Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 50
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 21(1): 375, 2021 06 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34154546

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dementia is currently the leading certified underlying cause of death in England. We assess how dementia recording on Office for National Statistics death certificates (ONS) corresponded to recording in general practice records (GP) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). METHODS: Retrospective study of deaths (2001-15) in 153 English General Practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, with linked ONS and HES records. RESULTS: Of 207,068 total deaths from any cause, 19,627 mentioned dementia on the death certificate with 10,253 as underlying cause; steady increases occurred from 2001 to 2015 (any mention 5.3 to 15.4 %, underlying cause 2.7 to 10 %). Including all data sources, recording of any dementia increased from 13.2 to 28.6 %. In 2015, only 53.8 % of people dying with dementia had dementia recorded on their death certificates. Among deaths mentioning dementia on the death certificate, the recording of a prior diagnosis of dementia in GP and HES rose markedly over the same period. In 2001, only 76.3 % had a prior diagnosis in GP and/or HES records; by 2015 this had risen to 95.7 %. However, over the same period the percentage of all deaths with dementia recorded in GP or HES but not mentioned on the death certificate rose from 7.9 to 13.3 %. CONCLUSIONS: Dementia recording in all data sources increased between 2001 and 2015. By 2015 the vast majority of deaths mentioning dementia had supporting evidence in primary and/or secondary care. However, death certificates were still providing an inadequate picture of the number of people dying with dementia.


Asunto(s)
Certificado de Defunción , Demencia , Causas de Muerte , Demencia/diagnóstico , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Humanos , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 86(7): 1326-1335, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32058606

RESUMEN

AIMS: Polypharmacy is widespread and associated with medication-related harms, including adverse drug reactions, medication errors and poor treatment adherence. General practitioners and pharmacists cite limited time and training to perform effective medication reviews for patients with complex polypharmacy, yet no specialist referral mechanism exists. To develop a structured framework for specialist review of primary care patients with complex polypharmacy. METHODS: We developed the clinical pharmacology structured review (CPSR) and stopping by indication tool (SBIT). We tested these in an age-sex stratified sample of 100 people with polypharmacy aged 65-84 years from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, an anonymised primary care database. Simulated medication reviews based on electronic records using the CPSR and SBIT were performed. We recommended medication changes or review to optimise treatment benefits, reduce risk of harm or reduce treatment burden. RESULTS: Recommendations were made for all patients, for almost half (4.8 ± 2.4) of existing medicines (9.8 ± 3.1), most commonly stopping a drug (1.7 ± 1.3/patient) or reviewing with the patient (1.4 ± 1.2/patient). At least 1 new medicine (0.7 ± 0.9) was recommended for 51% patients. Recommendations predominantly aimed to reduce harm (44%). There was no relationship between number of recommendations made and time since last primary care medication review. We identified a core set of clinical information and investigations (polypharmacy workup) that could inform a standard screen prior to specialist review. CONCLUSION: The CPSR, SBIT and polypharmacy workup could form the basis of a specialist review for patients with complex polypharmacy. Further research is needed to test this approach in patients in general practice.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Farmacología Clínica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Farmacéuticos , Polifarmacia , Atención Primaria de Salud
3.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 85(12): 2734-2746, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31454087

RESUMEN

AIMS: To investigate the longitudinal exposure of English primary care patients to pharmacogenomic drugs to inform design of pre-emptive testing. METHODS: Sixty-three drugs were identified with dosing guidelines based on variants of 19 pharmacogenes in the Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase on 01 September 2018. Prescribing of these pharmacogenomic drugs between 1993 and 2017 was summarised for a sample of 648 141 English patients aged 50-99 years on 01 January 2013, registered with Clinical Practice Research Datalink practices during 2011-12. Exposure of patients to pharmacogenomic drugs retrospectively (2, 10, 20 y) and prospectively (5 y) was described. RESULTS: During 2011-12, 58% of patients were prescribed at least 1 pharmacogenomic drug, increasing to 80% over the previous 20 years. Multiple exposure was common, with 47% patients prescribed ≥2 pharmacogenomic drugs and 7% prescribed ≥5 pharmacogenomic drugs over the next 5 years. The likelihood of exposure to pharmacogenomic drugs increased with age, with 89% patients ≥70 years prescribed at least 1 pharmacogenomic drug over the previous 20 years. Even among those aged 50-59 years, 71% were prescribed at least 1 pharmacogenomic drug over the previous 20 years. The pharmacogenomic drugs prescribed to the most patients were for pain relief, gastroprotection, psychiatric and cardiovascular conditions. Three pharmacogenes (CYP2D6, CYP2C19 and SLCO1B1) accounted for >95% pharmacogenomic drugs prescribed. CONCLUSIONS: In primary care patients, exposure to pharmacogenomic drugs is extremely common, multiplicitous and has commenced by relatively early adulthood. A small number of pharmacogenes account for the majority of drugs prescribed. These findings could inform design of pre-emptive pharmacogenomic testing for implementation in primary care.


