RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and effectiveness of biologic and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA). METHODS: The retrospective multicentre observational study included patients with a diagnosis of ICI-IA treated with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL6Ri) and/or methotrexate (MTX); patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease were excluded. The primary outcome was time to cancer progression from ICI initiation; the secondary outcome was time to arthritis control from DMARD initiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare medication groups, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: 147 patients were included (mean age 60.3 (SD 11.9) years, 66 (45%) women). ICI-IA treatment was TNFi in 33 (22%), IL6Ri 42 (29%) and MTX 72 (49%). After adjustment for time from ICI initiation to DMARD initiation, time to cancer progression was significantly shorter for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 3.27 (95% CI 1.21 to 8.84, p=0.019)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 2.37 (95% CI 0.94 to 5.98, p=0.055). Time to arthritis control was faster for TNFi compared with MTX (HR 1.91 (95% CI 1.06 to 3.45, p=0.032)) while the result for IL6Ri was HR 1.66 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.97, p=0.089). A subset analysis in patients with melanoma gave similar results for both cancer progression and arthritis control. CONCLUSION: The treatment of ICI-IA with a biologic DMARD is associated with more rapid arthritis control than with MTX, but may be associated with a shorter time to cancer progression.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Productos Biológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Inhibidores de la Interleucina-6 , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To provide insight into the safety of recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). METHODS: Patients who received RZV in a single-centre rheumatology department were retrospectively included. An IMID flare was defined as (i) a documentation of flare in the office notes or patient portal communication or (ii) new prednisone prescription, in the 12 weeks after each dose. RESULTS: Six-hundred and twenty-two patients were included (67% female, median age 67 years), 8.5% of them experienced adverse events (AEs) and herpes zoster (HZ) incidence was 0.6% after median follow-up of 36 weeks. Of 359 IMID patients: 88 had RA (25%), 50 vasculitis (14%) and 29 PMR (8%). At vaccination, 35% were on glucocorticoids (GC). Fifty-nine patients (16%) experienced a flare, 18 flares occurred in temporal relation to a treatment change (31%). RA patients had the highest flare rate (n = 21, 24%), 25% of patients who flared required adjustment of immunosuppression. In a multivariate analysis, use of GC at time of vaccination was associated with flare after vaccination [odds ratio (OR) 2.31 (1.3-4.1), P =0.004]. A time-to-flare survival analysis (Cox-model) showed that GC was a significant predictor of IMID flare after first RZV dose [hazard ratio (HR) 2.4 (1.3-4.5), P =0.0039] and that a flare after the first dose was associated with flaring after the second RZV dose [HR 3.9 (1.7-9), P =0.0015]. CONCLUSION: RZV administration in patients with IMIDs was generally well-tolerated, though mild flares were not uncommon in the first 12 weeks after vaccination. These data may provide useful information for patient education when considering RZV administration.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Brote de los Síntomas , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To update guidance regarding the management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: The task force (TF) includes 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by inquiries received by the National Psoriasis Foundation. A Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: The TF updated evidence for the original 22 statements and added 5 new recommendations. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements, 13 with high consensus and 14 with moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: The evidence behind many guidance statements is variable in quality and/or quantity. CONCLUSIONS: These statements provide guidance for the treatment of patients with psoriatic disease on topics including how the disease and its treatments affect COVID-19 risk, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (including novel vaccination), and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is a living document that is continuously updated by the TF as data emerge.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Pandemias , Psoriasis/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
There are emerging data depicting the clinical presentation of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) in solid organ transplant recipients but negligible data-driven guidance on clinical management. A biphasic course has been described in some infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), beginning with a flu-like illness followed by an intense inflammatory response characterized by elevated c-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with high mortality. The exuberant and possibly dysregulated immune response has prompted interest in therapeutic agents that target the cytokines involved, particularly IL-6. Tocilizumab is an IL-6 receptor antagonist with a record of use for a variety of rheumatologic conditions and cytokine release syndrome due to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy but experience in solid organ and composite tissue transplant recipients (SOT/CTTRs) with SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS has not been previously reported in detail. We present the clinical course of 5 SOT/CTTRs with SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS that received tocilizumab with favorable short-term outcomes in 4. Responses were characterized by reductions in CRP, discontinuation of vasopressors, improved oxygenation and respiratory mechanics, and variable duration of ventilator support. Four bacterial infections occurred within 2 weeks of tocilizumab administration. We discuss safety concerns and the need for randomized comparative trials to delineate tocilizumab's clinical utility in this population.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Trasplante de Órganos/métodos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are currently many unanswered questions surrounding the management of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic and several 'rapid' guidelines have been released, although are subject to be updated and changed in the near future. The purpose of this review is to discuss the approach to management of patients with immune-mediated diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS: At present, there is little evidence to suggest an increased risk of COVID-19 infection or its complications in patients with immune-mediated diseases or associated with conventional or biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; however, glucocorticoid use does appear to have negative associations. SUMMARY: Currently, conventional and biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs can be continued in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. In the case of exposure, with the exception of hydroxyhcloroquine and sulfasalazine, immunosuppression should be held for 2 weeks. Our recommendations and the guidelines we discuss here are based on C-level recommendations but help provide a framework for how to counsel our patients during this pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus , Competencia Clínica , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Reumatólogos/normas , COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Pandemias , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The introduction of checkpoint inhibitors as well as other allied advances in cancer immunology has made immunotherapy a pillar in the treatment of cancer. At the same time, these therapies have been associated with a remarkable array of immune-mediated toxicities observed in virtually every organ system, a portion of which are rheumatic in nature or multisystem in expression making them of particular relevance for rheumatologists. RECENT FINDINGS: Most of our knowledge of these immune-related adverse events (irAEs) stems from clinical descriptive reports; we lack detailed understanding on immunopathogenesis for most complications. Therapeutic approaches are currently empiric and rely heavily on glucocorticoids and inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor. Serious consideration must now be given to advance our understanding of the immunopathogenesis of this emergent field and to exploit the full depth and breadth of the rich armamentarium of targeted therapies currently available to treat autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. SUMMARY: irAEs are and will continue to increase in incidence and pose major hurdles to the continuing success and evolution of cancer immunotherapy. Basic and translational research into pathogenesis of irAEs and clinical trials of targeted therapies for these complications is urgently needed. Rheumatologists are well poised to actively contribute to the care and research of these complications.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inducido químicamente , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias/inmunologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance about management of psoriatic disease during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: A task force (TF) of 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care was convened. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by questions received by the NPF. A Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: The TF approved 22 guidance statements. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements. All guidance statements proposed were recommended, 9 with high consensus and 13 with moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: The evidence behind many guidance statements is limited in quality. CONCLUSION: These statements provide guidance for the management of patients with psoriatic disease on topics ranging from how the disease and its treatments impact COVID-19 risk and outcome, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is intended to be a living document that will be updated by the TF as data emerge.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro/normas , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Comités Consultivos/normas , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Consenso , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Técnica Delphi , Dermatología/normas , Epidemiología/normas , Humanos , Infectología/normas , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/virología , Psoriasis/complicaciones , Psoriasis/inmunología , Reumatología/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19/terapia , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/mortalidad , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Inmunomodulación , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2 , Sarcoidosis/complicaciones , Sarcoidosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
