Does lung procurement and exposure to Perfadex impact heart transplantation outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Some studies have shown increased incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) after heart and lung procurement for heart transplant recipients. There have been limited investigations of the impact of lung procurement on heart procurement and the potential effects of the exposure to the type of lung preservation solution, the volume of the lung preservation solution and adequacy of decompression of the heart during heart and lung procurement and the impact on heart transplant outcomes. METHODS: Adult heart transplant recipients in the UNOS database recorded from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2022 formed the study cohort. Any heart that was procured with a lung team that utilized Perfadex preservation solution (XVIVO, Gothenburg, Sweden) was classified as exposed to Perfadex and otherwise classified as not exposed to Perfadex. Lung procurements performed with a preservation solution other than Perfadex or unknown were excluded (n = 2486). Simple comparisons were made with t-tests or chi-squared tests. Logistic regression models were used to predict 30 day and 1 year survival. Accelerated failure time models were employed to analyze time to death and time to rejection. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 34 192 heart transplants, of which 21 928 donors were not exposed to Perfadex (64.1%). There were statistically, but not clinically, significant differences in donor characteristics for these groups including in donor age (33.34 ± 11.01 not exposed vs. 30.70 ± 10.69 exposed; p < .001), diabetic donor (4% not exposed vs. 3% exposed; p = .004), and ischemic time (3.28 ± 1.09 h not exposed vs. 3.24 ± 1.05 h exposed; p = .002). In adjusted models, for all included donors, Perfadex exposure was associated with increased short term mortality, but no long term difference (1 year mortality OR 1.10, p = .014). CONCLUSION: Perfadex exposure was associated with increased short-term mortality for heart transplant recipients. Mechanistic investigation is warranted.

Outcomes and Predictors of Morbidity after Carotid Body Tumor Resection.

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are uncommon neuroendocrine tumors at the carotid bifurcation treated with resection. The goal of this study was to examine patient outcomes after CBT resection and establish predictors of morbidity. METHODS: Patients undergoing CBT resection were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database over 11 years. Demographics, past medical history, preoperative labs, procedural details, morbidity and mortality were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of morbidity. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2020, 668 CBT resections were identified. The majority of patients were female (65%) and White (72%) with a mean age of 56 (standard deviation [SD] ± 16). Average body mass index (BMI) was 29.9 (SD ± 7.1). Arterial resection occurred in 81 patients (12%). 6% of patients experienced morbidity, most commonly re-operation (2.4%). Morbidity was more common in patients with higher BMI (33.1 vs. 29.7, P = 0.005), chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (10% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.012), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (P = 0.005), and lower albumin (3.7 vs. 4, P = 0.016). Morbidity was not increased with arterial resection (P = 1) or based on length of operation (P = 0.169). Morbidity did not impact mortality (P = 0.06) though led to longer length of stay [LOS] (8 days vs. 2.4, P < 0.001). On MLR, preoperative BMI was the only risk factor for morbidity (odds ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.1, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CBT resection is very well tolerated with low stroke rates, morbidity, and mortality. Arterial resection leads to increased transfusion requirements and LOS but did not increase stroke rates, mortality, or overall morbidity. Within the NSQIP database, preoperative BMI was the only predictor of postoperative morbidity, which leads to significantly longer LOS.

Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Minor Amputation Conversion to Major Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Minor lower extremity amputations (LEAs) have become an important part of the limb salvage approach but are not as benign as previously thought. This study investigates the difference in outcome between toe/ray versus midfoot amputations and the risk factors for major amputation conversion associated with each procedure. METHODS: We performed retrospective chart review of foot amputation patients at a single tertiary care medical center with a primary end point of conversion to major amputation and secondary end points of 1-year wound healing and mortality rate. We collected data on relevant medical comorbidities, noninvasive vascular imaging, revascularization, repeat amputations, wound healing rate, and 1-year mortality. Patients were separated into toe/ray amputations versus midfoot amputation groups and compared using descriptive statistics, Chi-squared tests, Cox proportional hazards, and a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 375 amputations were included in the analysis. 65.3% (245 patients) included toe/ray amputations and 34.7% (130 patients) included midfoot amputations. We compared these 2 cohorts with regard to their rate of conversion to repeat minor and/or major amputation in addition to overall mortality. The toe/ray group underwent more repeat minor amputations within 1 year after index amputation (34.7% vs. 21.5%, P = 0.008) and wound healing (epithelization) at 90 days was also higher in this group. The midfoot group had a higher conversion to major LEA within 1 year on univariate analysis (20.8 vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001). Overall 1-year mortality was 6.17% and there was no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: While there is a consistency with previous studies that found no significant overall difference in mortality between types of minor LEA, we have extended this previous work by demonstrating the independent risk factors for conversion to major amputation between types of minor LEA. Comparing these 2 groups will assist surgeons in choosing the appropriate level of amputations and will enhance patient's understanding of their chance of wound healing and risk of repeat amputation.