Asunto(s)
Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2D6/genética , Transportador 1 de Anión Orgánico Específico del Hígado/genética , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento/genética , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/sangre , Medicina de Precisión , Reino Unido
4.
J Intellect Disabil ; 23(1): 78-96, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28812949

RESUMEN

Patient and public involvement is considered integral to health research in the United Kingdom; however, studies documenting the involvement of adults with intellectual disabilities and parent carers in health research studies are scarce. Through group interviews, this study explored the perspectives and experiences of a group of adults with intellectual disabilities and a group of parent carers about their collaborative/participatory involvement in a 3-year study which explored the effectiveness of annual health checks for adults with intellectual disabilities. Thematic analysis identified five key themes consistent across both groups; authenticity of participation, working together, generating new outcome measures, dissemination of findings and involvement in future research. Although reported anecdotally rather than originating from the analysis, increased self-confidence is also discussed. The groups' unique perspectives led to insights not previously considered by the research team which led to important recommendations to inform healthcare practice.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Discapacidad Intelectual/psicología , Padres/psicología , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Personas con Discapacidades Mentales/psicología , Adulto , Cuidadores/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa
5.
Ann Fam Med ; 15(5): 462-470, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28893817

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Adults with intellectual disabilities experience poorer physical health and health care quality, but there is limited information on the potential for reducing emergency hospital admissions in this population. We describe overall and preventable emergency admissions for adults with vs without intellectual disabilities in England and assess differences in primary care management before admission for 2 common ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs). METHODS: We used electronic records to study a cohort of 16,666 adults with intellectual disabilities and 113,562 age-, sex-, and practice-matched adults without intellectual disabilities from 343 English family practices. Incident rate ratios (IRRs) from conditional Poisson regression were analyzed for all emergency and preventable emergency admissions. Primary care management of lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections, as exemplar ACSCs, before admission were compared in unmatched analysis between adults with and without intellectual disabilities. RESULTS: The overall rate for emergency admissions for adults with vs without intellectual disabilities was 182 vs 68 per 1,000 per year (IRR = 2.82; 95% CI, 2.66-2.98). ACSCs accounted for 33.7% of emergency admissions among the former compared with 17.3% among the latter (IRR = 5.62; 95% CI, 5.14-6.13); adjusting for comorbidity, smoking, and deprivation did not fully explain the difference (IRR = 3.60; 95% CI, 3.25-3.99). Although adults with intellectual disability were at nearly 5 times higher risk for admission for lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections, they had similar primary care use, investigation, and management before admission as the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with intellectual disabilities are at high risk for preventable emergency admissions. Identifying strategies for better detecting and managing ACSCs, including lower respiratory and urinary tract infections, in primary care could reduce hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Discapacidad Intelectual , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas con Discapacidades Mentales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
6.
Am J Public Health ; 106(8): 1483-90, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27310347

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe mortality among adults with intellectual disability in England in comparison with the general population. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study from 2009 to 2013 using data from 343 general practices. Adults with intellectual disability (n = 16 666; 656 deaths) were compared with age-, gender-, and practice-matched controls (n = 113 562; 1358 deaths). RESULTS: Adults with intellectual disability had higher mortality rates than controls (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.3, 3.9). This risk remained high after adjustment for comorbidity, smoking, and deprivation (HR = 3.1; 95% CI = 2.7, 3.4); it was even higher among adults with intellectual disability and Down syndrome or epilepsy. A total of 37.0% of all deaths among adults with intellectual disability were classified as being amenable to health care intervention, compared with 22.5% in the general population (HR = 5.9; 95% CI = 5.1, 6.8). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality among adults with intellectual disability is markedly elevated in comparison with the general population, with more than a third of deaths potentially amenable to health care interventions. This mortality disparity suggests the need to improve access to, and quality of, health care among people with intellectual disability.