Herpes zoster (HZ) incidence is much higher in immunocompromised individuals than in immunocompetent individuals. HZ also occurs at a younger age and is often more severe in immunocompromised persons. Preventive strategies center around the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV), which is approved for immunocompromised adults age 19 and older. Identifying those at greatest risk is critical. For those considering vaccination, evidence gaps regarding vaccine efficacy, toxicity, length of protection, and potential effects on underlying conditions may complicate shared and informed decision-making. Recent data have filled some of these gaps, with several societies issuing recommendations regarding vaccination. Remaining gaps are currently addressed by expert opinion.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Humanos , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Vacunación/métodosRESUMEN
Approximately one-third of patients with myeloid disorders like myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) exhibit inflammatory and autoimmune disorders (IADs). These IADs often include atypical and incomplete forms of common autoimmune conditions, and exhibit resistance to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. There is growing interest in molecular relationships between IADs and MDS/CMML to find potential targeted therapies. Recently, patients with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene were identified as having VEXAS syndrome. Herein, we present a concise case-series illustrating concurrent elderly-onset inflammatory manifestations and myeloid disorders (MDS, CMML, and idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance). These patients manifested inflammatory or autoimmune symptoms, including erythema nodosum, Raynaud's phenomenon, Sjogren syndrome, and refractory pruritus, having onset after 60-years of age. The inflammatory manifestations were largely refractory to traditional immunosuppressive regimens. Remarkably, treatment with a JAK-1 inhibitor, upadacitinib, in two cases yielded marked resolution of inflammatory symptoms, facilitating the gradual tapering of corticosteroids, improvement of hemoglobin levels, and reduction in serum C-reactive protein levels. Upon loss of response to upadacitinib, JAK-2 inhibitor ruxolitinib provided clinical benefit in one of the cases, facilitating further tapering of glucocorticoids. This arena warrants further exploration through prospective studies of larger cohorts to delineate optimal management strategies.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos , Humanos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Inflamación/patología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/complicaciones , Leucemia Mielomonocítica Crónica/genética , Enzimas Activadoras de Ubiquitina/genética , Enzimas Activadoras de Ubiquitina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Vasculitis as an immune-related adverse event (irAE) from checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) to treat cancer is a rare clinical event, and little is known regarding its nosology, clinical manifestations, or response to treatment and outcomes. METHODS: To address these gaps, we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework to further define this complication. Two independent PUBMED searches in September and November of 2022 revealed 127 publications with 37 excluded from title by relevance, 43 excluded by article type, and 23 excluded due to lack of biopsy results, or biopsy negative for vasculitis. Twenty-nine documented cases from 24 publications were included for final analysis. Basic demographics, ICI details, timing of onset of vasculitis symptoms, irAE treatment and outcomes were collected. The vasculitides were classified using 2022 ACR/EULAR Vasculitis Classification Criteria as well as 2012 Revised Chapel-Hill Nomenclature. Adaptations from Naidoo et al. 2023 [1] consensus definitions for irAEs were used and efforts were made to classify steroid-responsive versus unresponsive irAEs. RESULTS: Of the 29 cases reviewed, the average age of patients was 62.1 ± 11.0, composed of 58.6 % (n = 17) male and 41.3 % (n = 12) female. Prominent cancer types were lung cancer (41.4 %; n = 12), melanoma (41.4 %; n = 12), and renal cancer (10.3 %; n = 3), with majority being stage 4 (75.9 %, n = 22) and stage 3 (10.3 %, n = 3). Only 8 cases met the ACR/EULAR criteria, and by Chapel-Hill Nomenclature, approximately a third were small-vessel vasculitis (31.0 %; n = 9) with n = 4 positive for ANCA. Most biopsies were taken from the skin (37.9 %, n = 11) and kidney (24.1 %, n = 7). Patients were either treated with single (65.5 %, n = 19), dual (17.2 %; n = 5), or sequential (17.2 %; n = 5) ICI regimen which included anti-PD-1 therapy in all but one case, with mean of 8.7 ± 10.5 cycles received. Mean time to onset of symptoms from start of ICI was 7.2 ± 7.8 months, with 55.2 % occurring >3 months since the initial immunotherapy. Vasculitis treatment included glucocorticoids in 96 % of cases and immunotherapy was often discontinued (44.8 %; n = 13). Clinical improvement of irAE was documented in 86.2 % (n = 25). Data were missing in terms of fate of ICI (34.5 %; n = 10) and tumor outcomes (41.4 %; n = 12). Cancer progressed in 20.7 % (n = 6), stable in 34.5 % (n = 10) cases, and 6 patients died of all-causes. CONCLUSION: Vasculitis as an irAE appears clinically heterogeneous and rare. Among reported cases with adequate documentation, vasculitis is of delayed onset following the initiation of immunotherapy. Outcomes of ICI-vasculitis were generally favorable, responding to glucocorticoids and immunotherapy withdrawal. There is an urgent need for more standardized reporting of rare irAEs such as vasculitis to clarify clinical risks, classification, relationship to immunotherapy and outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias , Vasculitis , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Vasculitis/inducido químicamente , Vasculitis/inmunología , AncianoRESUMEN
Since their introduction, immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment by harnessing the body's own immune system as a defense against tumor growth. The downside of activating the immune system is the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which mimic autoimmune disease of various organ systems. The musculoskeletal system is an uncommon, but substantial one for patients and can lead to long-term pain and disability that affects their quality of life. This review summarizes recent literature on imaging forms utilized for diagnosis and assessing treatment response in rheumatic irAEs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer and an underlying autoimmune disease who are considering immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) need to know about the benefits and risks of severe immune-related adverse events and flares of the autoimmune condition. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop and alpha test an educational website for patients with cancer. METHODS: Learning topics, images, and website architecture (including flow and requirements) were developed and iteratively reviewed by members of a community scientist program, a patient advisory group, and content experts. Alpha testing was performed, measuring the site's usability using the Suitability Assessment of Materials and its acceptability using the Ottawa Acceptability Measure. RESULTS: The website included a home page; general information about ICBs; comprehensive modules on the benefits and risks of ICBs for patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune diseases; general wellness information; and features such as a quiz, additional resources, and a glossary. For the alpha testing, 9 users assessed the newly developed website. Patient reviewers (n=5) had rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn disease, Sjogren syndrome, or vasculitis. Health care provider reviewers (n=4) were medical oncologists or rheumatologists. The median Suitability Assessment of Materials rating was 75 (IQR 70-79; range 0-100) for patients versus 66 (IQR 57-72; range 0-100) for providers (scores ≥70 indicate no substantial changes needed). Recommendations for improvement, mostly involving navigation and accessibility, were addressed. All participants expressed that the website was acceptable and balanced in terms of discussion of benefits and harms. Because half (2/4, 50%) of the providers suggested we increase the amount of information, we extended the content on the impact of having an autoimmune disease when considering ICB treatment, the probability of flares, and the management of flares in this context. CONCLUSIONS: The feedback led to minor revisions to enhance readability, navigation, and accessibility, ensuring the website's suitability as a decision-making aid. The newly developed website could become a supporting tool to facilitate patient-physician discussion regarding ICBs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Internet , Neoplasias , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Humanos , Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Bone-related diseases (osteopathologies) associated with human virus infections have increased around the globe. Recent findings have highlighted the intricate interplay between viral infection, the host immune system and the bone remodelling process. Viral infections can disrupt bone homeostasis, contributing to conditions such as arthritis and soft tissue calcifications. Osteopathologies can occur after arbovirus infections such as chikungunya virus, dengue virus and Zika virus, as well as respiratory viruses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and enteroviruses such as Coxsackievirus B. Here we explore how human viruses dysregulate bone homeostasis, detailing viral factors, molecular mechanisms, host immune response changes and bone remodelling that ultimately result in osteopathologies. We highlight model systems and technologies to advance mechanistic understanding of viral-mediated bone alterations. Finally, we propose potential prophylactic and therapeutic strategies, introduce 'osteovirology' as a research field highlighting the underestimated roles of viruses in bone-related diseases, and discuss research avenues for further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Arbovirus , Virus Chikungunya , Virus del Dengue , Infección por el Virus Zika , Virus Zika , Humanos , Virus Zika/fisiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are the cornerstone of modern oncology; however, side effects such as ICI-related myocarditis (irM) can be fatal. Recently, Bonaca proposed criteria for irM; however, it is unknown if they correlate well with cardiovascular (CV) ICI-related adverse events. Additionally, whether incident irM portends worse long-term CV outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to determine the incidence of long-term CV comorbidities and CV mortality among irM patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ICI-related adverse event (irAE) registry was queried to identify irM patients by using Bonaca criteria. Random controls were selected after excluding patients with other concomitant irAEs. Patients' demographics, comorbidities and myocarditis presenting features were gathered. Outcomes included 2-year freedom from CV comorbidities (composite of atrial fibrillation, stroke, myocardial infarction and heart failure) and freedom from CV death. IrM was treated as a time-varying covariate. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients developed irM at a median of 167 days (mean age 69, 63.2% male, 47% lung cancer). Majority of patients had new wall motion abnormalities or EKG changes on presentation. Mean LVEF was 43%, median peak TnT was 0.81, and median NTproBNP was 2057 at irM onset. Two-year freedom from CV comorbidities (67% vs 86.8%, P < 0.001) and death (93.4% vs 99.3%, P = 0.003) was lower among irM patients. Incident irM was an independent predictor of CV death (HR 8.28, P = 0.048), but not CV comorbidities (HR 2.21, P = 0.080). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest case-control study on irM highlighting worse long-term CV outcomes. Future studies are needed to establish appropriate therapeutic strategies and efficient screening strategies for irM survivors.
RESUMEN
A woman in her late 40s with a history of psoriatic arthritis presented to us with fever, migratory rash, cervical and axillary lymphadenopathy, and generalised myalgia. Her symptoms did not improve with steroids and her inflammatory markers were in the range of 200 mg/dL for C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 71 mm/hour and ferritin of 4000 ng/mL. Infectious workup was negative. Haematological malignancy and autoimmune conditions were among the top differentials, and she was eventually diagnosed with Schnitzler syndrome. A multidisciplinary team consisting of internal medicine, rheumatology, infectious disease and haematology-oncology specialists was involved in the care of this patient. We highlight the diagnostic schema that was followed for this rare and unique constellation of symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Exantema , Síndrome de Schnitzler , Femenino , Humanos , Síndrome de Schnitzler/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Schnitzler/tratamiento farmacológico , Sedimentación SanguíneaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19 and estimate the odds of severe COVID-19 associated with vaccination among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified adults with SLE in the Merative™ MarketScan® Databases. Patients were continuously enrolled the year before 1 April 2020 (baseline) and had a COVID-19 diagnosis between 1 April 2020 and the earliest of death, enrolment end or 31 December 2021. Severe COVID-19 was defined as hospitalisation with a COVID-19 diagnosis. Demographics on 1 April 2020, baseline comorbidities, corticosteroid use ≤30 days before COVID-19 diagnosis and other SLE medication use ≤6 months before COVID-19 diagnosis were assessed. Vaccination was identified by claims for a COVID-19 vaccine or vaccine administration. Backward stepwise logistic regression estimated odds of progression to severe COVID-19 associated with patient characteristics and vaccination. RESULTS: Among 2890 patients with SLE with COVID-19, 500 (16.4%) had a COVID-19-related hospitalisation. Significant risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19 included rituximab (OR (95% CI) 2.92 (1.67 to 5.12)), renal failure (2.15 (95% CI 1.56 to 2.97)), Medicaid (vs Commercial; 2.01 (95% CI 1.58 to 2.57)), complicated hypertension (1.96 (95% CI 1.38 to 2.77)) and time of infection, among others. Vaccination had a significant protective effect (0.68(95% CI 0.54 to 0.87)) among all patients with SLE with COVID-19, but the effect was not significant among those with prior use of belimumab, rituximab or corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Certain chronic comorbidities and SLE medications increase the odds of progression to severe COVID-19 among patients with SLE, but vaccination confers significant protection. Vaccine effectiveness may be attenuated by SLE treatments. Protective measures such as pre-exposure prophylaxis and booster vaccines should be encouraged among patients with SLE.