (asymptomatic) carotid plaques. Ultrasound contrast agents bearing ligands for VCAM-1 can sustain high-shear attachment and may be useful for identifying patients in whom more aggressive treatment is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Carótidas/metabolismo , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/metabolismo , Imagen Molecular/métodos , Placa Aterosclerótica , Ultrasonografía , Molécula 1 de Adhesión Celular Vascular/análisis , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Biomarcadores/análisis , Arterias Carótidas/patología , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/patología , Células Cultivadas , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Medios de Contraste/metabolismo , Células Endoteliales/metabolismo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Ligandos , Masculino , Microburbujas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Rotura Espontánea , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Depression is one of the most common psychiatric conditions among stroke survivors and is associated with several negative health outcomes. However, little is known about the depression treatment patterns among stroke survivors. The objective of this study was to examine national-level prevalence, patterns and predictors of depression treatment among community-dwelling stroke survivors. METHODS: This study adopted a retrospective, cross-sectional study design using multiple years of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (2002-2012) data. The study population consisted of older adults (age ≥ 50 years) who (i) were stroke survivors (ICD-9-CM codes of 430-438), (ii) did not die during the calendar year, and (iii) had co-occurring depression (ICD-9-CM code of 296.xx, or 311.xx). Depression treatment, identified by antidepressant medication and/or psychotherapy use, was the dependent variable of this study. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association of individual level factors with depression treatment among stroke survivors with co-occurring depression. RESULTS: The final study sample consisted 370 (unweighted) community-dwelling older adults with self-reported stroke and depression. The prevalence of co-occurring depression among stroke survivors was 22.03% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 19.7-24.4%]. An overwhelming majority (87.6%) of stroke survivors with co-occurring depression reported some form of depression treatment. Antidepressants only and combination therapy was reported by 74.8% (95% CI, 71.6-78.0%] and 12.8% (95% CI, 10.5-15.1%) by stroke survivors with co-occurring depression respectively. Approximately, 61% of stroke survivors with co-occurring depression reported using SSRIs, followed by SNRIs (15.2%), miscellaneous antidepressants (12.1%), TCAs (9.8%), phenylpiperazine antidepressants (5.2%), and tetracyclic antidepressants (4%). Sertraline (15.8, 95% CI, 12.7-19.0%) had the highest reported use among individual antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: Vast majority (nearly 90%) of the study sample received some form of depression treatment and several individual level factors (such as age, education) were associated with the report of depression treatment use. Future longitudinal studies are warranted to assess the comparative treatment benefits of antidepressants, psychotherapy and their combination. Healthcare providers should carefully assess the risks and benefits of antidepressant (such as SSRIs or TCAs) use in this vulnerable population prior to their use.
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Depresión/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/psicología , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
GOAL: The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association has specific recommendations for secondary stroke prevention. The aim of this study was to compare health behaviors engagement between stroke survivors and propensity score-matched controls. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional, matched case-control study using data from the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey. We included older adults aged 50 or older who participated in the 2015 BRFSS survey and completed the interview. Each case was matched to 3 controls (1:3) based on propensity scores to increase the power of the analyses. Stroke survivors were compared with controls on their physical activity, smoking, alcohol use, body mass index (BMI), last flu immunization, last physical checkup, last blood cholesterol check, heavy drinking, and vegetable and fruit consumption. We used binomial logistic regression to assess health behaviors among stroke survivors compared with controls. RESULTS: The final study sample consisted of 13,249 stroke survivors and 39,747 controls without stroke after propensity score matching. Multivariable analyses revealed that there were significant differences between stroke survivors and matched controls in terms of BMI, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and vegetable and fruit consumption. For example, stroke survivors were 51% more likely to be smokers (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-1.73) and 14% less likely to consume alcohol (AOR .86, 95% CI .78-.95). CONCLUSION: Findings from our study indicate that compared with propensity score-matched controls, stroke survivors engage in poorer health behaviors with the exception of alcohol consumption.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Sobrevivientes , Anciano , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Colesterol/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fumar/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
GOAL: Despite the importance of treating depression, little is known regarding the current practice pattern of depression treatment among older adults with stroke and depression. We used national survey data from ambulatory settings to examine the depression treatment patterns and predictors among stroke survivors in the United States (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a cross-sectional study design by pooling multiple-year data (2005-2011) from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the outpatient department of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Older adults (age ≥50 years) with stroke and depression constituted the final study sample. Depression treatment defined as antidepressant use with or without psychotherapy was the dependent variable in this study. All analyses adjusted for the complex survey design of the datasets to obtain nationally representative estimates. FINDINGS: The overall depression treatment was observed in 47.32% of the study sample, mainly driven by antidepressant use alone. An overwhelming majority used selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (77% of overall antidepressant use), and sertraline was the most prescribed antidepressant (30.5% of overall antidepressant use). Gender, race or ethnicity, region of residence, number of medications recorded at the sampled visit, and number of chronic conditions were significantly associated with depression treatment. CONCLUSION: According to this nationally representative sample, approximately 1 in 2 stroke survivors with depression received depression treatment in ambulatory care settings in the US. Appropriate interventions should be developed to optimize depression treatment.