Strategies for the Surgical Management of Highly Aggressive Williams Syndrome Aortopathy: A Three Case Report.

Severe aortopathy in Williams syndrome can sometimes present with an initial ascending aortic pathology, followed in short order by more distal multilevel obstruction and recurrence requiring reintervention. In this series, an early, comprehensive surgical approach using a combination of various access and perfusion strategies yielded excellent long-term results.

Clinical Outcomes and Echocardiographic Predictors of Reintervention After Interrupted Aortic Arch Repair.

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) remains a significant complication after primary repair of interrupted aortic arch with ventricular septal defect (IAA-VSD). Clinical and echocardiographic predictors for LVOTO reoperation are controversial and procedures to prophylactically prevent future LVOTO are not reliable. However, it is important to identify the patients at risk for future LVOTO intervention after repair of IAA-VSD. Patients who underwent single-stage IAA-VSD repair at our center 2006-2021 were retrospectively reviewed, excluding patients with associated cardiac lesions. Two-dimensional measurements, LVOT gradients, and 4-chamber (4C) and short-axis (SAXM) strain were obtained from preoperative and predischarge echocardiograms. Univariate risk analysis for LVOTO reoperation was performed using unpaired t-test. Thirty patients were included with 21 (70%) IAA subtype B and mean weight at surgery 3.0 kg. Repair included aortic arch patch augmentation in 20 patients and subaortic obstruction intervention in three patients. Seven (23%) required reoperations for LVOTO. Patient characteristics were similar between patients who required LVOT reoperation and those who did not. Patch augmentation was not associated with LVOTO reintervention. Patients requiring reintervention had significantly smaller LVOT AP diameter preoperatively and at discharge, and higher LVOT velocity, smaller AV annular diameter, and ascending aortic diameter at discharge. There was an association between LVOT-indexed cross-sectional area (CSAcm2/BSAm2) ≤ 0.7 and reintervention. There was no significant difference in 4C or SAXM strain in patients requiring reintervention. LVOTO reoperation was not associated with preoperative clinical or surgical variables but was associated with smaller LVOT on preoperative echo and smaller LVOT, smaller AV annular diameter, and increased LVOT velocity at discharge.

Does donor treatment with inotropes and/or vasopressors impact post-transplant outcomes?

PURPOSE: The purpose was to evaluate the effects of the most commonly used cardiac donor inotropes/vasopressors on subsequent post-heart transplant survival. METHODS: Adult heart transplant recipients from January 2000 to June 2022 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Exclusion criteria included: multiorgan transplants, donor age < 15, and recipient age < 18. Donors receiving vasoactive medications at the time of procurement were compared to donors not receiving these medications. Those on vasoactive medications were stratified by medication: phenylephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine, the combination of these agents, and the concomitant administration of vasopressin with any single agent alone or in combination. The primary area of interest was short-and-long-term survival. Survival at 30 days, 1 year, and long-term (Median = 13.6 years) was compared using logistic and Cox models to quantify survival endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 45,198 donors met inclusion criteria and had data on the use of vasoactive agents available. Mean donor age was 32.3 years with 71% male. Vasoactive medications and potential combinations included phenylephrine in 8156 donors (18.0%), dopamine in 9550 (21.1%), dobutamine in 718 (1.6%), epinephrine in 332 (.73%), and norepinephrine in 4854 (10.7%). A total of 25,856 donors (57.2%) were receiving vasopressin at the time of procurement. There was no impact of donor inotropes on 30-day survival. Donors receiving one inotrope and no vasopressin were associated with increased 1 year mortality (OR 1.14; p = .021), as were donors receiving 2+ inotropes and no vasopressin (OR 1.26; p = .006). For individual agents, 1 year mortality was increased for dopamine (OR 1.11; p = .042) and epinephrine (OR 1.59; p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in heart transplant recipient survival at 30 days when the donor is receiving inotropes without vasopressin at the time of procurement. Inotropic support without vasopressin is associated with greater 1 year mortality. The impact of donor inotropic support on long term heart transplant survival, and the interaction with vasopressin warrants further study.

