Mast Cell Activation Syndrome: current understanding and research needs.

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a term applied to several clinical entities which have gained increased attention from patients and medical providers. While several descriptive publications about MCAS exist, there are many gaps in knowledge resulting in confusion about this clinical syndrome. Whether MCAS is a primary syndrome or exists as a constellation of symptoms in the context of known inflammatory, allergic, or clonal disorders associated with systemic mast cell (MC) activation is not well understood. More importantly, the underlying mechanisms and pathways that lead to MC activation in MCAS patients remain to be elucidated. The purpose of this manuscript is to summarize the known literature, identify gaps in knowledge, and highlight research needs. Several topics are covered: 1) Contextualization of MCAS and MCAS-like endotypes and related diagnostic evaluations; 2) Mechanistic research; 3) Management of typical and refractory symptoms, and 4) MCAS-specific education for patients and healthcare providers.

Proposed refined diagnostic criteria and classification of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes.

Eosinophilia and eosinophil activation are recurrent features in various reactive states and certain hematologic malignancies. In patients with hypereosinophilia (HE), HE-induced organ damage is often encountered and may lead to the diagnosis of a hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). A number of known mechanisms and etiologies contribute to the development of HE and HES. Based on these etiologies and the origin of eosinophils, HE and HES are divided into primary forms where eosinophils are clonal cells, reactive forms where an underlying reactive or neoplastic condition is detected and eosinophils are considered to be "non-clonal" cells, and idiopathic HE and HES in which neither a clonal nor a reactive underlying pathology is detected. Since 2012, this classification and the related criteria have been widely accepted and regarded as standard. However, during the past few years, new developments in the field and an increasing number of markers and targets have created a need to update these criteria and the classification of HE and HES. To address this challenge, a Working Conference on eosinophil disorders was organized in 2021. In this conference, a panel of experts representing the relevant fields, including allergy, dermatology, hematology, immunology, laboratory medicine, and pathology, met and discussed new markers and concepts as well as refinements in definitions, criteria and classifications of HE and HES. The outcomes of this conference are presented in this article and should assist in the diagnosis and management of patients with HE and HES in daily practice and in the preparation and conduct of clinical trials.

Clinical and histopathological features of hypereosinophilic syndrome with cutaneous involvement: The Mayo Clinic Experience.

BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) encompasses a group of diseases with blood hypereosinophilia and eosinophil-mediated organ dysfunction. HES-associated skin abnormalities, termed cutaneous HES (cHES) here, may influence diagnosis of HES. We sought to better define clinical and histopathological features of cHES. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records and cutaneous histopathology of adult patients with HES evaluated at our institution from 2007 to 2018. RESULTS: Forty-one percent (61/150) patients with HES had cHES. The most common clinical morphologies were urticarial (30%) and eczematous (26%). Skin specimens most often showed a spongiotic pattern (31%) with abundant inflammation (50%) including eosinophils (85%). Two specimens (8%) showed interstitial granulomatous dermatitis, and two specimens showed eosinophilic fasciitis (8%). Vasculitis was not identified in any specimen. Eighty-four percent of patients with cHES had ≥1 other organ system involved: pulmonary 41%, ENT 26%, and nervous 23%. Sixty percent (53/89) of non-cHES patients had at least two organ systems involved. Cardiac or gastrointestinal involvement was more common in non-cHES than cHES (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our review confirms that there are no specific clinical or histopathological cHES patterns, but HES should be considered in patients who have eczematous or urticarial reactions of unknown etiology and persistent peripheral hypereosinophilia.

Differential mast cell mediators in systemic mastocytosis and hereditary α-tryptasemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with systemic mastocytosis often have symptoms of mast cell activation, which is associated with elevated levels of urinary mast cell mediator metabolites. Patients with hereditary α-tryptasemia (HαT) may present with symptoms of mast cell activation. Whether levels of mast cell mediators are elevated in this patient population is not known. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with HαT and symptoms of mast cell activation have elevated levels of urinary mediators and compare the levels with those in patients with systemic mastocytosis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed mast cell mediators in 63 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HαT, 20 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), and 23 healthy controls. All patients were referred to the Brigham and Women's Hospital Mastocytosis Center or the Mayo Clinic for evaluation of mast cell activation disorders. RESULTS: Our population was predominantly female (85.7%) with an average age of 53.8 years. The average baseline serum tryptase level was significantly higher in patients with ISM than in those with HαT (65.9 vs 19.3 ng/mL [P < .01]). When compared with patients with HαT, those with ISM had statistically significant increases in their levels of urinary N-methylhistamine (P < .01) and 2,3-dinor-11ß-prostaglandin F2α (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Patients with symptomatic HαT do not have elevations of mast cell urinary metabolites, suggesting that granule- and membrane-derived mediators may not drive symptoms in HαT.

Perioperative management of mastocytosis.

PURPOSE: Patients with mastocytosis have an increased risk of anaphylaxis during surgical procedures with general anesthesia. Therefore, we reviewed the anesthesia course of a large cohort of patients with mastocytosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed adult and pediatric patients with mastocytosis who underwent surgical procedures with general anesthesia at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2000, through June 30, 2021. We also included any procedures with general anesthesia that occurred during the 3-year period preceding mastocytosis diagnosis and designated the patients who underwent these procedures as having an unknown diagnosis at the time of their surgical procedure. We analyzed whether patients received chronic antimediator treatment for mastocytosis and/or prophylactic medications before the procedures. We also determined whether medications indicative of mastocytosis-related adverse events were intraoperatively administered. RESULTS: We identified 113 patients who underwent 219 procedures during the study period; 25 procedures were performed before mastocytosis diagnosis. Of 194 procedures in patients with known mastocytosis, patients received chronic antimediator therapy and/or perioperative prophylactic medications for 178 (91.8%) procedures. Among these procedures, 10 were potentially complicated by mast cell activation, which was inferred from administration of inhaled albuterol (n = 3) or intravenous diphenhydramine (n = 8). In addition, there was only one case of intraoperative anaphylaxis which occurred in a patient who underwent anesthesia before mastocytosis diagnosis and therefore did not receive prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative anaphylaxis can be the first presenting sign of mastocytosis. Patients with mastocytosis who received chronic antimediator therapy and/or preoperative prophylactic medications had an uneventful surgical course.

Divergent PGD2 and leukotriene C4 metabolite excretion following aspirin therapy: Ten patients with systemic mastocytosis.

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease and some cases of chronic idiopathic urticaria are disorders in which increased baseline urinary excretion of leukotriene(LT)E4 further increases following aspirin administration. Increased urinary excretion of the metabolites of prostaglandin D2, 11ß-prostaglandin(PG)F2α and (2,3-dinor)-11ß-PGF2α, have been documented in systemic mastocytosis (SM) and in mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS). Symptoms due to increased baseline and/or episodic release of PGD2 can be prevented with aspirin, an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase (COX)1 and COX2. Here by retrospective chart review we discovered 8 of 10 patients with SM in whom normalization of an elevated urinary (2,3-dinor)-11ß-PGF2α occurred with aspirin therapy also had a parallel increased excretion of LTE4 by an average of nearly 13-fold. How widespread this phenomenon occurs in SM is unknown; however, this occurrence needs to be considered when interpreting changes in these urinary mast cell mediator metabolites during aspirin therapy.

Risk and management of patients with mastocytosis and MCAS in the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic: Expert opinions.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic has massively distorted our health care systems and caused catastrophic consequences in our affected communities. The number of victims continues to increase, and patients at risk can only be protected to a degree, because the virulent state may be asymptomatic. Risk factors concerning COVID-19-induced morbidity and mortality include advanced age, an impaired immune system, cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and cancer treated with chemotherapy. Here, we discuss the risk and impact of COVID-19 in patients with mastocytosis and mast cell activation syndromes. Because no published data are yet available, expert opinions are, by necessity, based on case experience and reports from patients. Although the overall risk to acquire the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 may not be elevated in mast cell disease, certain conditions may increase the risk of infected patients to develop severe COVID-19. These factors include certain comorbidities, mast cell activation-related events affecting the cardiovascular or bronchopulmonary system, and chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, such treatments should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis during a COVID-19 infection. In contrast, other therapies, such as anti-mediator-type drugs, venom immunotherapy, or vitamin D, should be continued. Overall, patients with mast cell disorders should follow the general and local guidelines in the COVID-19 pandemic and advice from their medical provider.

Survey of Mast Cell Mediator Levels from Patients Presenting with Symptoms of Mast Cell Activation.

INTRODUCTION: Although 4 mast cell mediators can be routinely measured, the results of initial testing to evaluate symptoms of mast cell activation have not been widely reported. OBJECTIVE: We examined the results of mast cell mediator tests used to assess patients with mast cell activation symptoms during a 5-year time span. METHODS: After excluding patients with alternative diagnoses, records of 108 patients were reviewed for initial mediator test results. Mediators included serum tryptase plus urinary N-methyl histamine (N-MH), leukotriene (LT)E4, and 11ß-prostaglandin (PG) F2α or 2,3-dinor-11ß-PGF2α (BPG). RESULTS: Most commonly, either a single measured elevation of 1 mediator (48.1%) or elevations of 2 (33.3%) mediators was found at baseline, during symptoms or at both time points. Elevated levels of a single mediator in order of frequency were: BPG > tryptase > LTE4 > N-MH, and for two mediators: BPG + tryptase (n = 16 cases) > BPG + LTE4 (n = 9) > BPG + N-MH (n = 6). Elevations in 3 mediators (n = 8) or 4 mediators (n = 2) were much less frequent. Monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome (n = 6), and systemic and cutaneous mastocytosis (n = 4) were also infrequent. Baseline plus symptom-associated tryptase values were obtained in only 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggests that elevations of 1 or 2 mediators are the most common (total 81.4% of cases) findings from initial tests for mast cell activation. Elevated levels of BPG were most commonly found both singly and in combination with other mediators, followed by the finding of elevated levels of tryptase. Baseline plus symptom-associated tryptase levels were measured in only a minority of patients.

Adverse reactions to drugs and biologics in patients with clonal mast cell disorders: A Work Group Report of the Mast Cells Disorder Committee, American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

Providers caring for patients with mastocytosis are tasked with the decision to consider therapeutic options. This can come with some trepidation because information available in the public domain lists numerous mast cell (MC) activators based on data that do not discriminate between primates, rodents, and MC lines; do not consider dosage; and do not take into account previous exposure and resultant clinical findings. This being said, there is support in the literature for an enhanced MC response in some patients with mastocytosis and in cases in which there is a greater incidence of adverse reactions associated with certain antigens, such as venoms and drugs. Thus this report provides a comprehensive guide for those providers who must decide on therapeutic options in the management of patients with clonal MC disease.

AAAAI Mast Cell Disorders Committee Work Group Report: Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) diagnosis and management.

Our current recommendations for diagnosing and treating primary mast cell (MC) activation syndrome make use of the latest studies and consensus guidelines for clinically recognizing systemic anaphylaxis in real time, regardless of whether allergen-triggered or other pathways are involved; our current understanding of the biomarkers secreted by activated MCs that best discriminate this disorder from other conditions; and the therapeutic drugs that might selectively affect those mediators or MCs themselves. Finding familial or somatic mutations of genes that cause MCs to be hyperactivatable would extend our diagnostic tools and potentially indicate new therapeutic interventions, targeting either the mutated gene product or the associated molecular pathway. In conclusion, we trust that the clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic criteria for primary MC activation syndromes described herein will provide clinicians with practical criteria of sufficient sensitivity and specificity to diagnose most cases without overdiagnosing the disorder in patients who likely have other conditions.

Why the 20% + 2 Tryptase Formula Is a Diagnostic Gold Standard for Severe Systemic Mast Cell Activation and Mast Cell Activation Syndrome.

Mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is a condition characterized by recurrent episodes of clinically relevant, systemic, severe reactions to mast cell (MC)-derived mediators released in the context of anaphylaxis or another acute MC-related event. It is important to document MC involvement in these reactions in order to establish the diagnosis MCAS. The most specific and reliable marker of systemic MC activation is an acute and substantial event-related (transient) increase in the serum tryptase level over the individual's baseline value. However, the baseline level of tryptase varies depending on the underlying disease and the genetic background. For example, an estimated 3-5% of healthy individuals exhibit duplications or multiple copies of the TPSAB1 gene encoding for alpha-tryptase, and over 30% of all patients with myeloid neoplasms, including mastocytosis, have elevated basal tryptase levels. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to adjust the event-related diagnostic (MCAS-confirming) increase in tryptase over the individual baseline in a robust approach. To address this challenge, the 20% + 2 formula was proposed by the consensus group in 2012. Since then, this approach has been validated in clinical practice by independent groups and found to be sound. In the current article, we discuss the emerging importance and value of the 20% + 2 formula in clinical practice and its role as a criterion of severe systemic MC activation and MCAS.

Preclinical human models and emerging therapeutics for advanced systemic mastocytosis.

Mastocytosis is a term used to denote a group of rare diseases characterized by an abnormal accumulation of neoplastic mast cells in various tissues and organs. In most patients with systemic mastocytosis, the neoplastic cells carry activating mutations in KIT Progress in mastocytosis research has long been hindered by the lack of suitable in vitro models, such as permanent human mast cell lines. In fact, only a few human mast cell lines are available to date: HMC-1, LAD1/2, LUVA, ROSA and MCPV-1. The HMC-1 and LAD1/2 cell lines were derived from patients with mast cell leukemia. By contrast, the more recently established LUVA, ROSA and MCPV-1 cell lines were derived from CD34+ cells of non-mastocytosis donors. While some of these cell lines (LAD1/2, LUVA, ROSAKIT WT and MCPV-1) do not harbor KIT mutations, HMC-1 and ROSAKIT D816V cells exhibit activating KIT mutations found in mastocytosis and have thus been used to study disease pathogenesis. In addition, these cell lines are increasingly employed to validate new therapeutic targets and to screen for effects of new targeted drugs. Recently, the ROSAKIT D816V subclone has been successfully used to generate a unique in vivo model of advanced mastocytosis by injection into immunocompromised mice. Such a model may allow in vivo validation of data obtained in vitro with targeted drugs directed against mastocytosis. In this review, we discuss the major characteristics of all available human mast cell lines, with particular emphasis on the use of HMC-1 and ROSAKIT D816V cells in preclinical therapeutic research in mastocytosis.

Cutaneous manifestations in patients with mastocytosis: Consensus report of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; and the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology.

Cutaneous lesions in patients with mastocytosis are highly heterogeneous and encompass localized and disseminated forms. Although a classification and criteria for cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) have been proposed, there remains a need to better define subforms of cutaneous manifestations in patients with mastocytosis. To address this unmet need, an international task force involving experts from different organizations (including the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; and the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology) met several times between 2010 and 2014 to discuss the classification and criteria for diagnosis of cutaneous manifestations in patients with mastocytosis. This article provides the major outcomes of these meetings and a proposal for a revised definition and criteria. In particular, we recommend that the typical maculopapular cutaneous lesions (urticaria pigmentosa) should be subdivided into 2 variants, namely a monomorphic variant with small maculopapular lesions, which is typically seen in adult patients, and a polymorphic variant with larger lesions of variable size and shape, which is typically seen in pediatric patients. Clinical observations suggest that the monomorphic variant, if it develops in children, often persists into adulthood, whereas the polymorphic variant may resolve around puberty. This delineation might have important prognostic implications, and its implementation in diagnostic algorithms and future mastocytosis classifications is recommended. Refinements are also suggested for the diagnostic criteria of CM, removal of telangiectasia macularis eruptiva perstans from the current classification of CM, and removal of the adjunct solitary from the term solitary mastocytoma.

Presentation of untreated systemic mastocytosis as recurrent, pulseless-electrical-activity cardiac arrests resistant to cardiac pacemaker.

Recurrent, pulseless-electrical-activity (PEA) cardiac arrests were the novel presentation of untreated systemic mastocytosis in an 85-year-old woman who lacked cutaneous findings of mastocytosis. Despite prior implantation of a dual-chamber cardiac pacemaker 3 weeks previously for similar spells, she experienced a PEA arrest accompanied by flushing, increased urinary N-methylhistamine excretion and serum tryptase values on the day of presentation to our clinic. Bone marrow biopsy findings conducted to rule out breast cancer metastases showed 30% mast cell infiltration, aberrant expression of CD25 and a positive c-kit Asp816Val mutation. Treatment with a combination of H1 and H2 receptor blockers reduced flushing and eliminated hypotension. Maintenance medication included aspirin, cetirizine, ranitidine, montelukast, oral cromolyn sodium and an epinephrine autoinjector (as needed). At 6-month follow-up, the patient remained free of PEA arrests, flushing, or any clinical signs of mastocytosis or mast cell degranulation. PEA cardiac arrests may therefore be a presenting sign of untreated systemic mastocytosis.

Metformin: A potential adjunct for treatment of systemic mastocytosis.

Background: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clonal disorder of mast cells in which the KIT Asp816Val mutation can be detected not only in mature mast cells but also in the hematopoietic stem cell and in non-mast cell lineages. Current treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors provides improved clinical responses in patients with advanced mastocytosis but no cures. Targeting of cancer stem cells (CSCs) resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy potentially could improve clinical outcomes in mastocytosis. In recent years, nonchemotherapeutic medications such as metformin have been repurposed for this role because of their ability to destroy CSCs from both solid tumors and leukemias and also because of their ability to act as chemosensitizers. Objective: We sought to determine whether those patients with both type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and SM who were receiving metformin, which has been reported to inhibit CSCs, experienced clinical or laboratory benefit to their SM from this agent. Methods: Mayo Clinic databases were searched for patients with diagnoses of DM plus SM. The clinical courses of mastocytosis for patients with DM2 were compared among patients treated with metformin or by other means. Effects of metformin on human mast cell (HMC) leukemia line (HMC-1.1 and HMC-1.2) cell proliferation were tested in vitro. Results: No patient treated with metformin before SM was diagnosed developed advanced forms of disease. A lower percentage of these patients had splenomegaly compared with other groups not treated with metformin, and none of these patients developed Janus kinase 2, tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2, or serine and arginine-rich splicing factor 2 mutations. In vitro results showed that metformin inhibited the proliferation of both cell lines; HMC-1.1 cells were more sensitive to metformin. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that early use of metformin to target CSCs has the possibility to complement current treatments available for SM.

Systemic mastocytosis in the elderly.

"Later onset" of systemic mastocytosis (SM) has been associated with a poorer prognosis. We examined clinical and laboratory findings, associated disorders, and survival in an older mastocytosis population. After receiving Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approval, we identified 42 patients aged 70 years and older at the time of diagnosis of SM. Associated disorders, cytogenetic abnormalities, laboratory findings, and survival were recorded. Only 10 patients had no associated hematologic disorder. Single or multiple chromosomal abnormalities, exclusive of the KIT Asp816Val mutation, were detected in eight patients (19%). KIT Asp816Val mutation was present in 14 patients, negative in three, and not tested in 25. Slight to marked bone marrow hypercellularity was observed in 33 patients (79%). Concurrent hematologic abnormalities included chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 7), acute myelocytic leukemia (n = 1), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n = 7), eosinophilia (n = 7), myelofibrosis (n = 1), myeloproliferative disorder (n = 1), multiple myeloma (n = 1), B-cell lymphoma (n = 1), and thrombocytopenia (n = 4). Eight patients had a hematologic disorder that preceded the diagnosis of SM. Tryptase levels were elevated in 38 of 39 patients tested. Survival from the diagnosis of SM was poor for patients with associated thrombocytopenia, leukemias, and MDS. In conclusion, patients with SM diagnosed at age 70 or older have an increased risk of secondary hematologic disorders and abnormal laboratory findings. Cytogenetic abnormalities are common, and survival is short in many SM patients with associated leukemias, MDS, or eosinophilia.

Contemporary consensus proposal on criteria and classification of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes.

Eosinophilia is an important indicator of various neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions. Depending on the underlying disease and mechanisms, eosinophil infiltration can lead to organ dysfunction, clinical symptoms, or both. During the past 2 decades, several different classifications of eosinophilic disorders and related syndromes have been proposed in various fields of medicine. Although criteria and definitions are, in part, overlapping, no global consensus has been presented to date. The Year 2011 Working Conference on Eosinophil Disorders and Syndromes was organized to update and refine the criteria and definitions for eosinophilic disorders and to merge prior classifications in a contemporary multidisciplinary schema. A panel of experts from the fields of immunology, allergy, hematology, and pathology contributed to this project. The expert group agreed on unifying terminologies and criteria and a classification that delineates various forms of hypereosinophilia, including primary and secondary variants based on specific hematologic and immunologic conditions, and various forms of the hypereosinophilic syndrome. For patients in whom no underlying disease or hypereosinophilic syndrome is found, the term hypereosinophilia of undetermined significance is introduced. The proposed novel criteria, definitions, and terminologies should assist in daily practice, as well as in the preparation and conduct of clinical trials.

Increased Excretion of Mast Cell Mediator Metabolites During Mast Cell Activation Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: One requirement for diagnosing mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is an increase, above an established baseline level, in serum tryptase by 20% plus 2 ng/mL. However, there is no consensus of what constitutes excretion of a substantial increase in metabolites from prostaglandin D2, histamine, or leukotriene E4 in MCAS. OBJECTIVE: Ratios of acute/baseline levels for each urinary metabolite that accompanied tryptase increases of 20% plus 2 ng/mL were determined. METHODS: Mayo Clinic databases of patients with systemic mastocytosis with or without MCAS were reviewed. Patients with the requisite increase in serum tryptase during MCAS were examined for those who also had acute/baseline measurements of urinary mediator metabolite(s). RESULTS: Ratios of acute/baseline levels for tryptase and for each urinary metabolite were calculated. For all patients, the average acute/baseline ratio (SD) for tryptase was 4.88 (3.77). Average ratios of urinary mediator metabolites were: leukotriene E4: 35.98 (50.59), 2,3-dinor-11ß-prostaglandin F2α: 7.28 (6.89), and N-methyl histamine: 3.2 (2.31). The lowest acute-baseline ratios for each of the three metabolites accompanying a tryptase increase of 20% plus 2 ng/mL were similar, with values of about 1.3. CONCLUSIONS: To the author's knowledge, this is the largest series of mast cell mediator metabolite measurements during episodes of MCAS that were verified by the requisite tryptase increase above baseline. Unexpectedly, leukotriene E4 showed the greatest average increase. Acute/baseline increase of 1.3 or greater in any of these mediators could be useful for corroborating a diagnosis of MCAS.

The Normal Range of Baseline Tryptase Should Be 1 to 15 ng/mL and Covers Healthy Individuals With HαT.

Physiological levels of basal serum tryptase vary among healthy individuals, depending on the numbers of mast cells, basal secretion rate, copy numbers of the TPSAB1 gene encoding alpha tryptase, and renal function. Recently, there has been a growing debate about the normal range of tryptase because individuals with the hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HαT) trait may or may not be symptomatic, and if symptomatic, uncertainty exists as to whether this trait directly causes clinical phenotypes or aggravates certain conditions. In fact, most HαT-positive cases are regarded as asymptomatic concerning mast cell activation. To address this point, experts of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) and the American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases met at the 2022 Annual ECNM meeting and discussed the physiological tryptase range. Based on this discussion, our faculty concluded that the normal serum tryptase range should be defined in asymptomatic controls, inclusive of individuals with HαT, and based on 2 SDs covering the 95% confidence interval. By applying this definition in a literature screen, the normal basal tryptase in asymptomatic controls (HαT-positive persons included) ranges between 1 and 15 ng/mL. This definition should avoid overinterpretation, unnecessary referrals, and unnecessary anxiety or anticipatory fear of illness in healthy individuals.