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antidepresivos/clasificación , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicoterapia , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/psicología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Co-occurring dementia and depression exerts a substantial burden on the elderly. This study utilizes data from a nationally representative cohort of community-dwelling individuals 65 years and older to examine the prevalence, patterns, and predictors of depression treatment among elderly individuals with co-occurring dementia and depression. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Multiple years of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012) data. PARTICIPANTS: The study sample consisted of elderly (age ≥65 years) individuals who 1) had dementia, 2) were alive during the calendar year, and 3) had co-occurring depression. MEASUREMENTS: The dependent variable of this study was depression treatment, identified by antidepressant medication with or without psychotherapy use. Individual level factors associated with depression treatment among elderly individuals with dementia and co-occurring depression were evaluated by conducting multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Co-occurring depression prevalence among community-dwelling elderly individuals with dementia was approximately 22%. An overwhelming majority (nearly 88%) of the study sample reported receipt of depression treatment. Antidepressants only and combination therapy (antidepressant with psychotherapy) was reported by 75% and 13%, respectively, of the study sample. Age, race/ethnicity, marital status, limitations of instrumental activities of daily living, perceived mental health status, and pain were significantly associated with the reporting of receipt of depression treatment. CONCLUSIONS: An overwhelming majority of the study sample received depression treatment and several subgroup differences (such as in terms of age) existed in terms of reporting the use of depression treatment was observed.
Asunto(s)
Demencia/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Masculino , Prevalencia , Psicoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the health-related quality of life among myocardial infarction (MI) survivors in the United States. The purpose of this population-based study was to identify differences in health-related quality of life domains between MI survivors and propensity score matched controls. METHODS: This retrospective, cross-sectional matched case-control study examined differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among MI survivors of myocardial infarction compared to propensity score matched controls using data from the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey. Propensity scores were generated via logistic regression for MI survivors and controls based on gender, race/ethnicity, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and comorbidities. Chi-square tests were used to compare differences between MI survivors to controls for demographic variables. A multivariate analysis of HRQoL domains estimated odds ratios. Life satisfaction, sleep quality, and activity limitations were estimated using binary logistic regression. Social support, perceived general health, perceived physical health, and perceived mental health were estimated using multinomial logistic regression. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 16,729 MI survivors matched to 50,187 controls (n = 66,916). Survivors were approximately 2.7 times more likely to report fair/poor general health compared to control (AOR = 2.72, 95% CI: 2.43-3.05) and 1.5 times more likely to report limitations to daily activities (AOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.34-1.59). Survivors were more likely to report poor physical health >15 days in the month (AOR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.46-1.83) and poor mental health >15 days in the month (AOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.07-1.46) compared to matched controls. There was no difference in survivors compared to controls in level of emotional support (rarely/never: AOR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.48-1.18; sometimes: AOR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.41-1.28), hours of recommended sleep (AOR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.94-1.38), or life satisfaction (AOR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.99-2.63). CONCLUSION: MI survivors experienced lower HRQoL on domains of general health, physical health, daily activity, and mental health compared to the general population.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Infarto del Miocardio/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Anciano , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apoyo Social , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the impact of co-occurring chronic conditions on healthcare expenditures among noninstitutionalized older adults (age ≥50 years) with stroke in comparison to non-stroke-matched controls. METHODS: This study used a retrospective, cross-sectional, matched case-control design using pooled 2002-2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. Stroke survivors (N = 2913) were compared with matched controls (N = 8739) based on propensity scores. Healthcare expenditures for co-occurring chronic conditions were compared between stroke survivors and matched controls using ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions. All analyses were conducted in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) using survey procedures adjusting for the complex survey design of the MEPS. RESULTS: The annual mean total healthcare expenditures (expressed in 2012 United States dollars) were significantly higher among stroke survivors compared with matched non-stroke controls ($18,796 versus $14,391, P < .001). OLS regressions revealed that co-occurring chronic conditions partially explained the excess healthcare expenditures among stroke survivors. The annual mean total healthcare expenditures among stroke survivors were significantly higher for most of the co-occurring chronic conditions compared with matched controls (e.g., in presence of hyperlipidemia, stroke survivor expenditures were $18,807 compared to $15,807 among matched controls). Stroke survivors with co-occurring arthritis, diabetes, or hypertension had significantly greater inpatient, emergency room, and prescription expenditures compared with matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke survivors experience a high economic burden. Interdisciplinary team-based treatment approaches to provide holistic care may help reduce the burden due to co-occurring chronic medical conditions among stroke survivors.
Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sobrevivientes , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evaluating healthcare interventions for their impacts beyond health outcomes may result in recognition of changes in human capital, income level, tax revenue, and government spending, which could affect economic growth and population health. In this paper, we document instances where current health technology assessment (HTA) practices fail to account for the impacts of healthcare interventions on broader society beyond the healthcare sector. METHODS: We propose a novel conceptual framework, highlighting its three components (distributional cost-effectiveness analysis [DCEA], input-output model, and voting scheme) and their contributions to capturing the economic and societal ripple effects of healthcare interventions. This manuscript also outlines a case study in which the framework is applied to the reassessment of a previously evaluated digital health therapeutic for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) compared with standard of care, demonstrating its practical application. RESULTS: The DCEA health value metric indicates that digital therapeutic is more equitable, favoring socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, while standard of care exacerbates health inequality by benefiting the already advantaged. Additionally, digital therapeutic shows potential for boosting productivity, raising income, and creating jobs, supporting its consideration by employer-sponsored health plans to optimize resource allocation for treating OUD. CONCLUSION: The conceptual framework provides insights for enhancing HTAs to incorporate the broader economic and societal impacts of healthcare interventions. By integrating DCEA, extended HTA analysis with input-output modeling, and a voting scheme, decision makers can make informed choices aligned with societal priorities, although further research and validation are necessary for practical implementation across diverse healthcare contexts.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención a la Salud , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica , Humanos , Atención a la Salud/economía , Modelos Económicos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Sector de Atención de Salud/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the last decade there has been an increase in the development and marketing of digital therapeutic (DTx) products aiming to prevent, manage, or treat a medical disorder or disease. Health insurance coverage for these products is not well established, and payers are facing increasing pressure to include these products as a covered benefit. OBJECTIVE: To examine factors and characteristics that could drive health insurance coverage of DTx products from US payers' and coverage decision-makers' perspectives. METHODS: This was a qualitative noninterventional, cross-sectional study conducted from August 2022 to October 2022. Virtual focus group meetings with pharmacy benefit managers/directors or medical directors representing a range of health insurance organizations were held following a semistructured interview guide. Convenience and snowball sampling techniques were used to identify participants. Transcripts were coded and analyzed with Atlas.ti software to identify common themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Five focus group meetings and 1 individual interview were held from August to October 2022. Participants (n = 22) were mostly pharmacists (n = 18, 85%) with more than 15 years of experience (n = 18, 85%). Some participants indicated that DTx products for diabetes (n = 6, 29%), mental/behavioral health (n = 3, 14%), and substance abuse disorders (n = 3, 14%) were already covered by their organizations. The topics generating the most comments grouped by code were issues around the evidence for DTx (67 unique comments) and barriers for coverage (60 unique comments). Participants indicated they want to have evidence of effectiveness that is similar to traditional pharmaceutical products. Barriers for coverage included a need to revise benefit policies, exclusion of nonprescription products, and mechanisms for billing. DTx products with an indication for mental/behavioral health were viewed as most likely to be reimbursed. Coverage of DTx products may occur under either the pharmacy or medical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Health care payers stated that evidence of effectiveness was a necessary condition for health insurance coverage of DTx products. Given these are relatively new in health care, payers had more questions than answers regarding how these products will be integrated into health benefits.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Seguro de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Farmacéuticos , Cobertura del SeguroRESUMEN
Antidepressant use has been linked to new-onset diabetes. However, the existing literature on this relationship has yielded inconsistent findings. The primary objective of this study was to systematically synthesize the literature on the relationship between antidepressant use and new-onset diabetes using meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies in seven electronic databases. Two independent reviewers identified the final list of studies to be included in the meta-analysis using a priori selection criteria. Results for the primary outcome of interest, that is, odds and hazards of developing new-onset diabetes, were pooled using a random-effects model. Egger's regression test and the Trim and Fill method were utilized to detect the presence of any potential publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method as well as individual categories of antidepressant drugs. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Random effects models revealed that adults with any use of antidepressants were more likely to develop new-onset diabetes compared with those without any use of antidepressants [odd ratios = 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-2.10; hazards ratio = 1.19, 95% CI, 1.08-1.32]. Sensitivity analyses revealed fair robustness; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants were more likely to be associated with the development of new-onset diabetes. Results from the Egger's regression test and Trim and Fill method revealed no evidence of publication bias. Among adults, antidepressant use was associated with higher chances of new-onset diabetes. However, because a cause-and-effect relationship cannot be established by observational studies, future randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm this association.