Association between human herpesvirus infection and cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most common gynecologic tumors among women around the world. Although the etiological role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in CC is well established, other factors in CC carcinogenesis remains unclear. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the association between infections of human herpesvirus (HHVs) and CC risk. METHODS: Embase and PubMed databases were utilized to search the relevant studies. The revised JBI Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Prevalence and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the association between viral infection and CC or precancerous cervical lesions (PCL). RESULTS: Totally 67 eligible studies involving 7 different HHVs were included in meta-analysis. We found an increased risk of CC or PCL that was associated with the overall infection of HHVs (CC, OR = 2.74, 95% CI 2.13-3.53; PCL, OR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.58-2.41). Subgroup analysis showed a trend towards positive correlations between herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection and CC (OR = 3.01, 95% CI 2.24 to 4.04) or PCL (OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.96), and the same is true between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and CC (OR = 4.89, 95% CI 2.18 to 10.96) or PCL (OR = 3.55, 95% CI 2.52 to 5.00). However, for HSV-1 and cytomegalovirus (HCMV), there was no association between viral infection and CC or PCL. By contrast, the roles of HHV-6, HHV-7, and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) in cervical lesions were unclear due to the limited number of studies. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided evidence that HHVs infection as a whole increase the risk of CC incidence. In addition, some types of HHVs such as EBV and HSV-2 may serve as potential targets in the development of new interventions or therapeutic strategies for cervical lesions.

Diabetes mellitus and latent tuberculosis infection: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated an association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). This study was conducted to update the current understanding of the association between DM and LTBI. By conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis using adjusted odds ratios (aOR) or risk ratios (aRR), we aimed to further explore the association between DM and LTBI and provide essential reference for future research. METHODS: We conducted comprehensive searches in Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed without imposing any start date or language restrictions, up to July 19, 2022. Our study selection encompassed observational research that compared from LTBI positive rates in both DM and non-DM groups and reported aRR or aOR results. The quality of the included studies was assessed utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models, along with their associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 22 studies involving 68,256 subjects. Three cohort studies were eligible, with a pooled aRR of 1.26 (95% CI: 0.71-2.23). Nineteen cross-sectional studies were eligible, with a pooled aOR of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.14-1.29). The crude RR (cRR) pooled estimate for three cohort studies was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.03-2.57). Among the cross-sectional studies we included, sixteen studies provided crude ORs, and the crude OR (cOR) pooled estimate was 1.64 (95% CI: 1.36-1.97). In the diagnosis of diabetes, the pooled aOR of the HbA1c group was higher than that of self-reported group (pooled aOR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.24-1.96 vs. 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06-1.28). CONCLUSION: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest a positive association between DM and LTBI. Individuals with DM may have a higher risk of LTBI compared to those without DM. These findings provide important insights for future research and public health interventions in managing LTBI in diabetic populations.

Positive rates of interferon-γ release assay and tuberculin skin test in detection of latent tuberculosis infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 200,000 head-to-head comparative tests.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the positive rates of IGRA and TST in detection of LTBI. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on March 12, 2022. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled results. RESULTS: We included 458 head-to-head studies. Compared with immunocompetent controls, TST positive rate in immunosuppressed population decreased more than IGRA positive rate (OR 0.36 [95% CI: 0.31 to 0.41] versus 0.53 [0.46 to 0.61]). In immunocompetent BCG-vaccinated individuals, IGRA positive rate in low-TB burden areas was significantly lower than TST positive rate, but the difference was decreased in high-TB burden areas (OR 0.75 [0.60 to 0.94]). Additionally, IGRA positive rate was equal to that of TST in the elderly (OR 0.98 [0.66 to 1.46]). CONCLUSION: TST is more susceptible to immunosuppression than IGRA. The effect of BCG on TST might be weakened in high-TB burden areas, and TST response waned in the elderly. REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020180163.

Effectiveness and safety of tuberculosis preventive treatment for contacts of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Contacts of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are at risk of developing TB disease. Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is an intervention that can potentially reduce this risk. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TPT for contacts of patients with MDR-TB. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies on 24 July 2023, without start date restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included studies that compared TPT with no treatment in contacts of patients with MDR-TB and reported outcomes of progression to TB disease. PARTICIPANTS: Contacts of patients with MDR-TB. INTERVENTIONS: TPT. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Random-effects meta-analysis was utilized to calculate the relative risk for disease progression to TB in contacts of patients with MDR-TB who received TPT compared to those who did not. Additionally, completion, adverse effect, and discontinued rates were assessed. RESULTS: Involving 1105 individuals from 11 studies, the pooled relative risk for disease progression in contacts receiving TPT versus those without treatment was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.16-0.72). Subgroup analysis indicated a lower pooled relative risk for regimens based on the drug-resistance profile of the index patients with TB compared to uniform treatment regimens (0.22 [95% CI: 0.06-0.84] vs. 0.49 [95% CI: 0.17-1.35]), although not statistically significant. The pooled completed rate was 83.8%, adverse effect rate was 22.9%, and discontinued rate was 6.5%. After excluding the levofloxacin and pyrazinamide regimen study, the completed rate increased to 88.0%, and adverse effects and discontinued rates decreased to 8.0% and 4.0%, respectively. DISCUSSION: TPT reduces TB disease progression risk in contacts of patients with MDR-TB. Tailored TPT regimens based on drug-resistance profiles may offer additional benefits. Furthermore, efforts to improve completed rates and manage adverse effects are essential for optimizing effectiveness and safety.

Risk of progression to active tuberculosis for indeterminate interferon-gamma release assay in immunocompromised individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on assessing the risk of active tuberculosis (TB) in immunocompromised individuals during screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of progression to active TB for indeterminate interferon-γ release assays (IGRA) results in immunocompromised individuals during screening for LTBI. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched without start date or language restrictions on 18 April 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort study or randomized controlled trials that investigated the risk of progression to active TB for indeterminate IGRA during LTBI screening. PARTICIPANTS: Immunocompromised individuals. TEST: IGRA (T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON). REFERENCE STANDARD: None. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Fixed effects meta-analysis was used to obtain two pooled risk ratios (RRs). RR-ip represented disease progression rate in untreated individuals with indeterminate IGRA versus positive IGRA. RR-in represented disease progression rate in untreated individuals with indeterminate IGRA versus negative IGRA. RESULTS: Among the 5102 identified studies, 28 (14 792 immunocompromised individuals) were included. The pooled RR-ip and RR-in for cumulative incidence were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.32-0.82; I2 = 0%) and 2.94 (95% CI, 1.78-4.85; I2 = 0%), respectively. In addition, 11 studies reporting person-year data were included to verify the reliability of cumulative incidence results. The pooled RR-ip and RR-in for person-year incidence were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.19-0.82; I2 = 13%) and 2.67 (95% CI, 1.24-5.79; I2 = 23%), respectively. DISCUSSION: Indeterminate IGRA results in immunocompromised individuals may represent an intermediate risk of progression to active TB, with half the risk for positive results and three times for negative results. Proper follow-up and management of patients with indeterminate results are crucial for mitigating progression risk and improving patient outcomes.

Indeterminate results of interferon gamma release assays in the screening of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the indeterminate rate of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) in the detection of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Methods: On 15 November 2022, we searched the PubMed® (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA), Embase® (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two investigators independently extracted the study data and assessed their quality using a modified quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (i.e., QUADAS-2) tool. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled results. Results: We included 403 studies involving 486,886 individuals and found that the pooled indeterminate rate was 3.9% (95% CI 3.5%-4.2%). The pooled indeterminate rate for QuantiFERON®-TB (QFT) was similar to that for T-SPOT®.TB (T-SPOT) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.32]; however, the indeterminate rate for a new generation of QFT (QFT-plus) was lower than that of T-SPOT (OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.16-0.35). The indeterminate rate in the immunocompromised population was significantly higher than that in healthy controls (OR = 3.51, 95% CI 2.11-5.82), and it increased with the reduction of CD4+ cell count in HIV-positive patients. Children's pooled indeterminate rates (OR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.79-3.57) were significantly higher than those of adults, and the rates increased as the children's age decreased. Conclusion: On average, 1 in 26 tests yields indeterminate IGRA results in LTBI screening. The use of advanced versions of the QuantiFERON-TB assay (QFT-plus), may potentially reduce the occurrence of an indeterminate result. Our study emphasizes the high risk of immunosuppression and young age in relation to indeterminate IGRA, which should receive more attention in the management of LTBI. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020211363, CRD42020211363.