Positive donor blood cultures are not associated with worse heart transplant survival.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence has demonstrated that transplantation of hearts with blood culture positive donors (BCPDs) to pediatric recipients is safe and effective. Few studies have analyzed the effect of BCPD on adult heart transplant recipients. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was retrospectively reviewed from September, 1987 to March, 2021. Exclusion criteria included pediatric donors/recipients, donor ejection fraction <10% or >85%, inactive listed recipients, donors missing blood cultures, and recipients missing follow-up time. Outcomes were compared with fully adjusted logistic models. To account for discrepancies in BCPD and non-BCPD covariates, an inverse proportionally weighted model with regression adjustment (IPWRA) was used. RESULTS: A total of 60 592 donors were non-BCPD, while 4009 were BCPD. 7% of hearts not transplanted were BCPD, while 6% of hearts transplanted were BCPD (p = .001). These rates have been nearly constant since 2005. There were no differences in short term survival between the two groups in the adjusted or IPWRA models (p = .103 and .277, respectively). Additionally, the BCPD group had longer ischemic time (3.24 vs. 3.06 h, p < .001), older donor age (32.73 vs. 31.65 years, p < .001), and older recipient age (52.76 vs. 52.09 years, p = .001). The IPWRA revealed an average additional 3.4 years of overall survival and 2.25 years of graft function for BCPD versus non-BCPD recipients, although these results failed to reach statistical significance (p = .387 and .527, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Given the need for more donor hearts, donors with positive blood cultures should be considered. Great care in evaluating such patients is advised to eliminate donors with untreated infections, while carefully selected donors can be considered and used.

Do outcomes for heart transplantation differ based on donor and recipient race?

PURPOSE: There are limited data examining the impact of both donor and recipient race on outcomes following orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between donor and recipient race and OHT outcomes. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was retrospectively reviewed from January 2000 to March 2018 for donor hearts. A comparison was conducted based on donor and recipient race (White, Black, Hispanic, Other/Unknown). Races for which there were limited numbers were excluded from the analysis (Asian, n = 1292; American Indian, n = 132; Pacific Islander, n = 132, Multiple ethnicities, n = 225). The primary endpoint was survival at 30 days, 1 year survival, and post-transplant rejection. Logistic and Cox models were used to quantify survival endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 41 841 OHT were included. Of the recipients, 29 894 (71%) were White, 8475 (20%) were Black, and 3472 (8%) were Hispanic. Of the donors 27 783 (66%) were White, 6277 (15%) were Black, 6576 (16%) were Hispanic, and 1205 (3%) were Unknown/Other race. In a comparison of recipient demographics, White recipients were older (54.09 ± 12.21 years) compared to Black (49.44 ± 12.83 years) and Hispanic (49.97 ± 13.27 years) recipients. All other differences between groups were not clinically significant. Black recipients were more likely to receive a heart with an "urgent" status (probability .80) compared to White (.73) and Hispanic (.75) recipients (p < .001). Hispanic recipients were more likely to receive a transplant when listed as "non-urgent" (Probability .47) compared to White (.37) and Black (.30) recipients (p < .001). In terms of outcomes, compared to White recipients, Hispanic patients experienced a decreased 30-day survival (OR 1.27; p = .011) and 1-year survival (OR 1.17; p = .016). In comparing Donor/Recipient combinations compared to a White Donor/White Recipient combination, overall survival was decreased in White donor/African American recipient (HR 1.36; p < .001), African American donor/African American recipient (HR 1.41; p < .001) and Hispanic donor/African American recipient (HR 1.30; p < .001) combinations (Table 1). CONCLUSIONS: African American and Hispanic recipients have decreased survival compared to White recipients after heart transplant. The African American donor does not decrease survival. Racial differences still exist in donor and recipient characteristics and recipient outcomes after OHT. Increasing the donor pool for all races and ethnicities would potentially benefit all recipients. Continued study is warranted in order to minimize these differences among recipients and identify factors that could be contributing to decreased survival, in order to optimize outcomes for African American and Hispanic recipients post-transplant and eliminate disparities.

Do vasoactive medications impact donor hearts clinical outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation?

