High mutational concordance between primary colorectal tumors and associated pulmonary metastases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Precision medicine has altered the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the concordance of mutational findings between primary CRC tumors and associated pulmonary metastases (PM) is not well-described. This study aims to determine the concordance of genomic profiles between primary CRC and PM. METHODS: Patients treated for colorectal PM at a single institution from 2000 to 2017 were identified. Mutational concordance was defined as either both wild-type or both mutant alleles in lung and colorectal lesion; genes with opposing mutational profiles were reported as discordant. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria, among whom KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, MET, RET, and PIK3CA were examined for concordance. High concordance was demonstrated among all evaluated genes, ranging from 86% (KRAS) to 100% concordance (NRAS, RET, and MET). De novo KRAS mutations were detected in the PM of 4 from 35 (11%) patients, 3 of whom had previously received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Evaluation of Cohen's κ statistic demonstrated moderate to perfect correlation among evaluated genes. CONCLUSIONS: Because high intertumoral genomic homogeneity exists, it may be reasonable to use primary CRC mutational profiles to guide prognostication and targeted therapy for PM. However, the possibility of de novo KRAS-mutant PM should be considered, particularly among patients previously treated with anti-EGFR therapy.

Antinausea Protocol Reduces Hospital Length of Stay for Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication.

OBJECTIVE: The perioperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) was reviewed to determine whether the use of a new treatment protocol consisting of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) plus triple antiemetic therapy was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (HLOS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Single academic center. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 448 patients. Fifty-four patients undergoing LNF who received TIVA were compared with 394 who received standard inhalational anesthesia (non-TIVA) between January 2010 and June 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Patients who received TIVA were compared with those who received non-TIVA. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, TIVA was significantly associated with reduced HLOS (odds ratio 2.91, 95% confidence interval 1.47-5.78) and a 7.8% reduction in cost of care (p < 0.01). Female sex, length of surgery, and older age all were negatively associated with length of stay. The association between the use of TIVA and reduced HLOS and institutional cost was compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TIVA in patients undergoing uncomplicated LNF shortens HLOS and is associated with reduced cost of care. This study illustrates that communication among surgeons and anesthesiologists results in improved patient care.

Patient-reported outcome domains for the esophageal CONDUIT report card: a prospective trial to establish domains.

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (QoL) deteriorates immediately after esophagectomy. Patients may benefit from periodic assessments to detect increased morbidity on the basis of subjective self-reports. Using input from patients and health care providers, we developed a brief prototype for the esophageal conduit questionnaire (Mayo Clinic Esophageal Conduit Outcomes Noting Dysphagia/Dumping, and Unknown outcomes with Intermittent symptoms over Time after esophageal reconstruction [CONDUIT] Report Card) and previously used it in comparative research. The present study aimed to expand its content and establish health-related QoL and symptom domains of a patient-reported postesophagectomy conduit evaluation tool. METHODS: We expanded tool content by selecting items measuring patient-reported symptoms from existing questionnaires or written de novo. A multidisciplinary group of clinician content-matter experts approved the draft tool, together with a designated patient advocate. The expanded tool was administered to patients postesophagectomy from March 1 to November 30, 2016. We established domains of conduit performance for score reporting through data analysis with exploratory factor analyses. We assessed psychometric properties such as dimensionality, internal consistency, and inter-item correlations in each domain and compared content coverage with other existing measures intended for this patient population. For data that were missing less than 50% of patient responses, the missing values were imputed. RESULTS: Five multi-item domains were established from data of 76 patients surveyed after esophagectomy; single items were used to assess stricture and conduit emptying. For every multi-item domain, dominance of 1 factor was present. Internal consistency reliability estimates for the domains were 0.87, 0.78, 0.75, 0.80, and 0.83 and average inter-item correlations were 0.40, 0.50, 0.40, 0.33, and 0.73 for dysphagia, reflux, dumping-gastrointestinal symptoms, dumping-hypoglycemia, and pain, respectively. Some items observed to have lower inter-item correlation were reworded or flagged for removal at future validation. For reflux and dumping-related hypoglycemia, additional items were written after these analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The CONDUIT Report Card is a novel questionnaire for assessing QoL and symptoms of patients after esophageal reconstruction. It covers major symptoms of these patients and has good content validity and psychometric properties. The tool can be used to help direct patient care, guide intervention, and compare efficacy of different treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier No. 02530983 on 8/18/2015.

