Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BJOG ; 124(2): 231-240, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27225535

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of hysteroscopy for the detection and treatment of endometrial polyps versus expectant management in women with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB), a thickened endometrium and benign endometrial sampling. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Three academic hospitals and nine non-academic teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Women with PMB, an endometrial thickness >4 mm and benign result from endometrial sampling. METHODS: Women were randomised to either further diagnostic workup by hysteroscopy (preceded by saline infusion sonography) or expectant management. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome measure was recurrence of PMB within a year after randomisation. Secondary outcome measures were time to recurrent bleeding and recurrent bleeding after more than 1 year. In the hysteroscopy group, the presence of polyps and the results of their histology were registered. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and October 2013, 200 women were randomised; 98 to hysteroscopy and 102 to expectant management. Within 1 year a total of 15 women (15.3%) in the hysteroscopy group experienced recurrent bleeding, versus 18 (18.0%) in the expectant management group (relative risk 0.85 (95% CI 0.46-1.59). In the hysteroscopy group, 50/98 (51%) polyps were diagnosed of which 6/98 (6%) showed evidence of endometrial (pre)malignancy; final pathology results after hysterectomy showed three women with hyperplasia with atypia and three women with endometrial cancer. CONCLUSION: In women with PMB, a thickened endometrium and benign endometrial sampling, operative hysteroscopy does not reduce recurrent bleeding. Hysteroscopy detected focal endometrial (pre)malignancy in 6% of women who had benign endometrial sampling. This finding indicates that in these women, further diagnostic workup is warranted to detect focal (pre)malignancies, missed by blind endometrial sampling. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In women with PMB, hysteroscopy does not reduce recurrent bleeding but is warranted to detect focal malignancy.


Asunto(s)
Histeroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Pólipos/complicaciones , Posmenopausia , Enfermedades Uterinas/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Uterina/etiología , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos/diagnóstico , Lesiones Precancerosas/complicaciones , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Uterinas/complicaciones , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico , Útero/patología , Espera Vigilante
2.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2015: 605312, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25785283

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a model to predict a failed endometrial biopsy in women with postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) and a thickened endometrium can reduce costs without compromising diagnostic accuracy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION: Model based cost-minimization analysis. METHODS: A decision analytic model was designed to compare two diagnostic strategies for women with PMB: (I) attempting office endometrial biopsy and performing outpatient hysteroscopy after failed biopsy and (II) predicted probability of a failed endometrial biopsy based on patient characteristics to guide the decision for endometrial biopsy or immediate hysteroscopy. Robustness of assumptions regarding costs was evaluated in sensitivity analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs for the different strategies. RESULTS: At different cut-offs for the predicted probability of failure of an endometrial biopsy, strategy I was generally less expensive than strategy II. The costs for strategy I were always € 460; the costs for strategy II varied between € 457 and € 475. At a 65% cut-off, a possible saving of € 3 per woman could be achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Individualizing the decision to perform an endometrial biopsy or immediate hysteroscopy in women presenting with postmenopausal bleeding based on patient characteristics does not increase the efficiency of the diagnostic work-up.


Asunto(s)
Histeroscopía/economía , Histeroscopía/métodos , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico , Anciano , Biopsia/economía , Biopsia/métodos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Errores Diagnósticos , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Endometrio , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posmenopausia , Probabilidad
4.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 40(6): 621-9, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23001905

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Measurement of endometrial thickness is an important tool in the assessment of women with postmenopausal bleeding, but the role of endometrial thickness measurement by ultrasound in asymptomatic women is unclear. The aims of this study were to determine: (1) the normal endometrial thickness measured by ultrasonography, (2) the prevalence of serious endometrial pathology and (3) the sensitivity and specificity of endometrial thickness measurement by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) for diagnosing premalignant and malignant endometrial disease in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. METHODS: A MEDLINE and EMBASE search (from inception to January 2011) was performed. Articles reporting on endometrial thickness measurement in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia in asymptomatic postmenopausal women not using hormone replacement therapy (HRT) were selected. Endometrial thickness and the prevalence of endometrial (pre)malignancies were recorded. If possible, 2 × 2 tables were extracted. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies reporting on 11100 women were included. The estimated mean endometrial thickness was 2.9 mm (95% CI, 2.6-3.3 mm). The pooled estimated prevalences of endometrial carcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia were 0.62% (95% CI, 0.42-0.82%) and 0.59% (95% CI, 0.22-0.96%), respectively. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity of TVS endometrial thickness measurement in the prediction of endometrial carcinoma were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.19-1.00) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.23-0.95) for a 5-mm cut-off and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.04-0.85) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96) for a 6-mm cut-off. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this systematic review do not justify the use of endometrial thickness as a screening test for endometrial carcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in asymptomatic postmenopausal women not using HRT.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Endometrio/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Hiperplasia Endometrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperplasia Endometrial/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico por imagen , Endometrio/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Posmenopausia , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ultrasonografía
6.
Int J Surg Oncol ; 2016: 3039261, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27034826

