Cross-reactivity and Tolerability of Ertapenem in Patients With IgE-Mediated Hypersensitivity to ß-Lactams.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Administration of carbapenems to ß-lactam-allergic patients has always been considered potentially harmful because of a 47.4% rate of cross-reactivity to imipenem reported in a single study. Nevertheless, recent studies have shown that the rate of cross-reactivity of imipenem and meropenem with penicillins is lower than 1%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using ertapenem in patients with an established IgE-mediated ß-lactam allergy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied all participants who came to our allergy unit and had a clinical history of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to ß-lactams. The inclusion criteria were a positive skin test result to at least 1 ß-lactam molecule and/or positive specific IgE (when available). All participants underwent immediate-type skin tests with several ß-lactam molecules including ertapenem. Challenges with intravenous ertapenem were performed on 2 different days in patients with negative skin test results. RESULTS: We examined 49 patients with a clinical history of immediate reactions to ß-lactams. All the patients had positive skin tests and/or positive specific IgE to at least 1 ß-lactam reagent and negative carbapenem skin tests. Thirty-six patients agreed to undergo the challenges and 35 tolerated the full dose of ertapenem. CONCLUSIONS: The practice of avoiding carbapenems in patients with ß-lactam allergy should be abandoned considering the very low rate of cross-reactivity. ß-Lactam-allergic patients who need ertapenem therapy should undergo skin tests and, if negative, a graded challenge to assess tolerability.

TROP-2 expression in papillary thyroid cancer: a preliminary cyto-histological study.

OBJECTIVE: TROP-2 (human trophoblast cell surface marker) is a gene-related protein expressed in trophoblastic cells, which is also present in a variety of epithelial cancers and whose overexpression has been found to correlate with a poor prognosis. We analysed the possibility of using the expression of TROP-2 to detect papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) on cytological and histological samples, and compared it with Hector Battifora mesothelial antigen-1 (HBME-1). METHODS: From 127 patients, 127 fine needle aspirates (FNAs), in which HBME-1 was detected by immunocytochemistry (ICC), were re-classified according to the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC): 20% were benign, 56% were atypical cells/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), 4% were follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm, 5% were suspicious for malignancy and 16% were malignant. Sufficient material to test for TROP-2 was available in 64 FNAs, 22 of which had a histological control. Including six additional cases in which the FNAs were not available, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out with both markers on 94 cases. RESULTS: Among 88 FNAs with histological control, the sensitivity of HBME-1 to predict PTC was 87.5% (28/32) and the specificity was 86% (48/56), whereas, in 22 FNAs, TROP-2 sensitivity was 100% (13/13) and specificity was 89% (8/9). In 94 histological specimens in which IHC was carried out with both markers, the sensitivity and specificity were 82% and 86%, respectively, for HBME-1 and 87% and 89%, respectively, for TROP-2. The difference between the markers was not significant. Concordance between IHC and ICC was 76% for HBME-1 and 91% for TROP-2. CONCLUSION: TROP-2 can be used as well as HBME-1 in thyroid cytology to detect PTC. Positivity for either or both markers could help to stratify the risk of malignancy in indeterminate FNAs. Larger studies are need to analyse its role in the behaviour of PTC and its variants.

The Importance of Complying with Vaccination Protocols in Developed Countries: "Anti-Vax" Hysteria and the Spread of Severe Preventable Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are very effective medical tools for disease prevention and life span increase. Controversies have raised concern about their safety, from autism to polio vaccine contamination with simian virus 40 (SV-40). Hysteria surrounding vaccine-associated risks has resulted in a declining number of vaccinations in developed countries. Outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases (e.g. measles) have occurred in Europe and North America, causing also some causalities. OBJECTIVES: In this review, data on safety and efficacy of vaccines are discussed, showing that the benefits of vaccines far outweigh the risks and that it is important to comply with vaccination protocols, to avoid spreading of severe, preventable diseases. METHODS: Those opposed to vaccinations suggest that scientific literature supporting vaccines is influenced by pharmaceutical companies. In this review, studies on influenza produced by independent scientists and those authored by those who received some kind of benefit from the industry are discussed separately. All the chosen papers were selected through a MEDLINE research. RESULTS: Vaccination rates are decreasing, even though they are effective public health tools. Influenza, for example, is responsible for 250,000-500,000 deaths each year, according to the WHO. Yet, campaigns to extend influenza vaccine to all elderly subjects report little success, because of the vaccine scare and because not all patients develop immunity following vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This review proves that vaccine hysteria is detrimental because: 1) it causes an increased morbidity and mortality from preventable diseases; 2) it jeopardizes research for new vaccines; 3) patients are reluctant to accept any form of immune-therapy, commonly referred to as "vaccination".

Cross-reactivity and tolerability of Ertapenem in patients with IgE-mediated hypersensitivy to Beta-lactams

Background and Objective: Administration of carbapenems to β-lactam-allergic patients has always been considered potentially harmful because of a 47.4% rate of cross-reactivity to imipenem reported in a single study. Nevertheless, recent studies have shown that the rate of cross-reactivity of imipenem and meropenem with penicillins is lower than 1%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using ertapenem in patients with an established IgE-mediated β-lactam allergy. Patients and Methods: We studied all participants who came to our allergy unit and had a clinical history of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to β-lactams. The inclusion criteria were a positive skin test result to at least 1 β-lactam molecule and/or positive specific IgE (when available). All participants underwent immediate-type skin tests with several β-lactam molecules including ertapenem. Challenges with intravenous ertapenem were performed on 2 different days in patients with negative skin test results. Results: We examined 49 patients with a clinical history of immediate reactions to β-lactams. All the patients had positive skin tests and/or positive specific IgE to at least 1 β-lactam reagent and negative carbapenem skin tests. Thirty-six patients agreed to undergo the challenges and 35 tolerated the full dose of ertapenem. Conclusions: The practice of avoiding carbapenems in patients with β-lactam allergy should be abandoned considering the very low rate of cross-reactivity. β-Lactam-allergic patients who need ertapenem therapy should undergo skin tests and, if negative, a graded challenge to assess tolerability (AU)

Introducción y Objetivo: Siempre se ha considerado peligrosa la administración de carbapenems a pacientes alérgicos a betalactámicos por la presencia de reactividad cruzada en el 47,4% de los casos descrita en un estudio previo. Sin embargo, estudios recientes han mostrado que la reactividad cruzada de imipenem y meropenem con penicilinas es inferior al 1%. El objetivo de este estudio es valorar el uso de ertapenem en pacientes diagnosticado de alergia IgE mediada a betalactámicos. Pacientes y Métodos: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes que acudieron a nuestra unidad de Alergia con historia clínica de alergia inmediata a betalactámicos. Los criterios de inclusión fueron prueba cutánea positiva con al menos un betalactámico y/o IgE específica positiva (cuando estuviese disponible). Se realizaron pruebas cutáneas con betalactámicos, incluyendo ertapenem, con lectura inmediata en todos los pacientes. Se realizaron pruebas de provocación endovenosas con ertapenem en los pacientes con pruebas cutáneas negativas frente al mismo en dos días diferentes. Resultados: Se incluyeron 49 pacientes con historia clínica de alergia inmediata a betalactámicos. Todos los pacientes tenían pruebas cutáneas positivas y/o IgE específica positiva al menos a uno de los betalactámicos así como prueba cutánea negativa con carbapenémicos. Treinta y seis pacientes aceptaron la realización de pruebas de provocación con ertapenem que fueron tolerados por treinta y cinco de dichos pacientes. Conclusión: El hecho de recomendar evitar carbapenems en pacientes con alergia a betalactámicos debería ser abandonado, dada la baja reactividad cruzada que presentan. En los pacientes con alergia a betalactámicos que necesiten ertapenem se deberían realizar pruebas cutáneas con el fármaco y en caso de ser negativas, realizar un test de exposición progresiva para confirmar su tolerancia (AU)

Validation of an extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry quantification method for cocaine, methadone, and morphine in postmortem adipose tissue.

Adipose tissue is a complex biological matrix that necessitates several pre-analytical preparation steps to separate drugs and metabolites from the lipophilic matrix. A novel, sensitive, and specific gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric (GC-MS) method for the determination of cocaine (metabolites), methadone, and morphine in postmortem adipose tissue was developed, optimized, and validated. The method involves the aqueous acid extraction of analytes, alkalinization of the extract, solid-phase extraction with chloroform, and derivatization with BSTFA before GC-MS analysis. Deuterated compounds were used as internal standards for determination and quantification of analytes. Limits of detection were 0.005 microg/g for cocaine and cocaethylene, 0.02 microg/g for benzoylecgonine, 0.01 microg/g for ecgoninemethylester, 0.005 microg/g for methadone, and 0.01 microg/g for morphine. Linearity ranged from 0.1 to 1.000 microg/g for all analytes. Intra- and interday accuracy ranged from 70.6 to 105%, and intra- and interday precisions were less than 8.2% and 8.6%, respectively, for all analytes. The method showed a good recovery.