A novel muscle-sparing high thoracotomy for upper thoracic spine resection and reconstruction.

PURPOSE: High thoracotomy allows access to the anterior cervicothoracic and upper thoracic vertebrae; however, traditional techniques transect shoulder girdle muscles, leading to postoperative shoulder dysfunction. Muscle-sparing techniques diminish this concern, but often sacrifice the quality of exposure. We describe a novel muscle-sparing, high thoracotomy approach for the treatment of ventral cervicothoracic and upper thoracic spine lesions. METHODS: A novel muscle-sparing, high thoracotomy approach is described, utilizing a midline posterior incision with lateral extension from the lateral decubitus position. Five patients are presented to illustrate the application of this technique in thoracic tumors with intimate spinal involvement. RESULTS: The muscle-sparing, high thoracotomy approach afforded gross total resection and spinal reconstruction in five consecutive patients, including stage IV lung carcinoma with invasion of the T5 and T6 vertebral bodies, two malignant fibrous histiocytomas causing thoracic cord compression, a metastatic T6 lesion of unknown primary with associated cord compression; and a Pancoast tumor. All patients seen at 6 months had full symmetric shoulder range of motion postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The described muscle-sparing, high thoracotomy approach provides excellent exposure of the ventral cervicothoracic and upper thoracic spine without the morbidity associated with the transection of shoulder girdle muscle bellies. This technique is particularly useful in patients with primary malignant bone tumors requiring en bloc excision and metastatic tumors with large soft tissue components.

PRO-Angoff method for remote standard setting: establishing clinical thresholds for the upper digestive disease tool.

BACKGROUND: The Upper Digestive Disease (UDD) Tool™ is used to monitor symptom frequency, intensity, and interference across nine symptom domains and includes two Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains assessing physical and mental health. This study aimed to establish cut scores for updated symptom domains through standard setting exercises and evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of virtual standard setting. METHODS: The extended Angoff method was employed to determine cut scores. Subject matter experts refined performance descriptions for symptom control categories and achieved consensus. Domains were categorized into good, moderate, and poor symptom control. Two cut scores were established, differentiating good vs. moderate and moderate vs. poor. Panelists estimated average scores for 100 borderline patients per item. Cut scores were computed based on the sum of the average ratings for individual questions, converted to 0-100 scale. RESULTS: Performance descriptions were refined. Panelists discussed that interpretation of the scores should take into account the timing of symptoms after surgery and patient populations, and the importance of items asking symptom frequency, severity, and interference with daily life. The good/moderate cut scores ranged from 21.3 to 35.0 (mean 28.6, SD 3.6) across domains, and moderate/poor ranged from 47.5 to 71.3 (mean 54.5, SD 7.0). CONCLUSIONS: Panelists were confident in the virtual standard setting process, expecting valid cut scores. Future studies can further validate the cut scores using patient perspectives and collect patient and physician preferences for displaying contextual items on patient- and physician-facing dashboard.

Esophagectomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Initiative Results in Improved Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a procedure with high morbidity and mortality. This study developed a Multidisciplinary Esophagectomy Enhanced Recovery Initiative (MERIT) pathway and analyzed implementation outcomes in a single institution. METHODS: The MERIT pathway was developed as a practice optimization and quality improvement initiative. Patients were studied from November 1, 2021 to June 20, 2022 and were compared with historical control subjects. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The study compared 238 historical patients (January 17, 2017 to December 30, 2020) with 58 consecutive MERIT patients. There were no significant differences between patient characteristics in the 2 groups. In the MERIT group, 49 (85%) of the patients were male, and their mean age was 65 years (range, 59-71 years). Most cases were performed for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Length of stay improved by 27% from 11 to 8 days (P = .27). There was a 12% (P = .05) atrial arrhythmia rate reduction, as well as a 9% (P = .01) decrease in postoperative ileus. Overall complications were reduced from 54% to 35% (-19%; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully developed and implemented an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for esophagectomy. In the first year, study investigators were able to reduce overall complications, specifically atrial arrhythmias, and postoperative ileus.