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether structured assessment of outpatient endometrial biopsies decreases the number of inconclusive samples. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single hospital pathology laboratory. POPULATION: Endometrial biopsy samples of 66 women with postmenopausal bleeding, collected during the usual diagnostic work-up and assessed as insufficient for a reliable histological diagnosis. METHODS: Endometrial biopsy samples were requested from the pathology laboratories. The retrieved samples were systematically reassessed by a single pathologist specialized in gynecology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Disagreement between initial assessment and conclusion after structured reassessment. RESULTS: We retrieved 36 of 66 endometrial biopsy samples from six different pathology laboratories. Structured reassessment of the retrieved samples by a single pathologist specialized in gynecology did not change the conclusion in 35 of the 36 samples. The remaining sample contained a large amount of endometrial tissue and the diagnosis at reassessment was endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. All other samples contained insufficient material for a reliable diagnosis. CONCLUSION: A structured reassessment of endometrial biopsies samples, which were classified as inconclusive due to insufficient material, did not change the conclusion. Although it might be helpful for pathologists to have diagnostic criteria for adequacy and/or inadequacy of an endometrial biopsy sample, the gain in efficiency is likely to be small.


Asunto(s)
Endometrio/patología , Posmenopausia , Manejo de Especímenes , Hemorragia Uterina/patología , Biopsia , Estudios de Cohortes , Hiperplasia Endometrial/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Endometriales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
Maturitas ; 68(2): 155-64, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21145186

RESUMEN

Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is a common complaint in general gynecological practice. Women with PMB have around a 10% chance of having endometrial carcinoma and therefore PMB always needs further evaluation. This article summarizes the reviews on the subject and provides an overview of the use of diagnostic tools in patients with PMB. Four types of diagnostic test are described: sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness, endometrial sampling, hysteroscopy and saline infusion sonography. All four have been independently shown to be accurate in excluding endometrial cancer. However, neither in systematic reviews nor in international guidelines is consensus found regarding the sequence in which these methods should be employed in women with PMB. For measurement of endometrial thickness in symptomatic women, a cut-off value of 3mm is recommended, but the cost-effectiveness of this strategy has yet to be shown. Research should now focus on the incorporation of individual patient characteristics and pre-test probabilities for cancer in algorithms for the investigation of PMB, and the most cost-effective sequenced combination of the four types of test.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Endometrio/patología , Posmenopausia , Hemorragia Uterina/etiología , Biopsia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Endometrio/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Histeroscopía/métodos , Valores de Referencia , Ultrasonografía , Hemorragia Uterina/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Uterina/patología
8.
Obstet Gynecol Int ; 2010: 850812, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20169169

RESUMEN

Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) is a common clinical problem. Patients with PMB have 10%-15% chance of having endometrial carcinoma and therefore the diagnostic workup is aimed at excluding malignancy. Patient characteristics can alter the probability of having endometrial carcinoma in patients with PMB; in certain groups of patients the incidence has been reported to be as high as 29%. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) is used as a first step in the diagnostic workup, but different authors have come to different conclusions assessing the accuracy of TVS for excluding endometrial carcinoma. Diagnostic procedures obtaining material for histological assessment (e.g., dilatation and curettage, hysteroscopy, and endometrial biopsy) can be more accurate but are also more invasive. The best diagnostic strategy for diagnosing endometrial carcinoma in patients with PMB still remains controversial. Future research should be focussed on achieving a higher accuracy of different diagnostic strategies.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA