RESUMEN
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry and cell-cell fusion require glycoproteins gD, gH/gL, and gB. HSV entry begins with gD binding its receptor (nectin-1), which then activates gH/gL to enable the conversion of pre-fusion gB to its active form to promote membrane fusion. Virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) interfere with one or more of these steps and localization of their epitopes identifies functional sites on each protein. Utilizing this approach, we have identified the gH/gL binding face on gD and the corresponding gD binding site on gH/gL. Here, we used combinations of these Mabs to define the orientation of gD and gH/gL relative to each other. We reasoned that if two Mabs, one directed at gD and the other at gH/gL, block fusion more effectively than when either were used alone (additive), then their epitopes would be spatially distanced and binding of one would not directly interfere with binding of the other during fusion. However, if the two Mabs blocked fusion with equal or lesser efficacy that when either were used alone (indifferent), we propose that their epitopes would be in close proximity in the complex. Using a live cell fusion assay, we found that some Mab pairings blocked the fusion with different mechanisms while other had a similar mechanisms of action. Grouping the different combinations of antibodies into indifferent and additive groups, we present a model for the orientation of gD vis-à-vis gH/gL in the complex.Importance: Virus entry and cell-cell fusion mediated by HSV require four essential glycoproteins, gD, gH/gL, gB and a gD receptor. Virus-neutralizing antibodies directed against any of these proteins bind to residues within key functional sites and interfere with essential steps in the fusion pathway. Thus, the epitopes of these Mabs overlap and point to critical, functional sites on their target proteins. Here, we combined gD and gH/gL antibodies to determine whether they work in an additive or non-additive (indifferent) fashion to block specific events in glycoprotein-driven cell-cell fusion. Identifying combinations of antibodies that have additive effects will help in the rational design of an effective therapeutic "polyclonal antibody" to treat HSV disease. In addition, identification of the exact contact regions between gD and gH/gL can inform the design of small molecules that would interfere with the gD-gH/gL complex formation, thus preventing the virus from entering the host cell.
RESUMEN
Alphaherpesviruses are enveloped viruses that enter cells by fusing the viral membrane with a host cell membrane, either within an endocytic vesicle or at the plasma membrane. This entry event is mediated by a set of essential entry glycoproteins, including glycoprotein D (gD), gHgL, and gB. gHgL and gB are conserved among herpesviruses, but gD is unique to the alphaherpesviruses and is not encoded by all alphaherpesviruses. gD is a receptor-binding protein, the heterodimer gHgL serves as a fusion regulator, and gB is a class III viral fusion protein. Sequential interactions among these glycoproteins are thought to trigger the virus to fuse at the right place and time. Structural studies of these glycoproteins from multiple alphaherpesviruses has enabled the design and interpretation of functional studies. The structures of gD in a receptor- bound and in an unliganded form reveal a conformational change in the C terminus of the gD ectodomain upon receptor binding that may serve as a signal for fusion. By mapping neutralizing antibodies to the gHgL structures and constructing interspecies chimeric forms of gHgL, interaction sites for both gD and gB on gHgL have been proposed. A comparison of the post fusion structure of gB and an alternative conformation of gB visualized using cryo- electron tomography suggests that gB undergoes substantial refolding to execute membrane fusion. Although these structures have provided excellent insights into the entry mechanism, many questions remain about how these viruses coordinate the interactions and conformational changes required for entry.
Asunto(s)
Alphaherpesvirinae/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/virología , Internalización del Virus , Animales , Membrana Celular/metabolismo , Membrana Celular/virología , Glicoproteínas/metabolismo , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/metabolismo , Humanos , Unión Proteica/fisiología , Conformación ProteicaRESUMEN
A cascade of protein-protein interactions between four herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoproteins (gD, gH/gL, and gB) drive fusion between the HSV envelope and host membrane, thereby allowing for virus entry and infection. Specifically, binding of gD to one of its receptors induces a conformational change that allows gD to bind to the regulatory complex gH/gL, which then activates the fusogen gB, resulting in membrane fusion. Using surface plasmon resonance and a panel of anti-gD monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that sterically blocked the interaction, we previously showed that gH/gL binds directly to gD at sites distinct from the gD receptor binding site. Here, using an analogous strategy, we first evaluated the ability of a panel of uncharacterized anti-gH/gL MAbs to block binding to gD and/or inhibit fusion. We found that the epitopes of four gD-gH/gL-blocking MAbs were located within flexible regions of the gH N terminus and the gL C terminus, while the fifth was placed around gL residue 77. Taken together, our data localized the gD binding region on gH/gL to a group of gH and gL residues at the membrane distal region of the heterodimer. Surprisingly, a second set of MAbs did not block gD-gH/gL binding but instead stabilized the complex by altering the kinetic binding. However, despite this prolonged gD-gH/gL interaction, "stabilizing" MAbs also inhibited cell-cell fusion, suggesting a unique mechanism by which the fusion process is halted. Our findings support targeting the gD-gH/gL interaction to prevent fusion in both therapeutic and vaccine strategies against HSV.IMPORTANCE Key to developing a human HSV vaccine is an understanding of the virion glycoproteins involved in entry. HSV employs multiple glycoproteins for attachment, receptor interaction, and membrane fusion. Determining how these proteins function was resolved, in part, by structural biology coupled with immunological and biologic evidence. After binding, virion gD interacts with a receptor to activate the regulator gH/gL complex, triggering gB to drive fusion. Multiple questions remain, one being the physical location of each glycoprotein interaction site. Using protective antibodies with known epitopes, we documented the long-sought interaction between gD and gH/gL, detailing the region on gD important to create the gD-gH/gL triplex. Now, we have identified the corresponding gD contact sites on gH/gL. Concurrently we discovered a novel mechanism whereby gH/gL antibodies stabilize the complex and inhibit fusion progression. Our model for the gD-gH/gL triplex provides a new framework for studying fusion, which identifies targets for vaccine development.
Asunto(s)
Herpesvirus Humano 1/metabolismo , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/metabolismo , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/química , Anticuerpos Antivirales/química , Fusión de Membrana , Células Sf9 , Spodoptera , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/genéticaRESUMEN
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) requires fusion between the viral envelope and host membrane. Four glycoproteins, gD, gH/gL, and gB, are essential for this process. To initiate fusion, gD binds its receptor and undergoes a conformational change that hypothetically leads to activation of gH/gL, which in turn triggers the fusion protein gB to undergo rearrangements leading to membrane fusion. Our model predicts that gD must interact with both its receptor and gH/gL to promote fusion. In support of this, we have shown that gD is structurally divided into two "faces": one for the binding receptor and the other for its presumed interaction with gH/gL. However, until now, we have been unable to demonstrate a direct interaction between gD and gH/gL. Here, we used surface plasmon resonance to show that the ectodomain of gH/gL binds directly to the ectodomain of gD when (i) gD is captured by certain anti-gD monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that are bound to a biosensor chip, (ii) gD is bound to either one of its receptors on a chip, and (iii) gD is covalently bound to the chip surface. To localize the gH/gL binding site on gD, we used multiple anti-gD MAbs from six antigenic communities and determined which ones interfered with this interaction. MAbs from three separate communities block gD-gH/gL binding, and their epitopes encircle a geographical area on gD that we propose comprises the gH/gL binding domain. Together, our results show that gH/gL interacts directly with gD, supporting a role for this step in HSV entry.IMPORTANCE HSV entry is a multistep process that requires the actions of four glycoproteins, gD, gH/gL, and gB. Our current model predicts that gD must interact with both its receptor and gH/gL to promote viral entry. Although we know a great deal about how gD binds its receptors, until now we have been unable to demonstrate a direct interaction between gD and gH/gL. Here, we used a highly sensitive surface plasmon resonance technique to clearly demonstrate that gD and gH/gL interact. Furthermore, using multiple MAbs with defined epitopes, we have delineated a domain on gD that is independent of that used for receptor binding and which likely represents the gH/gL interaction domain. Targeting this interaction to prevent fusion may enhance both therapeutic and vaccine strategies.
Asunto(s)
Herpesvirus Humano 1/fisiología , Mapas de Interacción de Proteínas , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/metabolismo , Internalización del Virus , Sitios de Unión , Unión Proteica , Resonancia por Plasmón de SuperficieRESUMEN
Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) glycoprotein D (gD2) subunit antigen is included in many preclinical candidate vaccines. The rationale for including gD2 is to produce antibodies that block crucial gD2 epitopes involved in virus entry and cell-to-cell spread. HSV-2 gD2 was the only antigen in the Herpevac Trial for Women that protected against HSV-1 genital infection but not HSV-2. In that trial, a correlation was detected between gD2 ELISA titers and protection against HSV-1, supporting the importance of antibodies. A possible explanation for the lack of protection against HSV-2 was that HSV-2 neutralization titers were low, four-fold lower than to HSV-1. Here, we evaluated neutralization titers and epitope-specific antibody responses to crucial gD2 epitopes involved in virus entry and cell-to-cell spread as correlates of immune protection against genital lesions in immunized guinea pigs. We detected a strong correlation between neutralizing antibodies and protection against genital disease. We used a high throughput biosensor competition assay to measure epitope-specific responses to seven crucial gD2 linear and conformational epitopes involved in virus entry and spread. Some animals produced antibodies to most crucial epitopes while others produced antibodies to few. The number of epitopes recognized by guinea pig immune serum correlated with protection against genital lesions. We confirmed the importance of antibodies to each crucial epitope using monoclonal antibody passive transfer that improved survival and reduced genital disease in mice after HSV-2 genital challenge. We re-evaluated our prior study of epitope-specific antibody responses in women in the Herpevac Trial. Humans produced antibodies that blocked significantly fewer crucial gD2 epitopes than guinea pigs, and antibody responses in humans to some linear epitopes were virtually absent. Neutralizing antibody titers and epitope-specific antibody responses are important immune parameters to evaluate in future Phase I/II prophylactic human vaccine trials that contain gD2 antigen.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Herpes Genital/prevención & control , Vacunas contra el Virus del Herpes Simple/inmunología , Simplexvirus/inmunología , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/inmunología , Internalización del Virus , Animales , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Chlorocebus aethiops , Epítopos/inmunología , Femenino , Cobayas , Inmunización Pasiva , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/aislamiento & purificación , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Células VeroRESUMEN
HSV virus-cell and cell-cell fusion requires multiple interactions between four essential virion envelope glycoproteins, gD, gB, gH, and gL, and between gD and a cellular receptor, nectin-1 or herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM). Current models suggest that binding of gD to receptors induces a conformational change that leads to activation of gH/gL and consequent triggering of the prefusion form of gB to promote membrane fusion. Since protein-protein interactions guide each step of fusion, identifying the sites of interaction may lead to the identification of potential therapeutic targets that block this process. We have previously identified two "faces" on gD: one for receptor binding and the other for its presumed interaction with gH/gL. We previously separated the gD monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) into five competition communities. MAbs from two communities (MC2 and MC5) neutralize virus infection and block cell-cell fusion but do not block receptor binding, suggesting that they block binding of gD to gH/gL. Using a combination of classical epitope mapping of gD mutants with fusion and entry assays, we identified two residues (R67 and P54) on the presumed gH/gL interaction face of gD that allowed for fusion and viral entry but were no longer sensitive to inhibition by MC2 or MC5, yet both were blocked by other MAbs. As neutralizing antibodies interfere with essential steps in the fusion pathway, our studies strongly suggest that these key residues block the interaction of gD with gH/gL.IMPORTANCE Virus entry and cell-cell fusion mediated by HSV require gD, gH/gL, gB, and a gD receptor. Neutralizing antibodies directed against any of these proteins bind to residues within key functional sites and interfere with an essential step in the fusion pathway. Thus, the epitopes of these MAbs identify critical, functional sites on their target proteins. Unlike many anti-gD MAbs, which block binding of gD to a cellular receptor, two, MC2 and MC5, block a separate, downstream step in the fusion pathway which is presumed to be the activation of the modulator of fusion, gH/gL. By combining epitope mapping of a panel of gD mutants with fusion and virus entry assays, we have identified residues that are critical in the binding and function of these two MAbs. This new information helps to define the site of the presumptive interaction of gD with gH/gL, of which we have limited knowledge.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/farmacología , Simplexvirus/fisiología , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/química , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/metabolismo , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/farmacología , Sitios de Unión/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular , Chlorocebus aethiops , Mapeo Epitopo , Ratones , Modelos Moleculares , Unión Proteica , Conformación Proteica , Células Vero , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/genética , Internalización del Virus/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
While HSV-2 typically causes genital lesions, HSV-1 is increasingly the cause of genital herpes. In addition, neonatal HSV infections are associated with a high rate of mortality and HSV-2 may increase the risk for HIV or Zika infections, reinforcing the need to develop an effective vaccine. In the GSK Herpevac trial, doubly sero-negative women were vaccinated with a truncated form of gD2 [gD2(284t)], then examined for anti-gD serum titers and clinical manifestations of disease. Surprisingly, few vaccinees were protected against genital HSV-2 but 86% were protected from genital HSV-1. These observations suggest that subtle differences in gD structure might influence a protective response. To better understand the antigenic structure of gD and how it impacts a protective response, we previously utilized several key anti-gD monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to dissect epitopes in vaccinee sera. Several correlations were observed but the methodology limited the number of sera and mAbs that could be tested. Here, we used array-based surface plasmon imaging (SPRi) to simultaneously measure a larger number of protein-protein interactions. We carried out cross-competition or "epitope binning" studies with 39 anti-gD mAbs and four soluble forms of gD, including a form [gD2(285t)] that resembles the Herpevac antigen. The results from these experiments allowed us to organize the mAbs into four epitope communities. Notably, relationships within and between communities differed depending on the form of gD, and off-rate analysis suggested differences in mAb-gD avidity depending on the gD serotype and length. Together, these results show that gD1 and gD2 differ in their structural topography. Consistent with the Herpevac results, several mAbs that bind both gD1 and gD2 neutralize only HSV-1. Thus, this technology provides new insights into the antigenic structure of gD and provides a rationale as to how vaccination with a gD2 subunit may lead to protection from HSV-1 infection.
Asunto(s)
Herpes Simple/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 1/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 2/inmunología , Resonancia por Plasmón de Superficie/métodos , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Antígenos Virales/química , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 1/química , Herpesvirus Humano 2/química , Vacunas contra Herpesvirus/inmunología , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/químicaRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 infect many humans and establish a latent infection in sensory ganglia. Although some infected people suffer periodic recurrences, others do not. Infected people mount both cell-mediated and humoral responses, including the production of virus-neutralizing antibodies (Abs) directed at viral entry glycoproteins. Previously, we examined IgGs from 10 HSV-seropositive individuals; all neutralized virus and were directed primarily against gD or gD+gB. Here, we expand our studies and examine 32 additional sera from HSV-infected individuals, 23 of whom had no recurrent disease. Using an Octet RED96 system, we screened all 32 serum samples directly for both glycoprotein binding and competition with known neutralizing anti-gD and -gB monoclonal Abs (MAbs). On average, the recurrent cohort exhibited higher binding to gD and gB and had higher neutralization titers. There were similar trends in the blocking of MAbs to critical gD and gB epitopes. When we depleted six sera of Abs to specific glycoproteins, we found different types of responses, but always directed primarily at gD and/or gB. Interestingly, in one dual-infected person, the neutralizing response to HSV-2 was due to gD2 and gB2, whereas HSV-1 neutralization was due to gD1 and gB1. In another case, virus neutralization was HSV-1 specific, with the Ab response directed entirely at gB1, despite this serum blocking type-common anti-gD and -gB neutralizing MAbs. These data are pertinent in the design of future HSV vaccines since they demonstrate the importance of both serotypes of gD and gB as immunogens. IMPORTANCE: We previously showed that people infected with HSV produce neutralizing Abs directed against gD or a combination of gD+gB (and in one case, gD+gB+gC, which was HSV-1 specific). In this more extensive study, we again found that gD or gD+gB can account for the virus neutralizing response and critical epitopes of one or both of these proteins are represented in sera of naturally infected humans. However, we also found that some individuals produced a strong response against gB alone. In addition, we identified type-specific contributions to HSV neutralization from both gD and gB. Contributions from the other entry glycoproteins, gC and gH/gL, were minimal and limited to HSV-1 neutralization. Knowing the variations in how humans see and mount a response to HSV will be important to vaccine development.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Epítopos/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 1/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 2/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/química , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/química , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/química , Anticuerpos Antivirales/química , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Chlorocebus aethiops , Reacciones Cruzadas , Epítopos/química , Herpesvirus Humano 1/química , Herpesvirus Humano 2/química , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Ratones , Células VeroRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Relatively little is known about the extent of the polyclonal antibody (PAb) repertoire elicited by herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoproteins during natural infection and how these antibodies affect virus neutralization. Here, we examined IgGs from 10 HSV-seropositive individuals originally classified as high or low virus shedders. All PAbs neutralized virus to various extents. We determined which HSV entry glycoproteins these PAbs were directed against: glycoproteins gB, gD, and gC were recognized by all sera, but fewer sera reacted against gH/gL. We previously characterized multiple mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and mapped those with high neutralizing activity to the crystal structures of gD, gB, and gH/gL. We used a biosensor competition assay to determine whether there were corresponding human antibodies to those epitopes. All 10 samples had neutralizing IgGs to gD epitopes, but there were variations in which epitopes were seen in individual samples. Surprisingly, only three samples contained neutralizing IgGs to gB epitopes. To further dissect the nature of these IgGs, we developed a method to select out gD- and gB-specific IgGs from four representative sera via affinity chromatography, allowing us to determine the contribution of antibodies against each glycoprotein to the overall neutralization capacity of the serum. In two cases, gD and gB accounted for all of the neutralizing activity against HSV-2, with a modest amount of HSV-1 neutralization directed against gC. In the other two samples, the dominant response was to gD. IMPORTANCE: Antibodies targeting functional epitopes on HSV entry glycoproteins mediate HSV neutralization. Virus-neutralizing epitopes have been defined and characterized using murine monoclonal antibodies. However, it is largely unknown whether these same epitopes are targeted by the humoral response to HSV infection in humans. We have shown that during natural infection, virus-neutralizing antibodies are principally directed against gD, gB, and, to a lesser extent, gC. While several key HSV-neutralizing epitopes within gD and gB are commonly targeted by human serum IgG, others fail to induce consistent responses. These data are particularly relevant to the design of future HSV vaccines.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Glicoproteínas/inmunología , Herpes Simple/inmunología , Simplexvirus/inmunología , Proteínas Estructurales Virales/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Formación de Anticuerpos , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , RatonesRESUMEN
The results of a clinical trial of a subunit vaccine against genital herpes were recently reported (R. B. Belshe, P. A. Leone, D. I. Bernstein, A. Wald, M. J. Levin, J. T. Stapleton, I. Gorfinkel, R. L. Morrow, M. G. Ewell, A. Stokes-Riner, G. Dubin, T. C. Heineman, J. M. Schulte, C. D. Deal, N. Engl. J. Med. 366: 34-43, 2012, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1103151). The vaccine consisted of a soluble form of herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) glycoprotein D (gD2) with adjuvant. The goal of the current study was to examine the composition of the humoral response to gD2 within a selected subset of vaccinated individuals. Serum samples from 30 vaccine recipients were selected based upon relative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) titers against gD2; 10 samples had high titers, 10 had medium titers, and the remaining 10 had low ELISA titers. We employed a novel, biosensor-based monoclonal antibody (MAb)-blocking assay to determine whether gD2 vaccination elicited IgG responses against epitopes overlapping those of well-characterized MAbs. Importantly, IgGs from the majority of gD2-immunized subjects competed for gD binding with four antigenically distinct virus-neutralizing MAbs (MC2, MC5, MC23, and DL11). Screening of patient IgGs against overlapping peptides spanning the gD2 ectodomain revealed that about half of the samples contained antibodies against linear epitopes within the N and C termini of gD2. We found that the virus-neutralizing abilities of the 10 most potent samples correlated with overall gD-binding activity and to an even greater extent with the combined content of IgGs against the epitopes of MAbs MC2, MC5, MC23, and DL11. This suggests that optimal virus-neutralizing activity is achieved by strong and balanced responses to the four major discontinuous neutralizing epitopes of gD2. Importance: Several herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) subunit vaccine studies have been conducted in human subjects using a recombinant form of HSV-2 glycoprotein D (gD2). Although several distinct, well-characterized virus-neutralizing epitopes on gD2 are targeted by murine monoclonal antibodies, it is not known whether the same epitopes are targeted by the humoral response to gD2 in humans. We have developed a novel, biosensor-based competition assay to directly address this important question. Using this approach, we identified epitopes that elicit strong humoral responses in humans, as well as other epitopes that elicit much weaker responses. These data provide new insight into the human response to known neutralizing gD2 epitopes and reveal characteristics of this response that may guide future vaccine development.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Epítopos/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 2/inmunología , Vacunas contra Herpesvirus/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Vacunas contra Herpesvirus/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Pruebas de Neutralización , Unión ProteicaRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Glycoprotein B (gB), the fusogen of herpes simplex virus (HSV), is a class III fusion protein with a trimeric ectodomain of known structure for the postfusion state. Seen by negative-staining electron microscopy, it presents as a rod with three lobes (base, middle, and crown). gB has four functional regions (FR), defined by the physical location of epitopes recognized by anti-gB neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Located in the base, FR1 contains two internal fusion loops (FLs) and is the site of gB-lipid interaction (the fusion domain). Many of the MAbs to FR1 are neutralizing, block cell-cell fusion, and prevent the association of gB with lipid, suggesting that these MAbs affect FL function. Here we characterize FR1 epitopes by using electron microscopy to visualize purified Fab-gB ectodomain complexes, thus confirming the locations of several epitopes and localizing those of MAbs DL16 and SS63. We also generated MAb-resistant viruses in order to localize the SS55 epitope precisely. Because none of the epitopes of our anti-FR1 MAbs mapped to the FLs, we hyperimmunized rabbits with FL1 or FL2 peptides to generate polyclonal antibodies (PAbs). While the anti-FL1 PAb failed to bind gB, the anti-FL2 PAb had neutralizing activity, implying that the FLs become exposed during virus entry. Unexpectedly, the anti-FL2 PAb (and the anti-FR1 MAbs) bound to liposome-associated gB, suggesting that their epitopes are accessible even when the FLs engage lipid. These studies provide possible mechanisms of action for HSV neutralization and insight into how gB FR1 contributes to viral fusion. IMPORTANCE: For herpesviruses, such as HSV, entry into a target cell involves transfer of the capsid-encased genome of the virus to the target cell after fusion of the lipid envelope of the virus with a lipid membrane of the host. Virus-encoded glycoproteins in the envelope are responsible for fusion. Antibodies to these glycoproteins are important biological tools, providing a way of examining how fusion works. Here we used electron microscopy and other techniques to study a panel of anti-gB antibodies. Some, with virus-neutralizing activity, impair gB-lipid association. We also generated a peptide antibody against one of the gB fusion loops; its properties provide insight into the way the fusion loops function as gB transits from its prefusion form to an active fusogen.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Dominios y Motivos de Interacción de Proteínas/inmunología , Simplexvirus/inmunología , Proteínas Virales de Fusión/inmunología , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Antivirales/metabolismo , Línea Celular , Chlorocebus aethiops , Mapeo Epitopo , Epítopos/química , Epítopos/genética , Epítopos/inmunología , Humanos , Fragmentos Fab de Inmunoglobulinas/inmunología , Fragmentos Fab de Inmunoglobulinas/metabolismo , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/metabolismo , Liposomas/química , Liposomas/metabolismo , Modelos Moleculares , Mutación , Pruebas de Neutralización , Unión Proteica , Conformación Proteica , Simplexvirus/genética , Células Vero , Proteínas Virales de Fusión/química , Proteínas Virales de Fusión/genéticaRESUMEN
As the receptor-binding protein of herpes simplex virus (HSV), gD plays an essential role in virus entry. In its native state, the last 56 amino acids of the ectodomain C terminus (C-term) occlude binding to its receptors, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) and nectin-1. Although it is clear that movement of the C-term must occur to permit receptor binding, we believe that this conformational change is also a key event for triggering later steps leading to fusion. Specifically, gD mutants containing disulfide bonds that constrain the C-term are deficient in their ability to trigger fusion following receptor binding. In this report, we show that two newly made monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), MC2 and MC5, have virus-neutralizing activity but do not block binding of gD to either receptor. In contrast, all previously characterized neutralizing anti-gD MAbs block binding of gD to a receptor(s). Interestingly, instead of blocking receptor binding, MC2 significantly enhances the affinity of gD for both receptors. Several nonneutralizing MAbs (MC4, MC10, and MC14) also enhanced gD-receptor binding. While MC2 and MC5 recognized different epitopes on the core of gD, these nonneutralizing MAbs recognized the gD C-term. Both the neutralizing capacity and rate of neutralization of virus by MC2 are uniquely enhanced when MC2 is combined with MAb MC4, MC10, or MC14. We suggest that MC2 and MC5 prevent gD from performing a function that triggers later steps leading to fusion and that the epitope for MC2 is normally occluded by the C-term of the gD ectodomain.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Pruebas de Neutralización , Simplexvirus/inmunología , Técnicas Biosensibles , Western Blotting , Línea Celular , Electroforesis en Gel de Poliacrilamida , Humanos , Inmunoprecipitación , Modelos Moleculares , Conformación Proteica , Simplexvirus/químicaRESUMEN
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) requires four essential virion glycoproteins-gD, gH, gL, and gB-for virus entry and cell fusion. To initiate fusion, the receptor binding protein gD interacts with one of two major cell receptors, HVEM or nectin-1. Once gD binds to a receptor, fusion is carried out by the gH/gL heterodimer and gB. A comparison of free and receptor-bound gD crystal structures revealed that receptor binding domains are located within residues in the N-terminus and core of gD. Problematically, the C-terminus lies across and occludes these binding sites. Consequentially, the C-terminus must relocate to allow for both receptor binding and the subsequent gD interaction with the regulatory complex gH/gL. We previously constructed a disulfide bonded (K190C/A277C) protein that locked the C-terminus to the gD core. Importantly, this mutant protein bound receptor but failed to trigger fusion, effectively separating receptor binding and gH/gL interaction. Here, we show that "unlocking" gD by reducing the disulfide bond restored not only gH/gL interaction but fusion activity as well, confirming the importance of C-terminal movement in triggering the fusion cascade. We characterize these changes, showing that the C-terminus region exposed by unlocking is: (1) a gH/gL binding site; (2) contains epitopes for a group (competition community) of monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) that block gH/gL binding to gD and cell-cell fusion. Here, we generated 14 mutations within the gD C-terminus to identify residues important for the interaction with gH/gL and the key conformational changes involved in fusion. As one example, we found that gD L268N was antigenically correct in that it bound most Mabs but was impaired in fusion, exhibited compromised binding of MC14 (a Mab that blocks both gD-gH/gL interaction and fusion), and failed to bind truncated gH/gL, all events that are associated with the inhibition of C-terminus movement. We conclude that, within the C-terminus, residue 268 is essential for gH/gL binding and induction of conformational changes and serves as a flexible inflection point in the critical movement of the gD C-terminus.
Asunto(s)
Simplexvirus , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral , Simplexvirus/genética , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/metabolismo , Unión Proteica , Glicoproteínas/metabolismo , Disulfuros , Internalización del VirusRESUMEN
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry requires the core fusion machinery of gH/gL and gB as well as gD and a gD receptor. When gD binds receptor, it undergoes conformational changes that presumably activate gH/gL, which then activates gB to carry out fusion. gB is a class III viral fusion protein, while gH/gL does not resemble any known viral fusion protein. One hallmark of fusion proteins is their ability to bind lipid membranes. We previously used a liposome coflotation assay to show that truncated soluble gB, but not gH/gL or gD, can associate with liposomes at neutral pH. Here, we show that gH/gL cofloats with liposomes but only when it is incubated with gB at pH 5. When gB mutants with single amino acid changes in the fusion loops (known to inhibit the binding of soluble gB to liposomes) were mixed with gH/gL and liposomes at pH 5, gH/gL failed to cofloat with liposomes. These data suggest that gH/gL does not directly associate with liposomes but instead binds to gB, which then binds to liposomes via its fusion loops. Using monoclonal antibodies, we found that many gH and gL epitopes were altered by low pH, whereas the effect on gB epitopes was more limited. Our liposome data support the concept that low pH triggers conformational changes to both proteins that allow gH/gL to physically interact with gB.
Asunto(s)
Simplexvirus/metabolismo , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/química , Animales , Baculoviridae/genética , Células Cultivadas , Cristalización , Vectores Genéticos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Liposomas/metabolismo , Modelos Moleculares , Spodoptera , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/metabolismoRESUMEN
The toxicity of mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccines depends on the total mRNA-LNP dose. We established that the maximum tolerated dose of our trivalent mRNA-LNP genital herpes vaccine was 10 µg/immunization in mice. We then evaluated one of the mRNAs, gD2 mRNA-LNP, to determine how much of the 10 µg total dose to assign to this immunogen. We immunized mice with 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 10 µg of gD2 mRNA-LNP and measured serum IgG ELISA, neutralizing antibodies, and antibodies to six crucial gD2 epitopes involved in virus entry and spread. Antibodies to crucial gD2 epitopes peaked at 1 µg, while ELISA and neutralizing titers continued to increase at higher doses. The epitope results suggested no immunologic benefit above 1 µg of gD2 mRNA-LNP, while ELISA and neutralizing titers indicated higher doses may be useful. We challenged the gD2 mRNA-immunized mice intravaginally with HSV-2. The 1-µg dose provided total protection, confirming the epitope studies, and supported assigning less than one-third of the trivalent vaccine maximum dose of 10 µg to gD2 mRNA-LNP. Epitope mapping as performed in mice can also be accomplished in phase 1 human trials to help select the optimum dose of each immunogen in a multivalent vaccine.
Asunto(s)
Herpes Genital , Vacunas , Animales , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Epítopos , Herpes Genital/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Humano 2/genética , Liposomas , Ratones , Nanopartículas , ARN Mensajero/genética , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/genéticaRESUMEN
Glycoprotein B (gB) enables the fusion of viral and cell membranes during entry of herpesviruses. However, gB alone is insufficient for membrane fusion; the gH/gL heterodimer is also required. The crystal structure of the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) gB ectodomain, gB730, has demonstrated similarities between gB and other viral fusion proteins, leading to the hypothesis that gB is a fusogen, presumably directly involved in bringing the membranes together by refolding from its initial or prefusion form to its final or postfusion form. The only available crystal structure likely represents the postfusion form of gB; the prefusion form has not yet been determined. Previously, a panel of HSV-1 gB mutants was generated by using random 5-amino-acid-linker insertion mutagenesis. Several mutants were unable to mediate cell-cell fusion despite being expressed on the cell surface. Mapping of the insertion sites onto the crystal structure of gB730 suggested that several insertions might not be accommodated in the postfusion form. Thus, we hypothesized that some insertion mutants were nonfunctional due to being "trapped" in a prefusion form. Here, we generated five insertion mutants as soluble ectodomains and characterized them biochemically. We show that the ectodomains of all five mutants assume conformations similar to that of the wild-type gB730. Four mutants have biochemical properties and overall structures that are indistinguishable from those of the wild-type gB730. We conclude that these mutants undergo only minor local conformational changes to relieve the steric strain resulting from the presence of 5 extra amino acids. Interestingly, one mutant, while able to adopt the overall postfusion structure, displays significant conformational differences in the vicinity of fusion loops, relative to wild-type gB730. Moreover, this mutant has a diminished ability to associate with liposomes, suggesting that the fusion loops in this mutant have decreased functional activity. We propose that these insertions cause a fusion-deficient phenotype not by preventing conversion of gB to a postfusion-like conformation but rather by interfering with other gB functions.
Asunto(s)
Herpesvirus Humano 1/genética , Herpesvirus Humano 1/fisiología , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/genética , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/fisiología , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Animales , Células CHO , Línea Celular , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Herpesvirus Humano 1/patogenicidad , Ratones , Microscopía Electrónica de Transmisión , Modelos Moleculares , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Mutagénesis Insercional , Fenotipo , Conformación Proteica , Estructura Cuaternaria de Proteína , Proteínas Recombinantes/química , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/metabolismo , Proteínas Recombinantes/ultraestructura , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/química , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/ultraestructura , Internalización del VirusRESUMEN
Herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoproteins gB, gD, and gH/gL are necessary and sufficient for virus entry into cells. Structural features of gB are similar to those of vesicular stomatitis virus G and baculovirus gp64, and together they define the new class III group of fusion proteins. Previously, we used mutagenesis to show that three hydrophobic residues (W174, Y179, and A261) within the putative gB fusion loops are integral to gB function. Here we expanded our analysis, using site-directed mutagenesis of each residue in both gB fusion loops. Mutation of most of the nonpolar or hydrophobic amino acids (W174, F175, G176, Y179, and A261) had severe effects on gB function in cell-cell fusion and null virus complementation assays. Of the six charged amino acids, mutation of H263 or R264 also negatively affected gB function. To further analyze the mutants, we cloned the ectodomains of the W174R, Y179S, H263A, and R264A mutants into a baculovirus expression system and compared them with the wild-type (WT) form, gB730t. As shown previously, gB730t blocks virus entry into cells, suggesting that gB730t competes with virion gB for a cell receptor. All four mutant proteins retained this function, implying that fusion loop activity is separate from gB-receptor binding. However, unlike WT gB730t, the mutant proteins displayed reduced binding to cells and were either impaired or unable to bind naked, cholesterol-enriched liposomes, suggesting that it may be gB-lipid binding that is disrupted by the mutations. Furthermore, monoclonal antibodies with epitopes proximal to the fusion loops abrogated gB-liposome binding. Taken together, our data suggest that gB associates with lipid membranes via a fusion domain of key hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues and that this domain associates with lipid membranes during fusion.
Asunto(s)
Herpesvirus Humano 1/fisiología , Fusión de Membrana , Receptores Virales/metabolismo , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/metabolismo , Animales , Línea Celular , Cricetinae , Liposomas/metabolismo , Ratones , Mutagénesis Sitio-Dirigida , Unión Proteica , Estructura Terciaria de Proteína , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/genética , Acoplamiento Viral , Internalización del VirusRESUMEN
Herpes simplex virus entry into cells requires four glycoproteins, gB, gD, gH, and gL. Binding of gD to one of its receptors triggers steps requiring the core fusion proteins, gB and the gH/gL heterodimer. There is evidence that gH/gL initiates hemifusion of cells, but whether this complex interacts physically with gB to cause complete fusion is unknown. We used bimolecular complementation (BiMC) of enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) to detect glycoprotein interactions during cell-cell fusion. The N- or C-terminal half of EYFP was fused to the C terminus of gD, gB, and gH to form six chimeric proteins (Dn, Dc, Bn, Bc, Hn, and Hc). BiMC was detected by confocal microscopy. Receptor-bearing (C10) cells cotransfected with Dn and Bc or Dn, Hc, and untagged gL exhibited EYFP fluorescence, indicative of interactions between gD and gB and between gD and gH/gL. EYFP complementation did not occur in cells transfected with gL, Bc, and Hn. However, when gD was coexpressed with these other three proteins, cell-cell fusion occurred and the syncytia exhibited bright EYFP fluorescence. To separate glycoprotein expression from fusion, we transfected C10 cells with gL, Bc, and Hn for 20 h and then added soluble gD to trigger fusion. We detected fluorescent syncytia within 10 min, and both their number and size increased with exposure time to gD. Thus, when gD binds its receptor, the core fusion machinery is triggered to form a multiprotein complex as a step in fusion and possibly virus entry.
Asunto(s)
Glicoproteínas/metabolismo , Fusión de Membrana , Simplexvirus/metabolismo , Proteínas Virales/metabolismo , Animales , Línea Celular , Cricetinae , Genes Reporteros/genética , Glicoproteínas/genética , Ratones , Unión Proteica , Simplexvirus/genética , Solubilidad , Proteínas Virales/genéticaRESUMEN
Effective oncolytic virotherapy may require systemic delivery, tumor targeting, and resistance to virus-neutralizing (VN) antibodies. Since herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoprotein D (gD) is the viral attachment/entry protein and predominant VN target, we examined the impact of gD retargeting alone and in combination with alterations in dominant VN epitopes on virus susceptibility to VN antibodies. We compared the binding of a panel of anti-gD monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that mimic antibody specificities in human HSV-immune sera to the purified ectodomains of wild-type and retargeted gD, revealing the retention of two prominent epitopes. Substitution of a key residue in each epitope, separately and together, revealed that both substitutions (1) blocked retargeted gD recognition by mAbs to the respective epitopes, and, in combination, caused a global reduction in mAb binding; (2) protected against fusion inhibition by VN mAbs reactive with each epitope in virus-free cell-cell fusion assays; and (3) increased the resistance of retargeted HSV-1 to these VN mAbs. Although the combined modifications of retargeted gD allowed bona fide retargeting, incorporation into virions was partially compromised. Our results indicate that stacking of epitope mutations can additively block retargeted gD recognition by VN antibodies but also that improvements in gD incorporation into virus particles may be required.
RESUMEN
Glycoprotein D (gD) is the receptor binding protein of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and binds to at least two distinct protein receptors, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) and nectin-1. While both receptor binding regions are found within the first 234 amino acids, a crystal structure shows that the C terminus of the gD ectodomain normally occludes the receptor binding sites. Receptor binding must therefore displace the C terminus, and this conformational change is postulated to be required for inducing fusion via gB and gH/gL. When cysteine residues are introduced at positions 37 and 302 of gD, a disulfide bond is formed that stabilizes the C terminus and prevents binding to either receptor. We speculated that if disulfide bonds were engineered further upstream, receptor binding might be separated from the induction of fusion. To test this, we made five additional double cysteine mutants, each potentially introducing a disulfide bond between the ectodomain C terminus and the core of the gD ectodomain. The two mutants predicted to impose the greatest constraint were unable to bind receptors or mediate cell-cell fusion. However, the three mutants with the most flexible C terminus bound well to both HVEM and nectin-1. Two of these mutants were impaired in cell-cell fusion and null-virus complementation. Importantly, a third mutant in this group was nonfunctional in both assays. This mutant clearly separates the role of gD in triggering fusion from its role in receptor binding. Based upon the properties of the panel of mutants we conclude that fusion requires greater flexibility of the gD ectodomain C terminus than does receptor binding.