Asunto(s)
Discapacidad Intelectual/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Comorbilidad , Síndrome de Down/mortalidad , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Epilepsia/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad Prematura , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
7.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 31(8): 929-37, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26833866

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Caring for a partner with dementia and partner bereavement are independently associated with poor health. An understanding of the health effects of living with a partner dying with dementia can help optimise support. We describe health in the year before and after loss of a partner with dementia compared with other bereavements. METHODS: In a UK primary care database, 2624 older individuals whose partner died with dementia during 2005-2012 were matched with 7512 individuals experiencing bereavement where the deceased partner had no dementia recorded. RESULTS: Prior to bereavement, partners of the deceased with dementia were more likely to be diagnosed with depression (OR 2.31, 1.69-3.14) and receive psychotropic medication (OR 1.34, 1.21-1.49) than partners from bereavements without dementia. In contrast, psychotropic medication initiation two months after dementia bereavement was lower (HR 0.69, 0.56-0.85). Compared with other bereaved individuals, mortality after bereavement was lower in men experiencing a dementia bereavement (HR 0.68, 0.49-0.94) but similar in women (HR 1.02, 0.75-1.38). Prior to bereavement, those who died with dementia were less likely to receive palliative care (OR 0.47, 0.41-0.54). CONCLUSION: In the year before bereavement, partners of individuals dying with dementia experience poorer mental health than those facing bereavement from other causes, and their partner is less likely to receive palliative care. In the year after, individuals whose partner died with dementia experience some attenuation of the adverse health effects of bereavement. Services need to address the needs of carers for individuals dying with dementia and improve access to palliative care. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Aflicción , Cuidadores/psicología , Muerte , Demencia/mortalidad , Salud Mental , Esposos/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Pesar , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico
8.
Circulation ; 128(25): 2745-53, 2013 Dec 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24255060

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bereavement is a period of increased risk of cardiovascular death. There is limited understanding of the potential contribution of quality of cardiovascular disease management to this increased risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a UK primary-care database, 12 722 older individuals with preexisting cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, stroke) and a partner bereavement were matched with a non-bereaved control group (n=33 911). We examined key routine annual process measures of care in the year before and after bereavement and cardiovascular medication prescribing (lipid-lowering, antiplatelet, renin-angiotensin system drugs). Odds ratios for change after bereavement compared with the change in non-bereaved matched controls are presented. In the bereaved, uptake of all annual measures was lower in the year before bereavement, with improvement in the year after, whereas in the controls, uptake was relatively stable. The odds ratio for change was 1.30 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.46) for cholesterol measurement and 1.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.61) for blood pressure measurement. For all medication, there was a transient fall in prescribing in the peri-bereavement period lasting until about 3 months after bereavement. The odds ratio for at least 80% prescription coverage in the 30 days after bereavement was 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.88) for lipid-lowering medication and 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.91) for antiplatelet medication compared with the change in non-bereaved individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Lower uptake of key cardiovascular care measures in the year before bereavement and reduced medication coverage after bereavement may contribute to increased cardiovascular risk. Clinicians need to ensure that quality of cardiovascular care is maintained in the pre- and post-bereavement periods.