Outcomes of Standardized Protocols in Supercharged Pedicled Jejunal Esophageal Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of long-segment supercharged pedicled jejunal (SPJ) interposition after implementation of a dedicated multidisciplinary pathway and technical refinements. METHODS: This study was a 6-year review of consecutive patients who underwent complex esophageal reconstruction with SPJ interposition. Clinical data were abstracted, and PRO data were collected prospectively by using the Upper Digestive Disease mobile application (UDD App). This standardized questionnaire comprised domains for mental and physical health, pain, dysphagia, reflux, hypoglycemia dumping, and gastrointestinal dumping symptoms. Operative refinements were comprehensively established by 2018. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included in the study, 15 of whom had a history of esophageal malignant disease and neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Most patients (18; 95%) underwent delayed reconstruction after diversion. There was no 90-day mortality or flap loss. Most patients (18; 95%) achieved an enteral diet. Seven patients (37%) experienced early complications (<90 days) requiring procedural intervention. The incidence of any medical or surgical complication was similar in the earlier (2015-2017) and late (2018-2020) cohorts, but aspiration events, surgical site infections, anastomotic leak rates, and median hospital stay (reduced from 15 days [IQR, 10-21 days] to 9 days [IQR, 9-13 days]) improved in the contemporary cohort. PRO data were collected in 14 of 15 (93%) living patients. Severe symptoms in at least 1 domain were reported by most patients (11; 79%) and improved over time. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated care pathways allow standardization of complex procedures, and targeted modifications may optimize recovery and patient outcomes. This cohort of patients may report severe symptoms that require ongoing monitoring and intervention.

Preoperative Type and Screen Before General Thoracic Surgery: A Nomogram to Reduce Unnecessary Tests.

BACKGROUND: A preoperative type and screen (T&S) is traditionally routinely obtained before noncardiac thoracic surgery; however an intraoperative blood transfusion is rare. This practice is overly cautious and expensive. METHODS: We included adult patients undergoing major thoracic surgery at the Mayo Clinic from 2007 to 2016. Patients receiving a T&S blood test ≤72 hours of surgery was the main exposure. We randomly split the cohort into derivation and validation datasets. We used multiple logistic regression to create a parsimonious nomogram predicting the need for a T&S in relation to the likelihood of intraoperative blood transfusion. We validated the nomogram in terms of discrimination, calibration, and negative predictive value. RESULTS: Of 6280 patients 46.1% had a preoperative T&S, but only 7.1% received intraoperative transfusions. The derivation dataset had 4196 patients. Patients who had a T&S were more likely to have baseline hemoglobin level <10 g/dL (7.9% vs 3.6%, P < .001) and less likely to have minimally invasive operations (36.1% vs 43.5%, P < .001) but were otherwise similar in baseline age and comorbidities. A transfusion threshold of 5% was selected a priori. The nomogram included age, planned operation, approach, body mass index, and preoperative hemoglobin. The nomogram was validated with a c-statistic of 86% and a negative predictive value of 97.9%. Patients who needed a blood transfusion but who did not have a preoperative T&S did not have a higher rate of mortality (P = .121). CONCLUSIONS: An intraoperative blood transfusion during major thoracic surgery is a rare event. Patient who required transfusion but did not have a T&S did not have worse outcomes. A simple nomogram can aid in the selective use of T&S orders preoperatively.

