Treatment priorities and regret in older adults with head and neck cancer: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The majority of head and neck cancer (HNC) diagnoses are seen in people aged 70 and older; these numbers are set to increase. Greater understanding of treatment needs of older patients with HNC is essential. These older patients often have co-existing health conditions, are prone to frailty and may not prioritise survival when considering treatment options. This systematic review examines the current research with regard to priorities and factors influencing treatment regret in older people with HNC. METHODS: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they (i) reported data from patients with a mean age of 65 years or older who had a confirmed diagnosis of HNC and had been treated using surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with either palliative or curative intent, (ii) considered patient's priorities or preferences or examined treatment regret as one of the primary outcomes of the study (iii) were published in English. RESULTS: Pilot search identified n = 7222 articles; however, following screening, only four papers met the inclusion criteria. Narrative synthesis was indicated to analyse quantitative and qualitative evidence in parallel, as meta-analyses were not possible. DISCUSSION: There is a paucity in the literature examining older adults with HNC. There is an indication that older adults prioritise maintaining independence when making treatment decisions and treatment regret is seen in those with high levels of depression with level of frailty also a contributing factor. Clinicians should consider patient's social circumstances, premorbid status and priorities in maintaining independence and managing symptoms when making treatment decisions in this cohort.

Nutritional prehabilitation in head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Prehabilitation affords an opportunity to support the management of malnutrition that is strongly associated with head and neck cancer. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the components of nutritional prehabilitation interventions and their effects on nutritional and health outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search was completed within Medline (including PubMed), CINHAL, Cochrane database, EMBASE, PRoQUEST, clinical trials registries, and grey literature to identify studies involving a nutritional intervention pre-treatment in head and neck cancer patients receiving any form of curative therapy. Nutritional intervention was defined as a specified period pre-treatment and outcome measures had to include assessment of nutritional status or body composition. Quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias 2. RESULTS: From 557 identified studies, two met the inclusion criteria. Due to the low number of studies, a meta-analysis was not indicated. Both studies conducted a nutritional intervention using an "enriched formula" in malnourished patients prior to surgery. Neither study reported the intervention was effective for reducing weight loss, physical function, surgical complications, or length of stay versus the comparison. CONCLUSION: There is limited nutritional prehabilitation research within head and neck cancer. An "enriched formula" provided in the prehabilitation period appears no more advantageous than routine standard nutritional formula in mitigating against the weight loss experienced in malnourished head and neck patient. Due to the malnutrition risks on diagnosis and the negative impact of poor nutritional status on clinical and functional outcomes, robust nutritional prehabilitation research is required to inform clinical practice.

Prolonged immunosuppression does not improve risk of sensitization or likelihood of retransplantation after kidney transplant graft failure.

The optimum approach towards immunosuppression withdrawal following kidney transplant failure is unclear. Prolonged weaning may be associated with reduced sensitization, less graft nephrectomy and greater likelihood of retransplantation, but conversely increased risk of infection, malignancy and death. We conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of patients experiencing graft failure between 2007 and 2017, comparing rates of sensitization, retransplantation, nephrectomy, infection, malignancy and death between patients who had immunosuppression weaned over <90 vs. 90-180 vs. >180 days. Patient survival after immunosuppression withdrawal over <90 vs. 90-180 vs. >180 days was 73.3%, 72.1% and 80.4%, respectively (P = 0.35), with no differences in cPRA (80.06 vs. 81.21 vs. 85.42, P = 0.66) or retransplantation rate [24/31 (77.4%) vs. 21/35 (60.0%) vs. 22/36 (61.1%), P = 0.13]. There was significantly less nephrectomy after late immunosuppression cessation [10/42 (23.8%) vs. 7/42 (16.7%) vs. 3/43 (7.0%), P = 0.01] but no differences in infections or malignancy. On competing risk regression (death as competing risk) controlling for cofactors including age, nephrectomy and rejection, prolonged immunosuppression did not predict likelihood of retransplantation (SHR 1.000, P = 0.88). Prolonged immunosuppression withdrawal does not reduce sensitization or improve retransplantation rates but is associated with less nephrectomy. Immunosuppression withdrawal should be tailored to individual circumstances after graft failure.

Human leukocyte antigen eplet mismatches and long-term clinical outcomes in pediatric renal transplantation: A pragmatic, registry-based study.

BACKGROUND: HLA epitope-based matching offers the potential to improve immunological risk prediction and management in children receiving renal allografts; however, studies demonstrating the association between systems for defining epitope mismatches and clinical end-points are lacking in this population. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, retrospective, registry-based study of pediatric recipients of primary renal allografts in Victoria, Australia between 1990 and 2014 to determine the association between HLA EpMM and clinical outcomes including graft failure, re-transplantation and dnDSA formation. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included in the analysis with a median age of 11 years. Median follow-up period was 15 years during which time 108 (55%) primary grafts failed and 72 patients were re-transplanted. HLA class I but not class II EpMM was a significant predictor of graft failure on univariate analysis but not in adjusted models. EpMM was associated with reduced likelihood of re-transplantation in univariate but not adjusted analysis. Within the limitations of the study, class-specific EpMM was a strong predictor of dnDSA formation. Associations were stronger when considering only the subset of antibody-verified EpMM. CONCLUSION: Associations between HLA EpMM and clinical outcomes in pediatric renal allograft recipients seen on univariate analysis were attenuated following adjustment for confounders. These findings are inconclusive but suggest that HLA EpMM may provide one tool for assessing long-term risk in this population while highlighting the need for further clinical studies.

Transfer of donor anti-HLA antibody expression to multiple transplant recipients: A potential variant of the passenger lymphocyte syndrome?

Antibody-mediated rejection, whereby transplant recipient B cells and/or plasma cells produce alloreactive anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, negatively influences transplant outcomes and is a major contributor to graft loss. An early humoral immune response is suggested by the production of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) that can be measured using solid phase assays. We report the early posttransplant coexistence of a shared anti-HLA antibody profile in 5 solid organ transplant recipients who received organs from the same donor. Retrospective analysis of the donor's serum confirmed the presence of the same anti-HLA profile, suggesting the transfer of donor-derived anti-HLA antibodies, or the cells that produce them, to multiple solid organ transplant recipients. The time frame and extent of transfer suggest a novel variant of the passenger lymphocyte syndrome. These findings have important implications for the consideration of all posttransplant antibody measurements, particularly the interpretation of non-DSAs in the sera of transplant recipients.

Application of an epitope-based allocation system in pediatric kidney transplantation.

Donor-recipient HLA mismatch remains a leading cause for sensitization and graft loss in kidney transplantation. HLA compatibility at an epitope level is emerging as an improved method of matching compared with current HLA antigen allocation. A novel epitope-based allocation approach to prospectively exclude donors with high-level mismatches was implemented for pediatric KTRs on the DD waiting list. Nineteen consecutive transplants were followed for 12 months, including eight DD KTRs listed with eplet exclusions, as well as three DD KTRs and eight LD KTRs without exclusions. KTRs with eplet exclusions had estimated GFR of 78.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 , no episodes of rejection, and time to transplant 6.55 months. HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-DR antigen mismatches were similar between all groups. KTRs with exclusions had significantly lower class II eplet mismatches (20.4) than the contemporary DD KTRs without exclusions (63.7) and DD KTRs transplanted in the preceding decade (46.9). dnDSAs were identified in two of eight DD KTRs with exclusions, two of three DD KTRs without exclusions and five of eight LD KTRs. Epitope-based allocation achieved timely access to transplantation, low class II eplet mismatches, and low rates of dnDSAs in the first year. This strategy requires longer follow-up and larger numbers, but has the potential to reduce anti-HLA sensitization and improve both graft survival and opportunities for future retransplantation.

Four years of experience with the Australian kidney paired donation programme.

New approaches to increase kidney transplantation rates through expansion of live donor kidney transplantation have become necessary due to ongoing shortage of deceased donor organs. These strategies include desensitization in antibody-incompatible transplants to overcome the barrier of blood group incompatibility or human leucocyte antigen antibodies between recipient and donor and kidney paired donation (KPD) programmes. In KPD, a kidney transplant candidate with an incompatible live donor joins a registry of other incompatible pairs in order to find potentially compatible transplant solutions. To match the largest possible number of donor-recipient pairs while minimizing immunologic risk, KPD programmes use sophisticated algorithms to identify suitable matches with simultaneous two-way or more complex multi-way exchanges as well as including non-directed anonymous donors to start a chain of compatible transplantations. Because of the significant immunologic barriers when fewer donor options are available, the optimal solution for difficult-to-match, highly sensitized patients is access to more potential donors using large multi-centre or national KPD registries. This review focuses on the first 4 years of experience with the Australian multi-centre KPD programme that was established in October 2010.

Hidden perils in a highly sensitized kidney transplant recipient.

Highly sensitised patients are at increased risk for antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and reduced graft survival. Highly sensitive assays for detecting recipient preformed anti-HLA antibodies have been developed and identify high immunological risk donors. A 62yo male with end stage renal failure secondary to glomerulonephritis received a T-cell crossmatch negative, deceased donor, renal transplant mismatched at 3 of 6 HLA loci. A donor specific antibody (DSAb) to DR17 (MFI 2073) was present. Given his advancing age, multiple medical comorbidities and broad HLA sensitisation the transplant was accepted, however, shortly before transplantation two atypical results were made available. Firstly a B-cell crossmatch was performed and found to be negative in current serum but strongly positive in peak serum, secondly a further potential DSAb was predicted based on linkage disequilibrium with known donor HLA typing. The donor HLA typing would not be clarified until after the transplant. Despite the increased risk of AMR the transplant proceeded with pre-emptive plasma exchange. The patient developed severe AMR requiring extensive therapy. Incomplete prospective donor HLA typing can generate uncertainty in the interpretation of the virtual crossmatch performed for deceased donor transplants. This may result in clinically relevant sequelae. Advances in antibody detection techniques need to be matched by timely donor HLA typing for its full benefit to be realised.

Review article: Luminex technology for HLA antibody detection in organ transplantation.

Since its inception in the early 1960s, the serologically based complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay has been the cornerstone technique for the detection of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies, not only in pre-transplant renal patients, but also in other forms of organ transplantation. Recently, solid phase assays have been developed and introduced for this purpose, and in particular the Flow-based bead assays such as the Luminex system. This latter assay has proved to be far more sensitive than the CDC assay and has revealed pre-sensitization in potential transplant recipients not detected by other methods of HLA antibody detection. However, the clinical implications of this increased sensitivity have not been convincingly demonstrated until recently. This technology for HLA antibody detection permits the evaluation of the clinical importance of antibodies directed at, for example, HLA-DPB1 and HLA-DQA1, which has not been possible to date. There are Luminex issues, however, requiring resolution such as the ability to distinguish between complement fixing and non-complement fixing antibodies and determination of their relative clinical significance. Luminex technology will permit a re-evaluation of the role of HLA antibodies in both early and late antibody-mediated rejection.

HLA class II Eplet mismatch predicts De Novo DSA formation post lung transplant.

The use of algorithms such as HLAMatchmaker to redefine donor-recipient HLA matching is gaining increasing attention. Our research has previously demonstrated that higher HLA class II eplet mismatches correlated with the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). In this study of lung transplant recipients we prospectively examined the association between donor-recipient HLA eplet mismatches as defined by HLAMatchmaker (version 2.1) and de-novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation, as assessed by single antigen-bead solid phase assay. HLA class II eplet mismatch, when split at the median for the cohort, predicted the development of de-novo HLA class II DSA at 3 months but not at 12 months. Having previously shown that high HLA class II eplet mismatches was associated with CLAD, we now show that the same factors are associated with de-novo HLA class II DSA post-transplant.

Providing Better-Matched Donors for HLA Mismatched Compatible Pairs Through Kidney Paired Donation.

BACKGROUND: Participation of compatible pairs (CP) in kidney paired donation (KPD) could be attractive to CPs who have a high degree of HLA mismatch, if the CP recipient will gain a better HLA match. Because KPD programs were not designed to help CP, it is important to define allocation metrics that enable CP to receive a better-matched kidney, without disadvantage to incompatible pairs (ICP). METHODS: Simulations using 46 ICPs and 11 fully HLA-mismatched CPs were undertaken using the Australian KPD matching algorithm. Allocations were preformed adding 1 CP at a time or all 11 CPs at once, and with and without exclusion of unacceptable antigens selected to give a virtual calculated panel-reactive antibody ranging 70% to 80% to improve HLA matching in CP recipients. RESULTS: On average, most CP recipients could be matched and had a lower eplet mismatch (EpMM) with the matched donor (57 ± 15) than with their own donor (78 ± 19, P < 0.02). However, only recipients who had an EpMM to own donor greater than 65 achieved a significant reduction in the EpMM with the matched donor. The gain in EpMM was larger when CPs were listed with unacceptable antigens. Furthermore, inclusion of 1 CP at a time increased matching in ICP by up to 33%, and inclusion of all 11 CPs at once increased ICP matching by 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Compatible pair participation in KPD can increase match rates in ICP and can provide a better immunological profile in CP recipients who have a high EpMM to their own donor when using allocation based on virtual crossmatch.

Dietary intakes in geriatric orthopaedic rehabilitation patients: Need to look at food consumption not just provision.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Elderly orthopaedic rehabilitation patients are potentially at high nutritional risk and thus nutrition provision is a fundamental component of the multidisciplinary care to optimise physical rehabilitation. Hospital food service (catering) is internationally recognised as a key component of good clinical care of patients and has the potential to provide a population approach to managing under-nutrition. Within Scotland, there have been significant developments with regards to food, fluid and nutritional care within clinical settings including the setting of clinical standards. However audits to date have focused on processes being in place and not patient outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate food provision and consumption in elderly orthopaedic rehabilitation settings to determine whether nutrition standards are being met. METHODS: A service evaluation of food provision and consumption to inpatients 65 years and older in post-acute geriatric orthopaedic wards over 24 h in National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in Scotland, UK was conducted. Food provision from each meal, in-between meal snacks from the trolley service and also on ward provisions were measured by weighing all items prior to being served to the patient. Any leftover food items were also weighed to allow the amount of food consumed to be determined. Estimated energy and protein contents of foods provided and consumed were compared against nutrient standards for hospital foods. RESULTS: Food provision to n = 175 patients, across seven wards and three hospitals was significantly less than standards set for energy and protein provision for 'nutritionally well' patients; (Hospital B mean diff - 549 kcals, -19 g p < 0.01; and Hospital C mean diff -250 kcals, -12 g, p < 0.001). Patients consumed approximately three quarters (74%) of the food they were provided. Higher provision of both energy and protein was associated with higher levels of consumption (r = 0.77 and r = 0.79, p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant work has been undertaken to improve the nutritional care of patients in hospitals. However, at a time where inefficiencies in clinical services must be reduced along side improvements in patient outcomes, there is a need for greater monitoring of patient food intakes to enable improvements in food production and food service systems to this end.

Challenges inherent to the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection in lung transplantation.

A bilateral sequential lung transplant was performed on a young female with cystic fibrosis-related bronchiectasis. She had negative prospective T- and B-cell crossmatch, and no known donor-specific antibodies. Post-transplantation, she developed bilateral pulmonary infiltrates of uncertain etiology, compounded by persistent tachycardia and questionable medication adherence. Despite aggressive intervention for suspected cellular rejection with high-dose intravenous corticosteroid, immunoglobulin, and anti-thymocyte globulin, her condition deteriorated to ultimately require ventilatory support. The eventual discovery of eplet donor-recipient mismatches on related DQB1 alleles raised the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection. Before plasmapheresis could be instituted, the patient rapidly succumbed to respiratory failure. Postmortem examination confirmed features of atypical allograft rejection, without evidence of classic acute cellular rejection. This is an unconventional case of antibody-mediated lung allograft rejection - an entity that is currently a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Prevention of donor-specific antibodies by correct donor-recipient matching, and optimizing adherence post-transplantation are most important.

Evolving experience of treating antibody-mediated rejection following lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The importance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) following lung transplantation remains contentious. In particular, the diagnostic criteria suggested to define AMR, namely the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA), C4d immunoreactivity, histological features and allograft dysfunction are not always readily applicable or confirmatory in lung transplantation. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study of 255 lung transplant recipients (LTR), we identified 9 patients in whom a clinical diagnosis of AMR was made within 12months of transplant, and define the immunological, histological, clinical features, as well as the therapeutic response of this cohort. RESULTS: Nine LTR with AMR underwent combination therapy with high-dose intravenous corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis and rituximab. Following therapy, while the total number of the original DSA dropped by 17%, and the median value of the mean fluorescence intensity (mfi) of the originally observed DSA decreased from 5292 (IQR 1319-12,754) to 2409 (IQR 920-6825) (p<0.001), clinical outcomes were variable with a number of patients progressing to either chronic lung allograft dysfunction or death within 12month. CONCLUSION: AMR in lung transplantation remains both a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, but when clinically suspected is associated with a variable response to therapy and poor long-term outcomes.

High transplant rates of highly sensitized recipients with virtual crossmatching in kidney paired donation.

BACKGROUND: In kidney paired donation (KPD), flexibility in the allocation of incompatible pairs is required if a critical mass of pairs to efficiently find matches cannot be reached. METHODS: In the Australian KPD program, virtual crossmatch is used for the allocation of suitable donors to registered recipients. Matching is based on acceptable mismatches, and donors are excluded from matching to recipients with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) greater than 2000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Match and transplant rates in the first year of the program were reviewed with respect to recipient and donor characteristics, including blood group distribution, level of recipient's sensitization, and postallocation crossmatches. RESULTS: Four quarterly match runs were performed, which included 53 pairs and 2 altruistic donors. Human leukocyte antigen incompatibility accounted for 90% of the listed pairs. In the second run, the DSA threshold was increased to greater than 8000 MFI, because no matches were found with standard allocation. Optional ABO-incompatible matching was introduced from run 3. Matches were identified in 37 (70%) patients, of whom 92% had a negative crossmatch with their matched donor. Crossmatch positive results were found only in recipients with DSAs greater than 2000 MFI in the second run. In 4 cases immunological reasons and in 4 cases other reasons resulted in breakdown of chains and 17 patients not progressing to transplantation. Eventually, 20 (38%) patients received a KPD transplant, and 35% of these had a calculated panel-reactive antibody greater than 90%. CONCLUSIONS: KPD using virtual crossmatch is a valid and effective solution for patients with immunologically incompatible donors even in the context of highly sensitized recipients.