Asunto(s)
Aflicción , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Esposos/psicología , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 187(11): 1226-33, 2013 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23590261

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Cohort evidence linking long-term exposure to outdoor particulate air pollution and mortality has come largely from the United States. There is relatively little evidence from nationally representative cohorts in other countries. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between long-term exposure to a range of pollutants and causes of death in a national English cohort. METHODS: A total of 835,607 patients aged 40-89 years registered with 205 general practices were followed from 2003-2007. Annual average concentrations in 2002 for particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter less than 10 (PM(10)) and less than 2.5 µm (PM(2.5)), nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), ozone, and sulfur dioxide (SO(2)) at 1 km(2) resolution, estimated from emission-based models, were linked to residential postcode. Deaths (n = 83,103) were ascertained from linkage to death certificates, and hazard ratios (HRs) for all- and cause-specific mortality for pollutants were estimated for interquartile pollutant changes from Cox models adjusting for age, sex, smoking, body mass index, and area-level socioeconomic status markers. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Residential concentrations of all pollutants except ozone were positively associated with all-cause mortality (HR, 1.02, 1.03, and 1.04 for PM(2.5), NO(2), and SO(2), respectively). Associations for PM(2.5), NO(2), and SO(2) were larger for respiratory deaths (HR, 1.09 each) and lung cancer (HR, 1.02, 1.06, and 1.05) but nearer unity for cardiovascular deaths (1.00, 1.00, and 1.04). CONCLUSIONS: These results strengthen the evidence linking long-term ambient air pollution exposure to increased all-cause mortality. However, the stronger associations with respiratory mortality are not consistent with most US studies in which associations with cardiovascular causes of death tend to predominate.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Ambientales/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido/epidemiología
10.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 207: 111023, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37984487

RESUMEN

AIMS: People with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have raised infection rates compared to those without, but how these risks vary by age, sex and ethnicity, or by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), remain uncertain. METHODS: 33,829 patients with T1D in Clinical Practice Research Datalink on 01/01/2015 were age-sex-ethnicity matched to two non-diabetes patients. Infections were collated from primary care and linked hospitalisation records during 2015-2019, and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated versus non-diabetes. For 26,096 people with T1D, with ≥3 HbA1c measurements in 2012-2014, mean and coefficient of variation were estimated, and compared across percentiles. RESULTS: People with T1D had increased risk for infections presenting in primary care (IRR = 1.81, 95%CI 1.77-1.85) and hospitalisations (IRR = 3.37, 3.21-3.53) compared to non-diabetes, slightly attenuated after further adjustment. Younger ages and non-White ethnicities had greater relative risks, potentially explained by higher HbA1c mean and variability amongst people with T1D within these sub-groups. Both mean HbA1c and greater variability were strongly associated with infection risks, but the greatest associations were at the highest mean levels (hospitalisations IRR = 4.09, 3.64-4.59) for >97 versus ≤53 mmol/mol. CONCLUSIONS: Infections are a significant health burden in T1D. Improved glycaemic control may reduce infection risks, while prompter infection treatments may reduce hospital admissions.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Infecciones , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Hemoglobina Glucada , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones/etiología , Infecciones/complicaciones , Hospitalización
11.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 211: 111641, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548108

RESUMEN

AIMS: Long-term HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin) variability is associated with micro- and macrovascular complications in Type 2 diabetes (T2D). We explored prospective associations between HbA1c variability and serious infections, and how these vary by HbA1c level, age, sex and ethnicity. METHODS: 411,963 T2D patients in England, aged 18-90, alive on 01/01/2015 in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink with ≥ 4 HbA1c measurements during 2011-14. Poisson regression estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for infections requiring hospitalisation during 2015-19 by HbA1c variability score (HVS) and average level, adjusting for confounders, and stratified by age, sex, ethnicity and average level. Attributable risk fractions (AF) were calculated using reference categories for variability (HVS < 20) and average level (42-48 mmol/mol). RESULTS: An increased infection risk (IRR > 1.2) was seen with even modest variability (HVS ≥ 20, 73 % of T2D patients), but only at higher average levels (≥64 mmol/mol, 27 % patients). Estimated AFs were markedly greater for variability than average level (17.1 % vs. 4.1 %). Associations with variability were greater among older patients, and those with lower HbA1c levels, but not observed among Black ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c variability between T2D patients' primary care visits appears to be associated with more serious infections than average level overall. Well-designed trials could test whether these associations are causal.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hemoglobina Glucada , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos
12.
Epidemiology ; 24(1): 44-53, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23222514