Agreement Between Upper Digestive Disease App and Provider Evaluation of Esophagectomy Symptoms in a Mobile App Tool.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the criterion validity of score thresholds for the Upper Digestive Disease (UDD) App. METHODS: From December 15, 2017, to December 15, 2020, patients presenting after esophagectomy were offered the UDD App concurrent with a provider visit. This tool consists of 67 questions including 5 novel domains. Score thresholds were used to assign patients to a good, moderate, or poor category on the basis of domain scores. Providers were given performance descriptions for each domain and asked to assign patients to a category on the basis of their clinical evaluation. The weighted κ statistic was used to determine the magnitude of agreement between classifications based on the patients' UDD App scores and the providers' clinical evaluation. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients in the study (76% male; median age, 63 years [interquartile range, 57-72 years]) reported outcomes using the UDD App. Providers reviewed between 1 and 10 patients at a median time of 296.5 days (interquartile range, 50-975 days) after esophagectomy. The magnitude of agreement between patients and providers was moderate for dysphagia (κ = 0.52; P < .001) and reflux (κ = 0.42; P < .001). Dumping-related hypoglycemia (κ = 0.03; P = .148), gastrointestinal complaints (κ = 0.02; P = .256), and pain (κ = 0.05; P < .184) showed minimal agreement, with providers underestimating the symptoms and problems reported by patients in these domains. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was agreement between UDD App assessment and provider evaluation of dysphagia and reflux after esophagectomy, there was discordance of scoring for dumping-related symptoms and pain. Future research is needed to determine whether thresholds for pain and dumping domains need to be revised or whether additional provider education on performance descriptions is needed.

Pafolacianine for intraoperative molecular imaging of cancer in the lung: The ELUCIDATE trial.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine the clinical utility of pafolacianine, a folate receptor-targeted fluorescent agent, in revealing by intraoperative molecular imaging folate receptor α positive cancers in the lung and narrow surgical margins that may otherwise be undetected with conventional visualization. METHODS: In this Phase 3, 12-center trial, 112 patients with suspected or biopsy-confirmed cancer in the lung scheduled for sublobar pulmonary resection were administered intravenous pafolacianine within 24 hours before surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to surgery with or without intraoperative molecular imaging (10:1 ratio). The primary end point was the proportion of participants with a clinically significant event, reflecting a meaningful change in the surgical operation. RESULTS: No drug-related serious adverse events occurred. One or more clinically significant event occurred in 53% of evaluated participants compared with a prespecified limit of 10% (P < .0001). In 38 participants, at least 1 event was a margin 10 mm or less from the resected primary nodule (38%, 95% confidence interval, 28.5-48.3), 32 being confirmed by histopathology. In 19 subjects (19%, 95% confidence interval, 11.8-28.1), intraoperative molecular imaging located the primary nodule that the surgeon could not locate with white light and palpation. Intraoperative molecular imaging revealed 10 occult synchronous malignant lesions in 8 subjects (8%, 95% confidence interval, 3.5-15.2) undetected using white light. Most (73%) intraoperative molecular imaging-discovered synchronous malignant lesions were outside the planned resection field. A change in the overall scope of surgical procedure occurred for 29 of the subjects (22 increase, 7 decrease). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative molecular imaging with pafolacianine improves surgical outcomes by identifying occult tumors and close surgical margins.

Impact of Federal Lung Cancer Screening Policy on the Incidence of Early-stage Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In December 2013 the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended annual lung cancer screening for high-risk patients. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) later announced coverage in 2015. The impact of these federal decisions at the population level is unknown. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we studied changes in lung cancer incidence by stage and linked to US census data to obtain age-adjusted estimates standardized to the US population. Based on age at diagnosis we stratified patients as age-eligible or age-ineligible for screening. We used difference-in-differences regression to determine the effect of screening on lung cancer incidence by stage. RESULTS: For all age groups the incidence of early-stage lung cancer both before and after the USPSTF guidelines remained relatively stable at 12.8 ± 0.52 and 13.5 ± 0.92 per 100,000 patients, respectively (P = .068). However the difference-in-differences analysis estimated an absolute increase in the age-adjusted incidence by 3.4 per 100,000 persons in the age-eligible group after the announcement of the guidelines (P = .007). The effect was even larger after the CMS decision (4.3/100,000 persons, P < .001). Similarly there was a 14.2 per 100,000 persons absolute reduction in the incidence of advanced-stage lung cancer (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines and CMS coverage decisions were associated with an increased incidence of early-stage lung cancer and decreased incidence of advance-staged lung cancer at the population level.

Developing & integrating a mobile application tool into a survivorship clinic for esophageal cancer patients.

Esophageal cancer (EC) patients are living longer due to enhanced screening and novel therapeutics, however, the post-esophagectomy long-term management remains challenging for patients, caregivers, and providers. Patients experience significant morbidity and have difficulty managing symptoms. Providers struggle to manage symptoms, affecting patients' quality of life and complicating care coordination between surgical teams and primary care providers. To address these patient unique needs and create a standardized method for evaluating patient reported long-term outcomes after esophagectomy for EC, our team developed the Upper Digestive Disease Assessment tool, which evolved to become a mobile application. This mobile application is designed to monitor symptom burden, direct assessment, and quantify data for patient outcome analysis after foregut (upper digestive) surgery, including esophagectomy. It is available to the public and enables virtual and remote access to survivorship care. Patients using the Upper Digestive Disease Application (UDD App) must consent to enroll, agree to terms of use, and acknowledge use of health-related information prior to gaining access to the UDD App. The results of patients scores can be utilized for triage and assessment. Care pathways can guide management of severe symptoms in a scalable and standardized method. Here we describe the history, process, and methodology for developing a patient-centric remote monitoring program to improve survivorship after EC. Programs like this that facilitate patient-centered survivorship should be an integral part of comprehensive cancer patient care.

Impact of FDG PET Standardized Uptake Value in Resected Clinical Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience will recurrence and decreased survival after surgery. This study examined the impact of preoperative primary tumor positron emission tomography (PET) scan maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on oncologic outcomes after surgery. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 251 patients who underwent surgical treatment of clinical stage IA NSCLC at an academic medical center (2005-2014). Patients were classified according to PET SUVmax level (low vs high) for analysis of upstaging, tumor recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS: Median SUVmax values were higher in squamous cell carcinoma than in adenocarcinoma (median 3.3 vs 7.2; P < .0001). There were 109 (43.4%) patients in the SUVmax low group and 142 (56.6%) in the SUVmax high group. Patients with SUVmax high had larger tumors. SUVmax high was associated with higher rates of nodal upstaging (16.2% vs 4.6% in SUVmax low; P = .004), particularly in N1 nodes. SUVmax high was independently associated with nodal upstaging (adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.36-11.46; P = .011). SUVmax high was associated with time to recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.03-2.54; P = .036), but this association was lost on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.91-2.54; P = .106). SUVmax was not associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PET SUVmax level is strongly associated with nodal upstaging, particularly in N1 nodes, in patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC who undergo resection. PET SUVmax should be regarded as a risk factor when considering candidacy for sublobar resections and in future trials involving patients with stage I NSCLC.

Determinants of Long-term Survival Decades After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival in esophagectomy patients with esophageal cancer is low due to tumor-related characteristics, with few reports of modifiable variables influencing outcome. We identified determinants of overall survival, time to recurrence, and disease-free survival in this patient cohort. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer from January 5, 2000, through December 30, 2010, at our institution were identified. Univariate Cox models and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify associations between modifiable and unmodifiable patient and clinical variables and outcome of survival for the total cohort and a subgroup with locally advanced disease. RESULTS: We identified 870 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy. The median follow-up time was 15 years, and the 15-year overall survival rate was 25.2%, survival free of recurrence was 57.96%, and disease-free survival was 24.21%. Decreased overall survival was associated with the following unmodifiable variables: older age, male sex, active smoking status, history of coronary artery disease, advanced clinical stage, and tumor location. Decreased overall survival was associated with the following modifiable variables: use of neoadjuvant therapy, advanced pathologic stage, resection margin positivity, surgical reintervention, and blood transfusion requirement. The overall survival probability 6 years after esophagectomy was 0.920 (95% CI, 0.895-0.947), and time-to-recurrence probability was 0.988 (95% CI, 0.976-1.000), with a total of 17 recurrences and 201 deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Once patients survive 5 years, recurrence is rare. Long-term survival can be achieved in high-volume centers adhering to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines using multidisciplinary care teams that is double what has been previously reported in the literature from national databases.

Food Deserts Increase Readmission After Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: Food deserts are low-income census tracts with poor access to supermarkets and are associated with worse outcomes in breast, colon, and a small number of esophageal cancer patients. This study investigated residency in food deserts on readmission rates in a multi-institutional cohort of esophageal cancer patients undergoing trimodality therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent trimodality therapy at 6 high-volume institutions from January 2015 to July 2019 was performed. Food desert status was defined by the United States Department of Agriculture by patient ZIP Code. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission after esophagectomy. Multilevel, multivariable logistic regression was used to model readmission on food desert status adjusted for diabetes, insurance type, length of stay, and any complication, treating the institution as a random factor. RESULTS: Of the 453 records evaluated, 425 were included in the analysis. Seventy-three patients (17.4%) resided in a food desert. Univariate analysis demonstrated food desert patients had significantly increased 30-day readmission. No differences were seen in length of stay, complications, or 30-day mortality. In the adjusted logistic regression model, residing in a food desert remained a significant risk factor for readmission (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.07-4.15). There were no differences in 30-day, 90-day, or 1-year mortality based on food desert status, although readmission was associated with worse 90-day and 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Food desert residence was associated with 30-day readmission after esophagectomy in patients undergoing trimodality treatment for esophageal cancer in this multi-institutional population. Identification of patients residing in a food desert may allow surgeons to focus preventative interventions during treatment and postoperatively to improve outcomes.

Supercharged Jejunal Interposition.

Complex esophageal reconstruction represents a high risk and challenging procedure. A dedicated pathway with multispecialty teams can facilitate a systematic checklist approach to perioperative management and evaluation of long-term outcomes. Refinements in the operative technique for supercharged pedicled jejunum (SPJ) for long segment interposition in esophageal reconstruction are reviewed in this article. Medical and surgical complications among this complex niche group of patients are significant and require care in specialist centers with a focused team. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in long-segment SPJ interposition are recognized to provide additional monitoring of surgical outcomes and may help guide interventions for subsequent symptom control.

Patient-centred care in thoracic surgery: a holistic approach-A review of the subjects of enhanced recovery after surgery, rehabilitation, pain management and patient-reported outcome measures in thoracic surgery.

The symposium Patient-centered care in thoracic care: a holistic approach was held on June 22, 2021, as a virtual event in the context of the European conference on general thoracic surgery. Its aim was to explore how to improve patient outcomes in thoracic surgery by using enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) frameworks and collaboration within healthcare. During the four presentations, topics on patient mobilization and physical rehabilitation, pain management, and the role of chest drainage in facilitating perioperative care were discussed. Strategies to minimize opioid consumption and incorporate patients' experiences as quality indicators were described. There were two main ideas that were considered pivotal to achieve optimal care: (I) the use of simple, easily implementable perioperative protocols and practices to improve compliance from both patients and the healthcare team, and (II) promote a better recovery with early mobilization and reducing the patient's levels of pain. Among the key learnings that emerged from the presentations are the importance of taking the patient's experiences into account, including what they value the most after surgery, and how technology can enable better care. The use of digital chest drainage systems emerged as a way for improving patient outcomes and experiences across several key indicators.

Overview of Cardiothoracic Surgeon Compensation: Practice Setting, Productivity, and Payment Structures.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently proposed a substantial cut to reimbursement for surgical services, punctuating a steady decline in reimbursement for clinical services provided by cardiothoracic surgeons during the last several decades. Meanwhile, the costs of practicing cardiothoracic surgery continue to increase. In an effort to defect against diminishing control over patient care and further negative changes affecting reimbursement, cardiothoracic surgeons must be able to convincingly demonstrate their value to patients and the health care system. However, the overall contribution of a cardiothoracic surgeon can be difficult to measure objectively and varies widely according to a host of factors, including practice setting, experience, subspecialization, and the local market. To address these challenges, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Workforce on Practice Management has commissioned a Writing Task Force to raise awareness, to concentrate knowledge, and to organize information related to compensation as a comprehensive resource for cardiothoracic surgeons. The purpose of this initial report is to provide an overview of the major factors having an impact on compensation for cardiothoracic surgeons.

A prospective trial of CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for lung tumors.

Background: Percutaneous ablation is an alternative treatment for lung cancer in non-operable patients. This is a prospective clinical trial for percutaneous microwave ablation (pMWA) of biopsy-proven lung cancer to demonstrate safety and efficacy. Methods: A prospective trial from 6-1-2016 to 1-1-2019 enrolled patients with biopsy-proven primary or metastatic lung cancer <3 cm in size and 1 cm away from the pleura for pMWA with the Emprint Ablation System with Thermosphere Technology for Phase I analysis, (Clinicaltrials.gov; #NCT0267302). Patients were followed for 1 year with PET/CT and PET/MR to determine patterns of recurrence and efficacy of ablation. Results: After 12 patients consented for biopsy, 6 patients underwent treatment of 7 lesions, 3/6 women, median age of 67 (IQR, 65-70) years, body mass index (BMI): 27.8 (IQR, 21.4-32.1) kg/m2, lesion distance to pleura 24.4 (IQR, 13-38) mm, lesion size of 10.7 (IQR, 6-14) mm, and ablation duration time 5.9 (IQR, 3-10) minutes. pMWA were completed at 75 W. Twelve adverse events were reported (1 Grade 3, 3 Grade 2, and 8 Grade 1 events) with Grade 4 or 5 events. Mean % change after ablation in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was -2% and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was -1%. After 2-3 months, the lesions would decrease in size, rim thickness, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) activity, and T2 signal. FDG activity after 6 months was below blood pool in all cases. The ablation zones stabilized by 6-12 months. One patient expired during the study from pneumonia unrelated to ablation without local recurrence. Of the seven ablations during the 1 year follow-up, there was local tumor recurrence at 271 days following ablation at the apex of the ablation zone, subsequently successfully treated with percutaneous cryoablation (Cryo). Conclusions: pMWA appears to be a safe and effective mechanism for treatment of primary and secondary tumors of the lung, with possible preservation of pulmonary function.

Enhancing Support for Women in Cardiothoracic Surgery Through Allyship and Targeted Initiatives.

BACKGROUND: Issues of diversity, equity, and inclusion in cardiothoracic surgery have garnered increased attention. Although barriers persist for women in our field, they may be ameliorated through enhanced support from allies. We aimed to determine best practices for allyship to better support female cardiothoracic surgeons. METHODS: A survey was electronically distributed to members of Women in Thoracic Surgery, addressing presence of female colleagues, sense of allyship among colleagues and leadership, and supportive versus detrimental characteristics of colleagues. Qualitative responses were grouped and coded to identify key themes. RESULTS: Of 309 Women in Thoracic Surgery members, 87 (28%) responded. More than half of respondents felt supported by their male colleagues in the areas of clinical practice, research, teaching, and personal life. Whereas 64% of respondents considered at least one woman in their division an ally, only 48% considered at least one man in their division an ally, and 53% considered their division chief or department chair an ally. A theme of mentorship, support, and sponsorship was reported as the most important quality of allies, regardless of gender. A theme of disrespect, discrimination, stereotyping, and unconscious bias was reported as the most detrimental characteristic of male colleagues, whereas a theme of competitiveness and undermining was reported as the most detrimental of female colleagues. Initiatives to enhance support for female cardiothoracic surgeons were identified, with increased access to mentorship and sponsorship consistently identified as an important endeavor. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing access to mentors, promoting positive behavior, and minimizing detrimental behavior may enhance support for female cardiothoracic surgeons.