OBJECTIVES: There is limited data examining donor vasopressor and/or inotrope medications (vasoactives) on pediatric orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) outcomes. We aim to evaluate the effects of vasoactives on pediatric OHT outcomes. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 2000 to March 2018 for donor hearts. Exclusion criteria included multiorgan transplants and recipient age >18. Donors receiving vasoactives at the time of procurement were compared to donors not on vasoactives, including the number of vasoactives and the type. End-points of interest were survival at 30 days and 1 year as well as post-transplant rejection at 1 year. Logistic and Cox models were used to quantify survival end-points. RESULTS: Of 6462 donors, 3187 (49.3%) were receiving at least one vasoactive. Comparing any vasoactive medication versus none, there was no difference in 30-day survival (p = .27), 1 year survival (p = .89), overall survival (p = .68), or post-transplant rejection (p = .98). There was no difference in 30-day survival for donors receiving 2 or more vasoactive infusions (p = .89), 1 year survival (p = .53), overall survival (p = .75), or post-transplant rejection at 1 year (p = .87). Vasopressin was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (OR = 0.22; p = .028), dobutamine with decreased 1-year mortality (OR = 0.37; p = .036), overall survival (HR = 0.51; p = .003), and decreased post-transplant rejection (HR = 0.63; p = .012). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in pediatric OHT outcomes when the cardiac donor is treated with vasoactive infusions at procurement. Vasopressin and dobutamine were associated with improved outcomes. This information can be used to guide medical management and donor selection.

Acute complication posttransplant: primary allograft dysfunction.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart transplant is the gold standard treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure, improving both quality of life and survival. Despite advances in donor and recipient management, primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in the early posttransplant period. This review summarizes recent discoveries in the underlying pathophysiology, risk prediction and management of PGD. RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence of PGD appears to be rising and it is not clear whether this is due to better recognition or secular changes in transplant practice. The utilization of donation after circulatory death organs for transplant is a further consideration for the development of PGD. Organ transport systems and preservation techniques may help to prevent PGD. As some of the risk factors for developing PGD remain modifiable, we summarize the current evidence for prevention and management of PGD. SUMMARY: A better understanding will allow us to appropriately manage donors and recipients to reduce the complex interactions that lead to PGD. The development of an international consortium provides the opportunity for deep phenotyping and development of contemporary risk prediction models for PGD, which may reduce the incidence and consequent early mortality associated with heart transplantation.

The Safety and Efficacy of Tracheostomy in Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19: An Analysis of 143 Patients at a Major NYC Medical Center.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal surgical strategy for performing tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. BACKGROUND: Many ventilated COVID-19 patients require prolonged ventilation. We do not know if tracheostomy will improve their care. Given the paucity of data on this topic, the optimal surgical approach has yet to be elucidated. METHODS: This is a cohort study of 143 ventilator dependent COVID-19 patients undergoing tracheostomy at an academic medical center from April 15th to May 15th, 2020, with follow up until June 1, 2020. We included adult patients admitted to a NYC medical center with COVID-19 who required invasive mechanical ventilation for greater than 2 weeks who were unable to be extubated and determined to have reasonable chance of recovery and fit defined tracheostomy candidate criteria. Patients underwent either a percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) or open surgical tracheostomy (ST) performed by 1 of 3 surgical services. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients underwent tracheostomy, 58 (41%) via a ST, and 85 (59%) via a PT. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups, except that more patients who had a history of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation underwent PT (11% vs 2%, P = 0.049). There were no statistical differences observed between the PT and ST groups with regard to bleeding complications (3.5%vs 10.3%, P = 0.099), tracheostomy related complications (5.9% vs 8.6%, P = 0.528), inpatient death (12% vs 5%, P = 0.178), discharge from hospital (39% vs 36%, P = 0.751) or surgeon illness (0% vs 0%, P = 1). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The rapid formation of a multi-disciplinary team allows for the efficient evaluation and performance of a large volume of tracheostomies in a resource-limited setting. Bedside tracheostomy in COVID-19 does not cause additional harm to patients if performed after 2 weeks from intubation. It also seems to be safe for proceduralists to perform in this timeframe. The manner of tracheostomy does not change outcomes significantly if it is performed safely and efficiently.

Functional status of heart transplant recipients predicts survival.

INTRODUCTION: Recipient functional status prior to transplantation can significantly impact post-transplant survival. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adult heart transplants including data on functional capacity and from February 1, 2005 to March 1, 2021; there were 32 875 cases included. The four functional categories studied were based on adult daily activities of living and were separated into total assistance required, some assistance required, no assistance required, and near death. Survival outcomes were compared for recipient's pretransplant level of functional status versus those with near death status. These were compared using adjusted logistic regression (odds of death at 30 days and 1 year) and conditional Cox models (overall survival and time until post-transplant rejection). All models were adjusted for donor age, sex, ethnicity, ischemic time, as well as recipient age, sex, ethnicity, length of stay, UNOS region, ventricular assist device, creatinine, days on the waiting list, and status at transplant. RESULTS: There were 12 953 recipients classified as "near death" or "severely disabled"; 7711 "required total assistance in daily living", 7,328 "needed some", and 4883 "needed none". In adjusted models, the probabilities of death for the lowest functioning groups within 30 days and 1 year were 5% and 10%, respectively. Those "requiring total assistance" had analogous probabilities of 3% (OR = 0.58; p < 0.001) and 9% (OR = 0.81; p < 0.001). Those "requiring some assistance" had probabilities of 3% (OR = 0.56; p < 0.001) and 9% (OR = 0.74; p < 0.001). Lastly, those "requiring no assistance" had probabilities of death of 2% (OR = 0.35; p < 0.001) and 7% (OR = 0.63; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Recipient functional status assessed pre-transplant and recorded in the UNOS database is a strong predictor of post-transplant survival.

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery: a case series.

INTRODUCTION: This study describes the experience with robot-assisted transanal minimally invasive surgery (rTAMIS) at a single institution. TAMIS has become a popular minimally invasive technique for local excision of well-selected rectal lesions. rTAMIS has been proposed as another option as it improves the ergonomics of conventional laparoscopic techniques. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients with rectal lesions who underwent rTAMIS. Patient demographics, final pathology, surgical and admission details, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Successful procedures were defined as having negative margins on final pathology. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients underwent rTAMIS by a single surgeon between April 2018 and December 2019. Mean age of patients was 63 years. Final pathologies were negative for tumor (n = 4), tubulovillous adenoma (n = 4), tubulovillous adenoma with high-grade dysplasia (n = 4), and invasive rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 4). 43% were located in the middle rectum and 56% were located in the distal rectum. Mean maximum diameter was 4.1 cm (IQR 2-3.1 cm). Negative margins were seen in 100% of the excision cases, and 100% were intact. Mean operative time was 87 min (IQR 54.8-97.3 min), and median length of stay was 0 days (IQR 0-1 days). Postoperative complications included incontinence (n = 1) and abscess formation (n = 2). rTAMIS provided curative treatment for 12/16 patients, and the remaining 4 patients received the appropriate standard of care for their respective pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted TAMIS is a safe alternative to laparoscopic TAMIS for resection of appropriate rectal polyps and early rectal cancers. rTAMIS may provide a modality for resecting larger or more proximal rectal lesions due to the wristed instruments and superior visualization with the robotic camera. Future studies should focus on comparing outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic TAMIS, and whether rTAMIS allows for the removal of larger, more complex lesions, which may save patients from a more morbid radical proctectomy.

Palliative Care Consultation is Associated with Decreased Rates of In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Major Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in medical care and surgical techniques, major amputation continues to be associated with risks for morbidity and mortality. Palliative care programs may help alleviate symptoms and align patients' goals and the care they receive with their treatment plan. Access to specialty palliative medicine among vascular surgery patients is limited. Here, we aim to describe utilization and impact of formal palliative care consultation for patients receiving major amputations. METHODS: This is a retrospective, secondary data analysis project examining the records of patients who received major amputations by the vascular surgery team between 2016 and 2021. Demographics, operative, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome variable was palliative care consultation during index admission (the admission in which the patient received their first major amputation). Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and code status at the time of death, if death occurred during the index admission, location of death, and discharge destination. RESULTS: The cohort comprised of 292 patients (39% female, 53% Black, mean age 63), who received a lower extremity major amputation. Most patients (65%) underwent amputation for limb ischemia. One-year mortality after first major amputation was 29%. Average length of stay was 20 days. Thirty-five (12%) patients received a palliative care consultation during the hospitalization in which they received their first major amputation. On multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to receive a palliative care consult during their index admission if they had undergone a thorough knee amputation (OR = 2.89, P = 0.039) or acute limb ischemia (OR = 4.25, P = 0.005). A formal palliative care consult was associated with lower likelihood of in-hospital death and increased likelihood of discharge to hospice (OR = 0.248, P = 0.0167, OR = 1.283, P < 0.001).There were no statistically significant differences in the code status of patients who received a palliative care consultation. CONCLUSIONS: In a large academic medical center, palliative medicine consultation was associated with lower in-hospital mortality among patients with advanced vascular disease and major limb amputation. These data will hopefully stimulate much needed prospective research to develop and test tools to identify patients in need and derive evidence about the impact of palliative care services.

Commentary: The value of nonrandom and uncontrolled.

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate 3 (HM3) (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois) was approved by the FDA in 2018. AIMS: In this issue of the Journal, Bansal et al perform a single center review of their experience with implantation of the HeartMate 3 before and after FDA approval. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis by Bansal et al included 82 patients who were part of the RCT pre-approval group and 92 patients who underwent HM3 implantation after FDA approval. RESULTS: The authors found that the post-approval group was younger, had a higher preoperative INR, was more likely to be undergoing HM3 implantation as part of a bridge to transplant strategy, more likely to have other mechanical support pre-operatively, and included more patients with an INTERMACS profile. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the weakness of randomized controlled trials in that they do not reflect the reality of clinical practice which underscores the need for studies such as this one for a complete understanding of any medical intervention or technology.

Next steps in heart transplantation: Diagnosing and treating PGD, where are we?

In this issue of the Journal of Cardiac Surgery, Settepani et al. perform a single center analysis of clinical outcomes for primary graft dysfunction (PGD) in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation. The results of this study underscore the necessity to be proactive in the attempt to prevent PGD to give transplant recipients the best chance at a positive outcome. Further study of PGD should be directed to better understand the underlying pathophysiology and potentially lead to such targeted therapeutic management.

Exploring the ripples of the 2018 organ allocation policy change.

In this issue of the Journal, Patel et al. analyzed the United Network of Organ Sharing database for the impact of the 2018 organ allocation policy changes on outcomes for patients based on BMI. Their work is important for highlighting a population at risk of bias and emphasizes the need for continued study of the ripple effect of the allocation policy changes.

Enhanced recovery after surgery multimodality pain regimen performs similar to PRN narcotics on outcomes and pain control after cardiac surgery: A quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been successfully applied for cardiac surgery, there has been limited research directly comparing ERAS protocols to ad hoc narcotic use after surgery. We hypothesized that a standardized ERAS protocol would provide similar pain management and psychoemotional outcomes while decreasing the use of opioids in the hospital and after discharge. METHODS: As part of a 7-month quality improvement project, cardiac surgery patients on a fast-tracked to extubate pathway were assigned pro re nata (PRN) narcotic pain management for 3 months (n = 49). After a 1-month ERAS protocol optimization period, a separate group of patients were given the ERAS protocol (n = 34). Clinical outcomes were gathered, and participants completed a quality of recovery survey that allowed for the assessment of pain and symptom control at four-time points after surgery. RESULTS: Among 83 participants, 66% were male and the mean age was 53 years. There were no differences in patient characteristics between PRN and ERAS groups (all p > .244). There were no differences between ERAS and PRN groups for surgery characteristics (all p > .060), inpatient outcomes (all p > .658), or after-discharge outcomes (all p > .397). Furthermore, across all time-point comparisons, there were no supported differences in patient-reported outcome and pain control between the ERAS and PRN narcotic groups (all p > .075). CONCLUSIONS: An ERAS protocol demonstrated similar patient outcomes and pain control to traditional opioid use for postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Further research is recommended to further confirm the results of this study.

Hybrid repair of ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm.

For ascending aortic pseudoaneurysms with a large aortic entry site and thrombus burden, temporary stent-graft placement at induction of circulatory arrest can prevent thrombotic complication.

Anomalous left coronary artery from pulmonary artery repair: Outcomes from the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association Database.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine the surgical outcomes of patients with anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) enrolled in the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association (ECHSA) database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1999 to 2019, 907 patients with ALCAPA underwent surgical repair and were included in the current study. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included frequency and results of concomitant mitral valve surgery and postoperative mechanical circulatory support (MCS). RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 6% (54/907) and was significantly higher in neonates (p = .01), patients with lower body surface area (BSA) (p = .01), and those requiring postoperative MCS (p = .001). Associated mitral valve surgery was performed in 144 patients (15.9%) and was associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times (AOX) (p ≤ .0001) but was not significantly related to an increase in in-hospital mortality. Postoperative MCS was required in 66 patients (7.3%). These patients were younger (p ≤ .001), had a lower BSA (p ≤ .001), and required a longer CPB (p ≤ .001) and AOX time (p ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: ALCAPA repair can be achieved successfully, and with low surgical risk. Concomitant mitral valve procedures can be performed without increasing operative mortality. The use of MCS remains a valuable option, especially in younger patients.