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence based largely on US cohorts suggests that long-term exposure to fine particulate matter is associated with cardiovascular mortality. There is less evidence for other pollutants and for cardiovascular morbidity. By using a cohort of 836,557 patients age 40 to 89 years registered with 205 English general practices in 2003, we investigated relationships between ambient outdoor air pollution and incident myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmia, and heart failure over a 5-year period. METHODS: Events were identified from primary care records, hospital admissions, and death certificates. Annual average concentrations in 2002 for particulate matter with a median aerodynamic diameter <10 (PM10) and <2.5 microns, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone, and sulfur dioxide at a 1 × 1 km resolution were derived from emission-based models and linked to residential postcode. Analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for relevant confounders, including social and economic deprivation and smoking. RESULTS: While evidence was weak for relationships with myocardial infarction, stroke, or arrhythmia, we found consistent associations between pollutant concentrations and incident cases of heart failure. An interquartile range change in PM10 and in NO2 (3.0 and 10.7 µg/m, respectively) both produced a hazard ratio of 1.06 (95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.11) after adjustment for confounders. There was some evidence that these effects were greater in more affluent areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study of an English national cohort found evidence linking long-term exposure to particulate matter and NO2 with the development of heart failure. We did not, however, replicate associations for other cardiovascular outcomes that have been reported elsewhere.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/análisis , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/toxicidad , Ozono/análisis , Ozono/toxicidad , Material Particulado/análisis , Material Particulado/toxicidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Dióxido de Azufre/análisis , Dióxido de Azufre/toxicidad
13.
Am J Public Health ; 103(6): 1140-5, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23597341

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether unexpected bereavement has a greater impact on mortality in the surviving partner than death of a partner with preexisting chronic disease or disability. METHODS: In a UK primary care database (The Health Improvement Network), we identified 171,720 couples aged 60 years and older. We compared the rise in mortality in the first year after bereavement in those whose partner died without recorded chronic disease (unexpected bereavement) to those whose deceased partner had a diagnosis of chronic disease (known morbidity). RESULTS: For unexpected bereavement (13.4% of all bereavements), the adjusted hazard ratio for death in the first year after bereavement was 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.39, 1.86) compared with 1.21 (95% CI = 1.14, 1.30) where the partner had known morbidity. Differences between bereaved groups were significant (P = .001) and present for both men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Unexpected bereavement has a greater relative mortality impact than bereavement preceded by chronic disease. Our findings highlight the potential value of preparing individuals for the death of a spouse with known morbidity and providing extra support after bereavement for those experiencing sudden unexpected bereavement.


Asunto(s)
Aflicción , Enfermedad Crónica/mortalidad , Muerte Súbita , Mortalidad/tendencias , Esposos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido
14.
Age Ageing ; 42(2): 209-15, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23305759

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: mortality in UK care homes is not well described. OBJECTIVE: to describe 1-year mortality and predictors in older care home residents compared with community residents. METHOD: cohort study using the THIN primary care database with 9,772 care home and 354,306 community residents aged 65-104 years in 293 English and Welsh general practices in 2009. RESULTS: a total of 2,558 (26.2%) care home and 11,602 (3.3%) community residents died within 1 year. The age and sex standardised mortality ratio for nursing homes was 419 (95% CI: 396-442) and for residential homes was 284 (266-302). Age-related increases in mortality were less marked in care homes than community. Comorbidities and identification as inappropriate for chronic disease management targets predicted mortality in both settings, but associations were weaker in care homes. The number of drug classes prescribed and primary care contact were the strongest clinical predictors of mortality in care homes. CONCLUSIONS: older care home residents experience high mortality. Age and diagnostic characteristics are weaker predictors of risk of death within care homes than the community. Measures of primary care utilisation may be useful proxies for frailty and improve difficult end of life care decisions in care homes.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Vida Independiente/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Polifarmacia , Atención Primaria de Salud , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Gales/epidemiología
15.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0282513, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36857388

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People with neuromuscular disease (NMD) experience a broader range of chronic diseases and health symptoms compared to the general population. However, no comprehensive analysis has directly quantified this to our knowledge. METHODS: We used a large UK primary care database (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) to compare the prevalence of chronic diseases and other health conditions, including recent infections between 23,876 patients with NMD ever recorded by 2019 compared to 95,295 age-sex-practice matched patients without NMD. Modified Poisson regression estimated Prevalence Ratios (PR) to summarise the presence of the disease/condition ever (or for infections in 2018) in NMD patients versus non-NMD patients. RESULTS: Patients with NMD had significantly higher rates for 16 of the 18 conditions routinely recorded in the primary care Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Approximately 1-in-10 adults with NMD had ≥4 conditions recorded (PR = 1.39, 95%CI 1.33-1.45). Disparities were more pronounced at younger ages (18-49). For other (non-QOF) health conditions, significantly higher recorded levels were observed for rarer events (pulmonary embolism PR = 1.96 95%CI 1.76-2.18, hip fractures PR = 1.65 95%CI 1.47-1.85) as well as for more common primary care conditions (constipation PR = 1.52 95%CI 1.46-1.57, incontinence PR = 1.52 95%CI 1.44-1.60). The greatest co-morbidity burden was in patients with a myotonic disorder. Approximately 1-in-6 (17.1%) NMD patients had an infection recorded in the preceding year, with the risk of being hospitalised with an infection nearly double (PR = 1.92, 95%CI 1.79-2.07) compared to non-NMD patients. CONCLUSION: The burden of chronic co-morbidity among patients with NMD is extremely high compared to the general population, and they are also more likely to present in primary and secondary care for acute events such as infections.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Neuromusculares , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Prevalencia , Reino Unido , Atención Primaria de Salud
16.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 19(11): 1281-1287, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37365067

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: When surgery resumed following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, guidelines recommended the prioritization of patients with greater obesity-related co-morbidities and/or higher body mass index. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to record the effect of the pandemic on total number, patient demographics, and perioperative outcomes of elective bariatric surgery patients in the United Kingdom. SETTING AND METHODS: The United Kingdom National Bariatric Surgical Registry was used to identify patients who underwent elective bariatric surgery during the pandemic (1 yr from April 1, 2020). Characteristics of this group were compared with those of a pre-pandemic cohort. Primary outcomes were case volume, case mix, and providers. National Health Service cases were analyzed for baseline health status and perioperative outcomes. Fisher exact, χ2, and Student t tests were used as appropriate. RESULTS: The total number of cases decreased to one third of pre-pandemic volume (8615 to 2930). The decrease in operating volume varied, with 36 hospitals (45%) experiencing a 75%-100% reduction. Cases performed in the National Health Service fell from 74% to 53% (P < .0001). There was no change in baseline body mass index (45.2 ± 8.3 kg/m2 from 45.5 ± 8.3 kg/m2; P = .23) or prevalence of type 2 diabetes (26% from 26%; P = .99). Length of stay (median 2 d) and surgical complication rate (1.4% from 2.0%; relative risk = .71; 95% CI .45-1.12; P = .13) were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of a dramatic reduction in elective bariatric surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with more severe co-morbidities were not prioritized for surgery. These findings should inform preparation for future crises.

17.
Diabetes Care ; 46(6): 1209-1217, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37043827

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: People living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at higher infection risk, but it is unknown how this risk varies by ethnicity or whether the risk is similarly observed in people with nondiabetic hyperglycemia ("prediabetes"). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included 527,151 patients in England with T2D and 273,216 with prediabetes, aged 18-90, and alive on 1 January 2015 on the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Each was matched to two patients without diabetes or prediabetes on age, sex, and ethnic group. Infections during 2015-2019 were collated from primary care and linked hospitalization records. Infection incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for those with prediabetes or T2D were estimated, unadjusted and adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: People with T2D had increased risk for infections presenting in primary care (IRR 1.51, 95% CI 1.51-1.52) and hospitalizations (IRR 1.91, 1.90-1.93). This was broadly consistent overall within each ethnic group, although younger White T2D patients (age <50) experienced a greater relative risk. Adjustment for socioeconomic deprivation, smoking, and comorbidity attenuated associations, but IRRs remained similar by ethnicity. For prediabetes, a significant but smaller risk was observed (primary care IRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.34-1.36; hospitalization IRR 1.33, 1.31-1.35). These were similar within each ethnicity for primary care infections, but less consistent for infection-related hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The elevated infection risk for people with T2D appears similar for different ethnic groups and is also seen in people with prediabetes. Infections are a substantial cause of ill-health and health service use for people with prediabetes and T2D. This has public health implications with rising prediabetes and diabetes prevalence.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Infecciones , Estado Prediabético , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Estado Prediabético/epidemiología , Etnicidad , Comorbilidad , Infecciones/epidemiología
18.
Am J Epidemiol ; 176(8): 689-98, 2012 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23051600

RESUMEN

An increased risk of death in persons who have suffered spousal bereavement has been described in many populations. The impact of modifying factors, such as chronic disease and material circumstances, is less well understood. The authors followed 171,720 [corrected] couples 60 years of age or older in a United Kingdom primary care database between 2005 and 2010 for an average of 4 years. A total of 26,646 (15.5%) couples experienced bereavement, with mean follow up after bereavement of 2 years. In a model adjusted for age, sex, comorbid conditions at baseline, material deprivation based on area of residence, season, and smoking status, the hazard ratio for mortality in the first year after bereavement was 1.25 (95% confidence interval: 1.18, 1.33). Further adjustment for changes in comorbid conditions throughout follow up did not alter the hazard ratio for bereavement (hazard ratio = 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.19, 1.35). The association was strongest in individuals with no significant chronic comorbid conditions throughout follow up (hazard ratio = 1.50, 95% confidence interval: 1.28, 1.77) and in more affluent couples (P = 0.035). In the first year after bereavement, the association between bereavement and death is not primarily mediated through worsening or new onset of chronic disease. Good health and material circumstances do not protect individuals from increased mortality rates after bereavement.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Aflicción , Muerte , Estado de Salud , Clase Social , Esposos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Enfermedad Crónica/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pesar , Humanos , Masculino , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año , Fumar/efectos adversos , Esposos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido/epidemiología
19.
Age Ageing ; 41(1): 64-9, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22089079

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended for older people irrespective of cognitive decline or residential setting. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of dementia diagnosis on flu vaccination uptake in community and care home residents in England and Wales. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a primary care database with 378,462 community and 9,106 care (nursing and residential) home residents aged 65-104 in 2008-09. Predictors of vaccine uptake were examined adjusted for age, sex, area deprivation and major chronic diseases. RESULTS: Age and sex standardised uptake of influenza vaccine was 74.7% (95% CI: 73.7-75.8%) in community patients without dementia, 71.4% (69.3-73.5%) in community patients with dementia, 80.5% (78.9-82.2%) in care home patients without dementia and 83.3% (81.4-85.3%) in care home patients with dementia. In a fully adjusted model, compared with community patients without dementia, patients with dementia in the community were less likely to receive vaccination (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.97) while care home patients with (RR: 1.06, 1.03-1.09) and without (RR: 1.03, 1.01-1.05) dementia were more likely to receive vaccination. Area deprivation and chronic diseases were, respectively, negative and positive predictors of uptake. CONCLUSION: Lower influenza vaccine uptake among community patients with dementia, compared with care home residents, suggests organisational barriers to community uptake but high uptake among patients with dementia in care homes does not suggest concern over informed consent acts as a barrier. Primary care for community patients with dementia needs to ensure that they receive all appropriate preventive interventions.


Asunto(s)
Demencia/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gales/epidemiología
20.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 72(1): 157-61, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21453301

RESUMEN

AIMS: To examine the effect of ß-adrenoceptor blocker treatment on cancer survival. METHODS: In a UK primary care database, we compared patients with a new cancer diagnosis receiving ß-adrenoceptor blockers regularly (n= 1406) with patients receiving other antihypertensive medication (n= 2056). RESULTS: Compared with cancer patients receiving other antihypertensive medication, patients receiving ß-adrenoceptor blocker therapy experienced slightly poorer survival (HR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.04, 1.33 for all ß-adrenoceptor blockers; HR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.94, 1.55 for non-selective ß-adrenoceptor blockers). This poorer overall survival was explained by patients with pancreatic and prostate cancer with no evidence of an effect on survival for patients with lung, breast or colorectal cancer. Analysis in a cancer-free matched parallel cohort did not suggest selection bias masked a beneficial effect. CONCLUSION: Our study does not support the hypothesis that ß-adrenoceptor blockers improve survival for common cancers.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/mortalidad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA